Monday, April 13, 2026

1) Military members arbitrarily detain and torture two KNPB activists in Dekai, Yahukimo



2) Police officers fire rubber bullets at villagers following protest in Kaugapu Village, Mimika Regency – Seven protestors injured

3) Police officers arrest two Papuan gold panners without warrant in Yahukimo

4) Nabire police chief intimidates Papuan journalist in response to publication of article on illegal mining

5) Police officers allegedly intimidate activists following peaceful fundraising in Nabire


--------------------------------------------------------

1) Military members arbitrarily detain and torture two KNPB activists in Dekai, Yahukimo

On 23 March 2026, Marine Corps (TNI AL) members arbitrarily detained Yuni Suhun, 23, and Mr Eliaton Wetapo, 31, at the marines’ post in the Kokamo Village, Dekai District, Yahukimo Regency, Highlands Papua Province. They were reportedly subjected to torture during interrogation. Both detainees are indigenous Papuans and associated with the West Papua National Committee (KNPB), a movement organisation, promoting the right to self-determination through peaceful means.

Mr Yuni Suhun and Mr Eliaton Wetapo were on the way to the river to pan for gold when they were intercepted at the marines control post in the Kokamo Village. The TNI-AL personnel detained them inside the military post. The military personnel reportedly tortured both activists during detention after finding KNPB-related video content on their mobile phones. The detainees were blindfolded and subsequently beaten on the head with bare hands and blunt objects while their hands were tied behind the back. The ties were only removed for eating.

Mr Suhun and Mr Wetapo were released on 25 March 2026 at 11:20 am after attending a ceremony in which they were coerced to kiss the Indonesian flag and pledge allegiance.

Human rights analysis

The arbitrary detention and torture both constitute serious violations of international human rights law and Indonesia’s domestic legal framework. The arrest, carried out without a warrant and in the absence of any clearly defined criminal offence, violates the right to liberty and security of person as guaranteed under Article 9 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR). Furthermore, the treatment inflicted upon Mr Suhun amounts to torture or, at a minimum, cruel, inhuman, or degrading treatment under Article 7 of the ICCPR and the Convention against Torture (CAT), to which Indonesia is a state party. The coercion to participate in a ceremony pledging allegiance to the Indonesian flag further infringes upon the right to freedom of thought, conscience, and political expression under Article 18 and Article 19 ICCPR.

The targeting of Mr Yuni Suhun and Mr Eliaton Wetapo based on their alleged association with the West Papua National Committee (KNPB) raises additional concerns regarding discrimination and repression of peaceful political activity. As described, the KNPB promotes the right to self-determination through non-violent means, which is protected under international law, including Article 1 ICCPR. The actions of the Marine Corps personnel indicate a pattern of criminalising peaceful political expression and collective identity among indigenous Papuans.

These acts may also violate provisions of Indonesia’s Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP), which requires lawful arrest procedures and prohibits coercion, as well as obligations under the Indonesian Constitution to respect human dignity. Immediate, independent, and impartial investigations are required to ensure accountability. The incident is part of a broader pattern of arbitrary detentions in the Yahukimo Regency since January 2026.

Detailed Case Data
Location: Dekai, Yahukimo regency, Highland Papua, Indonesia (-4.8638158, 139.4837298)
Region: Indonesia, Highland Papua, Yahukimo, Dekai
Total number of victims: 2

#Number of VictimsName, DetailsGenderAgeGroup AffiliationViolations
1.Yuni Suhun
male23 Activist, Indigenous Peoplesarbitrary detention, torture
2.Eliaton Wetapo
male31 Activist, Indigenous Peoplesarbitrary detention, torture
Period of incident: 23/03/2026 – 25/03/2026
Perpetrator: Indonesian Navy (TNI-AL)
Issues: indigenous peoples



————————————————————————
https://humanrightsmonitor.org/case/police-officers-fire-rubber-bullets-at-villagers-following-protest-in-kaugapu-village-mimika-regency-seven-protestors-injured/

2) Police officers fire rubber bullets at villagers following protest in Kaugapu Village, Mimika Regency – Seven protestors injured

On 24 March 2026, Police Mobile Brigade (Brimob), members reportedly used excessive force against civilians during a community protest in Kaugapu Village, East Mimika District, Mimika Regency, Central Papua Province, resulting in seven residents sustaining gunshot wounds from rubber bullets. The incident occurred following tensions related to the poisoning of dogs belonging to the village head and longstanding grievances over unresolved customary land compensation.

