Thursday, October 8, 2026

1) Military intelligence officers visit KNPB activist’s residence in Merauke, raising concerns over intimidation

 


2) Melanesian leaders to step up West Papua advocacy as Indonesia objects at UN hearing

3) CSI statement at the UN: Displacement in West Papua has climbed to 127,000

4) Asian churches for an end to violence in Papua through Chiang Main declaration
5) Police arbitrarily detain and torture Papuan civilian in Dogiyai Regency


-------------------------------------------------------


1) Military intelligence officers visit KNPB activist’s residence in Merauke, raising concerns over intimidation

On 7 October 2026, two intelligence officers affiliated with the Strategic Intelligence Agency of the Indonesian Armed Forces (Badan Intelijen Strategis, BAIS) visited the rented accommodation of the local Secretary-General of the West Papua National Committee (Komite Nasional Papua Barat, KNPB), Mr Yoseph Novaris Wogan Apay, 42, in the Almasuh area, Merauke Regency, Papua Selatan Province. According to information provided by KNPB, the officers questioned him about KNPB activities, planned demonstrations and several individuals, requested his mobile telephone number and asked to take photographs with him (see photos below, source: KNPB). The KNPB representative nevertheless regarded the visit as an act of intimidation directed against KNPB members and other activists advocating for the rights of Papuans.
According to Mr Apay, the two intelligence officers arrived at his rented accommodation in the Almasuh area at approximately 07:20 am. One of the two officers had allegedly visited the accommodation several weeks earlier together with another person. During that earlier visit, the visitors reportedly stated that they were affiliated with the BAIS.
When Mr Apay asked the officers about the purpose of the visit on 7 October, they reportedly said that they had merely come for a courtesy visit. During the subsequent conversation, the officers asked whether the KNPB remained active in Merauke Regency and whether the organisation was planning any demonstrations. The KNPB representative responded that the organisation remained active but that no protest action was currently planned. He reportedly explained that any future activities instructed by the KNPB leadership would be implemented according to local circumstances and that activities involving public facilities would be formally notified to the police as required under Indonesian law.
The officers also reportedly asked the KNPB representative about several individuals and further asked about the KNPB representative’s employment. They subsequently requested his mobile telephone number, which he declined to provide. The officers proposed meeting again at a coffee shop to continue the discussion. Mr Apay declined, citing personal commitments. Before leaving, the officers reportedly requested that a group photograph be taken with him.

Human rights analysis

Repeated visits by security or intelligence personnel to the private residence of a political activist, combined with questioning about organisational activities, demonstrations, associates and personal contact information, may have an intimidating effect and warrant scrutiny where there is no clear legal basis or legitimate operational necessity for such conduct.
The incident is particularly relevant in the context of the rights to privacy, freedom of expression, peaceful assembly and freedom of association. Articles 19, 21 and 22 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) protect political expression, peaceful assembly and association. Any restrictions on these rights must be prescribed by law, pursue a legitimate objective recognised under the Covenant and satisfy the requirements of necessity and proportionality.
Article 17 ICCPR further protects individuals against arbitrary or unlawful interference with their privacy, family and home. Visits by intelligence or security personnel to a person’s private residence, requests for personal contact information and questioning concerning political associations may engage this protection where such measures amount to surveillance or interference without an adequate legal basis or appropriate safeguards.
The fact that the questions concerned political activities and potential demonstrations is significant. Peaceful political advocacy, including advocacy for self-determination or criticism of government policy, falls within the scope of protected expression under international human rights law. Security authorities should therefore ensure that intelligence-gathering activities do not have the purpose or effect of discouraging lawful political expression or peaceful civic participation.

Mr Yoseph Novaris Wogan Apay (right) together with two BAIS members who visited him at his home in Merauke on 7 October 2026


Detailed Case Data
Document ID: HRM-CAS-145-2026
Location: GC54+GR9, Kelapa Lima, Merauke, Merauke Regency, South Papua 99614, Indonesia (-8.4912047, 140.4071232) Almasuh area
Region: Indonesia > South Papua > Merauke > Merauke
Total number of victims: 1
#Number of VictimsName, DetailsGenderAgeGroup AffiliationViolations
1.1Yoseph Novaris Wogan Apay
male42Activist, Indigenous Peoplesintimidation
Period of incident: 07/10/2026 – 07/10/2026
Perpetrator: Republic Indonesia > Indonesian Security Forces > Indonesian Military (TNI)
Perpetrator details: Strategic Intelligence Agency of the Indonesian Armed Forces (Badan Intelijen Strategis, BAIS)
Issues: indigenous peoples
Related Cases:


