Thursday, August 13, 2026

1) Highland Papua Legislative Council Denied Request for Meeting, KNPB said

2) NIT-The New York Agreement 64 years on - West Papuans 'still oppressed'

---------------------------------------------

https://en.jubi.id/highland-papua-legislative-council-denied-request-for-meeting-knpb-said/?_gl=1*13y63az*_ga*MTU0NTkyNDAxLjE3NzM5NjI3MDk.*_ga_ZZTT8RG182*czE3ODY2MTAxNzIkbzE2NiRnMSR0MTc4NjYxMDQxMyRqNjAkbDAkaDA.*_ga_CNWVJ6KFKD*czE3ODY2MTAxNzMkbzE2MCRnMSR0MTc4NjYxMDQxMyRqNjAkbDAkaDA.

1) Highland Papua Legislative Council Denied Request for Meeting, KNPB said

News Desk August 13, 2026

Wamena, Jubi – The West Papua National Committee (KNPB) says it was denied an opportunity to meet with members of the Highland Papua Legislative Council (DPR Papua Pegunungan) after representatives of the organization visited the council building on Wednesday (August 12, 2026).

KNPB chairperson Agus Kossay said the group had sought a meeting because the legislative council is expected to represent the people of Highland Papua.

KNPB intended to discuss its planned “Papua: Military Emergency and Humanitarian Crisis Zone” peaceful demonstration, which it plans to hold with communities in the Lapago customary region on August 15 to mark the 64th anniversary of the New York Agreement.

The Highland Papua legislative building is expected to be the main target of the demonstration, as KNPB considers the council a representative institution for the people of the province.

“As a people’s organization, KNPB came in a spirit of respect as Indigenous people and requested an audience with the Highland Papua Legislative Council. However, they did not give us an opportunity to meet,” Kossay said on Wednesday.

He said KNPB and the council had agreed on August 10 to hold the meeting on August 12. However, he said the council did not follow through with the agreement.

“Today, they have been influenced by the colonial system, so they have refused to give space to the people of Papua, who have experienced human rights violations since 1961 until today. We have shown them our respect as Indigenous people,” he said.

Kossay alleged that government officials representing the Indonesian state in Tanah Papua were reluctant to meet with KNPB, which he described as representing the Indigenous people and customary landowners of the Baliem Valley.

“For a long time, we have been throughout Tanah Papua and allowed outsiders to govern us in Lapago. Today I have returned home. This is my home. I have set foot in my own home, and I must speak,” he said.

Furthermore, KNPB called on the Indonesian military, police and other institutions not to be alarmed by claims or narratives circulating beyond the organization’s responsibility. Kossay said KNPB remained committed to holding the August 15 demonstration peacefully and was prepared to take responsibility for the action.

“As the person responsible for the peaceful demonstration here, I am ready to take responsibility. As long as the Indonesian security forces and the people of Papua maintain good communication and consultation, there will be no misunderstanding or confrontation,” he said.

Kossay said KNPB had also asked the Jayawijaya police chief to provide space for people to express their demands during the August 15 demonstration.

He said the action would focus on the humanitarian situation in Tanah Papua and
called for Indonesia and Papua to engage in dialogue to find a resolution to the conflict.

“There must be no more military violence or military approaches to resolving the problems in Papua,” he said.

He also called on the Indonesian government in Jakarta, which he described as operating under a democratic, rule-of-law and human-rights system, to uphold humanitarian principles and justice.

Kossay said August 15 also marked what KNPB considers the “betrayal” of the Papuan people by the international community through the New York Agreement, which he said did not include Papuans as subjects of international law.

KNPB urged Papuans throughout Tanah Papua, particularly those in the Lapago customary region, to participate in the August 15 demonstration.

