Friday, October 9, 2026

1) Cenderawasih University student reports police officers over alleged assault


2) TNI neutralizes armed separatists in Southwest Papua clash

3) Papuan civlian killed after being detained by Marines personnel in Seradala District, Yahukimo Regency

4) Garuda Indonesia Reopens Bali-Papua Flight Route  

5) Five things Friday roundup: Rediscovering the Mennonites in Papua, East Indonesia

6) Merauke regent calls for 2027 special autonomy funds to target three priorities

-------------------------------------------------



1) Cenderawasih University student reports police officers over alleged assault

Nuevaterra Mambor October 9, 2026



Lawyers and legal assistant from the Papua Legal Aid Institute (LBH) Papua after filing a complaint over alleged assault of Wialo Silak – Courtesy of LBH Papua

Jayapura, Jubi – Wialo Silak, chair of Cenderawasih University’s Student Consultative Assembly (MPM Uncen) for the 2026–2027 term, has reported several Jayapura City Police officers to Papua Police over an alleged assault at the Jayapura City Police headquarters on September 30, 2026.

Silak lodged the complaint through lawyers and legal assistants from the Papua Legal Aid Institute (LBH Papua) at the Papua Police Integrated Police Service Centre (SPKT) on Wednesday, October 7, 2026.

The complaint was registered under report number LP/B/162/X/2026/SPKT/POLDA PAPUA, with the alleged perpetrators initially listed as unknown.

The legal team filed the complaint after Silak underwent a medical examination at Abepura Regional General Hospital.

LBH Papua said the fact that the alleged perpetrators had not yet been identified should not prevent the investigation from progressing. It said those involved could be identified through duty rosters, CCTV footage, and statements from the victim and witnesses.

According to LBH Papua, the alleged assault, intimidation, mobile phone searches and confiscation of students’ personal belongings occurred while Silak and about 34 other students were accompanying four fellow students, including Cenderawasih University Student Executive Board (BEM Uncen) chair Yuluku Wasiangge, who had been summoned as a witness in connection with a student protest on August 15, 2026.

“Wialo Silak was allegedly subjected to violence by several police officers. Meanwhile, about 27 mobile phones, identity cards, ATM cards and KPM cards belonging to students were allegedly taken without a clear legal basis,” LBH Papua said in a statement on Thursday, October 8, 2026.

The organisation said four witnesses were initially allowed into a room for questioning, while Silak and the other students were asked to wait in the waiting area.

Shortly afterwards, several police vehicles arrived carrying four students from the Jayapura University of Science and Technology (USTJ), who had been arrested that day.

When Silak retrieved his mobile phone from a chair, a police officer allegedly shouted at him, accusing him of taking photographs or recording footage. The officer reportedly warned him against making the material go viral or causing trouble.

LBH Papua said several police officers and intelligence personnel then approached Silak and allegedly punched and kicked him.

One officer allegedly took Silak’s phone and searched its photo gallery. No photographs or videos matching the accusation were found, and the phone was returned.

LBH Papua said an alleged intelligence officer who arrived later with the group of USTJ students then punched Silak on the right cheek with a clenched fist wearing a ring.

“As a result, the victim sustained injuries to his right cheek and temple, as well as bruising and swelling,” the statement said.

“At about 2.05pm Papua time, officers allegedly took about 27 mobile phones, identity cards, ATM cards and KPM cards belonging to students who were waiting. To date, it remains unclear whether there was a warrant, court authorisation or official seizure record for these items.”

LBH Papua said the alleged assault, reportedly witnessed by about 34 people, could constitute a criminal offence under Article 466 of Law No. 1 of 2023 on the Criminal Code, which took effect on January 2, 2026.

The provision carries a maximum penalty of two years and six months’ imprisonment or a Category III fine, with heavier penalties possible if the assault causes serious injury, according to LBH Papua.

The organisation also argued that the alleged group violence in a public place could fall under Article 262 in conjunction with Article 20 of the Criminal Code, which addresses participation in a criminal offence.

It said Article 52 could also apply if the alleged perpetrators used the authority, opportunities or resources available to them through their official positions as police officers.