-------------------------------------

2) Melanesian leaders to step up West Papua advocacy as Indonesia objects at UN hearing

Melanesian governments will jointly step up advocacy over reported human rights abuses in West Papua, Papua New Guinea (PNG) Prime Minister James Marape has announced. In the same week, Indonesia protested at the United Nations after a petitioner raised the territory’s status during a decolonisation hearing on New Caledonia.

Minister Marape: region cannot stay silent

Prime Minister Marape was reporting on the outcomes of an informal Melanesian Spearhead Group (MSG) Leaders’ Meeting held in Fiji on 7 October 2026. He said Papua New Guinea strictly respects Indonesia’s territorial sovereignty, but that the region cannot remain silent on humanitarian concerns.
The statement extends a line he has taken before. At the MSG’s 23rd summit in Suva in June 2025, Marape said West Papua was constitutionally part of Indonesia, while insisting the MSG had every right to speak on human rights and people’s welfare there.
The MSG brings together Fiji, Papua New Guinea, Solomon Islands, Vanuatu and New Caledonia’s pro-independence FLNKS. Indonesia is an associate member, and the United Liberation Movement for West Papua (ULMWP) holds observer status.

Indonesia objects at UN hearing

On 6 October 2026, a petitioner raised West Papua before the UN General Assembly’s Fourth Committee during its hearing on New Caledonia in New York. Indonesia’s delegation protested and tried to have the reference struck from the official record (see video below).
The petitioner cited a study on decolonisation of the Pacific region by the UN Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues, covering New Caledonia, French Polynesia, Hawaii and West Papua. He told the committee the study found “clear grounds” for the General Assembly to support reinstating West Papua on the UN decolonisation list, arguing the territory meets the criteria of resolution 1541. Invoking the Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, he urged that “no one is left behind”.
Video

Background

West Papua, the western half of New Guinea, was listed by the UN as a non-self-governing territory under Dutch administration until its transfer to Indonesia in 1963. Jakarta regards its sovereignty as settled by the 1969 Act of Free Choice, a vote independence advocates reject as unrepresentative.
Pacific Islands Forum leaders have named Marape and Fiji Prime Minister Sitiveni Rabuka as special envoys on West Papua. Their 2025 communique called for a visit to the territory by the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights in 2026.

————————————————————


3) CSI statement at the UN: Displacement in West Papua has climbed to 127,000

Christian Solidarity International (CSI) raised concerns at the UN Human Rights Council on 1 October 2026 that the number of internally displaced people (IDPs) in West Papua’s six provinces had reached 127,000 by September 2026, up from 105,000 six months earlier (see video below, source: CSI). CSI attributed the displacement to Indonesian military operations, which protect large mining and farming projects that are pushing indigenous Papuans off their land. CSI backed the Papuan Customary Council’s demands that Jakarta halt its National Strategic Projects in the region, independently investigate serious abuses and move towards ending military operations. The organisation also echoed a call made by Pacific countries at the UN General Assembly in September for Indonesia to facilitate a visit by the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights.
Indonesia rejected the account in a right of reply. Ambassador Nur Rakhman Setyoko blamed the displacement on Papuan rebels, whom he accused of terrorising civilians into fleeing, and said Indonesia remains committed to protecting all its citizens in Papua. On a possible visit, he said any arrangement was a matter for the host state and the High Commissioner’s office, not for third states or other bodies.
Video

—————————————————————
4) Asian churches for an end to violence in Papua through Chiang Main declaration
Nuevaterra Mambor October 8, 2026

About 40 people attended the symposium, including church leaders from Papua and other parts of Indonesia, regional and international ecumenical partners, Indigenous representatives, women and young people, academics, researchers, humanitarian workers and peace advocates.

Jayapura, Jubi – A symposium of Asian churches has called for an end to violence in Papua through a declaration adopted at an international meeting in Chiang Mai, Thailand.

Papua was not simply a subject of discussion at the symposium. Its representatives brought their own experiences and voices to the gathering

The International Symposium on Papua opened on 28 September 2026 with a period of contemplation rather than speeches or policy presentations.

