1) Dispossession, violence, and resistance: The human rights crisis around the Merauke National Strategic Project
In the forests and villages of Merauke Regency, South Papua Province, a quiet but intensifying crisis is unfolding. Indonesia’s National Strategic Project (Proyek Strategis Nasional, or PSN), an ambitious state-backed programme encompassing rice field development, a 135-kilometre access road, sugarcane plantations for bioethanol, and food self-sufficiency schemes, is colliding with the lives, lands, and rights of the Malind and other indigenous Papuan groups who have inhabited this region for generations.
Since late 2024, a growing body of evidence has documented serious procedural violations, the dismantling of indigenous land rights, incidents of violence against community members who resist, and the systematic exclusion of affected communities from decision-making processes. Legal challenges are now working their way through the Indonesian courts, while civil society organisations, churches, and human rights advocates have raised increasingly urgent calls for the government to halt the project and respect its obligations under national and international law.
The situation in Merauke is a stark illustration of the human costs of large-scale development projects that are pursued without adequate legal safeguards, meaningful community participation, or respect for indigenous rights. The communities who have lived in and stewarded these forests for generations are not opposed to development as such; they are opposed to development that destroys their homes, eliminates their food sources, and is imposed upon them without consultation or consent.
This article summarises the key developments from early 2026 and sets out the principal human rights concerns arising from the implementation of the PSN in Merauke.
Background: What is the Merauke PSN?
The Merauke PSN is a cluster of large-scale development programmes formally designated as National Strategic Projects under the administration of President Prabowo Subianto for the 2024–2029 term. The centrepiece is the construction of a 135-kilometre road connecting Wanam Village in Ilwayab District to Selauw Village in Muting District, intended to serve as infrastructure for a food and energy security programme.
The PSN includes a rice field development programme in Ilwayab District, implemented by Indonesia’s Ministry of Defence in collaboration with PT Jhonlin Group, a company owned by South Kalimantan entrepreneur Andi Syamsuddin Arsyad (widely known as Haji Isam). Other important components of the project are the sugarcane cultivation for bioethanol, a biogas project, and an agricultural land optimisation scheme. The programmes covers land in three regencies of south Papua Province, namely Merauke, Boven Digoel, and Mappi.
According to Suara Papua and Yamenadi, hundreds of excavators arrived at the Merauke port on 13 March 2026. (see video below, source: independent HRD) Reports suggest PT Jhonlin Group intends to bring additional of 2,000 excavators to the region to accelerate the programme. The scale of the operation signals the government’s determination to press forward regardless of ongoing legal challenges and community opposition.
Procedural violations: Building without a permit
One of the most legally significant findings to emerge from investigations by civil society groups is that the construction of the 135-kilometre road began approximately one year before the required environmental permit was issued.
According to the Merauke Solidarity legal advocacy team, land clearing for the road began in September 2024. The Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) decision (Merauke Regent’s Decree No. 100.3.3.2/1105/2025) was only issued in September 2025. This means that for roughly twelve months, construction proceeded without any valid environmental authorisation, a clear violation of Article 22(1) of Law No. 32 of 2009 on Environmental Protection and Management. Legal advocates argue that the permit effectively sought to retroactively legitimise activities that had already taken place illegally.
The Papua Human Rights Coalition, in a statement published on 18 March 2026, further noted that the absence of an EIA also means the project proceeded without a valid business licence, since under Article 24 of Law No. 6 of 2023 on Job Creation, the EIA serves as the mandatory basis for determining environmental feasibility prior to any licence being granted. The coalition argues that the project may therefore have violated Article 109 of the same law, which sets out environmental offences.
Advocates have also raised concerns about the financial implications of these procedural irregularities. According to the lawyers, the delayed issuance of the permit is suspected of being designed to allow state budget funds to reimburse private parties who had been financing construction costs. This practice raises potential corruption concerns. According to records from the Pusaka Bentala Rakyat Foundation cited in the same report, land clearing had by that point covered 56 kilometres of the planned route.