LBH Papua said the allegation that Silak had been recording officers did not justify the alleged violence, particularly because his phone gallery had been searched and no photographs or videos supporting the accusation were found. It also said Silak had not attacked or resisted officers and was not under arrest.

To ensure the case is handled professionally, protect the victim and witnesses from intimidation, and prevent further violence against students accompanying their peers or documenting police conduct, LBH Papua issued seven demands.

The organisation called on the Papua Police chief to ensure the complaint was investigated professionally, transparently and independently, and not dismissed without a legal basis.

It urged investigators to identify all uniformed and plainclothes police and intelligence personnel present at the scene who may have been involved in the alleged assault, and to consider the application of Articles 262, 20 and 52 alongside Article 466.

LBH Papua also called for all CCTV footage from the Jayapura City Police headquarters on September 30 to be secured, particularly recordings from the waiting room, entrance and vehicle arrival areas used by the USTJ students.

The organisation urged the Papua Police internal affairs division (Propam) to conduct ethical and disciplinary investigations into officers allegedly involved, including examining the responsibility of superiors who knew about or were responsible for the situation.

It also demanded that Jayapura City Police and Papua Police publicly explain the legal basis for taking the students’ phones, identity cards, ATM cards and KPM cards, including whether warrants, authorisations and official seizure records existed.

LBH Papua further called on Papua Police to ensure Silak’s medical examination results were included as evidence and that the victim and witnesses were protected against intimidation and retaliatory complaints.

Finally, it urged the National Commission on Human Rights (Komnas HAM), the National Police Commission (Kompolnas), the Ombudsman of the Republic of Indonesia’s Papua representative office, the Witness and Victim Protection Agency (LPSK) and other relevant oversight bodies to monitor the case and provide protection in response to the alleged violence, abuse of authority and seizure of students’ personal belongings. (*)

------------------------------------

2) TNI neutralizes armed separatists in Southwest Papua clash
  October 9, 2026 15:26 GMT+700

Jakarta (ANTARA) - Indonesia's military (TNI) said on Friday that its troops shot three members of the separatist Free Papua Movement (OPM) during a clash in Sungai Frambu, Maybrat District, Southwest Papua Province.

The Habema Joint Operations Command said troops from the 9th Marine Infantry Battalion clashed with members of OPM's Sorong Raya regional command.

The clash occurred as troops assigned to Operation Badai Kasuari 3.10 patrolled a forest in Sungai Frambu to monitor security and track separatist movements.

The patrol came under fire in an ambush at about 9:01 a.m. local time, triggering an exchange of gunfire.

After the clash, troops reported that three OPM members had been shot. A body found at the scene was believed to be Manfred Fatem, the group's regional operations commander.

Two other men, believed to be Anton Fatem and Yesias Fatem, were swept away by the river, and a search is underway.

Troops also recovered an AK-101 rifle at the scene.

Related news: TNI identifies OPM figure killed in Intan Jaya clash

Related news: TNIcommander says Papua separatists must be defeated

Translator: Walda Marison, Nabil Ihsan
Editor: Rahmad Nasution


—————————————————————————————————————————


3) Papuan civlian killed after being detained by Marines personnel in Seradala District, Yahukimo Regency

On 8 October 2026, members of the Indonesian Marine Corps allegedly shot dead Mr Toni Meyok, after detaining him at the Marine Post Bravo 2 A in Samboga Village, Seradala District, Yahukimo Regency, Papua Pegunungan Province. Mr Meyok was detained while returning from delivering food supplies to workers at a mining site. Searching relatives later found his body at the Regional General Hospital (RSUD) in Dekai Town, Yahukimo Regency, on 9 October 2026.
Mr Toni Meyok, an indigenous Papuan from Terep Village, Seradala District, had purchased food supplies for workers at a mining site and transported them to the area by pick-up truck on 8 October 2026. After completing an initial delivery, he reportedly returned to Dekai Town before making a second journey to deliver further supplies. During his return, he was reportedly intercepted and detained by Marine personnel at around 05:00 pm because security personnel found photos of known TPNPB members on his mobile phone and suspected him of being associated with the West Papua National Liberation Army (TPNPB).
Marines personnel reportedly took Mr Meyok to the Marine Post Bravo 2 in Samboga Village, where he was allegedly interrogated. Information from a local source alleges that he was unlawfully executed while in the custody or effective control of Marine personnel. The precise circumstances of the shooting, including the identities of the personnel involved, whether he was subjected to physical violence during interrogation, and whether any immediate threat existed that could have justified the use of lethal force, remain unclear and require an independent investigation.
On 9 October 2026, members of Mr Meyok’s family reportedly received information about his death and located his body at the RSUD in Dekai Town. The family sought to collect the body for burial but was allegedly prevented by Marine personnel, telling the relatives that the body could only be handled through church leaders and traditional community leaders. Relatives and community members stressed that Mr Toni Meyok was a civilian, who followed other relatives working at a traditional mining site in Seradala District.

