Sunday, February 15, 2026

1) Handshake diplomacy with Prabowo won’t secure shared values


2) Task force: 20 KKB members behind Smart Air shooting in South Papua  

----------------------------------------------


Duncan Graham 
1) Handshake diplomacy with Prabowo won’t secure shared values
 February 16, 2026


 Australia’s new security treaty with Indonesia is heavy on symbolism but light on substance. As President Prabowo Subianto tightens his grip on power, warm rhetoric from Canberra risks obscuring growing democratic regression and human rights abuses.

As head of a democracy Prime Minister Anthony Albanese’s duties include praising foreign leaders who despise his views and smile as they shake his hand. That’s one of the pains of high office.

Last week, the proffered palm belonged to Indonesia’s President Prabowo Subianto, 74. He runs the world’s fourth-largest nation (287 million), a former general with an alleged record of human rights abuses. To authoritarians he’s a role model.

Photos of PM Anthony Albanese and Foreign Minister Penny Wong signing a ’treaty’ and getting lavish attention in Jakarta last week reinforcedAlbanese’s claim for the “biggest step the countries have taken together in 30 years.”

But the pomp and horsiness is regular hospitality as world leaders pay homage at the Presidential Palace. During his first year in the job Prabowo made 33 state visits, so there’s been much reciprocity.

Earlier, Albanese had said: “Australia’s relationship with Indonesia is based on friendship, trust, mutual respect and a shared commitment to peace and stability in our region.

“This treaty is a recognition from both our nations that the best way to secure that peace and stability is by acting together.''

This is welcome fare, but prepared by Canberra’s cautious word cooks on a slow stove to remove impurities. Australia may have a treaty, but most Indonesian media have seen it has a side dish, not the main course.

For Indonesian academic Hangga Fathana, it’s “an agreement that reassures more than it constrains … the language focuses on consultation and coordination without requiring concrete action.

“The placebo effect is not that the treaty will do nothing. It’s that it may generate reassurance out of proportion to its real obligations.”

Prabowo’s language was more sober and accurate, just a deal with “good neighbours” though greatly outnumbered – one of us to 11 of them.

“Watershed” is Albanese’s description of the deal’s importance – an insensitive metaphor as flooding and landslips across the archipelago have killed and displaced thousands so far this wet season.

The speech notes call the inking a “bilateral security treaty”. If recent history is an indicator, it could be kindling come the next cold snap.

That’s what happened to its model predecessor. In 1995, then PM Paul Keating and Prabowo’s father-in-law, the second President Soeharto, signed a secret Agreement on Maintaining Security.

Soeharto’s successor, the mercurial Bacharuddin Jusuf (BJ) Habibie, stuffed the splendid hopes and perfectly structured pars in a shredder. This was to show his anger at the Australia-led 1999 INTERFET international peacekeeping force in East Timor after residents voted 80 per cent against staying with Indonesia in a referendum.

Resentment of Australia was at one stage intense and may linger still in the military.

Indonesians are quick to take umbrage, aka an inferiority complex, so the ’treaty’ may last only to the next outrage, whether real or contrived. In 2017, all military cooperation, including joint training, was suspended when Indonesians alleged that teaching materials were insulting.

Despite enormous disparities in income, religion, culture, language and values, our leaders erase these facts by asserting we are “good neighbours”. The image has a respectful couple thrown together by geography who respect each other.

To Australian Indonesianists, this hurts: the plaudits are nonsense.

When General Soeharto ran Indonesia for 32 years in the last century and before social media gripped our lives, young Western backpackers were hungrily questioned by student activists about events outside the archipelago.

To be an Australian was to be considered a friend, a representative of democracy, a sustainer of the rule of law and human rights values. Those were the days.

After Indonesia declared independence in 1945, Dutch troops tried to regain their former colony. But Australian wharfies boycotted the Europeans’ ships, defied Canberra’s pro-Netherlands policy, and actively supported the freedom movement.

An ANU exhibitionStruggle, Solidarity and Unity, recalled the Armada Hitam (Black Armada) union campaign, “one of the largest boycotts ever organised in Australia.”

That history is now little known in Indonesia. Instead, youngsters speed read about today’s celebrities on their mobile phones: like almost everywhere else on the planet, Australia has racists and is currently wriggling to slough its skin of Islamophobia which was growing even before the Bondi shootings and has been hardening since.

Here’s an awkward truth that annoys myopic nationalists: we think we’re important and admired in Indonesia. Once, yes. Now, no.

As Melbourne University Professor Tim Lindsey has written: “The countries seem to be moving further apart when it comes to freedom of speech and respect for civil society.