“People of Papua in the Lapago customary region — Lani, Nduga, Baliem and Yali communities, and all others — come on August 15, 2026, and gather at the Highland Papua Legislative Council. Let us hold a peaceful demonstration and do not bring sharp weapons. What can be brought are pamphlets, banners, billboards and red crosses,” Kossay said. (*)

———————————————————————————————



National Indigenous Times 
2) The New York Agreement 64 years on - West Papuans 'still oppressed'

Giovanni Torre
 Updated August 13, 2026 - 1.33pm (AWST), first published at 10.15am (AWST)



                                         Image: Free West Papua Campaign


Saturday will mark 64 years since the New York Agreement, which saw the West Papuan people "betrayed by the international community", the Australia West Papua Association noted this week.

On 15 August in 1962, an agreement was concluded in New York between the Netherlands and Indonesia. Under the agreement, the Dutch were to leave their colony of West New Guinea and transfer sovereignty to the United Nations Temporary Executive Authority (UNTEA).

Seven months on, the UN would transfer control of the territory to Indonesia with the provision that a referendum be held to determine Papuan preference for independence or integration with Indonesia.

'The Act of No Choice'

Indonesia did hold a referendum in 1969 called the Act of Free Choice. Many West Papuans refer to the vote as "the act of no choice". Indonesian authorities choose only 1025 people to vote (one representative for approximately every 700 Papuans) and under coercion they voted to remain with Indonesia.

On August 3 the West Papua National Committee (KNPB) held rallies across West Papua with the theme "Papua: Military and Humanitarian Emergency".

The rallies were called to bring attention to the humanitarian crises in the territory: The ongoing human rights abuses, the military operations, the killing and torture of civilians, the Australia West Papua Association said on Thursday.

Violent repression of peaceful protests

The Association said security forces responded with "their usual heavy-handed approach to rallies in the territory" at the protest organised in Sentani, Jayapura.

"As the demonstrators gathered for their planned march to the Jayapura Regent's Office, police officers dispersed the protesters using rubber batons and sticks, striking blows to protesters' heads and bodies during the dispersals," AWPA said.

According to Human Rights Monitor 33 protesters were injured.

In another incident, a Jubi journalist was intimidated by a police officer. The journalist reported the incident occurred as he attempted to photograph police officers placing a protester into a crowd-control vehicle on Ifar Gunung Road in the Sentani District. The Jayapura Police Chief later apologised for the incident.

More protests planned


The West Papua National Committee (KNPB) says it will stage another round of demonstrations this Saturday - 15 August - on the anniversary of the New York Agreement, under the theme "Papua: Military Emergency and Humanitarian Crisis Zone".

A KNPB spokesperson announced the plan after the group's rally in Jayapura City on Monday 3 August. He said that the rallies on the 3 August were an initial mobilisation ahead of the larger coordinated demonstrations planned for 15 August.

Australia West Papua Association (Sydney) spokesperson Joe Collins noted: "Every year West Papuans commemorate this tragic event in their history."

"In the past the security forces have responded with a heavy-handed approach to any demonstrations on the 15 August," he said.

During the August 2024 commemoration police dispersed used force to disperse peaceful protests in the towns of Nabire, Wamena, and Sentani, as well as in Jayapura City. According to Human Rights Monitor, approximately 222 protesters were arrested and 41 injured as police forces dispersed the crowd with batons, teargas, and rubber bullets

"Hopefully this year there will be not a repeat of the incidents of brutally by the security forces that have occurred the past and as occurred on the 3 August and the planned rallies for the 15 August will be allowed to proceeded without interference from the security forces," Mr Collins said.

Allegations of more intimidation

The KNPB have been submitting official notices of the planned peaceful protest to government and security institutions ahead of the nationwide demonstration planned for the 15 August.

The Australia West Papua Association alleged that in one incident while the KNPB were informing police of the planned rally, members were subjected to violence by officers while attempting to deliver the notification letter.

A KNPB official said several members were subjected to repressive treatment, including physical violence by the officers on guard. He reported police blocked the group from entering, confiscated two KNPB flags and assaulted two KNPB members.

The KNPB has called on security forces to refrain from any form of repression and to respect public safety and order during the planned demonstration.

