Thursday, March 19, 2026

1) Arbitrary detention, ill-treatment and internal displacement during security force operation in Tambrauw Regency

 


2) Alleged destruction of property and intimidation of a Papuan Pastor amid escalating security operations in Dekai, Yahukimo Regency

3) "Pig Feast" in Sydney - A Touching Reminder of West Papua

-----------------------------

https://humanrightsmonitor.org/case/arbitrary-detention-ill-treatment-and-internal-displacement-during-security-force-operation-in-tambrauw-regency/

1) Arbitrary detention, ill-treatment and internal displacement during security force operation in Tambrauw Regency

Between 1 March 2026, joint Indonesian military and police forces conducted raids in the districts Fef and Bamus Bama, Tambrauw Regency, South West Papua province. Security force personnel reportedly detained at least 12 villagers without warrants. Human rights defenders raised allegation of torture and ill-treatment, and documented mass displacement of villagers fleeing into forests. The arrests reportedly occurred between 2:00 pm and 6:00 pm on 18 March 2026 in several villages, including Banfot Village (Fef District), Bamus Bama Village, Bano Village and Jukbi (Jokbu) Village (Bamus Bama District). Identified detainees include Mr Tadius Yesyan, Mr Paulus Yesyan, Mr Wempi Yeblo, Mr Dominggus Yekwam, Mr Manfred Yekeam (Head of Bano Village), Mr Ayub Yekwam (Head of Banfot Village), Mr Lukas Yekwam, and five others whose identities remain unknown.
The military operation followed a violent incident on 16 March 2026 in the Jokbu Village, during which members of the West Papua National Liberation Aremy (TPNPB) reportedly killed two health workers, while two others escaped. The TPNPB claimed the health workers were found in possession of firearms, ammunition and communication equipment, alleging that the victims were intelligence agents working undercover as healthcare staff.
Between 17 and 18 March 2026, Indonesian security forces reportedly blocked the main road connecting Tambrauw Regency and Sorong Regency and conducted search and arrest operations across multiple villages. Witnesses stated that security personnel entered homes, forcibly dragged residents outside, and detained them without presenting arrest warrants or clearly identifying suspects. A video circulated locally showed several detainees with their hands bound and visible injuries, lying on the floor at the Tambrauw Police Headquarters in Fef (see video below, source: independent HRD).
The operation involved gunfire directed into or near civilian residential areas, which caused widespread panic. Many villagers including children, women, elderly persons and teenagers fled into nearby forests due to fear of further violence. Preliminary reports on 19 March 2026 indicated that additional Indonesian military forces had landed in Fef, prompting further civilian displacement and making independent verification of the situation difficult.

Human rights analysis

The reported arrests raise serious concerns regarding violations of the right to liberty and security of person, particularly where individuals were detained without clear evidence of involvement in criminal acts or armed hostilities. The binding of detainees’ hands and eyes, coupled with visible injuries, indicates a risk of torture or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment during arrest or detention. Such practices are prohibited under the International covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCRC) and the Convention against Torture and other Inhumane and Degrading Treatment or Punishment (CAT).
The practice of conducting indiscriminate or “blind” arrests during security operations in conflict-affected areas contributes to patterns of collective punishment and undermines the principle of distinction between civilians and combatants, which is central to international humanitarian law. Furthermore, the reported firing into villages and resulting displacement may constitute acts of intimidation against the civilian population and could amount to violations of the right to protection from arbitrary interference with home and family life, as well as the right to freedom of movement.
The presence of intensified military deployments in populated areas without adequate civilian protection measures also increases risks of further arbitrary detention, enforced disappearance, or extrajudicial violence, particularly in remote regencies such as Tambrauw where access to legal counsel, medical care and independent monitoring remains limited.