“Indonesia’s vulnerable democratic system has been under repeated attack from the government for most of the last decade. This could complicate matters for Albanese, particularly as Prabowo ramps up his crackdown on critics of his administration.”

There are more than 800,000 Muslims in Australia (about 120,000 are Indonesians, but not necessarily followers of Islam), and fewer than 120,000 Jews. The minority have great commercial, political and cultural clout.

Suggestions that the ‘treaty’ with Indonesia could lead to the two nations’ armies working together would require us to abandon many principles.  The military continues to oppress independence fighters in Papua.

Allegations of human rights abuses in the provinces are commonplace; 132 reportedly died in clashes last year. The armed separatist movement has been running for more than 60 years and taken at least 100,000 lives.

As in Gaza, independent journalists are banned, so confirmation of casualties is impossible. Albanese made no public comments on this issue.

Since his 2023 election, loud-mouth Prabowo has been bashing democracy, a sport played a little less vigorously by his soft-spoken predecessor Jokowi.

Lindsey underlines the President’s “nepotistic appointments, stacking the Constitutional Court, bringing the army into civil affairs, and banning elections for local governments.”

The President’s political party Gerindra (Great Indonesia movement) states publicly that it wants to go back to last century’s Orde Baru (New Order) authoritarian rule. (The government is a coalition of mainly small right-wing parties; there’s no real opposition in the legislature, so NGOs fill the gap.)

Lindsey continued: “Recent developments suggest the dismantling of democratic freedoms is speeding up.

“Opposition is routinely met with repression, and censorship prevails. Australia’s role as a hub for open dialogue, free speech, analysis and criticism of Indonesia will become even more important.”

A “xenophobic new law” is being hustled to “prevent, detect, and counter disinformation and foreign propaganda” – a blame-all phrase that could snare academics and journos, and kill funding from overseas aid agencies.

So read this while you can. The Prabowo-Albanese love-in may not last if democracy gets in the way of Orde Baru. Security and trade are important, but people ties are vital for future harmony.


The views expressed in this article may or may not reflect those of Pearls and Irritations.

Duncan Graham
 Duncan Graham has been a journalist for more than 40 years in print, radio and TV. He is the author of People Next Door (UWA Press). He is now writing for the English language media in Indonesia from within Indonesia. Duncan Graham has an MPhil degree, a Walkley Award, two Human Rights Commission awards and other prizes for his radio, TV and print journalism in Australia. He lives in East Java.


————————————————————————

2) Task force: 20 KKB members behind Smart Air shooting in South Papua  
February 15, 2026 11:54 GMT+700

Jayapura, Papua (ANTARA) - Crime scene investigation has indicated that the shooting of a Smart Air aircraft at Korowai Batu Airport in South Papua was allegedly carried out by around 20 members of an armed criminal group (KKB).

Head of Operations of the Cartenz Peace Task Force Brig. Gen. Faizal Rahmadani said on Saturday that the group reportedly emerged from a lodging house located near the airport before opening fire at the aircraft, prompting passengers and crew members to flee.

"The shooting involving the Smart Air aircraft with flight number PK-SNR occurred as the plane was preparing to continue its flight to Dekai, Yahukimo, on February 11," he stated.

Rahmadani said the alleged perpetrators were members of the KKB group led by Elkius Kobak from Yahukimo.

The crime scene investigation found 13 bullet holes in the aircraft's fuselage. Investigators also documented 23 pieces of evidence at the scene.

Witnesses said the shooting began shortly after the aircraft landed at around 10:30 a.m. local time at Korowai Batu Airport and was preparing for departure to Dekai.

"The KKB group suddenly appeared and opened fire while the pilot was starting the engine, forcing passengers and crew members to disembark for safety," Rahmadani noted.

The armed group then allegedly pursued and shot pilot Captain Enggon Erawan and co-pilot Captain Baskoro Adi Anggoro, who later died from their injuries.

Rahmadani said witnesses reported they were unable to identify the perpetrators and believed the suspects were not residents of Korowai.

He added that the investigation and law enforcement process is being conducted in a measured and professional manner. Security personnel are deployed not only to pursue the perpetrators but also to protect residents, restore order, and ensure public safety.

"The safety of residents remains our primary concern. Joint security forces are working to ensure that Korowai returns to a peaceful condition," he emphasized.