Mr Collins said the KNPB can mobilise large numbers of demonstrators to take part in rallies and the crackdown on peaceful rallies in West Papua "should be seen as a way to try and intimidate civil society groups into not taking part as the rallies can be an effective way of bringing the world's attention to what West Papuans suffer under Indonesian rule".

"This is what Jakarta fears most, the internationalisation of the issue," he said.

The situation in the territory 64 years after the New York Agreement

"West Papuans continue to be arrested and intimidated as they take part in rallies to protest against the injustices they suffer under Indonesian rule," the Association said.

Human Rights Monitor notes that as a result of ongoing military operations in the territory there are more than 125,931 internal refugees.

"Civilians are bearing the brunt in the areas of conflict with children missing out on education because schools are closed, access to health services for people can be difficult and economic activity is paralysed. West Papua is basically a colony of Jakarta," the Australia West Papua Association said.

According to a Project Multatuli investigation, there are approximately 103,196 security forces (Military +police) in the territory.

West Papuans have also reported that they are not only seeing more military personnel deployed in the territory but also the rising use of drone technology by the Indonesian military.

There is also the "massive" environmental destruction caused by agricultural projects, such as the Merauke Integrated Food and Energy Estate (MIFEE) and projects to convert forests, into rice fields, sugarcane and palm oil plantations, the Australia West Papua Association noted.

The world must take action

"If the International community continue to turn a blind eye to the human rights abuses in West Papua, we will see an endless conflict with West Papuans the victims," the organisation said.

"The Australian Government prefers to ignore the situation in West Papua. However, a simple action Canberra could do is to support and urge the Pacific Islands Forum leaders in again pressing Jakarta to allow the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights to visit West Papua to investigate the human rights situation in the territory. That is what they West Papuans are asking for," Mr Collins said.

The 55th Pacific Islands Forum Leaders Meeting (PIFLM) will be held from 30 August to 04 September 2026 in Palau under the theme - Building Economies: Life. Action. Unity.


------------------------------------- 

Wednesday, August 12, 2026

Awpa statement. 64 years since the New York Agreement -West Papuans still oppressed

Australia West Papua Association (Sydney)

64 years since the New York Agreement -West Papuans  still oppressed

Statement.  13 August  2026

This year will mark   64 years since the New York Agreement when the West Papuan people were betrayed by the international community.

 

The New York Agreement

On 15 August in 1962, an agreement was concluded in New York between the Netherlands and Indonesia. Under this agreement, the Dutch were to leave their colony of West New Guinea and transfer sovereignty to UNTEA (the United Nations Temporary Executive Authority). After 7 months the UN would transfer power to Indonesia with the provision that a referendum be held to determine Papuan preference for independence or integration with Indonesia. Indonesia did hold a referendum in 1969 called the Act of Free Choice. The West Papuans call this,  the act of no free choice. It was a sham. Indonesia choose only 1025 people to vote (one representative for approximately every 700 Papuans) and under coercion they voted to remain with Indonesia.

 

Rallies 3 August 

On  Monday 3 August 2026,   the West Papua National Committee (KNPB) held rallies  across West  Papua  with the theme “Papua: Military and Humanitarian Emergency”.  The rallies were called to bring attention to the humanitarian crises  in the territory. The ongoing human rights abuses,  the military operations, the killing and torture of civilians.



At the rally organised in Sentani, Jayapura, the security forces responded with their usual heavy-handed approach to  rallies in the territory.   As the demonstrators gathered for their planned  march to the Jayapura Regent’s Office,  Police officers dispersed the protesters using rubber batons and  sticks,  striking blows to  protesters’ heads and bodies during the dispersals.  According to Human Rights Monitor 33 protesters were  injured.



                                  Photo in Suara Papua

                KNPB demonstration in Abepura, Monday morning (August 3, 2026). (Doc. Aida Ulim for Suara Papua)

 

In another  incident   a Jubi journalist was intimidated  by a  police officer. The journalist reported that the incident occurred as he attempted to photograph police officers placing a protester into a crowd-control vehicle on Ifar Gunung Road in the Sentani District. The Jayapura Police Chief later apologised for the incident.