Several detainees with their hands bound and visible injuries, lying on the floor at the Tambrauw Police Headquarters in Fef, 18 March 2026

Indonesian security forces reportedly blocked the main road connecting Tambrauw Regency and Sorong Regency , 17/18 March 2026

Detailed Case Data
Location: Fef, Tambrauw Regency, Southwest Papua, Indonesia (-0.7798216, 132.3665985) 
Region: Indonesia, Southwest Papua, Tambrauw, Fef
Total number of victims: 12
#Number of VictimsName, DetailsGenderAgeGroup AffiliationViolations
1.Tadius Yesyan
maleadult arbitrary detention, torture
2.Lukas Yekwam
maleadult arbitrary detention, torture
3.Paulus Yesyan
maleadult arbitrary detention, torture
4.Wempi Yeblo
maleadult arbitrary detention, torture
5.Dominggus Yekwam
maleadult arbitrary detention, torture
6.
maleadult Indigenous Peoplesarbitrary detention, torture
7.Ayub Yekwam
maleadult Indigenous Peoplesarbitrary detention, torture
8.Manfred Yekwam
maleadult Indigenous Peoplesarbitrary detention, torture
Period of incident: 18/03/2026 – 18/03/2026
Perpetrator: , Indonesian Security Forces
Issues: indigenous peoples, security force violence
———————————————————————————————————————




2) Alleged destruction of property and intimidation of a Papuan Pastor amid escalating security operations in Dekai, Yahukimo Regency

Between 12 December 2025 and February 2026, a series of incidents of alleged shooting, vandalism, robbery, intimidation and continued harassment were reported at the home of Rev. Victor Kobak in Jalan Gunung, Dekai District, Yahukimo Regency, Papua Pegunungan province. Rev Kobak leads the Evanhastia congregation, belonging to the Evangelical Church in Indonesia (GIDI). The events occurred in the context of security force raids in response to the deteriorating security situation in the Yahukimo Regency. Authorities reacted with intensified military deployments, restrictions on civilian activities and a series of reported arbitrary arrests in Dekai Town. Rev Kobak reportedly suffered material losses, psychological distress and ongoing intimidation, while the wider community experienced heightened fear and insecurity linked to escalating armed conflict dynamics in the area.
Security forces came to Rev Kobak’s house, opening fire at his house, damaging parts of the property, and seizing personnel belongings. On 12 December 2025 joint security forces reportedly opened fire at the house belonging to Rev. Victor Kobak. Bullets struck walls and roof sections at both the front and rear of the building, causing structural damage and material losses. On 22 January 2026, security personnel again entered Rev Kobak’s house without showing a warrant and devastated the interior. The doors were kicked in and damaged. After the house search, personal belongings were missing. On 31 January 2026, security force personnel again came to Rev Kobak’s house, dismantling parts of the house and removing items, including his Starlink communication equipment, four sleeping bags or mats, and work-related equipment. Four doors were dismantled.
Following the circulation of video documentation of the incidents, Rev. Kobak received anonymous threatening phone calls and hostile social media posts in February 2026. The acts of intimidation included attempts to stigmatise him as a member of the West Papua National Liberation Army (TPNPB) in social media posts. These actions increased fear for the safety of the Rev Kobak and his family.

Deteriorating security situation and series of arbitrary detentions in Dekai

The harassments and intimidation of Rev Kobak occurred amid a significant escalation of security operations across Yahukimo Regency in early 2026, particularly in the Dekai District. Reports indicate the establishment of additional security presence, expanded patrols and increased surveillance of civilian movement. Statements by security officials during meetings with business operators on 17 February 2026 suggested that civilians remaining in public spaces beyond designated curfew hours could be warned, detained overnight or otherwise subjected to enforcement measures. Such policies reportedly contributed to fears of arbitrary detention, racial profiling and collective stigmatisation of indigenous Papuans as potential supporters or members of armed groups.
The deteriorating situation also had humanitarian consequences. Healthcare workers at the Yahukimo Regional General Hospital and community health centres publicly stated on 20 February 2026 that they felt unsafe while performing their duties amid the presence of armed personnel near medical facilities. They demanded explicit security guarantees from both Indonesian security forces and armed Papuan groups, emphasising their neutral humanitarian role protected under International Humanitarian Law. Reports further indicated temporary closures of healthcare facilities and disruptions to essential services due to security fears, affecting civilian access to medical treatment.
Church leaders similarly expressed alarm at the militarisation of civilian spaces. On 21 February 2026, Rev. Atias Matuan, Chair of the Yahukimo Churches’ Fellowship (PGGY), urged security forces not to station personnel at hospitals, warning that their presence had traumatised patients and undermined public trust in essential services. These developments reflect a broader climate of insecurity in which civilian institutions such as churches, schools and healthcare facilities have become increasingly entangled in conflict dynamics.