Human rights analysis

The reported circumstances of Mr Toni Meyok’s death raise serious concerns under the right to life and the prohibition of arbitrary deprivation of life as enshrined in the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR). Where a person dies while detained or otherwise under the effective control of State agents, the authorities bear a heightened obligation to provide a credible and verifiable explanation of the circumstances surrounding the death. Any use of lethal force by security personnel must be strictly necessary to protect life and proportionate to the threat confronted. Suspicion that an individual may be associated with an armed group does not justify the use of lethal force.
If Mr Meyok was apprehended and deprived of his liberty without a lawful basis, without being informed of the grounds for his arrest, or without being transferred promptly to the competent law-enforcement authorities, his detention may constitute arbitrary arrest or detention. Military personnel exercising security functions remain bound by Indonesia’s obligations under international human rights law and by applicable domestic law governing arrest, detention and the use of force.
The allegation that Meyok was interrogated before being shot also requires urgent scrutiny regarding possible torture or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment. Investigators should determine whether he sustained injuries before the fatal shooting and whether force was used during questioning. A full forensic examination conducted in accordance with the Minnesota Protocol on the Investigation of Potentially Unlawful Death (2016) is essential to establish the cause, manner and circumstances of death.
Any investigation should be prompt, effective, independent, impartial and transparent. Personnel belonging to the unit allegedly implicated in the incident should not exercise control over the investigation, evidence, witnesses or the victim’s body. Investigators should secure the site of detention, obtain weapons and ammunition records, identify all personnel present at Marine Post Bravo 2 at the relevant time, collect available communications and operational records, interview civilian and military witnesses, and preserve all medical and forensic evidence.
The reported restriction preventing Mr Meyok’s family from directly receiving his body also requires clarification. His relatives should be provided with accurate information concerning his death, access to relevant medical and investigative documentation, and the opportunity to arrange burial in accordance with their wishes, culture and traditions, unless a temporary restriction is demonstrably necessary for a lawful forensic investigation.
Detailed Case Data
Document ID: HRM-CAS-146-2026
Location: Seradala, Yahukimo regency, Highland Papua, Indonesia (-5.0222492, 139.9274723)Samboga Village, location: https://mapcarta.com/de/N5726089440
Region: Indonesia > Highland Papua > Yahukimo > Seradala
Total number of victims: 1
#Number of VictimsName, DetailsGenderAgeGroup AffiliationViolations
1.1 Toni Meyak
male36 Indigenous Peoplesarbitrary detention, execution, right to life
Period of incident: 08/10/2026 – 09/10/2026
Perpetrator: Republic Indonesia > Indonesian Security Forces > Indonesian Military (TNI) > Indonesian Navy (TNI-AL)
Perpetrator details: Military personnel stationed at the Marine Post Bravo 2 A
Issues: indigenous peoples, security force violence
Related Cases:



—————————————————————————————


4) Garuda Indonesia Reopens Bali-Papua Flight Route  
Reporter Antara October 8, 2026 | 05:59 pm


TEMPO.CO, Jakarta - National flag carrier Garuda Indonesia is set to reactivate its direct Bali–Papua service from October 25, 2026, through March 2027, in response to surging travel demand ahead of the peak tourist season.

Garuda Indonesia Sorong Branch General Manager Nadia Anisa stated in Sorong, Southwest Papua, on Thursday, October 8, 2026, that the route was previously suspended in April 2026 due to seasonal drops in passenger volume.