Reclassification of 486,939 hectares forest without consent
In January 2026, further alarm was raised when two decisions issued by the Minister of Forestry (Decrees No. 591 and No. 430 of 2025) came to the attention of civil society groups. These decisions reclassify 486,939 hectares of forest area in South Papua Province as non-forest land, intended to support the national food, energy, and water self-sufficiency programmes.
Critically, the decisions were never made public. However, the Merauke Solidarity Advocacy team was able to obtain copies by filing a formal public information request, receiving the documents on 13 January 2026. The affected indigenous communities in Merauke and Boven Digoel Regencies were neither informed nor consulted. The communities’ formal administrative objection, filed on 10 February 2026.
The free, prior and informed consent (FPIC) principle ensures that indigenous communities be meaningfully consulted before decisions affecting their lands are made. It is not only enshrined in international human rights law, but also in Indonesian law, including Articles 43 and 44 of Law No. 2 of 2021 on Special Autonomy, Article 6 of Law No. 39 of 1999 on Human Rights, and Constitutional Court Decision No. 35/PUU-X/2012, which confirms that customary forests are not state forests.
The consequences for affected communities are profound. Among those acutely affected is the Wambon Kenemopte tribe of Boven Digoel, whose eight clans had submitted a formal application for recognition of their customary forest as early as September 2023, with assistance from the Pusaka Foundation. While they were still working to fulfil the documentation requirements requested by the Ministry of Forestry, the Minister issued the reclassification decree, changing the status of their forest to non-forest land earmarked for oil palm cultivation.
On 10 February 2026, twelve representatives of indigenous communities from Boven Digoel and Merauke lodged a formal administrative appeal against the two ministerial decisions, demanding their revocation and calling for concrete steps towards the recognition of indigenous Papuan land rights.
Violence against the Kamuyen Clan: A community under attack
Among the most disturbing developments in early 2026 have been the attacks on Esau Kamuyen, head of the Kamuyen clan in Nakias Village, Ngguti District, and his family. The Kamuyen clan is one of several clans in Merauke whose customary land falls within the planned route of the 135-kilometre road. Unlike some neighbouring clans, Esau Kamuyen has consistently refused to relinquish his community’s land.
As far back as 8 October 2025, the Kamuyen clan erected red crosses on their territory as a traditional symbol of prohibition (see photo on top, source: independent HRD), blocking access to their customary land and demanding a halt to all activities by PT Jhonlin Group, which had already begun clearing the forest. According to investigations by LBH Papua Merauke, the clan’s forest had been forcibly cleared by contractors despite their explicit objections.
The attacks on the family began on 23 January 2026. A group of people reportedly set fire to a temporary forest shelter used as a resting place (see top left photo below, source: independent HRD). Mr Norton Kamuyen, was struck with the blunt side of a machete and threatened. The following night, on 24 January, a larger group, believed to include residents from Yodom Village and Nakias Village, mounted a more serious attack on Mr Esau Kamuyen’s home. The attackers were armed with axes, machetes, spears, arrows, and air rifles. Arrows and spears were fired at the house; one spear became lodged in the wall.
Outnumbered, Mr Kamuyen and his family fled their home to seek refuge in another village. The attackers entered the house, ransacked and damaged household property, and stole the motorbike (see photos above, source: independent HRD). The motorcycle was later found in another village. The violence was followed by threats of further assault and murder delivered via text messages, as well as a written declaration from several customary leaders affiliated with the attacking group threatening further action if authorities and other parties did not meet their demands within 72 hours.
Solidarity Merauke’s investigations suggest the attackers are residents from four villages who hold opposing views to the Kamuyen clan on the question of releasing customary land for the road construction. Civil society groups attribute the violence directly to the pressures generated by the PSN and the approaches taken by the project’s implementers to secure land access.
On 14 February 2026, accompanied by LBH Papua Merauke, Mr Esau Kamuyen formally filed a police report (reference number LP/B/39/II/2026/SPKT/Res Merauke/Polda Papua). However, the intimidations did not end there. On 3 March 2026, members of the Kamuyen clan patrolling their territory discovered that the red crosses had been removed by unknown persons and replaced with a piece of wood wrapped in yellow palm fronds resembling a traditional ritual object from the Marind community. LBH Papua Merauke characterised this act as part of a systematic effort to undermine the Kamuyen clan’s resistance and provoke intra-community conflict.