On 23 March 2026, three dogs belonging to the Head of Kaugapu Village, Mr Xaverius Kapirapu, were allegedly poisoned, triggering anger among residents. In response, at approximately 07:00 am the following morning, members of the community erected a roadblock by felling a large tree across the Timika–Paomako main road, rendering it impassable until approximately 3:00 pm

The protest was not solely directed at the poisoning incident but was also driven by longstanding frustration regarding unresolved customary land disputes. Community members claim that land was appropriated during the tenure of former Mimika Regent Eltinus Omaleng without subsequent compensation to customary rights holders.

At approximately 5:15 pm, a large contingent of Brimob personnel arrived at the location. According to eyewitness accounts, security forces responded with the use of rubber bullets against the assembled villagers as tensions between the villagers and the police unfolded (see videos below, source: independent HRD). This action triggered a confrontation between the authorities and residents.

As a result, seven individuals sustained gunshot wounds. One victim required hospital treatment, while six others were treated privately at home. Later that evening, at approximately 8:00 pm, negotiations between community representatives and the village head resulted in the reopening of the road.

Human rights analysis

The reported use of excessive force against civilians raises serious concerns under international human rights law, particularly regarding the principles of necessity, proportionality, and legality in the use of force by law enforcement officials as stipulated in the UN Basic Principles on the Use of Force and Firearms by Law Enforcement Officials. Even in the context of a roadblock, the deployment of rubber bullets must comply with strict standards, including the requirement that force be used only as a last resort and in a manner that minimises harm.

Brimob officers fired rubber bullets at villagers as tensions escalated in Kaugapu Village on 24 March 2026


Detailed Case Data
Location: Kaugapu, Mimika Timur, Mimika Regency, Central Papua, Indonesia (-4.6451342, 136.8010727)
Region: Indonesia, Central Papua, Mimika, East Mimika
Total number of victims: 7

#Number of VictimsName, DetailsGenderAgeGroup AffiliationViolations
1.Hengky Kapirapu
male28 Indigenous Peoplesill-treatment
2.Alo
maleadult Indigenous Peoplesill-treatment
3.Bartolomius Kapirapu
maleadult Indigenous Peoplesill-treatment
4.Linus Kanareyau
maleadult Indigenous Peoplesill-treatment
5.Samuel Yemaromo
maleadult Indigenous Peoplesill-treatment
6.Yosopina Mupiyu
femaleadult Indigenous Peoplesill-treatment
7.Falen Kaorapeya
maleadult Indigenous Peoplesill-treatment
Period of incident: 24/02/2026 – 25/02/2026
Perpetrator: , Mobile Brigades (BRIMOB)
Issues: indigenous peoples, security force violence

————————————————————————

3) Police officers arrest two Papuan gold panners without warrant in Yahukimo

Members of the “Damai Cartens” police task force arbitrarily detained Mr Yominus Sekenil, 35, and Mr Eliaton Wetapo, 31, near the Nami River gold panning site in Dekai District, Yahukimo Regency, Papua Highlands Province, on 22 March 2026. Security forces reportedly apprehended the two Papuan men without a warrant. The arrests appeared to be based on outer appearance and digital content found on the victims’ mobile phones. Both individuals remain in detention at the Yahukimo District Police headquarters (Polres Yahukimo) as of 10 April 2026, without clear legal grounds and access to legal counsel.

The circumstances of the arrests raise serious concerns under international human rights law. The failure to present an arrest warrant and the absence of clearly defined legal grounds both indicate arbitrary arrest. The reliance on subjective indicators, such as personal accessories and unspecified digital content, further indicates a lack of lawful basis, raising concerns regarding discriminatory or politically motivated profiling. The authorities’ failure to immediately disclose the victims’ whereabouts or ensure access to legal representation contravenes fundamental fair trial guarantees and due process rights. The lack of transparency surrounding their detention conditions and legal status is particularly concerning given the documented patterns of abuse in similar cases in the Dekai District.