Participants were surrounded by symbols of Papuan identity, including noken, betel nut and areca nut, and traditional Papuan fabrics. The sound of tifa drums accompanied a worship service led by Reverend Lenta Enni Simbolon, Deputy General Secretary on the Communion of Churches in Indonesia (PGI).

The cultural symbols were intended to bring Papuan life, community, identity, dignity and cultural voice into the ecumenical gathering.

Reverend Lenta encouraged participants to engage with Papua’s struggles by first listening to, feeling and mourning the suffering experienced by its people before discussing strategies for responding it.

Drawing on Nehemiah 2:17-18 from the Old Testament and Galatians 6:2 form the New Testament, Reverend Lenta reminded churches of their responsibility not to turn away from destruction and suffering.

She said that lament should not end with grief but could become a pathway towards the courage needed to rebuild.

“We gather in Chiang Mai today because of an urgent humanitarian call. From the ancestral land of Papua, we bring the dust of displacement, the laments of mothers in the interior, the cries of children whose futures have been cut short, and the blood and tears that have for too long soaked the land blessed by God,” Reverend Lenta said in her reflection, as quoted by pgi.or.id.

A commitment to choosing life

Four days later, on 1 October 2026, the symposium concluded with the reading of The Chiang Main Ecumenical Declaration for Papua.

The declaration was the outcome of the meeting organised by PGI and the Christian Conference of Asia (CCA) under the same there, “Choosing Life: Strengthening the Role of Churches in Humanitarian Protection, Justice, and Peace in Papua.”

 The theme was drawn from Deuteronomy 30:19: “Choose life, so that you and your descendants may live.”

The symposium used the biblical passage as a starting point for a broader question: what should churches do when human life remains under threat?

The declaration describes Choosing Life not simply as a theological imperative, but as an ethical commitment for churches.

It calls on churches to oppose violence and death, protect human dignity, defend vulnerable people, care for the land and creation, and work towards justice, reconciliation and peace.

Papua speaks for itself

About 40 people attended the symposium, including church leaders from Papua and other parts of Indonesia, regional and international ecumenical partners, Indigenous representatives, women and young people, academics, researchers, humanitarian workers and peace advocates.

Representatives from Papua included members of the Fellowship of Evangelical Churches in Papua (PGIW Tanah Papua), the Evangelical Christian Church in the Land of Papua (GKI-TP), the Kingmi Church of Papua, the Indonesian Christian Evangelical Church (GKII), the Protestant Church in Indonesia (GPI) Papua, the Indonesian Bible Christian Fellowship Church (GPKAI), the Holy Word Christian Church (GKKK), and the Fellowship of Churches in Papua (PGGP) Papua and West Papua.

Representatives of the Papuan People’s Council, women’s rights activists, academics from Cenderawasih University and several theological colleges in Papua also attended.

The range of denominations represented was significant. Through the participation of its churches, Papua was not simply presented as an issue for others to discuss. People from the region brought their own experiences, concerns and perspectives directly into the Asian ecumenical forum.

These perspectives were joined by representatives of international ecumenical organisations and networks, including the World Council of Churches (WCC), the World Communion of Reformed Churches (WCRC), the Christian Conference of Asia (CCA), Kerk in Actie, Mission 21 and the United Evangelical Mission (UEM). Young people were represented by the World Student Christian Federation (WSCF).

The General Chair of the Communion of Churches in Indonesia (PGI), Reverend Jacklevyn Frits Manuputty, described the symposium as an important milestone in the PGI’s advocacy work on Papua.

He said regional and international ecumenical networks needed to be strengthened so the concerns of Papuan churches and communities could reach a wider audience.

“PGI believes it is important to bring the genuine voices of Papuan people and churches in Papua to an international platform of churches in Asia. Papua’s voice should not simply be represented by others, but heard directly,” he said.

For Jacklevyn, the theme Choosing Life also carries practical responsibilities for churches.

“Choosing life means affirming the dignity of every human being, protecting vulnerable people, seeking justice and working for peace. Churches cannot simply stand by when human life is under threat. They are called to listen to those who are suffering, speak the truth courageously, strengthen humanitarian work and create space for fair and dignified dialogue,” he said.

Solidarity begins with listening

Support for the symposium also came from international ecumenical networks.