Legal challenges
Following the mounting pressure, indigenous communities and their legal representatives have pursued an active legal strategy, filing challenges at multiple levels of Indonesia’s administrative and judicial system. On 5 March 2026, five representatives of the Malind indigenous community filed a lawsuit at the Administrative Court (PTUN) in Jayapura, formally challenging the environmental feasibility permit for the 135-kilometre road. The plaintiffs represent the Balagaize, Mahuze, Moyuwend, Basik-Basik, and Gebze clans. The case is registered under number 9/G/LH/2026/PTUN Jayapura.
The filing was accompanied by a solidarity demonstration at the court in Jayapura’s Waena district, where the plaintiffs were joined by students and civil society representatives. Before entering the court building, the plaintiffs held a traditional prayer ceremony during which they daubed their bodies in white clay as a symbol of grief over the destruction of their ancestral forests.
The first hearing took place on 31 March 2026. A second hearing followed on 14 April 2026, at which judges requested amendments and clarifications to the lawsuit, including strengthening arguments around climate change impacts. The road construction was confirmed to still be ongoing at the time of the hearings. A next hearing was scheduled for 21 April 2026. The Papua Human Rights Coalition, in a statement published 18 March 2026, urged President Prabowo and the Minister of Defence to halt all construction pending the court’s ruling on environmental feasibility.
At the national level, civil society groups have also initiated a judicial review at the Constitutional Court (Mahkamah Konstitusi), challenging provisions in the Job Creation Law that facilitate PSN designation and implementation.
Voices of resistance: Church, civil society, and indigenous communities
The resistance to the Merauke PSN has drawn support from a broad coalition of actors beyond the directly affected communities. In late January and early February 2026, the Indonesian Council of Churches (PGI) held its Full Workers’ Council (MPL) session in Merauke, providing a prominent platform for community voices. Following the session, PGI General Chair Rev Jacklevyn Manuputty issued a statement strongly condemning military expansion and PSN implementation in Papua, describing these as tools of state oppression and a continuation of internal colonialism. The PGI further called for an end to militarism and authoritarianism, and urged President Prabowo to engage in dialogue with affected communities.
LBH Papua Merauke and the Merauke Solidarity Group welcomed the PGI statement, calling on President Prabowo to halt the PSN and withdraw security forces from project sites in Wanam and other locations, noting that the presence of armed TNI personnel has generated fear among communities already under pressure.
—————————————————————————
https://www.teaonews.co.nz/2026/04/15/nz-urged-to-respond-to-civilian-killings-in-west-papua/
Kia mataara: This story contains references to the deaths of people and police violence.
Kua roa ngā tāngata o West Papua ka noho i raro i te kapua pōuri, nā ngā patunga a ngā hōia me ngā pirihimana.
Yulita Pigai, an elderly woman in her 70s, was killed inside her home after being shot as Indonesian security forces carried out a sweep through her village in West Papua.
She is among at least six civilians, including children, reportedly shot dead by Indonesian security forces during an operation in Central Papua.
West Papua lies just 6,000km from Aotearoa, and about an hour’s flight from Darwin, Australia, yet many people remain unaware of the daily realities faced by our Papuan whanaunga.
Indonesia has controlled West Papua since 1969, following a United Nations-backed process known as the Act of Free Choice, which remains widely contested by Indigenous Papuans.
Witness accounts compiled by Human Rights Monitor allege the Indonesian National Armed Forces and the Indonesian National Police opened fire in public areas, including near Moanemani Market, before pursuing residents into surrounding villages in Dogiyai Regency.
The reported shootings took place in Kamu District between March 31 and April 2, 2026, leaving at least six Indigenous Papuans dead and at least two others injured.
The West Papua Action Aotearoa network is now calling on the New Zealand Government to respond publicly to the reports.