Detailed Case Data
Location: 4J38+JV, Kokamu, Dekai, Yahukimo regency, Highland Papua, Indonesia (-4.8958868, 139.6171251)Bravo 3, Nami River, Dekai DIstrict
Region: Indonesia, Highland Papua, Yahukimo, Dekai
Total number of victims: 2

#Number of VictimsName, DetailsGenderAgeGroup AffiliationViolations
1.Yominus Sekenil
male35 Indigenous Peoplesarbitrary arrest
2.Eliaton Wetapo
male31 Indigenous Peoplesarbitrary arrest
Period of incident: 22/03/2026 – 22/03/2026
Perpetrator: Indonesian Police

Perpetrator details: Damai Cartenz Police Task Force

Issues: indigenous peoples


——————————————————————
https://humanrightsmonitor.org/case/nabire-police-chief-intimidates-papuan-journalist-in-response-to-publication-of-article-on-illegal-mining/

4) Nabire police chief intimidates Papuan journalist in response to publication of article on illegal mining

Papuan Journalist Mr Mis Murib, affiliated with the Nadi Papua Media, was reportedly subjected to intimidation following the publication of an investigative report on illegal gold mining activities in the Siriwo upstream area, Nabire Regency. The intimidation included direct messages from individuals suspected to be police officers, culminating in a message sent by Nabire Police Chief AKBP Samuel Dominggus Tatiratu summoning the journalist to provide formal clarification. The incident constitutes a potential violation of press freedom and protection guarantees for journalists.

According to the information received, Mr Mis Murib received a series of messages exerting pressure shortly after publishing an investigative article on 16 February 2026, alleging that illegal gold mining operations at kilometre 80 of the Trans-Papua road were purportedly authorised by local police. The situation escalated on 17 February 2026, when the Nabire Police Chief addressed the journalist directly in shared WhatsApp group with other journalists, demanding accountability and instructing Mr Murib to come to the police station for questioning. This followed earlier instances of pressure linked to previous investigative reporting. On 18 February 2026, the Police Chief publicly denied any involvement of the police in issuing mining permits and characterised the request for clarification as part of lawful procedure, later issuing an apology for any misunderstanding.

On 13 March 2026, a civil society coalition, the Forum Solidaritas Peduli Media Nadi Papua, issued a formal statement in Nabire condemning the intimidation. The forum highlighted a broader pattern of threats and pressure against journalists in Tanah Papua, including prior incidents such as an alleged threatening message received by Mis Murib from an unidentified number in November 2025. The forum also raised concerns regarding a police summons issued to Nadi Papua on 10 March 2026, warning that such actions may amount to criminalisation of journalistic work.

Human rights and legal analysis

The reported actions raise serious concerns under the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) and domestic legal frameworks protecting freedom of expression and media freedom. The summoning of a journalist in response to published reporting without prior recourse to established mechanisms such as the right of reply or correction, may constitute undue interference with legitimate journalistic activity. The pattern of intimidation, including direct and indirect threats, potentially violates the obligation of state authorities to ensure a safe and enabling environment for journalists.

The case also engages protections under Indonesian law, notably Law No. 40 of 1999 on the Press, which guarantees legal protection for journalists (Article 8) and establishes corrective mechanisms (Articles 1(11–12), 5(2–3)) as the appropriate response to disputed reporting. Any attempt to bypass these mechanisms through coercion or intimidation may contravene Article 18(1) of the same law.

Detailed Case Data
Location: Nabire, Nabire Regency, Central Papua, Indonesia (-3.3722254, 135.5016253)
Region: Indonesia, Central Papua, Nabire, Nabire
Total number of victims: 1

#Number of VictimsName, DetailsGenderAgeGroup AffiliationViolations
1.Mis Murib
maleadult Journalistfreedom of expression, intimidation
Period of incident: 17/02/2026 – 17/02/2026
Perpetrator: , POLRES

Perpetrator details: Polres Nabire Polcie Chief, AKBP Samuel Dominggus Tatiratu

Issues: indigenous peoples


—————————————————————


https://humanrightsmonitor.org/case/police-officers-allegedly-intimidate-activists-following-peaceful-fundraising-in-nabire/

5) Police officers allegedly intimidate activists following peaceful fundraising in Nabire

On 28 March 2026, officers of the Nabire Police Intelligence and Criminal Investigation Units intercepted a group of activists associated with the West Papua National Committee (KNPB) following a peaceful fundraising activity at Karang Tumaritis Market in Nabire Town. The incident, which occurred at approximately 11:30 am, involved intimidation measures, including photographing participants, erecting a roadblock, and a subsequent pursuit using riot control (Dalmas) vehicle. The KNPB is a political movement organisation peacefully advocating for the right to self-determination through a referendum. They organise peaceful mass protests and political discussions.