 

 

Demonstrations planned for the 15 August 

The KNPB says it will stage another round of demonstrations on  the 15 August 2026 (under the theme “Papua: Military Emergency and Humanitarian Crisis Zone”) to mark the anniversary of the New York Agreement.  A KNPB spokesperson announced the plan after the group’s rally in Jayapura City on Monday 3 August. He said that the rallies on the 3 August were an initial mobilisation ahead of the larger coordinated demonstrations planned for 15 August.

 

 

Cause for concern

Joe Collins of AWPA said, "every year West Papuans commemorate this tragic event in their history.  In the past the security forces have responded with a heavy-handed approach to any demonstrations on the 15 August”.  During the August  2024 commemoration   police dispersed peaceful protests in the towns of Nabire, Wamena, and Sentani, as well as in Jayapura City with force. According to Human Rights Monitor, approximately 222 protesters were arrested and 41 injured as police forces dispersed the crowd with batons, teargas, and rubber bullets 

 

“Hopefully this year  there will be not a repeat of the incidents of brutally by the security forces that  have  occurred the past  and as occurred  on the 3 August and the  planned   rallies for the 15 August will be allowed to proceeded without interference from the security forces”, Collins said.


The KNPB have been submitting  official notices of  the planned peaceful protest to government and security institutions ahead of the nationwide demonstration planned for the 15  August.



The West Papuan National Committee (KNPB) activist after submitting notification of the August 15, 2026 protest at the Papua Governor’s Office, Tuesday (11/08/2026). – Courtesy of KNPB (photo in Jubi)



Intimidation 

In one incident while the KNPB were informing police of the planned rally, members were subjected to violence by police officers while attempting to deliver the notification letter. A KNPB official said several members were subjected to repressive treatment, including physical violence by the police officers on guard. He reported  that police blocked the group from entering, confiscated two KNPB flags and assaulted two KNPB members. The KNPB  has called on security forces to refrain from any form of repression and to respect public safety and order during the planned demonstration (Jubi 12 August).


 

"The KNPB can bring out large numbers of  demonstrators to take part in rallies  and  the crackdown on peacefully rallies in West Papua should be seen as a way to try  and intimidate civil society groups into not taking part  as  the rallies can be  an effective way of bringing the world’s attention to what  West Papuans suffer under Indonesian rule. This is what Jakarta fears most, the internationalisation of the issue".  



The situation in the territory 64 years after the New York Agreement

The world might recognise Indonesian sovereignty over West Papua. However, the fact is that 64 years after the New York Agreement clashes still continue between the West Papua National Liberation Army and the security forces.  West Papuans continue to be arrested and intimidated as the take part in rallies to protest against the injustices they suffer under Indonesian  rule.  As a result of ongoing military operations  in the territory there are over 125.931   internal refugees  according to Human Rights Monitor.   Civilians are bearing the brunt in the areas of conflict with children missing out on education because schools are closed,  access to health services for  people can be difficult and  economic activity is paralysed.  West Papua is basically a colony of Jakarta.

 

 

West Papua is the most militarised area of the archipelago. 

According to a Project Multatuli investigation, there are approximately 103,196 security forces (Military +police) in the territory. 




Illustration: Indonesian military operations in Papua have driven over a hundred thousand Papuans from their homes, leaving them displaced in their own land. (Project M/Sekarjoget)
Illustration from Project Multatuli report 
                      https://projectmultatuli.org/militerisasi-papua-tentara-non-organik-dalam-operasi-militer/


 

West  Papuans have also reported that they are not only seeing more military personnel deployed in the territory but  they are also beginning to see the use of drone  technology by the Indonesian military. A new  drone command has been set up  to support military operations in Papua.

 https://en.jubi.id/indonesia-military-establishes-drone-command-centre-for-operations-in-papua/?_gl=1*15aaq3k*_ga*MTU0NTkyNDAxLjE3NzM5NjI3MDk.*_ga_ZZTT8RG182*czE3ODQyMzYyNTckbzEyMiRnMCR0MTc4NDIzNjI1NyRqNjAkbDAkaDA.*_ga_CNWVJ6KFKD*czE3ODQyMzYyNTckbzEyMCRnMCR0MTc4NDIzNjI1NyRqNjAkbDAkaDA.