The indiscriminate killing of civilians and children by Indonesian security forces is deplorable and must be condemned. —
Teanau Tuiono, Green Party MP
Among those killed was 11-year-old Maikel Waine, who was shot in the chest and later died from his injuries. Others who lost their lives were Sipirianus Tibakoto (19), Martinus Yobee (12), Angkian Edowai (20) and Ferdinand Auwe (19).
The operation was reportedly launched following the fatal stabbing of a police officer, identified as Juventus Edowai, in Moanemani town on the morning of March 31.
Reports allege security forces opened fire near homes in villages including Ikebo, Kimupugi and Ekemanida, where further shootings occurred. Civilian property was also reportedly burned, and tensions remained high as residents fled and normal activities were suspended.
Human Rights Monitor says the reported use of live ammunition in populated areas raises serious concerns under international law, including the right to life under the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.
Human Rights Monitor warned the incident could constitute collective punishment if carried out in retaliation for the killing of the police officer.
I kī te māngai o West Papua Action Aotearoa, a Catherine Delahunty, he raru nui ēnei pūrongo.
“This kind of response amounts to collective punishment of communities and an attack on their human rights,” she said.
“Opening fire on villages and killing children cannot be justified.”
I whakahē hoki te mema pāremata o Ngā Kākāriki, a Teanau Tuiono, i aua mahi tūkino, ā, i karanga ia kia whai papanga te hapori o te ao.
“The indiscriminate killing of civilians and children by Indonesian security forces is deplorable and must be condemned,” he said.
1) Dispossession, violence, and resistance: The human rights crisis around the Merauke National Strategic Project
1) Dispossession, violence, and resistance: The human rights crisis around the Merauke National Strategic Project
In the forests and villages of Merauke Regency, South Papua Province, a quiet but intensifying crisis is unfolding. Indonesia’s National Strategic Project (Proyek Strategis Nasional, or PSN), an ambitious state-backed programme encompassing rice field development, a 135-kilometre access road, sugarcane plantations for bioethanol, and food self-sufficiency schemes, is colliding with the lives, lands, and rights of the Malind and other indigenous Papuan groups who have inhabited this region for generations.
Since late 2024, a growing body of evidence has documented serious procedural violations, the dismantling of indigenous land rights, incidents of violence against community members who resist, and the systematic exclusion of affected communities from decision-making processes. Legal challenges are now working their way through the Indonesian courts, while civil society organisations, churches, and human rights advocates have raised increasingly urgent calls for the government to halt the project and respect its obligations under national and international law.
The situation in Merauke is a stark illustration of the human costs of large-scale development projects that are pursued without adequate legal safeguards, meaningful community participation, or respect for indigenous rights. The communities who have lived in and stewarded these forests for generations are not opposed to development as such; they are opposed to development that destroys their homes, eliminates their food sources, and is imposed upon them without consultation or consent.
This article summarises the key developments from early 2026 and sets out the principal human rights concerns arising from the implementation of the PSN in Merauke.
Background: What is the Merauke PSN?
The Merauke PSN is a cluster of large-scale development programmes formally designated as National Strategic Projects under the administration of President Prabowo Subianto for the 2024–2029 term. The centrepiece is the construction of a 135-kilometre road connecting Wanam Village in Ilwayab District to Selauw Village in Muting District, intended to serve as infrastructure for a food and energy security programme.
The PSN includes a rice field development programme in Ilwayab District, implemented by Indonesia’s Ministry of Defence in collaboration with PT Jhonlin Group, a company owned by South Kalimantan entrepreneur Andi Syamsuddin Arsyad (widely known as Haji Isam). Other important components of the project are the sugarcane cultivation for bioethanol, a biogas project, and an agricultural land optimisation scheme. The programmes covers land in three regencies of south Papua Province, namely Merauke, Boven Digoel, and Mappi.
According to Suara Papua and Yamenadi, hundreds of excavators arrived at the Merauke port on 13 March 2026. (see video below, source: independent HRD) Reports suggest PT Jhonlin Group intends to bring additional of 2,000 excavators to the region to accelerate the programme. The scale of the operation signals the government’s determination to press forward regardless of ongoing legal challenges and community opposition.