The KNPB members began their fundraising activity at 08:11 am in the Karang Pasar area. The activity reportedly concluded without incident at 11:20 Papua Time. As members prepared to disperse, plainclothes intelligence officers photographed participants and questioned them about the purpose of the activity. Shortly thereafter, additional officers from the Intelligence and Criminal Investigation Units established a roadblock using two vehicles and one motorbike, preventing the group from leaving freely. During a tense exchange, officers demanded that the KNPB flag be removed. The group complied with the demand in order to avoid escalation.

Following the negotiations, KNPB members began to disperse. However, two Dalmas riot control trucks pursued the activists into residential areas, creating fear of arbitrary detention among participants. No arrests were reported, yet the actions of the police are emblematic for repressive policing in West Papua, given the peaceful nature of the activity.

Human rights analysis

From a human rights perspective, the incident raises serious concerns regarding violations of the rights to freedom of expression, peaceful assembly, and association. The use of surveillance, coercive questioning, forced removal of political symbols, and pursuit into residential areas suggest undue interference with lawful civic activity. Even in the absence of formal arrests, such conduct may constitute intimidation and harassment, which can have a chilling effect on political participation and civil society engagement in West Papua.

The absence of a clear legal basis for the intervention further raises concerns under the principle of legality and necessity. Peaceful fundraising and political expression fall within protected democratic activities. Any restrictions should be strictly justified, proportionate, and grounded in law. The reported actions of the Nabire police appear to fall short of these standards.

KNPB fundraising activity at Karang Tumaritis Market in Nabire Town on 28 March 2026


Detailed Case Data
Location: JG94+H25, Karang Tumaritis, Pertama, Nabire Regency, Central Papua 98811, Indonesia (-3.3811125, 135.5051094)
Region: Indonesia, Central Papua, Nabire, Nabire
Total number of victims: 5

#Number of VictimsName, DetailsGenderAgeGroup AffiliationViolations
1.
maleunknown Activistfreedom of assembly, freedom of expression, intimidation
Period of incident: 28/03/2026 – 28/03/2026
Perpetrator: , Indonesian Police

Perpetrator details: ntelligence and Criminal Investigation Unit officers of Polres Nabire

Issues: indigenous peoples

---------------------------------------

Saturday, April 11, 2026

1) The humanitarian cost of Indonesia’s refusal to allow a UN Human Rights visit to West Papua




2) Indonesian Police Go on Killing Spree, as Crackdown Escalates in West Papua  
—————————————————————————————


1) The humanitarian cost of Indonesia’s refusal to allow a UN Human Rights visit to West Papua 

April 9, 2026 in Communique

Indonesia has refused the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights access to West Papua since 2019. This round-up details the human rights abuses Indonesia has committed in West Papua during that time. 

The ULMWP urges world leaders to renew the outstanding demand for UN High Commissioner for Human Rights visit to West Papua, in the wake of the Dogiyai massacre of six West Papuans, including two minors, by the Indonesian police.

Since 2019, 111 UN member states – a clear majority of the UN General Assembly – have demanded a visit to West Papua by the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR). The first of these demands was made in August 2019 by the Pacific Islands Forum (PIF), who labelled West Papua ‘the festering human rights sore’ of the Pacific region. Despite this pressure, Indonesia has consistently and deliberately blocked UN access to West Papua.

More than six years have passed since the initial state-level demand for a UN visit was made. To underscore the urgency of a UN High Commissioner for Human Rights visit, the ULMWP has provided a breakdown of how the human rights situation in West Papua has deteriorated since 2019.


  • At least 107,039 West Papuans are currently displaced by Indonesian military operations – perhaps one in fifteen West Papuans has been a refugee since 2019;
  • More than 20,000 West Papuans were displaced in 2025 alone;
  • A minimum of 1110 West Papuans have died as a result of internal displacement, from disease, malnutrition, or as a result of inadequate medical facilities;
  • Only localised or temporary returns home have been documented, such as 353 returnees in Maybrat in 2022;
  • Some IDPs have been displaced more than once, such as 900+ in Intan Jaya who were forced to leave their homes a second time in mid-2025;
  • Indonesia has at times bombed makeshift refugee camps in West Papua, including in Puncak in February 2026.