Related news: Police step up security at Korowai Airport after Smart Air shooting
Related news: Separatist group KKB battalions behind Smart Air shooting in Papua


Translator: Evarukdijati, Resinta Sulistiyandari
Editor: Anton Santoso

-------------------------------- 

Saturday, February 14, 2026

1) HRW claims Indonesia police violated Papua protesters’ rights


2) TNI's involvement in combating terrorism will worsen situation in Papua  
3) Water Tank Driver Shot by KKB in Yahukimo 
-----------------------------------------



1) HRW claims Indonesia police violated Papua protesters’ rights 
Alex Kwok | HKU Faculty of Law, CN/HK 
FEBRUARY 14, 2026 08:14:56 AM

Human Rights Watch (HRW) on Friday condemned the Indonesian police for the reported unlawful dispersal, physical assault, and detention of 11 Papuan protesters in Merauke on January 25.

Meenakshi Ganguly, the deputy Asia director at HRW, reiterated Indigenous Papuan communities’ right to protest without fear of reprisal. Ganguly stated, “Police and military personnel who commit abuses against local communities should be held to account and appropriately punished.”

According to HRW, members of the Voice of Catholic People of Papua gathered at a cathedral and urged church officials to intervene and protect indigenous populations harmed by the Merauke Integrated Food and Energy Estate (MIFEE) project. According to witnesses, police officers arrived and forcibly dispersed the crowd without prior warning or attempts at dialogue. Officers allegedly choked and beat demonstrators, striking several on the head with batons.

The rights group also reported that the police detained 11 protesters and released them without charge after midnight. Arnold Anda, their lawyer from the Merauke Legal Aid Institute, stated that authorities failed to provide any legal basis for the arrests. Police also seized a smartphone and deleted its photos and videos before returning it, leaving protesters feeling monitored and unsafe.

The MIFEE project plans to convert nearly three million hectares of forest and swampland into rice, sugarcane, and other crop plantations. The Indonesian government frames the project as a path toward national food and biofuel self-sufficiency.

HRW warned, however, that the “project risks the customary land rights of over 40,000 people from the Indigenous Malind, Maklew, Yei, and Khimaima communities.” Indonesian civil society organization Pusaka has documented fraudulent land grabs that strip these communities of their ancestral forests. They face difficulties in accessing sources of food and sources of livelihood, destruction of social and cultural systems, exploitation of workers, and inadequate wages.

In March 2025, nine UN special rapporteurs issued a joint letter expressing grave concerns over systematic human rights and environmental violations in the region. They warned that approximately 40 villages are at risk of losing their traditional rights due to large-scale deforestation, military intimidation, and the criminalization of dissent.

In November 2025, UN experts expressed concern about the Special Autonomy Law for Papua, describing the law as one that centralizes authority and worsens the poverty, persecution, and displacement of Papuan Indigenous peoples.

Article 18B (2) of the Indonesian Constitution recognizes and respects customary law communities and their traditional rights, provided they align with national interests and legal regulations. Article 28I (3) emphasizes the protection of cultural identities and the rights of Indigenous communities in line with societal progress.


———————————————————————


2) TNI's involvement in combating terrorism will worsen situation in Papua  
Jubi Papua – February 11, 2026

Aida Ulim, Jayapura – A Draft Presidential Regulation (Ranperpres) on the involvement of the Indonesian Military (TNI) in combating terrorism is seen as further strengthening suspicions by various groups that the state is adopting a military approach to various problems in the country.

Indonesian Human Rights Watch (Imparsial) Director Ardi Manto Adiputra said that in the context of Papua, this draft presidential regulation has the potential to worsen the conflict, the humanitarian situation and democracy in Papua.

This is despite the prolonged conflict that has never been resolved peacefully, an armed conflict that has been going on for around 70 years. Furthermore, this draft presidential regulation is still being legally challenged.

According to Adiputra, the regulation is extremely dangerous if linked to the situation in Papua, as it labels certain groups in Papua as terrorists.

This statement was conveyed by Adiputra during a public discussion held by Imparsial on the Papuan conflict and the stigmatisation of terrorism titled "The Dangers of the Ranperpres and the Involvement of the TNI and Counterterrorism", which was broadcast online through Imparsial's YouTube channel on Tuesday February 10.

He said that the community's opposition in the land of Papua national strategic projects (PSN) shows that the problem there is not only development and armed conflict. It also involves humanitarian issues and the abrogation indigenous peoples' rights.

"Amid these conditions, the government has issued a draft Ranperpres that regulates the TNI's role in countering acts of terrorism", said Adiputra.

Imparsial noted that there are currently more than 14,000 TNI personnel in Papua. This number is considered very significant compared to the population ratio in Indonesia's easternmost region.