Human rights analysis

The reported shooting at a civilian residence, vandalism and removal of property raise concerns regarding arbitrary interference with the home and unlawful destruction of civilian objects, particularly if conducted by state security forces without lawful basis or judicial oversight. Such conduct violates the right to privacy, family life and property, as well as abuses of authority under domestic criminal law.
The intimidation of a religious leader and the dissemination of personal identity data without consent may amount to harassment of a human rights defender and interference with freedom of religion, expression and association. In conflict-affected contexts, religious figures often play key humanitarian and mediation roles; targeting them risks undermining civilian protection mechanisms and community resilience.
More broadly, the imposition of curfews combined with threats of detention for civilians present in public spaces may engage international human rights standards relating to freedom of movement and protection from arbitrary arrest or detention. Where security operations result in the closure of hospitals or intimidation of healthcare workers, this may also violate obligations to respect and protect medical personnel and ensure access to essential services.
Under International Humanitarian Law applicable to non-international armed conflicts, parties must distinguish between civilians and combatants, respect the neutrality of medical personnel and religious institutions, and refrain from pillage or destruction of civilian property unless imperatively required by military necessity. The reported developments in Dekai suggest a shrinking humanitarian space and increasing risks to civilians not directly participating in hostilities.

On 31 January 2026, security personnel again searched Rev Kobak’s house without warrant and devastated the interior

On 12 December 2025 joint security forces reportedly opened fire at the house belonging to Rev. Victor Kobak. The bullets struck walls and the roof.


Social media post accusing Rev Kobak of affiliation with the West Papua National Liberation Army (TPNPB)

Detailed Case Data
Location: Dekai, Yahukimo regency, Highland Papua, Indonesia (-4.8638158, 139.4837298) 
Region: Indonesia, Highland Papua, Yahukimo, Dekai
Total number of victims: 1
#Number of VictimsName, DetailsGenderAgeGroup AffiliationViolations
1.Victor Kobak
maleadult Indigenous Peoplescriminalisation, intimidation
Period of incident: 12/12/2025 – 11/03/2026
Perpetrator: , Indonesian Security Forces
Issues: indigenous peoples, security force violence


---------------------------------------------


3) "Pig Feast" in Sydney - A Touching Reminder of West Papua

Podcast 8”15 in Bahasa



After first screening in Papua, the film “Pesta Babi” was also aired through a series of nobar and discussion events in various places, including in New Zealand and Australia (Sydney).


Published 20 March 2026 12:00pm  By Dina Indrasafitri Source: SBS

The documentary "Pesta Babi", directed by journalist Dandhy Laksono and produced by journalist Victor Mambor, depicts the struggle of indigenous people in Papua to defend their ancestral lands.
Although the documentary Pesta Babi tells about Indonesia, the film was first shown in Sydney instead of Jakarta. According to Dandhy, the screening of the film this time, which is on March 13, 2026, is more of a pre-screening where feedback is still taking place.
Advertisement
Pig Feast sheds light on the growing concern regarding land clearings in West Papua in the interest of multiple agri-business ventures, including cane sugar plantations to be utilised for bio-ethanol fuel.

The documentary features voices of Papuan indigenous peoples who are against the projects taking place in their traditional lands and who stated that they preferred to live in a thriving natural environment with clear river waters and abundant traditional staple food.
The title Pig Feast refers to a major tradition involving multiple clans of Papua’s Muyu tribe. The survival of this tradition is highly dependent on the natural environment surrounding those clans, because in order for the feast to be held, years of preparation in which pigs belonging to different clans are allowed to roam free in the forest until it comes the time to slaughter them. Within that process respect between clans is reflected in the way that each has their own territories and pigs.