  • It is impossible to verify the true number of West Papuans killed by Indonesian security forces, due to Indonesia’s strict media and NGO reporting ban, and routine misinformation spread by the Indonesian state in the wake of killings;
  • However, it is likely that at least 653 West Papuans have been killed since December 2018 (the numbers below are minimum estimates);
    • 2019: 278 
    • 2020-2021: 93 
    • 2022: 33 
    • 2023: 81 
    • 2024: 40 
    • 2025-2026: 128 so far
  • Mass killings are common and accountability is effectively non-existent. Emblematic mass killings during this period include:
  • Fifteen civilians massacred in Soanggama village, Intan Jaya, in October 2025;
  • Up to fifteen civilians executed during a military raid in Intan Jaya in May 2025;
  • ‘Bloody Wamena’: Ten Papuans murdered by security forces (pictured above) in Wamena in February 2023;
  • Ten Papuan civilians massacred in Yahukimo and Fakfak in September 2023;
  • Fifteen killed in Kiwirok in 2021.

Militarisation:

  • As of December 2025, at least 83,177 security forces were stationed in West Papua, roughly one for every twenty-two Indigenous Papuans;
  • This figure includes 56,517 soldiers and 26,660 police, but does not include forces temporarily deployed to West Papua from other regions of Indonesia, so the real number is likely to be higher;
  • At least 40,000 additional troops have been deployed to West Papua since 2019;
  • Hundreds of military posts have been established in West Papua during this time; while no hard figure is available for the entire territory, we know that 31 checkpoints were established between July and September 2025 in Intan Jaya alone;
  • Indonesia is using a range of technologically advanced weaponry on West Papuans, including Brazilian‑made EMB‑314 Super Tucano fighter jets, Chinese blowfish drones, and UK-made sniper rifles.

Environmental destruction:


  • Ecocide in occupied West Papua has increased dramatically since 2019, as Indonesia seeks to use West Papua to secure its future food and energy security;
  • Indonesia launched the largest deforestation project in human history in West Papua in 2024 – a 3-million-hectare rice and sugarcane food estate in Merauke (pictured above), since expanded to the entire South Papua Province;
  • The Merauke food estate – covering an area the size of Wales – is set to release an additional 780 million tonnes of CO2 into the atmosphere, more than doubling Indonesia’s existing emissions;
  • Wabu Block, a 1.8-million-hectare gold mine in Intan Jaya, has been under construction since 2021, and continues to displace communities and militarise the Papuan highlands;
  • In 2024, BP completed an expansion of its Tangguh gas field in West Papua, which will now supply 35% of Indonesia’s entire gas supply.

Secrecy is the key weapon Indonesia uses to maintain its genocidal and ecocidal rule over West Papua. By keeping its occupation hidden from the world, Indonesia is able to get away with its crimes with near total impunity, while continuing to expropriate West Papua’s huge mineral wealth. Only international intervention, beginning with a UN Human Rights visit, can stop this suffering. Indonesia must face serious diplomatic consequences until the UN High Commissioner access to West Papua is finally allowed to visit West Papua.


----------------------------------------------------------------




2) Indonesian Police Go on Killing Spree, as Crackdown Escalates in West Papua  
BY PAUL GREGOIRE PUBLISHED ON 11 APR 2026


Members of the occupying Indonesian police went on a murderous rampage in the West Papuan village of Moanemani, located in Dogiyai Regency at around 10 am on 31 March 2026, which involved officers firing randomly into a local marketplace, prior to the police assault shifting to neighbouring Ikebo village, where officers started indiscriminately shooting upon Papuan houses.

The number of people injured is unknown, however, five West Papuans were shot dead. The Indonesian police commenced applying collective punishment to the villagers of Moanemani and Ikebo, after the body of a murdered police officer, who was an Indigenous West Papuan, was found in front of Ebenezer Church in Moanemani. And no one is sure who killed the officer.

This callous attack on villagers comes at a time when Indonesian president Prabowo Subianto has been cracking down on West Papuans within their own Melanesian homelands, particularly in the regencies of Yahukimo, Intan Jaya, Paniai, Maybrat, and now Dogiyai. This marks an escalation of attacks on villages that commenced in Nduga regency in 2018, under the former Jokowi government.



Indonesia commenced administering West Papua in 1963, following the former Netherlands colonisers exiting and the UN brokering a deal, which was to permit the West Papuans to hold a referendum on independence. But in seeking to maintain control of the resource rich region, Indonesia held a 1969 vote where 1,026 Papuans voted to remain with Jakarta at gun point.

The recent random shootings on the part of Indonesian police reveals the circumstances that West Papuans have lived under since the 1960s, and the escalation in violence against the locals is in keeping with a Prabowo presidency, as the former Suharto-era army general earnt himself a reputation for perpetrating war crimes against the East Timorese and West Papuans.