 

There is also the massive environmental destruction caused by agricultural projects, such as the Merauke Integrated Food and Energy Estate (MIFEE)  and projects to convert forests, into rice fields,  sugarcane and palm oil plantations.


If the International community continue to turn a blind eye to the human rights abuses in West Papua, we will see an endless conflict with West Papuans the victims.

 

Joe Collins said, “  the Australian Government  prefers to ignore the situation in  West Papua. However,  a simple action Canberra could do is to support and urge the Pacific Islands Forum leaders in again pressing Jakarta to allow the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights to visit West Papua to investigate the human rights situation in the territory. That is what they West Papuans are asking for”. 

 

The 55th Pacific Islands Forum Leaders Meeting (PIFLM) will be held from 30 August to 04 September 2026 in Palau under the theme – Building Economies: Life. Action. Unity.

Ends


--------------------------------

 

 


1) Four New Papua Provinces’ Progress to Be Considered in Lifting Regional Expansion Moratorium

 


2) Time For (and With) Papua at Wereldmuseum Leiden
————————————————————————


1) Four New Papua Provinces’ Progress to Be Considered in Lifting Regional Expansion Moratorium
News Desk August 12, 2026

Merauke, Jubi – The performance of four newly established provinces in Tanah Papua will be among the factors considered by the Indonesian government in deciding whether to lift the moratorium on regional expansion, according to a member of the House of Representatives’ Commission II.

Indrajaya said around 374 proposals for new administrative regions had been
submitted to the government and the House of Representatives.

He said the performance of the four new provinces would therefore be important in assessing whether regional expansion had delivered the outcomes intended by the policy. “This will be one of the indicators for the President in deciding whether the moratorium should be lifted or not,” Indrajaya told journalists in Merauke, South Papua, on Tuesday (August 11, 2026).

He said Commission II had previously initiated discussions on amendments to the Regional Government Law, which he said needed to be updated to reflect current developments.

The proposed changes have drawn attention from regional governments because they could reopen the possibility of creating new administrative regions.


However, Indrajaya said the government should first assess the performance of the four new provinces — South Papua, Central Papua, Highland Papua and Southwest Papua — to determine whether the policy had accelerated development, improved access to public services and contributed to greater public welfare.

“The regional autonomy law is intended to ensure that development is distributed fairly and evenly, public services reach people more quickly and effectively, and ultimately that people’s welfare can improve faster,” he said.

South Papua is the first of the four new provinces to undergo the evaluation. The process will continue in Southwest Papua, Highland Papua and Central Papua. The evaluation of South Papua has been conducted over several days and concludes on Tuesday.

Merauke Regency is one of the four regencies within South Papua that has beenasked to provide data on government administration and the delivery of basic public services.

Indrajaya urged the South Papua provincial government and the four regencies under its jurisdiction to take the data collection process seriously.

The data will form part of a report submitted to the central government through the Ministry of Home Affairs before being presented to the President.

“We have asked the agencies and local governments present here to take this data collection seriously and work on it together,” he said.

Indrajaya also highlighted unresolved administrative boundary issues in South
Papua, including the boundaries between Merauke and Boven Digoel regencies and
between Merauke and Mappi regencies.

He encouraged the provincial and regency governments to resolve the disputes
through joint discussions.

“We need to sit down together and reach a common understanding so these issues
can be resolved directly,” he said.

Indrajaya stressed that the evaluation was not merely an administrative exercise but
part of the government’s oversight of the implementation of the mandate behind the
creation of the new provinces.

He said he hoped South Papua would be able to demonstrate tangible benefits from the regional expansion for local communities.