The name Pig Feast itself refers to a large traditional ceremony involving various clans within the Muyu tribe of Papua. The viability of the pig feast largely depends on the state of nature around the clans involved.
Because, in order to hold this pig feast ceremony, it takes years of preparation in which the pigs that will be cooked and eaten in the ceremony are left to roam the surrounding forest until it is time to be slaughtered. In this process is implied respect between one clan and another as each has its own territory and its own pig.


Patrick Earl is the Executive Director for the Diplomacy Training Program for the Asia Pacific Region. He said the organisation, which is affiliated with the University of New South Wales’ Law Faculty, considers the movie to be highly relevant to their advocacy for the rights of indigenous peoples.
Earle said that he personally gained new knowledge from Pig Feast, such as the link between Australia’s sugar consumption and the land clearings in Papua for cane sugar plantations.
Dian Anggreini, an Indonesian student currently studying at the University of New South Wales, said she was touched by the sincerity of Papuans' love for nature, as depicted in the documentary.
=========
Dina Indrasafitri

Listen to SBS Indonesian every Monday, Wednesday, Friday and Sunday at 3pm.
Follow us on Facebook and Instagram, and don't miss our podcasts.

-------------------------------------------

Wednesday, March 18, 2026

1) Drone attack on the office of Papuan movement organisation KNPB in Jayapura

 


2) Acid attack against human rights defender Andrie Yunus in Central Jakarta

3) TNI officers arrested over suspected acid attack on rights activist 

4) New documentary exposes development-driven human rights crisis in West Papua

5)  Indonesia to build over 2,000 homes for tribal chief in Highland Papua  
6) Indonesia’s civil–military boundaries under new pressure  
-------------------------------------------------------


1) Drone attack on the office of Papuan movement organisation KNPB in Jayapura

The headquarters of the Papuan movement organisation West Papua National Committee (KNPB) in Jayapura, Papua Province, were attacked by a drone in the early hours of 16 March 2026 at approximately 04:16 am. The drone reportedly dropped an explosive device which detonated in the office courtyard whilst several KNPB members and officials were asleep inside the building. The incident follows a previous arson attack against the same office on 17 January 2026, indicating an emerging pattern of intimidation against the political activists and human rights defenders in West Papua.
The KNPB is a non-violent civil resistance movement in West Papua, which has been organising West Papua-wide mass protests for self-determination through a political referendum for more than ten years. Their members have committed to non-violent protest by organising peaceful demonstrations and political discussions.
According to information documented by local human rights activists, an unidentified drone is believed to have dropped an explosive device into the courtyard of the KNPB headquarters in the Kambolker area in Waena, a sub-district of Jayapura City. The device reportedly exploded approximately two metres from the main office building and near the boundary wall separating the compound from a residential area.
The loud explosion abruptly awakened KNPB members sleeping inside the office and caused panic among occupants and nearby residents. Several residents reportedly left their homes and gathered at the scene. Following the incident, local human rights activists conducted preliminary documentation, including photographing the crime scene and collecting visible fragments believed to be components of the explosive device. The impact of the detonation in the courtyard of the KNPB office was still visible on the following day, illustrating the force of the blast and the potential lethality of the attack (see photos below, source: independent HRD).
Given that multiple individuals were present inside the building at the time, the incident posed a serious and immediate threat to life and physical integrity. The attack also significantly undermined the sense of safety of civil society actors operating in Jayapura City and more broadly in the Papuan provinces.
Fragments believed to be part of the explosive device, including black metal plates suspected to be bomb casing, cardboard fragments, small screws and bolts.

Previous arson attack in January 2026

The drone attack follows a prior attack on the same office on 17 January 2026 at approximately 3:16 am. During that incident, unknown perpetrators allegedly poured petrol on the office walls and set them alight. KNPB members who were asleep at the time awoke upon noticing flames and were able to extinguish the fire manually, preventing the blaze from spreading further. Witnesses reported that the perpetrators fled the scene in a black Toyota Avanza vehicle waiting nearby.
Evidence documented after the arson attempt reportedly included traces of petrol on the office wall, a container wrapped in duct tape, plastic sheeting, and a grey handkerchief (see photos below, source: independent HRD).