Escalating occupier aggression

Footage of the recent incident supplied by the United Liberation Movement for West Papua (ULMWP), shows armed and heavily uniformed Indonesian police emerging from a police van and chasing unarmed West Papuan civilians deeper into a residential area, shots can be heard and buildings can be seen ablaze in the distance.

Those gunned down and killed, included 19-year-old Siprianus Tibakoto, 20-year-old Yosep You, 60-year-old Ester Pigai, who suffered from paralysis, along with 14-year-old Martinus Yobee and 19-year-old Angkian Edowai. And on 1 April, 14-year-old Maikel Waine and 11-year-old Maikel Pekei continued to be in a critical condition, after being shot by Indonesian police.

“Indonesia’s actions in Dogiyai are both a crime against humanity – a grave act of colonial violence – and a breach of international law,” insisted West Papuan provisional government president Benny Wenda. “Shooting indiscriminately into homes and a public market is a form of collective punishment, while the intentional killing of civilians is a war crime.”

This latest incident comes after Jakarta had been dropping bombs upon a makeshift refugee camp in Puncak’s Kembru District, causing West Papuans, who were already displaced to have to relocate once more. And there are currently 105,000 West Papuan villagers displaced in the highlands, due to the ongoing attacks on these unarmed people living in the planet’s third largest rainforest.

“What the carnage in Dogiyai demonstrates is that Indonesia views all West Papuans as legitimate targets,” Wenda further set out. “Elders, women, and children: no one is safe from the murderous vengeance of the Indonesian security state. The massacre triggered a wave of internal displacement, as terrified civilians fled into the mountains and surrounding villages.”

EU priorities profit over rights

A key issue for West Papua achieving its independence is due to the reluctance of other nations to raise the issue of the occupied Melanesian peoples, so as to not rock the boat with Jakarta. And Wenda recently pointed to the International Parliamentarians for West Papua (IPWP) analysis of the September 2025 established EU–Indonesia Free Trade Agreement (FTA) as an example.

IPWP considers that in signing off on the FTA, the European Union has effectively approved the ongoing environmental destruction and rights abuses caused by Indonesia in the Melanesian region. The West Papuan environment and its people’s rights were not considered during negotiations, yet a fair amount of LNG, palm oil and metals are sourced from West Papua by EU nations.

Prabowo first paid a visit to West Papau after becoming president in November 2024, with a key part of his tour being a visit to Merauke district, which is the site of the world’s largest deforestation project, with the clearing of an eventual 2 million hectares set to take place in order to facilitate giant sugarcane plantations.

In its assessment of the EU-Indonesia FTA, IPWP pointed out that the sustainability impact assessment of the free trade agreement with Indonesia made no mention of West Papua whatsoever, and this is while unprecedented deforestation and environmental destruction are being perpetrated in the Melanesian region.

The IPWP further charged the EU with failing to take the plight of the West Papuan people into any consideration when finalising the trade agreement. The parliamentarians pointed to the fraudulent 1969 UN-brokered referendum, which saw a little over 1,000 Papuans vote to stay with Indonesia, and they wondered why this was not an issue for European negotiators.

United in denial of self-determination

Wenda questioned in February, why, despite the fact that Indonesia has been carrying out attacks on unarmed West Papuan villages for coming on eight years now, Indonesia’s permanent representative to the United Nations, Sidharto Reza Suryodipuro, was appointed to the position of president of the UN Human Rights Council in January.

The UN was further presented with a copy of the West Papuan People’s Petition back in 2019. This is a document that calls upon the UN to facilitate a new and legitimate vote on self-determination. The petition has been signed by 1.8 million West Papuans, or 70 percent of that Indigenous population. And yet, there has been no movement on this issue ever since.

“I reiterate our demand for Indonesia to allow the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights to visit West Papua,” said Wenda, who has been exiled from his homeland for decades. “Over 110 countries – a clear majority of the UN member states – have now demanded this visit, but Indonesia continues to refuse.”

“Dogiyai is not an isolated incident: every day brings a new atrocity,” the president of the West Papuan provisional government in waiting made clear in ending.

“How long will the world allow this to continue before Indonesia is made to suffer genuine diplomatic consequences for their refusal?”



PAUL GREGOIRE 

Paul Gregoire is a Sydney-based journalist and writer. He's the winner of the 2021 NSW Council for Civil Liberties Award For Excellence In Civil Liberties Journalism. Prior to Sydney Criminal Lawyers®, Paul wrote for VICE and was the news editor at Sydney’s City Hub.


---------------------------------------------