Procedural violations: Building without a permit
One of the most legally significant findings to emerge from investigations by civil society groups is that the construction of the 135-kilometre road began approximately one year before the required environmental permit was issued.
According to the Merauke Solidarity legal advocacy team, land clearing for the road began in September 2024. The Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) decision (Merauke Regent’s Decree No. 100.3.3.2/1105/2025) was only issued in September 2025. This means that for roughly twelve months, construction proceeded without any valid environmental authorisation, a clear violation of Article 22(1) of Law No. 32 of 2009 on Environmental Protection and Management. Legal advocates argue that the permit effectively sought to retroactively legitimise activities that had already taken place illegally.
The Papua Human Rights Coalition, in a statement published on 18 March 2026, further noted that the absence of an EIA also means the project proceeded without a valid business licence, since under Article 24 of Law No. 6 of 2023 on Job Creation, the EIA serves as the mandatory basis for determining environmental feasibility prior to any licence being granted. The coalition argues that the project may therefore have violated Article 109 of the same law, which sets out environmental offences.
Advocates have also raised concerns about the financial implications of these procedural irregularities. According to the lawyers, the delayed issuance of the permit is suspected of being designed to allow state budget funds to reimburse private parties who had been financing construction costs. This practice raises potential corruption concerns. According to records from the Pusaka Bentala Rakyat Foundation cited in the same report, land clearing had by that point covered 56 kilometres of the planned route.
Reclassification of 486,939 hectares forest without consent
In January 2026, further alarm was raised when two decisions issued by the Minister of Forestry (Decrees No. 591 and No. 430 of 2025) came to the attention of civil society groups. These decisions reclassify 486,939 hectares of forest area in South Papua Province as non-forest land, intended to support the national food, energy, and water self-sufficiency programmes.
Critically, the decisions were never made public. However, the Merauke Solidarity Advocacy team was able to obtain copies by filing a formal public information request, receiving the documents on 13 January 2026. The affected indigenous communities in Merauke and Boven Digoel Regencies were neither informed nor consulted. The communities’ formal administrative objection, filed on 10 February 2026.
The free, prior and informed consent (FPIC) principle ensures that indigenous communities be meaningfully consulted before decisions affecting their lands are made. It is not only enshrined in international human rights law, but also in Indonesian law, including Articles 43 and 44 of Law No. 2 of 2021 on Special Autonomy, Article 6 of Law No. 39 of 1999 on Human Rights, and Constitutional Court Decision No. 35/PUU-X/2012, which confirms that customary forests are not state forests.
The consequences for affected communities are profound. Among those acutely affected is the Wambon Kenemopte tribe of Boven Digoel, whose eight clans had submitted a formal application for recognition of their customary forest as early as September 2023, with assistance from the Pusaka Foundation. While they were still working to fulfil the documentation requirements requested by the Ministry of Forestry, the Minister issued the reclassification decree, changing the status of their forest to non-forest land earmarked for oil palm cultivation.
On 10 February 2026, twelve representatives of indigenous communities from Boven Digoel and Merauke lodged a formal administrative appeal against the two ministerial decisions, demanding their revocation and calling for concrete steps towards the recognition of indigenous Papuan land rights.
Violence against the Kamuyen Clan: A community under attack
Among the most disturbing developments in early 2026 have been the attacks on Esau Kamuyen, head of the Kamuyen clan in Nakias Village, Ngguti District, and his family. The Kamuyen clan is one of several clans in Merauke whose customary land falls within the planned route of the 135-kilometre road. Unlike some neighbouring clans, Esau Kamuyen has consistently refused to relinquish his community’s land.
As far back as 8 October 2025, the Kamuyen clan erected red crosses on their territory as a traditional symbol of prohibition (see photo on top, source: independent HRD), blocking access to their customary land and demanding a halt to all activities by PT Jhonlin Group, which had already begun clearing the forest. According to investigations by LBH Papua Merauke, the clan’s forest had been forcibly cleared by contractors despite their explicit objections.