The Moderator of the Central Committee of the World Council of Churches, Bishop Professor Dr Heinrich Bedford-Strohm, expressed the WCC’s solidarity with churches and communities in Papua.

He said churches were called to be present in practical ways amid human suffering and to turn solidarity into responsible action.

A similar commitment was expressed by Peter Prove, Director of the WCC’s Commission of the Churches on International Affairs.

The messages reflected a view that the situation in Papua is not solely the responsibility of churches in Papua or Indonesia. It is also part of the broader calling of churches around the world to uphold life, human dignity, justice and peace.

CCA General Secretary Reverend Jung Eun Grace Moon said solidarity begins with listening.

She called on churches and ecumenical partners to create space for people directly affected by violence, displacement, loss of homes and other consequences of the humanitarian crisis.

In this context, solidarity does not mean speaking on behalf of Papuan communities or taking control of their advocacy. Instead, it means walking alongside them and ensuring their experiences are heard in regional and international discussions.

WCRC General Secretary Reverend Philip Vinod Peacock also described the symposium as an important space for hearing from Papuans.

He reaffirmed the WCRC’s commitment to walking alongside Papuan communities experiencing suffering.

Five calls to action


After days of dialogue and testimony, the commitments made at the symposium were set out in a formal declaration.

The document expressed deep concern about the suffering of Papuan communities as a result of armed violence, displacement, loss of life, fear, threats to Indigenous land and livelihoods, and environmental destruction.

Participants also acknowledged the risk that repeated violence could eventually come to be regarded as normal.

The declaration sets out five calls to action.

First, all parties involved in the conflict in Papua are urged to end violence, protect civilians, and uphold human rights and the dignity of every person.

Second, the humanitarian and displacement crises must be addressed in a coordinated way. The government, churches, HONA (Humanitarian Outreach to Need Assistance initiative) and humanitarian partners are encouraged to ensure reliable data is available, along with basic services protection for vulnerable groups and support for affected communities to recover.

Third, the declaration calls for religious and humanitarian dialogue grounded in faith and Indigenous traditions.

Participants said the situation in Papua cannot be addressed through a security-based approach alone. They called for dialogue that is honest, equal, inclusive and dignified, with meaningful participation from Papuan communities.

Fourth, the rights of Indigenous Papuans to their land, identify, culture, and traditional livelihoods must be protected.

The declaration says development policies and natural resource management must respect those rights, ensure meaningful participation, protect the environment and uphold the principle of Free, Prior and Informed Consent (FPIC).

Fifth, the humanitarian crisis in Papua must receive sustained attention from international ecumenical networks.

Churches around the world and regional and global ecumenical networks are encouraged to strengthen evidence-based advocacy, using verified information, and ensure that the perspectives of Papuan churches and communities are represented directly in international ecumenical forums.

Not an end point

For participants, the declaration is not an endpoint. Instead, it provides a framework for turning solidarity into action.

Churches and ecumenical partners have committed to supporting communities displaced or affected by conflict, strengthening peace and reconciliation education in churches, schools, and communities and ensuring women, children and your people have meaningful roles in humanitarian action, peacebuilding and decision-making.

The commitments will be implanted thorough HONAI. PGI, CCA, WCC and the wider ecumenical network are also expected to translate the declaration into pastoral support, practical solidarity and accountable action.

The journey that began with a period of contemplation on the first day of the symposium had taken on a more concrete form.

The lament brought from Papua did not remain an expression of grief. It became a shared awareness, a commitment to solidarity and a call to action.

In Chiang Mai, the churches chose not to allow Papua’s suffering to remain unheard.

“From Chiang Mai, we choose life”, to end violence, protect life, genuinely listen to the voices of Papuan communities, pursue justice and refuse to allow their suffering to continue in silence. (*)