Pattern of intimidation against civil society organisations



These two incidents appear to form part of a broader pattern of intimidation targeting civil society organisations, journalists, and human rights defenders in Indonesia. On 12 March 2026, Mr Andrie Yunus, Deputy Coordinator of the Commission for the Disappeared and Victims of Violence (KontraS), was attacked with acid by unidentified perpetrators whilst riding a motorcycle on Jalan Salemba I–Talang, Central Jakarta. The issue has also reached alarming levels in the Papuan provinces. Previous attacks in the region include a Molotov cocktail attack against the office of the independent media outlet JUBI in October 2024.
The reported use of drone technology to deliver an explosive device suggests a relatively high level of planning and operational capability. Such methods heighten concerns regarding the security for organisations engaged in critical journalism, human rights advocacy and community mobilisation. At the time of writing, no official investigation had publicly identified the perpetrators or established a motive. Civil society actors have called for a transparent, independent, and comprehensive investigation into the alleged attacks.

Human rights analysis

The bombing and earlier arson attempt potentially engage multiple human rights protections under international and Indonesian law. Attacks against civil society organisations threaten the right to security of person, the right to freedom of association and peaceful assembly and the right to freedom of expression. These right are enshrined in International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), to which Indonesia is a party.
States have a positive obligation not only to refrain from violating human rights but also to protect individuals and organisations from harm by third parties. Failure to prevent, investigate, and prosecute repeated attacks may raise concerns regarding state compliance with its duty of due diligence. Such incidents may also contribute to a climate of fear that restricts civic space and undermines democratic participation in the Papuan provinces.

Drone attack on 16 March 2026

Arson attack on 17 January 2026

Detailed Case Data
Location: Kampung Waena, Heram, Jayapura City, Papua, Indonesia (-2.5932318, 140.6339916)Kamwolker area, Waena
Region: Indonesia, Papua, Jayapura, Heram
Total number of victims: few
#Number of VictimsName, DetailsGenderAgeGroup AffiliationViolations
1.few 
diverseunknown Indigenous Peoplesfreedom of assembly, freedom of expression, intimidation
Period of incident: 16/03/2026 – 16/03/2026
Perpetrator: Other
Issues: indigenous peoples
————————————————————————————————



2) Acid attack against human rights defender Andrie Yunus in Central Jakarta

On 12 March 2026, Mr Andrie Yunus, Deputy Coordinator of the Commission for the Disappeared and Victims of Violence (KontraS), was attacked with acid by unidentified perpetrators whilst riding a motorcycle on Jalan Salemba I–Talang, Central Jakarta. The attack caused serious injuries affecting various body parts, including his face, eyes, chest, and hands. Mr Yunus was subsequently admitted to Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital (RSCM) in Jakarta, where he remains under specialised medical care.
Earlier that evening, Mr Andrie Yunus had attended and recorded a podcast discussion on “Remilitarisation and Judicial Review in Indonesia” at the offices of the Indonesian Legal Aid Foundation (YLBHI). After leaving the premises, he travelled by motorcycle through Central Jakarta. According to CCTV analysis and witness statements, the suspected perpetrators had followed Mr Yunus on two motorcycles after he had left the YLBHI office.
At approximately 11:30 pm, the suspects were observed waiting near a petrol station and a fast-food outlet in Cikini, before resuming surveillance as the victim continued his journey. Shortly thereafter, at around 23:37 pm, the perpetrators approached him on their motorcycle from the opposite direction on Jalan Talang. While passing Mr Yunus, the person sitting in the back splashed a corrosive substance believed to be acid directly at his face and upper body. The victim fell from his motorcycle and screamed for assistance. Residents nearby provided immediate aid and arranged his transfer for emergency medical treatment.
Police later confirmed that the perpetrators split up after the attack, travelling towards different areas including Ragunan, Kalibata, and Bogor. Investigators analysed footage from approximately 86 CCTV cameras across Jakarta in an effort to reconstruct the suspects’ movements. Evidence recovered from the scene reportedly includes a purple tumbler-type container believed to have contained the acid, as well as other items such as a helmet suspected to belong to one of the attackers.