The attacks on the family began on 23 January 2026. A group of people reportedly set fire to a temporary forest shelter used as a resting place (see top left photo below, source: independent HRD). Mr Norton Kamuyen, was struck with the blunt side of a machete and threatened. The following night, on 24 January, a larger group, believed to include residents from Yodom Village and Nakias Village, mounted a more serious attack on Mr Esau Kamuyen’s home. The attackers were armed with axes, machetes, spears, arrows, and air rifles. Arrows and spears were fired at the house; one spear became lodged in the wall.
Outnumbered, Mr Kamuyen and his family fled their home to seek refuge in another village. The attackers entered the house, ransacked and damaged household property, and stole the motorbike (see photos above, source: independent HRD). The motorcycle was later found in another village. The violence was followed by threats of further assault and murder delivered via text messages, as well as a written declaration from several customary leaders affiliated with the attacking group threatening further action if authorities and other parties did not meet their demands within 72 hours.
Solidarity Merauke’s investigations suggest the attackers are residents from four villages who hold opposing views to the Kamuyen clan on the question of releasing customary land for the road construction. Civil society groups attribute the violence directly to the pressures generated by the PSN and the approaches taken by the project’s implementers to secure land access.
On 14 February 2026, accompanied by LBH Papua Merauke, Mr Esau Kamuyen formally filed a police report (reference number LP/B/39/II/2026/SPKT/Res Merauke/Polda Papua). However, the intimidations did not end there. On 3 March 2026, members of the Kamuyen clan patrolling their territory discovered that the red crosses had been removed by unknown persons and replaced with a piece of wood wrapped in yellow palm fronds resembling a traditional ritual object from the Marind community. LBH Papua Merauke characterised this act as part of a systematic effort to undermine the Kamuyen clan’s resistance and provoke intra-community conflict.
Legal challenges
Following the mounting pressure, indigenous communities and their legal representatives have pursued an active legal strategy, filing challenges at multiple levels of Indonesia’s administrative and judicial system. On 5 March 2026, five representatives of the Malind indigenous community filed a lawsuit at the Administrative Court (PTUN) in Jayapura, formally challenging the environmental feasibility permit for the 135-kilometre road. The plaintiffs represent the Balagaize, Mahuze, Moyuwend, Basik-Basik, and Gebze clans. The case is registered under number 9/G/LH/2026/PTUN Jayapura.
The filing was accompanied by a solidarity demonstration at the court in Jayapura’s Waena district, where the plaintiffs were joined by students and civil society representatives. Before entering the court building, the plaintiffs held a traditional prayer ceremony during which they daubed their bodies in white clay as a symbol of grief over the destruction of their ancestral forests.
The first hearing took place on 31 March 2026. A second hearing followed on 14 April 2026, at which judges requested amendments and clarifications to the lawsuit, including strengthening arguments around climate change impacts. The road construction was confirmed to still be ongoing at the time of the hearings. A next hearing was scheduled for 21 April 2026. The Papua Human Rights Coalition, in a statement published 18 March 2026, urged President Prabowo and the Minister of Defence to halt all construction pending the court’s ruling on environmental feasibility.
At the national level, civil society groups have also initiated a judicial review at the Constitutional Court (Mahkamah Konstitusi), challenging provisions in the Job Creation Law that facilitate PSN designation and implementation.
Voices of resistance: Church, civil society, and indigenous communities
The resistance to the Merauke PSN has drawn support from a broad coalition of actors beyond the directly affected communities. In late January and early February 2026, the Indonesian Council of Churches (PGI) held its Full Workers’ Council (MPL) session in Merauke, providing a prominent platform for community voices. Following the session, PGI General Chair Rev Jacklevyn Manuputty issued a statement strongly condemning military expansion and PSN implementation in Papua, describing these as tools of state oppression and a continuation of internal colonialism. The PGI further called for an end to militarism and authoritarianism, and urged President Prabowo to engage in dialogue with affected communities.