Therefore, a security approach that relies on troop deployment is seen as prolonging the conflict and distancing Papua from a peaceful resolution.

"Moreover, this Ranperpres will expand the TNI's authority to include prevention, enforcement and recovery, with a definition that is very broad and open to multiple interpretation", he said.

One of the points most highlighted by Adiputra was the definition of terrorism in the draft regulation, which covers actions deemed to threaten the state ideology of Pancasila.

This definition is considered highly vulnerable to abuse in Papua, bearing in mind the right to peacefully express political opinions and aspirations, which represent part of human rights, is not fully allowed.

"Not only that, the deployment of TNI troops to (the land of) Papua has not been based on a state political decision as mandated under Law Number 34/2004 on the TNI. This has resulted in military deployments taking place without clear measures and accountability", he said.

If the draft presidential regulation is ratified, it is feared that civil space in Papua will shrink further, the risk of human rights violations will increase and peace efforts that have been promoted by civil society, religious leaders, academics and other parties will be further obstructed.

"Resolving the conflict in Papua must be done by addressing the root of the problem, including human rights violations that have never been resolved. A coercive and military approach will only prolong the cycle of violence. A peaceful path through dialogue is the only way to resolve the Papuan conflict justly and with dignity", he said.

On the other hand, the draft regulation is also seen as confusing the military's function with law enforcement. Indonesia's handling of terrorism has traditionally used a law enforcement approach.

If the regulation is ratified, there are concerns that this approach will shift to a war approach or war model. Because previous experience has shown that various human rights violations have already occurred in with just the police handling of terrorism, including cases of wrongful arrest and deaths during law enforcement.

The military's involvement is seen as further increasing the risk of the use of excessive force, especially given the persistent issues of impunity and minimal accountability within the military justice system.

Law Number 2/2018 on Criminal Acts of Terrorism, continued Adiputra, does indeed mandates the creation of a presidential regulation or Perpres on the involvement of the TNI.

However, the requirement is that there must first be consultation with the House of Representatives (DPR). In contrast, the revised TNI Law Number 3/2025 does not require such consultation.

"We are concerned that the government will refer to the 2025 TNI Law and ignore the obligation to consult with the DPR as stipulated under the Terrorism Law. If that happens, then the Ranperpres will formally contradict the law", said Adiputra.

Meanwhile, Cenderawasih University academic Bernarda Meteray said that Papua is a region with social, cultural and historical complexities that cannot be compared to other regions in Indonesia.

The security approach, which prioritises military force from the Trikora (the 1961 Triple Commands of the People) era to the present, has failed to address the root of the problems in the land of Papua and has instead exacerbated the cycle of violence.

"Various policies have increasingly positioned the Papuan people as objects, rather than as dignified human beings", said Meteray.

He said that violence, murder and arson are recurring events that have been imprinted on the collective memory of the Papuan people for generations.

According to Meteray, academics have long identified the roots of the conflict in Papua, ranging from the failure to uphold human rights, corruption, the marginalisation of indigenous Papuans, to the failure of political dialogue.

The results of these studies however have not yet become the primary reference in state policy making.

He said that the social impact of this, which is directly felt by the people of Papua today, includes mutual suspicion between indigenous Papuans and non-Papuans, identity polarisation between coastal and highland communities and shrinking space for freedom of expression, including on campus.

"This situation shows that the security approach has not brought a sense of security to civilians, so the military approach through the Ranperpres actually risks obstructing peace efforts", he said.

The government is urged to halt deliberations on the draft presidential regulation and instead prioritise inclusive, dignified dialogue and the resolution of human rights violations as a solution to the conflict in the land of Papua.

"Without addressing the root causes, security policies will only leave wounds and recurring conflicts", he said.

[Translated by James Balowski. The original title of the article was "Ranperpres Pelibatan TNI Menguatkan Dugaan Pemerintah Melakukan Pendekatan Militer".]

Source: https://jubi.id/polhukam/2026/ranperpres-pelibatan-tni-menguatkan-dugaan-pemerintah-melakukan-pendekatan-militer/


—————————————————————
3) Water Tank Driver Shot by KKB in Yahukimo 
12 Februari 2026, 21:18 |
 Editorial Team 

JAYAPURA - A driver of a clean water tanker truck was shot by an unknown person (OTK) on the Dekai axis to Lopon, Yahukimo Regency, Papua Mountains.

Head of Peace Operations Cartenz 2026, Brigadier General Faizal Ramadhani said the incident occurred when the victim was driving a tanker vehicle carrying clean water supplies for the community in the Lopon area.