Investigation and developments

The Jakarta Metropolitan Police elevated the case from preliminary investigation to a formal criminal inquiry aimed at identifying suspects, citing indications of premeditation, coordination, and surveillance prior to the attack. Authorities believe the perpetrators monitored the victim’s daily routines and selected the timing and location strategically.
Civil society organisations, legal experts, and members of the Advocacy Team for Democracy have characterised the attack as an attempted premediated murder, emphasising similarities with previous attacks on activists in Indonesia, including the acid attack against anti-corruption investigator Novel Baswedan (2017) and the poisoning murder of HRD Munir Said Thalib (2004). They raised concerns that investigations in such cases historically failed to identify or prosecute alleged masterminds.
Indonesia’s President reportedly instructed the National Police Chief to ensure a professional, transparent, and professional investigation, while parliamentary oversight bodies pledged to monitor progress. The United Nations human rights leadership publicly expressed grave concern over the attack, emphasising the obligation of the State to protect human rights defenders and hold perpetrators accountable.

Human rights analysis

The acid attack constitutes a grave violation of the rights to life, security of person, and freedom from cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment, as well as a direct attack on the legitimate work of a human rights defender. The apparent premeditation, use of dangerous corrosive substances, and coordinated surveillance strongly indicate that the act may qualify as attempted premeditated murder under Indonesian criminal law.
Moreover, the attack reflects a broader pattern of intimidation and violence against civil society actors in Indonesia, raising concerns regarding impunity, inadequate HRD protection mechanisms, and potential involvement or tolerance by elements linked to state institutions. The failure to conduct an effective investigation could further undermine public trust in the rule of law and Indonesia’s democratic commitments.
Under international law, Indonesia has a positive obligation to prevent, investigate, punish, and provide remedies for attacks against human rights defenders, particularly when such acts may be linked to their advocacy work. The targeting of Mr Andrie Yunus following his involvement in sensitive issues, including security sector legislation and past protest investigations, suggests a possible retaliatory motive aimed at silencing dissenting voices.
#Number of VictimsName, DetailsGenderAgeGroup AffiliationViolations
1.Andrie Yunus
diverseadult Human Rights Defender (HRD)right to life, torture
Period of incident: 12/03/2026 – 12/03/2026
Perpetrator: , Other
Issues: human rights defenders
--------------------------------------


3) TNI officers arrested over suspected acid attack on rights activist 
 March 18, 2026 17:27 GMT+700

Jakarta (ANTARA) - The Indonesian Defence Forces (TNI) have arrested four personnel for their suspected involvement in an acid attack against human rights activist Andrie Yunus, Deputy Coordinator of the Commission for Missing Persons and Victims of Violence (KontraS).

"The four suspects have been arrested by the military police for investigation purposes," TNI's Military Police Commander Major General Yusri Nuryanto stated here on Wednesday.

Nuryanto confirmed that the four suspects were members of the military's Strategic Intelligence Agency headquarters detachment (Denma BAIS), identified by the initials NDP, SL, BWH, and ES.

The military police chief said that investigators have yet to establish the motive for the attack as the probe is ongoing.

The four suspects will be charged under Article 467 of the Criminal Code concerning premeditated assault, with a maximum sentence of seven years in prison.

Nuryanto stressed that the Military Police will work professionally and transparently, and that all findings by them will be presented openly in court.

Related news: Acid attack on activist defies RI Govt's freedom pledge: Lawmaker

"The TNI Military Police will work professionally. We will publicly inform all phases of the probe, including the investigation, case filing, and submission of the case to the military court for trial," he remarked.

The assault took place on Thursday evening (March 12) in Central Jakarta, as Yunus was riding a motorcycle after attending a podcast on militarism and the judicial review of military law, organized by the Indonesian Legal Aid Foundation (YLBHI). He was promptly rushed to a hospital for treatment.

Initial CCTV footage showed two unidentified assailants approaching Yunus on a motorbike before throwing corrosive liquid at him, leaving the activist with burns on his limbs and visual impairment.

Chair of Commission III of the House of Representatives (DPR) Habiburokhman, on Monday (16/3), condemned the acid attack on Yunus as a deviant act against President Prabowo Subianto’s commitment to upholding fundamental freedom.