LBH Papua Merauke and the Merauke Solidarity Group welcomed the PGI statement, calling on President Prabowo to halt the PSN and withdraw security forces from project sites in Wanam and other locations, noting that the presence of armed TNI personnel has generated fear among communities already under pressure.
—————————————————————————
Kia mataara: This story contains references to the deaths of people and police violence.
Kua roa ngā tāngata o West Papua ka noho i raro i te kapua pōuri, nā ngā patunga a ngā hōia me ngā pirihimana.
Yulita Pigai, an elderly woman in her 70s, was killed inside her home after being shot as Indonesian security forces carried out a sweep through her village in West Papua.
She is among at least six civilians, including children, reportedly shot dead by Indonesian security forces during an operation in Central Papua.
West Papua lies just 6,000km from Aotearoa, and about an hour’s flight from Darwin, Australia, yet many people remain unaware of the daily realities faced by our Papuan whanaunga.
Indonesia has controlled West Papua since 1969, following a United Nations-backed process known as the Act of Free Choice, which remains widely contested by Indigenous Papuans.
Witness accounts compiled by Human Rights Monitor allege the Indonesian National Armed Forces and the Indonesian National Police opened fire in public areas, including near Moanemani Market, before pursuing residents into surrounding villages in Dogiyai Regency.
The reported shootings took place in Kamu District between March 31 and April 2, 2026, leaving at least six Indigenous Papuans dead and at least two others injured.
The West Papua Action Aotearoa network is now calling on the New Zealand Government to respond publicly to the reports.
The indiscriminate killing of civilians and children by Indonesian security forces is deplorable and must be condemned. —
Teanau Tuiono, Green Party MP
Among those killed was 11-year-old Maikel Waine, who was shot in the chest and later died from his injuries. Others who lost their lives were Sipirianus Tibakoto (19), Martinus Yobee (12), Angkian Edowai (20) and Ferdinand Auwe (19).
The operation was reportedly launched following the fatal stabbing of a police officer, identified as Juventus Edowai, in Moanemani town on the morning of March 31.
Reports allege security forces opened fire near homes in villages including Ikebo, Kimupugi and Ekemanida, where further shootings occurred. Civilian property was also reportedly burned, and tensions remained high as residents fled and normal activities were suspended.
Human Rights Monitor says the reported use of live ammunition in populated areas raises serious concerns under international law, including the right to life under the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.
Human Rights Monitor warned the incident could constitute collective punishment if carried out in retaliation for the killing of the police officer.
I kī te māngai o West Papua Action Aotearoa, a Catherine Delahunty, he raru nui ēnei pūrongo.
“This kind of response amounts to collective punishment of communities and an attack on their human rights,” she said.
“Opening fire on villages and killing children cannot be justified.”
I whakahē hoki te mema pāremata o Ngā Kākāriki, a Teanau Tuiono, i aua mahi tūkino, ā, i karanga ia kia whai papanga te hapori o te ao.
“The indiscriminate killing of civilians and children by Indonesian security forces is deplorable and must be condemned,” he said.
“Once again, West Papuan civilians are the victims of Indonesia’s ever-escalating military occupation of West Papua. The global community must hold Indonesia accountable for this indiscriminate violence.”
E āki ana a Tuiono rāua ko Delahunty kia kaha ake e te Kāwanatanga o Aotearoa te whakamatāra i tēnei take ki te iwi whānui.
“It is imperative on the New Zealand Government to hold Indonesia accountable for their violence in West Papua. The Government’s silence is unacceptable,” Tuiono said.
“Indonesia must be challenged on their appalling human rights record.”
Hei tā Delahunty, kāore anō kia whakahoki kōrero e te Kāwanatanga o Aotearoa me ēnei take tika tangata o te ao.
“This country’s silence on Indonesian state violence is shameful. We cannot ignore the plight of our Pacific neighbours in West Papua,” she said.
Ko te whakatūpato a Tuiono, he whakanoa te mahi a ngā tūāhua tōrangapū o te ao me te tūkino a ngā kāwanatanga.