"Tourist seasonality had declined, so there's no demand. Now that the peak tourist season has begun, we are reactivating the route," Anisa said during a press conference at the Domine Eduard Osok (DEO) Airport Office in Sorong.

Under the revised flight schedule, the service departs Bali's I Gusti Ngurah Rai International Airport at 8:00 a.m. Central Indonesian Time (WITA) and arrives in Sorong at approximately 12:00 p.m. WITA. The return flight is scheduled to depart Sorong for Denpasar at 1:00 p.m. Eastern Indonesian Time (WIT).

Anisa noted that the route's operation through March 2027 will be continuously reviewed and adjusted based on market demand.

Alongside the Denpasar–Sorong reactivation, Garuda Indonesia is also increasing flight frequencies on its Jakarta–Sorong route on Saturdays through March 2027.

"For the Jakarta–Sorong route, regular flights will continue to operate at 00:10 a.m. Western Indonesian Time (WIB), while an additional flight will depart Jakarta at 8:55 a.m. WIB," Anisa explained.

She expressed hope that the increased frequency and route reactivation will broaden travel options for the public while strengthening air connectivity to Sorong as a key gateway to Raja Ampat.

-----------------------------------------------

5) Five things Friday roundup: Rediscovering the Mennonites in Papua, East Indonesia

Teguh Karyanto | For Anabaptist World October 9, 2026

My trip to Papua, East Indonesia, took me to congregations that kept traces of Mennonite ministry. Mountain roads, simple houses, encounters with the locals and ocean views were all part of the visit. I went home with five things that I kept thinking about: the history that needs to be cared for, the perseverance of the congregation, the widespread fellowship, the longing for identity and the hospitality that made guests feel welcome.

1.  The enduring history behind the change in the church

When I traced the history of the churches I visited, I found the story of the ministry of Doopsgezinde Zendingsbereenigung (DZV), a Mennonite mission from the Netherlands. In Papua, the ministry took place through missionary Marcus Herbert in from 1950 to 1961. In 1958, the mission churches in Papua merged into one church, the Evangelical Christian Church (GKI) of Papua. Some of the congregations separated and joined the Australian Baptist Missionary Society (ABMS). The year 1995 became a new chapter: the congregation rooted in Mennonite ministry formed a synod or conference called Gereja Baptis Anugerah Indonesia (GBAI). The name and form of the fellowship did change, but the story of the beginning of the ministry is still alive. Among the congregations I met, there was a desire to rediscover where their journey began. I see that history as not just an old record; it helps them understand the relationship with the wider churches.

2. Perseverance of faith in the midst of difficult terrain

Most of the congregation lived in the mountains and villages. Their homes were simple; many families farmed on less fertile land. Healthy sanitation was not yet within reach, education was limited and the economic life of some residents was around the poverty line. To reach to the city, people pass through mountains and valleys. Such a journey makes the distance feel longer than the numbers on the map. The road and terrain determine how long it takes for one to get to school, market or needed services. Lack of basic infrastructure and limited access to learning make the journey to the city more than a matter of distance; it also determines the opportunities of families and children. Therefore, the story of the congregation needs to be read with their real needs, not just as a testimony to endurance. I do not want this to be the only picture of Papua. Behind these limitations, I see the life of the congregation going on and the ministry that continues to be done. The experience made me appreciate their perseverance, while reminding me that support for education, health and a decent livelihood are still needed.



3. A federation that crosses islands and generations

The footprint of this ministry stretches from east to west in Papua.  Today, GBAI has 65 churches in Papua, Bali and Batam. This figure gives an idea of the breadth of fellowship, but it does not replace the story of the congregation in each place. The life of the church is maintained by families, ministers and the young generation who are present in their respective neighborhoods. This made me see that the future of the church is not only about increasing the number of congregations. The future also depends on the relationships that are nurtured: greeting each other, sharing news, praying and being present when brothers and sisters are in need. The distance between Papua, Bali and Batam is indeed far. Therefore, the relationship between churches needs to be built with intentionality. It requires joint attention from many parties.