"In the middle of the journey, the victim was shot from the side of the road and suffered a gunshot wound to the left side of the back," he said as quoted by ANTARA, Thursday, February 12.

According to Faizal, despite being injured, the victim and a kenek continued their journey until they managed to reach Lopon to save themselves.

"We received a report of the incident from the Cartenz Peace Operation Task Force to the location and evacuated the victim to Dekai Hospital to receive intensive medical care," he said.

He explained that based on the latest information, the victim was in critical condition and underwent initial medical treatment before being referred to the Bhayangkara Hospital of the Papua Police in Jayapura for further treatment.

The apparatus is emphasized not to tolerate acts of violence against civilians, especially against people who are carrying out activities to provide basic needs.


The victims are people who are working to transport basic necessities in the form of clean water. This is an action that cannot be tolerated. We are moving quickly to evacuate the victims and secure the situation. Law enforcement will be carried out firmly against the perpetrators," he said.

His party emphasized that the safety of the community was the main priority in every step of the Cartenz Peace Operation because the presence of the task force to ensure that the community could carry out activities safely.

"There should be no fear when people make a living or carry out their daily work," he said.

Head of Public Relations and Peace Operations Cartenz 2026, Kombes Yusuf Sutejo said based on the results of the preliminary investigation, the allegations were directed at an armed criminal group (KKB) from the Yahukimo region. The apparatus is still investigating the identity and connection of the group to ensure that the legal process runs optimally.


"As a precautionary measure, security on the logistics distribution route and a number of vital objects in Yahukimo Regency have also been increased," he said.


The English, Chinese, Japanese, Arabic, and French versions are automatically generated by the AI. So there may still be inaccuracies in translating, please always see Indonesian as our main language. (system supported by DigitalSiber.id)


------------------------------------

Friday, February 13, 2026

1) Papua Quarterly Report Q4 2025: Securing Development Through Force: Surge in victims as military operations expand across West Papua

 


2) Indonesia: Police Disperse Papuans Protesting ‘Food Estate’ Project

3) INDIGENOUS FAMILIES FORCED TO FLEE FROM INDONESIAN SECURITY FORCES IN WEST PAPUA

-------------------------------------------------------------------

https://humanrightsmonitor.org/reports/papua-quarterly-report-q4-2025-securing-development-through-force-surge-in-victims-as-military-operations-expand-across-west-papua/







1) Papua Quarterly Report Q4 2025: Securing Development Through Force: Surge in victims as military operations expand across West Papua



This 10-page document outlines cases and developments, including human rights violations and their patterns, the escalation of armed conflict and its impact on civilians, significant political shifts in Indonesia affecting West Papua, and international responses and initiatives. It covers the period from 1 October to 31 December 2025.


Summary

Human rights

The human rights situation in West Papua between October and December 2025 was characterised by an increase in victims of human rights violations. This surge is linked to the rapid expansion of large-scale government-driven economic development projects and the military operations deployed to secure them. These projects primarily affect small indigenous communities, often inhabited by several hundred people.
The pace of development is likely to accelerate further as the government establishes new military battalions across the region. Some of these are Territorial Development Infantry Battalion units. They have been deployed to support projects of food security, infrastructure development, public health, and economic empowerment in West Papua. Such new battalions have recently been established in Biak-Numfor, Supiroi, and Waropen.  
Whilst the number of cases during the reporting period slightly decreased compared to previous quarters, the pattern of violations remained consistent. The extraordinarily high number of victims of extrajudicial executions and ill-treatment, combined with the recurrence of enforced disappearances, is directly linked to military operations that fail to distinguish between civilians and combatants. Such tactics reportedly included airstrikes, battle drones and victim-activated explosive devices in or near civilian areas (see Conflict section).
In October 2025, the Indonesian National Human Rights Commission (Komnas HAM) expressed deep concerns regarding a proposed revision to Law No. 39 of 1999 on Human Rights. Human rights observers warn that the revision is part of a systematic effort to weaken Indonesia’s primary independent human rights institution.
Various court proceedings raised the attention of human rights observers and civil society. On 28 October, a panel of judges at the Wamena District Court sentenced four Indonesian police officersfor their roles in the fatal shooting of Mr Tobias Silak and the serious injury of Naro Dapla in Dekai, Yahukimo Regency, in 2024. The primary defendant, Chief Brigadier Muhammad Kurniawan Kudu of the Gorontalo Police Mobile Brigade, was convicted under Article 338 of the Indonesian Criminal Code for murder and sentenced to 14 years imprisonment. Three other defendants were sentenced to 5 years’ imprisonment. The verdict marked a victory in the ongoing battle against impunity. However, the prolonged failure to resolve the Jubi Molotov attack case despite incriminating evidence is exemplary of the persistent impunity in the Indonesian justice system. Authorities have failed to make arrests or identify suspects after twelve months of investigation. 
In November 2025, judges at the Makassar District Court in Makassar City in South Sulawesi Province sentenced four Papuan political prisoners from Sorong City to seven months’ imprisonment. The four activists were convicted under Article 106 of the Indonesian Criminal Code on treason for taking part in a plan to “separate a part of the territory of the Republic of Indonesia”. The verdict came after months of proceedings marked by the transfer of the trial from Sorong to Makassar, delays, and reports of intimidation of families and supporters.  