Meanwhile, Sumule Tumbo, Director of Regional Arrangement, Special Autonomy and the Special Autonomy Advisory Council at the Ministry of Home Affairs, said the 

three-year evaluation of new autonomous regions uses a set of performance indicators to assess the implementation of regional government.

According to Sumule, a score above 85 is classified as good, a score above 70 to 85
as adequate, while scores between 50 and 70 are considered poor. He said he hoped South Papua would achieve the highest category.

“We are working together as a team to improve performance and strengthen public
services,” Sumule said.

He stressed that the evaluation must reflect the actual conditions in South Papua. Local governments, therefore, should not simply report achievements but provide complete data based 

on the latest situation on the ground.

The assessment will cover a range of areas, including administrative boundaries,
spatial planning, regional budgets, the establishment of government agencies, civil
servant management, membership of the provincial legislature and the Papuan
People’s Assembly (MRP), grants, assets and official documents, as well as government facilities and infrastructure.

For financial management, local governments must submit their financial positions,
including audited revenue and expenditure reports from the Supreme Audit Agency
(BPK).

On civil servants, the government must provide information on staffing targets and
actual placements, the origins of civil servants, appointments to structural positions,
whether positions are permanent or still pending formal appointment, and employees’ educational qualifications.

The status of civil servants from regencies who are already working for the South Papua provincial government but have not yet been formally transferred must also be clarified.

Sumule warned that the issue needed to be resolved to prevent problems with the
payment of civil servants’ entitlements.

“They must not receive two salary entitlements, for example. That would certainly
become an issue during an audit,” he said. (*)

--------------------------------------------


2) Time For (and With) Papua at Wereldmuseum Leiden

Andy Fuller 12.08.2026 recensie

The new permanent exhibition at the Wereldmuseum in Amsterdam titled Our Colonial Heritage (Onze Koloniale Erfenis) brings Dutch ‘elsewhere histories’ to the fore, rupturing the primacy of the ‘happy stories’ the Netherlands prefers to tell about itself. At Wereldmuseum Leiden the exhibition Time for Papua (Tijd voor Papoea) turns the gaze to Papua, where visitors are invited to engage differently with time. Andy Fuller visits the exhibition in Leiden
A few years ago, the book Revolusi (2020) by Belgian author David van Reybrouck, 
created a storm due to the ‘home truths’ it brought to the Netherlands about the 
revolutionary era in Indonesia. These ‘elsewhere histories’ of uncomfortable realities
 were long written out of mainstream textbooks. Time for Papua is another vital iteration 
of this engagement with Dutch colonial heritage. Structuring of time is also a part 
of the colonial logic and this exhibition recalibrates how time is imagined through 
Papuan cultural practices.
The title of the exhibition is rather poetically ambiguous. It suggests that ‘it is 
time to give attention to Papua’, rather than a separate ‘elsewhere’. But it is also 
an inquiry into what time means in Papua. The exhibition engages with the varying 
ways in which regimes of time are constructed, enforced, negotiated, and subverted. 
The curatorial notes frame the theme by stating: ‘Whereas museums preserve objects, 
in Papua, ideas about time are dynamic and circular—with room for renewal through 
loss and decay. What does it mean when objects are removed from that cycle and 
preserved “forever” elsewhere?’ Through the exhibition, us visitors experience an
 ‘elsewhere’. We have to consider our own subjectivity, rather than projecting our 
conceptions of time on that ‘somewhere else.’
Throughout the darkened rooms, I encounter works that invite visitors to think across 
these varying senses of time. I’m attracted to the ‘noisy’ art works of Udeido 
Collective and Kevin van Braak, rather than artefacts. The curious case of Papua I
s that it has been subject to the colonial presence of both the Netherlands and 
Indonesia. The collaborative works of Udeido Collective and van Braak speak 
back to this in particular. Their works are almost ‘messy’; not putting their hope 
in a singularly articulated image of what contrasting realities can mean. In a linear 
sense of time ‘the past’ is unreachable; something subject to forgetting that 
forever falls into the distance. Here, I see how people have a continual dialogue 
with their ancestors and the stories they have told them.
Time for Papua (Tijd voor Papoea) is on show until the 3rd of January 2027 
Andy Fuller is a co-founder of Reading Sideways Press. He lives in Leiden. 