“The world’s failure to act on Israel’s genocidal in Gaza and to challenge Trump’s illegal wars and ever-escalating threats legitimises not just atrocious crimes by the United States, but by all repressive states around the world,” he said.
“New Zealand must stop being part of that normalisation.”
New Zealand and Indonesia have committed to strengthening economic ties, with a shared goal of increasing bilateral trade to NZ$6 billion by 2029.
Te Ao Māori News has approached the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade and Foreign Minister Winston Peters for comment.
A spokesperson for the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade said New Zealand’s recognition of Indonesia’s sovereignty and territorial integrity is a long-standing position of successive governments.
“MFAT is aware of reports about the incident in Dogiyai. New Zealand closely follows developments in Papua and raises issues with the Government of Indonesia when appropriate. The New Zealand Embassy in Jakarta also meets regularly with civil society representatives from Papua, undertakes regional visits, and reports regularly on issues in Papua.”
The Embassy of the Republic of Indonesia in Wellington said its government’s position has been consistent, maintaining that human rights protection is part of national law enforcement.
It said the Ministry of Human Rights, the National Police and the National Human Rights Commission (Komnas HAM) are working together to enhance safety in local communities, particularly in Moanemani, Dogiyai Regency.
The embassy added that national and local authorities are working with civil society to conduct a thorough investigation into the incident, aimed at determining its causes and preventing similar events in the future.
Te Aniwaniwa Paterson
Te Aniwaniwa is a digital producer for Te Ao Māori News.
------------------------------------------“Once again, West Papuan civilians are the victims of Indonesia’s ever-escalating military occupation of West Papua. The global community must hold Indonesia accountable for this indiscriminate violence.”
E āki ana a Tuiono rāua ko Delahunty kia kaha ake e te Kāwanatanga o Aotearoa te whakamatāra i tēnei take ki te iwi whānui.
“It is imperative on the New Zealand Government to hold Indonesia accountable for their violence in West Papua. The Government’s silence is unacceptable,” Tuiono said.
“Indonesia must be challenged on their appalling human rights record.”
Hei tā Delahunty, kāore anō kia whakahoki kōrero e te Kāwanatanga o Aotearoa me ēnei take tika tangata o te ao.
“This country’s silence on Indonesian state violence is shameful. We cannot ignore the plight of our Pacific neighbours in West Papua,” she said.
Ko te whakatūpato a Tuiono, he whakanoa te mahi a ngā tūāhua tōrangapū o te ao me te tūkino a ngā kāwanatanga.
“The world’s failure to act on Israel’s genocidal in Gaza and to challenge Trump’s illegal wars and ever-escalating threats legitimises not just atrocious crimes by the United States, but by all repressive states around the world,” he said.
“New Zealand must stop being part of that normalisation.”
New Zealand and Indonesia have committed to strengthening economic ties, with a shared goal of increasing bilateral trade to NZ$6 billion by 2029.
Te Ao Māori News has approached the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade and Foreign Minister Winston Peters for comment.
A spokesperson for the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade said New Zealand’s recognition of Indonesia’s sovereignty and territorial integrity is a long-standing position of successive governments.
“MFAT is aware of reports about the incident in Dogiyai. New Zealand closely follows developments in Papua and raises issues with the Government of Indonesia when appropriate. The New Zealand Embassy in Jakarta also meets regularly with civil society representatives from Papua, undertakes regional visits, and reports regularly on issues in Papua.”
The Embassy of the Republic of Indonesia in Wellington said its government’s position has been consistent, maintaining that human rights protection is part of national law enforcement.
It said the Ministry of Human Rights, the National Police and the National Human Rights Commission (Komnas HAM) are working together to enhance safety in local communities, particularly in Moanemani, Dogiyai Regency.
The embassy added that national and local authorities are working with civil society to conduct a thorough investigation into the incident, aimed at determining its causes and preventing similar events in the future.
Te Aniwaniwa Paterson
Te Aniwaniwa is a digital producer for Te Ao Māori News.
------------------------------------------