Conflict

The Indonesian government’s militarised approach to conflict resolution and economic development in West Papua has reached alarming levels, triggering widespread internal displacement, human rights violations, and growing civil society resistance. Between late October and early November 2025, Papuans in the towns of Nabire, Enarotali, Sugapa, and Jayapura went to the streets to protest against the central Government’s approach to settling the longstanding conflict in West Papua. Indigenous people in the remote central highlands are increasingly exposed to a growing military presence and ongoing counterinsurgency operations. As of 1 January 2026, more than 105,878 civilians across multiple regencies have been internally displaced due to military operations and armed conflict.
A December 2025 report by the Indonesian Legal Aid Foundation (YLBHI) with the title “Papua in the Grip of Military Operations” provides an overview of the military deployments and expansion of military infrastructure in the region.  In Intan Jaya Regency alone, approximately 23 non-organic (temporary) military posts were built in September as troops took control of villages. This resulted in the total paralysis of 52 out of 59 educational facilities. Six health facilities, including hospitals and health centres, have ceased functioning. Furthermore, 62 civilian killings by Indonesian military personnel have been documented. The local indigenous population and human rights observers are concerned that the extensive military presence in Intan Jaya serves the purpose of securing the gold-rich Wabu Block mining concession covering approximately 1.18 million hectares.
HRM documented 41 armed attacks and clashes throughout the fourth quarter of 2025, significantly higher than the 29 clashes recorded in the third quarter. The majority of armed hostilities between October and December 2025 occurred in Yahukimo, with 15 armed clashes and attacks documented during the reporting period. Armed hostilities were also documented from the regencies of Intan Jaya, Pegunungan Bintang, Nduga, and Mimika. Isolated incidents of armed violence occurred in the regencies of Teluk Bintuni, Maybrat, Nabire, and Dogiyai.
HRM counted eight civilians killed and six injured by the TPNPB. Meanwhile, 15 civilians were killed, and 8 were wounded by security force members during armed clashes or counter-insurgency operations. Concerning the combatants, 15 security force members were killed, and 15 were injured during this period. In contrast, the TPNPB reportedly lost 11 combatants, with 4 guerrilla fighters being injured during armed clashes.

Political developments

The government faced mounting criticism over its approach to West Papua, where lethal military operations continue despite growing civil society opposition. Residents held demonstrations across multiple Papuan cities in late October and early November, denouncing military expansion in the central highlands and alleging extrajudicial killings and enforced disappearances. Despite widespread civil society rejection, President Prabowo pushed forward with development plans, hosting provincial leaders in December to call for accelerated development across all sectors. He announced plans to expand palm oil plantations across West Papua as part of a broader strategy to achieve energy self-sufficiency within five years. Prabowo declared that palm oil, along with sugar cane and cassava, would be cultivated to produce biofuels and ethanol, potentially saving Indonesia hundreds of trillions of rupiah in fuel imports. In response to the announcement, civil society groups and indigenous landrights holders from Merauke launched a peaceful protest against the Merauke Sugarcane National Strategic Project in Jakarta on 18 December 2025.
Various developments in the legal sector in October and November 2025 raise growing concerns regarding civilian oversight and extensive powers of the police and military. Indonesia’s Constitutional Court has issued a landmark ruling prohibiting active police officers from holding civilian government positions. Still, the implementation of the decision has sparked controversial discussions as thousands of police officers remain in posts across ministries and state agencies. In October, Indonesia’s Constitutional Court rejected formal review petitions challenging Law No. 3/2025 on the Indonesian National Armed Forces (TNI), ruling that the legislative process did not violate the 1945 Constitution despite procedural controversies and widespread criticism from civil society.
In November, the Indonesian House of Representatives (DPR) unanimously passed the revision of the Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP) into Law. A coalition of legal aid organisations and human rights defenders warns that the new KUHAP officially opens the door to a police state, legitimising arbitrary detention, invasive surveillance, and unchecked investigative powers. A fierce national debate on historical memory and justice arose after President Prabowo Subianto officially bestowed the title of National Hero upon Indonesia’s second president, General Suharto, during a ceremony at the State Palace.  While many Indonesians condemn Suharto for being responsible for numerous gross human rights violations, a significant demographic views the New Order era with nostalgia.