The terms ‘traditional’ and ‘modern’ feel inadequate for describing the complexities at play in the works, 
yet they are the labels most easily applied to the encounters between the Papuan and the Global North. 
Notably, Indonesia’s intrusion into Papua casts it as a modernizing ally of the West; as a textbook 
modernist nation-state, Indonesia has long projected an image of ‘backwardness’ onto Papua to justify 
its colonization and the extraction of its resources.
A tension between the local and the distant is also present outside the museum walls. Along the streets 
of Leiden, I see billboards promoting Tijd voor Papoea. The image depicts a running figure. whose 
face remains unseen, enclosed in woven clothing, adorned with thick textures and sandals. Here, T
ime for Papua entices us for a momentary leave from our busy lives, soaked in our usual obligations, 
to consider something distant. But once inside the exhibition, the sense of distance becomes bumpy 
as viewers see the intertwined histories of the Netherlands and Papua. It turns out that what is ‘distant’ is a 
part of local histories.
The ‘how’ of these distant objects’ journeys into Dutch institutions remains subject to critical interrogation. 
The museum acknowledges that the 50,000 items in their collection arrived via explorers, missionaries, 
and civil servants, and is continuing to investigate their origins. The lens of ‘worlding’ contests a Eurocentric 
gaze and re-situates the histories of these objects. Perhaps there is some kind of discomfort with the 
abundance of these objects: they are a part of a heritage which is both subject to critical inquiry and to 
being re-presented. While the institution has rebranded as Wereldmuseum, it still carries the atmosphere 
of a traditional ethnographic museum: darkened rooms, glass-protected objects, and clinical notes. 
 find myself struggling with the weighting of the display; there is a lack of context regarding what the ‘Papuas’ 
invoked through these objects actually are like today. This may be another reason for my orientation towards 
the works where the makers are clearly acknowledged, rather than the artefacts coming from more generally 
acknowledged places.
The works that facilitate this connection most effectively are those by contemporary artists and documentary 
filmmakers. The audio narratives of the Dutch-based Papuan diaspora are particularly meaningful, as they 
bridge the colonial past with present-day realities. The works of the Udeido Collective and van Braak t
ransform the exhibition from an old-school ethnographic collection into a critical act of worlding. 
These works recontextualize Papuan imagery within the context of ongoing colonization and environmental destruction.
In one of their most striking collaborations, teeth are depicted as bullets. One bullet rests at the 
end of a lawmaker’s gavel. The word bubar, meaning ‘dismantle’, is graffitied across the Indonesian 
national motto, Bhinneka Tunggal Ika (Unity in Diversity). By spreading these large-scale (approximately 1.5m x 2m) 
works throughout the exhibition rather than clumping them together, the curators allow the contemporarypieces
 to stay in a constant, provocative dialogue with the historical objects nearby. Another striking work,
 Bhim (between 2018-2025), features a mask placed atop a collage of Dutch newspaper articles. 
Here, Udeido Collective and van Braak practice the postcolonial art of ‘speaking back to empire.’ 
In an era of digital saturation, they remind us of the tactile history of the press, where headlines l
ike ‘primitieve Papoea-cultuur gedoemd te verdwijnen’ (primitive Papuan culture is doomed to disappear) 
served to justify erasure.
I have been back and forth to the museum to see this exhibition. Each time I go, I feel I respond differently. 
 feel the multiplicity of images and materials enable various readings of ‘time’ for Papua. The curatorial I
ntention of worlding disrupts the essentialist gaze and acknowledges the intersections of industry, 
capitalism, and colonialism. Through the exhibition, we see more than just artefacts; we see the material 
and discursive resistance to the co-option of Papuan lives, objects and environment.
-------------------------