4. The longing to re-recognize Mennonite identity

The Papuan congregations are longing to rediscover the roots of Mennonites. They were excited to meet Mennonite brothers and sisters in various parts of the world. They wanted to understand Mennonite values and beliefs again, and then connect them with the church’s ministry today. That longing continues to be prayed for ahead of GBAI’s anniversary on July 20, 2027. The date gives them hope to celebrate history and connection. This desire deserves to be answered with a willingness to listen and walk together. It is not enough to rediscover identity by mentioning names or origins; it needs to grow through conversations, visits, learning and cooperation. The Papuan congregations bring their own experiences. Therefore, relationships with the Mennonite community in the world will be more meaningful if they are built as mutual learning friendships, not one-way relationships.

5. Hospitality and beauty as an identity


Regarding the geography of Papua: Mountains meet the sea, and some areas feature crystal-clear rivers and beautiful beaches. Beyond the stunning scenery, the people there possess genuine hospitality. Hospitality doesn’t require many words; giving a place, greeting and making time to meet make people feel welcome. Along the way, such a welcome makes conversations about history and identity feel close to everyday life. From Papua, I learned that brotherhood grows not only because of similarity, but because people are willing to open up to each other.


Closing

The Mennonite legacy in Papua is an ongoing history, not merely a story that concluded with the era of the missionaries. GBAI congregations strive to trace these roots while building church life in their local communities. They long for encounters with the global Mennonite family as an expression of care and friendship. Reconnecting with the Mennonite community is a hope they cherish.

eguh Karyanto is a pastor at Javanese Mennonite Church (GITJ) Pesantenan Pati, lecturer of Wiyata Wacana Seminary Indonesia, secretary of GITJ Synod, member of Global Anabaptist Higher Education Network (GAHEN) and specialist of Mission Commission under Mennonite World Conference (MWC).

————————————————————————————


6) Merauke regent calls for 2027 special autonomy funds to target three priorities

Nuevaterra Mambor October 9, 2026


Merauke, Jubi – Merauke Regent Yoseph Bladib Gebze has called for Papua’s 2027 Special Autonomy (Otsus) funds to focus on three development priorities: education, health and economic productivity.

Gebze made the statement during a meeting to finalise the 2027 Special Autonomy Budget and Program Plan (RAP Otsus) at the Merauke Regional Development, Research and Innovation Planning Agency (Bapperida) office in South Papua on Thursday, October 8, 2026.

He said the proposed programs must align with the Papua Acceleration Development Action Plan (RAPPP) and Merauke Regency’s 2025–2029 Regional Medium-Term Development Plan (RPJMD).


“All regional government agencies must translate these three priorities into programs according to their respective duties and functions: Smart Papua, Healthy Papua and Productive Papua,” Gebze said.

He stressed that the priorities must be backed by measurable targets and indicators, allowing the government to assess whether programs funded through Special Autonomy allocations were improving people’s lives.

Gebze said achieving the Healthy Papua goal, for example, should not be the sole responsibility of the health department. Other government agencies must also contribute to disease prevention and related initiatives within their respective areas of responsibility.

“Healthy Papua is not just the responsibility of the Health Department. Preventive, curative and rehabilitative efforts must be supported collectively,” he said.

Gebze called on all regional government agencies to coordinate their planning, warning that fragmented programs would not be enough to meet development targets.

He also urged agencies to use indicators set out in the regional development plan to measure progress, including school participation rates in the education sector.

“We need to look at the figures and see whether there has been an improvement. These indicators will also form part of evaluations by the provincial and central governments,” he said.

Gebze said tighter fiscal conditions, including efficiency measures affecting transfers to regional governments, made it increasingly important to ensure public spending was targeted and measurable.

He said Special Autonomy funds must be used effectively to address community needs, with all programs aligned with the regional development plan and the RAPPP.

Agency heads, program officials and planning staff were urged to become involved from the outset to ensure projects could be properly planned, monitored and evaluated for their impact.

Gebze said the results would need to be accounted for to the regional administration, the Merauke Regional House of Representatives (DPRD) and the central government.

Bapperida is conducting the finalisation process through separate review sessions with each regional government agency from Thursday, October 8, to Tuesday, October 13, 2026.