—————————————————
5) Police arbitrarily detain and torture Papuan civilian in Dogiyai Regency
On 30 September 2026, officers of the Dogiyai District Police apprehended Mr Zeth Giyai in front of the Kamuu District Office in Mauwa Village, Dogiyai Regency, Papua Tengah province. He was detained at the Dogiyai District Police Headquarters for approximately two days before being released on 2 October 2026 (see photo on top, source: independent HRD). Community representatives alleged that police officers tortured Mr Giyai during his detention. Questions also remain concerning the legal grounds for his arrest, the examination of his mobile phone, and the conditions imposed upon his release.
Police officers conducting a night patrol stopped Mr Giyai and attempted to inspect a mobile phone he was carrying at approximately 7:30 pm. Mr Giyai threw the device into nearby bushes when officers sought to inspect it. Thereupon, the officers retrieved the phone and took him to the Dogiyai District Police Headquarters, suspecting that the phone had been stolen. Community representatives subsequently visited the police station and demanded clarification and Mr Giyai’s release. Police investigators declined to release him, stating that the contents of the mobile phone still had to be examined.
On 2 October, representatives of the Papuan People’s Solidarity (Solidaritas Rakyat Papua, SRP), members of the Dogiyai Regency People’s Representative Council (DPRK), tribal and traditional leaders, community representatives and youth leaders met with the Dogiyai District Police Chief. According to SRP, police initially provided no clear explanation for the arrest. Community representatives stated that allegations linking Mr Giyai to the West Papua National Liberation Army (TPNPB) only emerged after officers had examined the contents of his mobile phone. Mr Giyai was released later that day but was reportedly ordered by the Dogiyai District Police Chief to report to the police station twice a week. He did not provide an official response concerning the torture allegations or the evidentiary basis for the allegation of TPNPB engagement.

Human rights and legal analysis

The circumstances raise serious concerns regarding arbitrary arrest and detention. Indonesia’s new Code of Criminal Procedure, Law No. 20 of 2025 (KUHAP), has been in force since 2 January 2026 and replaced Law No. 8 of 1981. Under Articles 94 and 95, an arrest must generally be based on at least two items of evidence, and officers must show their assignment letter and provide an arrest warrant specifying the suspect’s identity, the grounds for arrest, the alleged criminal offence and the place of examination, except in cases of arrest in flagrante delicto. Article 96 limits arrest to a maximum of 1 x 24 hours unless another statutory basis applies. Formal detention is subject to additional requirements under Article 100.
If Mr Zeth Giyai remained deprived of his liberty for approximately two days without a lawful detention order and the required evidentiary and procedural safeguards, his detention may have violated Indonesian criminal procedure as well as the prohibition of arbitrary detention under Article 9 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR).
The examination of Mr Giyai’s mobile phone also requires independent scrutiny. Under Articles 112 and 113 of the 2025 KUHAP, searches may extend to electronic information and electronic documents, but investigators must generally obtain prior authorisation from the competent district court. An exception exists in urgent circumstances, in which case judicial approval must subsequently be sought within the prescribed period. Examination of private communications and digital information without an adequate legal basis may additionally engage the protection against arbitrary or unlawful interference with privacy under Article 17 ICCPR. The UN Human Rights Committee has emphasised that the confidentiality of correspondence and communications must be protected against arbitrary State interference.
Of particular concern are allegations that officers tortured Mr Giyai whilst he was in police custody. Such conduct, if substantiated, would violate the absolute prohibition of torture and cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment under Article 7 ICCPR. The allegations also trigger Indonesia’s obligation under Articles 12 and 13 of the Convention against Torture (CAT) to ensure a prompt and impartial investigation wherever there are reasonable grounds to believe that torture or other prohibited ill-treatment has occurred and to enable victims to submit complaints without intimidation. A prompt independent medical examination and proper documentation of any injuries are therefore essential both for Mr Giyai’s treatment and for the preservation of potential evidence.
Detailed Case Data
Document ID: HRM-CAS-144-2026
Location: X2RJ+9JX, Jl. Trans Nabire, Kimupugi, Kec. Kamu, Kabupaten Dogiyai, Papua Tengah 98862, Indonesia (-4.009014, 136.0316161) arbitrary detention occurred at the Kamuu District Office. Officers allegedly tortured Mr Giyai during detention at the Polres Dogiyai
Region: Indonesia > Central Papua > Dogiyai > Kamuu
Total number of victims: 1
#Number of VictimsName, DetailsGenderAgeGroup AffiliationViolations
1.1Zeth Giyai
diverseapproximateIndigenous Peoplesarbitrary detention, torture
Period of incident: 30/09/2026 – 02/10/2026
Perpetrator: Republic Indonesia > Indonesian Security Forces > Indonesian Police > POLRES
Perpetrator details: Dogiyai District Police
Issues: indigenous peoples
Related Cases:

---------------------------------------------------

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.