International developments

Between October and December 2025, the Indonesian government under President Prabowo Subianto pursued an active foreign policy focused on strengthening defence ties. Indonesia convened its first trilateral defence ministers’ meeting with Australia and Papua New Guinea in early December, during which Papua New Guinea raised concerns about the West Papua conflict potentially spilling across its border and proposed a 10 km buffer zone. President Prabowo also met with Russian President Putin in Moscow to discuss military cooperation, nuclear energy, and wheat exports, while Defence Minister Sjafrie Sjamsoeddin announced the purchase of at least 42 Chinese-made fighter jets.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

https://www.hrw.org/news/2026/02/13/indonesia-police-disperse-papuans-protesting-food-estate-project
Human Rights Watch
February 13, 2026 2:00PM EST | News Release

2) Indonesia: Police Disperse Papuans Protesting ‘Food Estate’ Project
 Ensure Right to Peaceful Assembly, Indigenous Rights, Accountability for Abuses

Members of the Voice of Catholic People of Papua gathered at the St. Francis Xavier Catholic Cathedral in Merauke, Indonesia, call on church officials to protect Indigenous people from government policies, January 25, 2026. © 2026 Stenly Dambujai

(Tokyo) – Indonesian police unlawfully dispersed, beat, and detained 11 Papuan protesters in Merauke City, South Papua, on January 25, 2026, Human Rights Watch said today. The authorities should promptly and impartially investigate the incident, appropriately discipline or punish those responsible for abuses, and consult with Indigenous communities to address longstanding grievances.

That morning, members of the Voice of Catholic People of Papua (Suara Kaum Awam Katolik Regio Papua) had gathered at the St. Francis Xavier Catholic Cathedral to call on church officials to protect Indigenous people harmed by the government’s massive Merauke food project. They also expressed opposition to the bishop of the Catholic Archdiocese of Merauke for backing the government project. The police arrived and forcibly dispersed those gathered inside the church courtyard and arrested 11.

“Indigenous Papuan communities have the right to protest the government’s Merauke food project without having to worry about being beaten, arrested, and jailed,” said Meenakshi Ganguly, deputy Asia director at Human Rights Watch. “Police and military personnel who commit abuses against local communities should be held to account and appropriately punished.”

Protesters allege that the police broke up the peaceful protest with unnecessary force. Stenlhy Dambujai, 30, said that the officers “choked and beat” him, and hit two others, Maria Amote, 24, and Angel Gebze, 22, on the head with batons.

The police took those detained to the Merauke Traffic Police Station, where the officers again beat them, and then transferred them to the Merauke police precinct for further questioning. All the protesters were released without charge after midnight, but their legal counsel, Arnold Anda of the Merauke Legal Aid Institute, said that the police had refused to disclose any legal basis for their detention.

“The police also forcibly seized a smartphone belonging to one of our friends, which was only returned after the photos and videos had been deleted,” Dambujai said. “I feel unsafe because it feels like I am constantly being monitored by the authorities.”

The Indonesian government’s Merauke Integrated Food and Energy Estate project aims to convert nearly three million hectares of forest and swampland to grow rice, sugarcane, and other crops for national food self-sufficiency. Then-President Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono initiated the project in 2010, but it stalled. His successor, Joko Widodo revived and expanded the plan in 2023, giving it National Strategic Project status, which increased deforestation in Merauke. Since succeeding Widodo in October 2024, President Prabowo Subianto has accelerated expansion of the food estate, saying he wished to transform Indonesia into the “granary of the world.”

The Merauke food project risks the customary land rights of over 40,000 people from the Indigenous Malind, Maklew, Yei, and Khimaima communities, who depend upon the forest and swampland for their livelihood and traditional practices, Human Rights Watch said. The communities allege that the project is displacing Indigenous communities, forcibly taking customary lands, logging traditional forests, threatening biodiversity, and using the military to suppress dissent.

The government asserts that no one has applied for the designation of customary forests in the Merauke project area and that the project has complied with applicable national laws and regulations, including those related to upholding Indigenous rights, environmental protections, and human rights.