Merauke Bapperida head Benhur Rentandatu said the reviews were intended to ensure each agency had identified project locations, established targets and prepared supporting documentation.

He urged agencies to develop programs based on community needs and development priorities rather than their own preferences.

“The regional budget is not just about how much money we have. What matters most is what we can deliver for the community,” Rentandatu said. (*)

-------------------------------------

Thursday, October 8, 2026

1) Military intelligence officers visit KNPB activist’s residence in Merauke, raising concerns over intimidation

 


2) Melanesian leaders to step up West Papua advocacy as Indonesia objects at UN hearing

3) CSI statement at the UN: Displacement in West Papua has climbed to 127,000

4) Asian churches for an end to violence in Papua through Chiang Main declaration
5) Police arbitrarily detain and torture Papuan civilian in Dogiyai Regency


-------------------------------------------------------


1) Military intelligence officers visit KNPB activist’s residence in Merauke, raising concerns over intimidation

On 7 October 2026, two intelligence officers affiliated with the Strategic Intelligence Agency of the Indonesian Armed Forces (Badan Intelijen Strategis, BAIS) visited the rented accommodation of the local Secretary-General of the West Papua National Committee (Komite Nasional Papua Barat, KNPB), Mr Yoseph Novaris Wogan Apay, 42, in the Almasuh area, Merauke Regency, Papua Selatan Province. According to information provided by KNPB, the officers questioned him about KNPB activities, planned demonstrations and several individuals, requested his mobile telephone number and asked to take photographs with him (see photos below, source: KNPB). The KNPB representative nevertheless regarded the visit as an act of intimidation directed against KNPB members and other activists advocating for the rights of Papuans.
According to Mr Apay, the two intelligence officers arrived at his rented accommodation in the Almasuh area at approximately 07:20 am. One of the two officers had allegedly visited the accommodation several weeks earlier together with another person. During that earlier visit, the visitors reportedly stated that they were affiliated with the BAIS.
When Mr Apay asked the officers about the purpose of the visit on 7 October, they reportedly said that they had merely come for a courtesy visit. During the subsequent conversation, the officers asked whether the KNPB remained active in Merauke Regency and whether the organisation was planning any demonstrations. The KNPB representative responded that the organisation remained active but that no protest action was currently planned. He reportedly explained that any future activities instructed by the KNPB leadership would be implemented according to local circumstances and that activities involving public facilities would be formally notified to the police as required under Indonesian law.
The officers also reportedly asked the KNPB representative about several individuals and further asked about the KNPB representative’s employment. They subsequently requested his mobile telephone number, which he declined to provide. The officers proposed meeting again at a coffee shop to continue the discussion. Mr Apay declined, citing personal commitments. Before leaving, the officers reportedly requested that a group photograph be taken with him.

Human rights analysis

Repeated visits by security or intelligence personnel to the private residence of a political activist, combined with questioning about organisational activities, demonstrations, associates and personal contact information, may have an intimidating effect and warrant scrutiny where there is no clear legal basis or legitimate operational necessity for such conduct.
The incident is particularly relevant in the context of the rights to privacy, freedom of expression, peaceful assembly and freedom of association. Articles 19, 21 and 22 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) protect political expression, peaceful assembly and association. Any restrictions on these rights must be prescribed by law, pursue a legitimate objective recognised under the Covenant and satisfy the requirements of necessity and proportionality.
Article 17 ICCPR further protects individuals against arbitrary or unlawful interference with their privacy, family and home. Visits by intelligence or security personnel to a person’s private residence, requests for personal contact information and questioning concerning political associations may engage this protection where such measures amount to surveillance or interference without an adequate legal basis or appropriate safeguards.
The fact that the questions concerned political activities and potential demonstrations is significant. Peaceful political advocacy, including advocacy for self-determination or criticism of government policy, falls within the scope of protected expression under international human rights law. Security authorities should therefore ensure that intelligence-gathering activities do not have the purpose or effect of discouraging lawful political expression or peaceful civic participation.