Related news: Indonesian lawmaker calls acid attack on activist a democracy warning



Translator: Fianda Sjofjan R, Nabil Ihsan
Editor: Rahmad Nasution


———————————————————————


4) New documentary exposes development-driven human rights crisis in West Papua

A new documentary, Pesta Babi (Pig Feast), premiered at the West Papua Forum in Auckland on 7 March 2206, highlighting how Indonesian development projects are devastating indigenous Papuan communities. Produced by West Papuan journalist Victor Mambor and directed by film maker Dandhy Dwi Laksono, the documentary exposes the collusion between the Indonesian government, corporations, and military forces in destroying two million hectares of forest for sugarcane plantations and rice fields under Jakarta’s National Strategic Project. Papuan representatives at the forum reported that community members who criticise or protest these developments face military force to silence their dissent. As local communities and NGOs continue to stop the project, massive deforestation continues to disrupt traditional food sources, alienate indigenous peoples from their ancestral lands, and threaten the region’s biodiversity.
Forum participants called on the Pacific Islands Forum and foreign government to challenge the destruction of critical forests and displacement of thousands of West Papuans. The documentary shows “deeply disturbing” images of military presence and deforestation. The forum, which included panels on militarization, environmental destruction, and human rights abuses, concluded that indigenous people in West Papua are more than ever facing a human rights crisis admidst the deteriorating armed conflict and development projects, both posing an equally serious threat to their survival, culture, and land rights.


--------------------------------------------



5)  Indonesia to build over 2,000 homes for tribal chief in Highland Papua  
March 18, 2026 21:16 GMT+700

Wamena, Highland Papua (ANTARA) - Indonesia's Housing and Settlements Ministry will help develop thousands of homes for tribal chiefs and residents in the Highland Papua province, a ministry official has confirmed.

Aziz Andriansyah, director general for administration and risk management of the ministry, stated that President Prabowo Subianto has instructed the local authority to provide 2,200 housing units for local chiefs and residents in Highland Papua.

"We are here for the 2,200 homes program, implemented according to the president's instruction to the Highland Papua Governor to build houses for the people and tribal chiefs in eight districts of the province," he said in a statement received on Wednesday.

The provision of 2,200 housing units in Highland Papua is a special program enacted directly by the president with its own legal basis and procedures, he said.

It is "not a regular program usually provided to local authorities from government ministries or agencies," the ministry official noted, with the regular program referring to the development of flats for poorer residents, disaster victims' housing, or regular housing renovation.

"The special program is implemented according to the president's instruction, and we will prepare special regulations, procedures, and criteria with attention to its technical and non-technical needs," Andriansyah said.

He expressed hope that the development of 2,200 housing units for residents and tribal chiefs in Highland Papua will proceed smoothly according to plan.

He added that the 2,200 housing units allocated for residents in the Highland Papua province consist of 2,000 units of 45-square-meter houses and 200 units of 90-square-meter houses.

Related news: Papua unveils plan to build 14,000 homes in one year

Related news: Committee backs Prabowo's plan for 2,200 new homes in Highland Papua

Related news: Prabowo orders construction of 2,200 homes in Highland Papua

Translator: Yudhi Efendi, Nabil Ihsan
Editor: Azis Kurmala


————————————————————————


6) Indonesia’s civil–military boundaries under new pressure  

The plan to train thousands of civil servants as military reservists raise risks of militarizing the bureaucracy.

  Charles Simabura (The Jakarta Post) 360info/Padang Wed, March 18, 2026  

T he government’s proposal to train 4,000 civil servants as military reservists has triggered renewed debate about the boundaries between civil and military roles in government. The Defense Ministry has also floated the possibility of designating all civil servants, a total of around 5 million, as part of the reserves. Critics have warned that such a move risks shifting the country’s  civilian bureaucracy toward a more militarized posture. The plan sits at the intersection of national defense policy, civil–military relations and bureaucratic reform.