The civic group Solidarity for Merauke says the project has exacerbated human rights violations and forced displacement. President Prabowo has deployed the Indonesian military to support agricultural programs in the Merauke regency, including to plant and harvest food crops, but also to discourage protests.

Norton Kamuyen, a Marind resident of Nakias village, Nguti district, told Human Rights Watch that he and his family were forced to flee to a neighboring village in January due to a land dispute. “We once lived safely and without fear, free to forage in our forests,” Kamuyen said. “But since we disagree with the National Strategic Project, we are considered to be opposing the government. The military makes us afraid, so we have to leave our villages to find safety and protect our lives.”

Indonesian authorities regard Merauke as an important symbol of nationalism, signifying the unity of the vast Indonesian archipelago through the “From Sabang to Merauke” anthem, referring to Sabang Island, Indonesia’s westernmost tip, and Merauke, which is Indonesia’s easternmost regency. Protests by Indigenous Papuans are unusual in Merauke because of the heavy military deployment. A Malind tribal leader in Merauke said that “Bulldozers here are always guarded by soldiers with semi-automatic weapons.”

On February 5, the Communion of Churches in Indonesia, the umbrella organization of 105 Protestant denominations, issued a joint statement in Merauke, calling on the Indonesian government to “[end] land grabbing of Indigenous Papuans, even in the name of National Food Security,” in the six Papuan provinces and to have “honest, equal, and dignified dialogue with Papuan Indigenous communities” in reviewing the food estate.

In March 2025, nine United Nations special rapporteurs raised concerns in a letter that Indigenous peoples living in 40 villages within and around the project area would lose their livelihoods and traditional rights. They reported systematic human rights and environmental violations, including the denial of customary land rights, deforestation, severe environmental degradation, minimal meaningful participation by Indigenous peoples in decision-making, and the military’s alleged intimidation of Indigenous peoples and others.

“The Indonesian government has a responsibility to improve food production in the country,” Ganguly said. “But it should be clear that the Merauke food project cannot be pursued by trampling on the rights to liberty, land, and livelihoods of the Indigenous Papuan population.”



———————————————————————

3) INDIGENOUS FAMILIES FORCED TO FLEE FROM INDONESIAN SECURITY FORCES IN WEST PAPUA

John Ahni Schertow

February 13, 2026

 

 

New raids and aerial strikes by Indonesian security forces in the central highlands of West Papua have once again forced Indigenous civilians to flee their homes and makeshift refugee camps into surrounding forests.

Residents of Puncak Regency, already displaced by earlier clashes, were among those uprooted in the latest wave of violence that began with intensified military operations at the end of January.

Civilians from at least nine villages in the Kembru District abandoned settlements and camps after what local monitors describe as air and ground strikes — including drone attacks near civilian areas — left families with little choice but to flee on foot through rugged terrain.

“This is part of their ongoing campaign of terror in the West Papuan highlands,” said a statement this week from United Liberation Movement for West Papua (ULMWP) President Benny Wenda, who accused Indonesian forces of breaching international law by bombing refugee sites and cutting internet access to the affected areas.

“It is an international disgrace that Indonesia has been chosen to lead the UN Human Rights Council. How can Indonesia lead on human rights when they are dropping bombs on refugees?” Wenda said. “Their presence on Donald Trump’s Board of Peace is yet another hypocritical joke. Indonesia asks for justice for displaced Palestinians while displacing hundreds of thousands of Indigenous West Papuans.”

Wenda’s office said the populations fleeing the latest strikes include pregnant women, children and elderly people who had already been displaced by earlier fighting.

“It is only a matter of time before West Papuans begin dying as a result of these attacks, as thousands have over the past five years while living in the bush without adequate food, water, or medical care,” Wenda added.

Indonesian officials have not issued a public response to the most recent attacks. However, they typically frame their military operations in West Papua — which Jakarta administers as part of the republic — as efforts to suppress armed separatist groups that have waged an insurgency for decades. But rights groups and advocacy organizations contend that the blurred distinction between combatants and civilians has contributed to widespread suffering among Indigenous Papuans.

 

The escalating conflict has forced tens of thousands of people from their homes across multiple regencies, with internal displacement figures reportedly topping 105,000 as of early 2026.

The latest displacement is part of a long history of violence in West Papua, where conflict has simmered since the territory was incorporated into Indonesia following a disputed UN-backed vote in the 1960s. Since then, Indigenous Papuans have reported decades of military operations, human rights abuses and restrictions on political expression tied to an ongoing independence movement.

According to some estimates, at least 100,000 Indigenous Papuans have also been killed

-----------------------------------