 It also raises questions about how the state interprets the constitutional obligation of citizens to participate in national defense, and whether the Law No. 23/2019 on Management of National Resources for State Defense (PSDN) is being applied as originally intended. The PSDN Law outlines five mechanisms for managing national resources for defense: bela negara or a civic‑education program that builds citizens’ awareness, resilience and willingness to contribute to national defense without requiring military training, structuring of supporting components, formation of the national reserve, strengthening of the main component and mobilization and demobilization. The law places bela negara at the forefront, emphasizing civic awareness and national resilience for Indonesia’s overall strength and readiness as a nation. It aspires to a cohesive society that stays calm, cooperative and united during crises because people trust institutions and know how to respond responsibly.



Crucially, the law classifies civil servants as Supporting Components, not reserve troops. PSDN Law places civil servants under “other citizens as elements of the citizenry.” In the explanation of the stipulation, “citizens other than citizens” are citizens who are not included in the Main Component, Reserve Component, trained citizens and experts but who meet the physical and psychological requirements to become Supporting Components alongside veterans and individual citizens.

Supporting Components are developed through “socialization, technical guidance and/or simulations,” not military-style training. As the original document notes, Supporting Components “are not subjected to military-style training as is the case with the Reserve Component.” As such, the Supporting Component is a non-military national resource that can be used to increase the strength and capabilities of the Main Component and Reserve Component. While the law allows citizens, including civil servants, to volunteer as military reservists, it does not envision blanket designation of all civil servants as reserve troops. Participation must occur through voluntary registration. The military reservist was introduced as a compromise after Indonesia chose not to adopt mandatory military service. Article 30 of the Constitution states that every citizen has both the right and the obligation to participate in national defense and security.

The PSDN Law organizes national defense resources into a three‑part structure in which the Main Component consists of the Indonesian Military (TNI), the military reservists are made up of civilians who volunteer for military training and the Supporting Components include institutions, resources and citizens who contribute through non‑military roles such as veteran members of the Republic of Indonesia, state civil apparatus and individuals. The obligation for citizens to participate becomes binding only during emergencies or when mobilization is declared. Outside of such conditions, participation is voluntary. This structure was designed to balance Indonesia’s defense needs with its commitment to civilian supremacy and democratic governance. 

Expanding the National Reserve to include all civil servants would represent a significant reinterpretation of this balance. Civil society organizations, legal experts and some lawmakers have expressed concern that involving civil servants as military reservists could blur the line between civilian and military spheres. They emphasized that civil servant involvement must not be coercive and must not disrupt public services. Military training is built on hierarchy, command structures and obedience, values that differ from the principles of civilian governance, which emphasize accountability, transparency and public service.

The document notes that the military reservist doctrine prepares individuals to confront threats, while the job of civil servants is to improve “humane and accountable public service governance.” Military‑style training could reshape the culture of Indonesia’s civil service, reinforcing rigidity and weakening the momentum for reform. Military indoctrination for civil servants through the reserve component seems to repeat the indoctrination program of the New Order era, which “ultimately failed to improve the quality of civil services” and instead deepened bureaucratic rigidity and corruption. The debate over the military reservist comes amid broader concerns about the increasing presence of military personnel in civilian institutions. 

Analysts note that such presence will strengthen the Soeharto era’s military dual-function doctrine regime. This doctrine allowed the military to engage in both civilian and military affairs. Even more than that, apart from the placement of military officers in the civilian positions, the reserve component is actually a form of militarization of civilians, including civil servants. Indonesia’s post‑reform era sought to dismantle the dual-function doctrine and restore clear boundaries between civilian and military domains. The deviations in the past must not be repeated, where the military was not only active in the realm of national defense but was also involved in socio-political activities. Any proposal to mandate the civil servant’s participation as military reservists must be carefully reconsidered. At present, the public expects civil servants to work professionally, uphold integrity and honesty and refrain from corruption, collusion and nepotism. The government should continue advancing bureaucratic reform, an agenda that still faces many challenges. For the civil servants, working professionally and upholding good governance principles is itself the foremost expression of state defense, as mandated by PSDN Law. --- The writer is an associate professor of law and the director of the Center for Constitutional Studies  (PUSaKO) at Andalas University.

------------------------------------------