Mr Yoseph Novaris Wogan Apay (right) together with two BAIS members who visited him at his home in Merauke on 7 October 2026


Detailed Case Data
Document ID: HRM-CAS-145-2026
Location: GC54+GR9, Kelapa Lima, Merauke, Merauke Regency, South Papua 99614, Indonesia (-8.4912047, 140.4071232) Almasuh area
Region: Indonesia > South Papua > Merauke > Merauke
Total number of victims: 1
#Number of VictimsName, DetailsGenderAgeGroup AffiliationViolations
1.1Yoseph Novaris Wogan Apay
male42Activist, Indigenous Peoplesintimidation
Period of incident: 07/10/2026 – 07/10/2026
Perpetrator: Republic Indonesia > Indonesian Security Forces > Indonesian Military (TNI)
Perpetrator details: Strategic Intelligence Agency of the Indonesian Armed Forces (Badan Intelijen Strategis, BAIS)
Issues: indigenous peoples
Related Cases:


-------------------------------------

2) Melanesian leaders to step up West Papua advocacy as Indonesia objects at UN hearing

Melanesian governments will jointly step up advocacy over reported human rights abuses in West Papua, Papua New Guinea (PNG) Prime Minister James Marape has announced. In the same week, Indonesia protested at the United Nations after a petitioner raised the territory’s status during a decolonisation hearing on New Caledonia.

Minister Marape: region cannot stay silent

Prime Minister Marape was reporting on the outcomes of an informal Melanesian Spearhead Group (MSG) Leaders’ Meeting held in Fiji on 7 October 2026. He said Papua New Guinea strictly respects Indonesia’s territorial sovereignty, but that the region cannot remain silent on humanitarian concerns.
The statement extends a line he has taken before. At the MSG’s 23rd summit in Suva in June 2025, Marape said West Papua was constitutionally part of Indonesia, while insisting the MSG had every right to speak on human rights and people’s welfare there.
The MSG brings together Fiji, Papua New Guinea, Solomon Islands, Vanuatu and New Caledonia’s pro-independence FLNKS. Indonesia is an associate member, and the United Liberation Movement for West Papua (ULMWP) holds observer status.

Indonesia objects at UN hearing

On 6 October 2026, a petitioner raised West Papua before the UN General Assembly’s Fourth Committee during its hearing on New Caledonia in New York. Indonesia’s delegation protested and tried to have the reference struck from the official record (see video below).
The petitioner cited a study on decolonisation of the Pacific region by the UN Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues, covering New Caledonia, French Polynesia, Hawaii and West Papua. He told the committee the study found “clear grounds” for the General Assembly to support reinstating West Papua on the UN decolonisation list, arguing the territory meets the criteria of resolution 1541. Invoking the Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, he urged that “no one is left behind”.
Video

Background

West Papua, the western half of New Guinea, was listed by the UN as a non-self-governing territory under Dutch administration until its transfer to Indonesia in 1963. Jakarta regards its sovereignty as settled by the 1969 Act of Free Choice, a vote independence advocates reject as unrepresentative.
Pacific Islands Forum leaders have named Marape and Fiji Prime Minister Sitiveni Rabuka as special envoys on West Papua. Their 2025 communique called for a visit to the territory by the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights in 2026.

————————————————————


3) CSI statement at the UN: Displacement in West Papua has climbed to 127,000

Christian Solidarity International (CSI) raised concerns at the UN Human Rights Council on 1 October 2026 that the number of internally displaced people (IDPs) in West Papua’s six provinces had reached 127,000 by September 2026, up from 105,000 six months earlier (see video below, source: CSI). CSI attributed the displacement to Indonesian military operations, which protect large mining and farming projects that are pushing indigenous Papuans off their land. CSI backed the Papuan Customary Council’s demands that Jakarta halt its National Strategic Projects in the region, independently investigate serious abuses and move towards ending military operations. The organisation also echoed a call made by Pacific countries at the UN General Assembly in September for Indonesia to facilitate a visit by the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights.
Indonesia rejected the account in a right of reply. Ambassador Nur Rakhman Setyoko blamed the displacement on Papuan rebels, whom he accused of terrorising civilians into fleeing, and said Indonesia remains committed to protecting all its citizens in Papua. On a possible visit, he said any arrangement was a matter for the host state and the High Commissioner’s office, not for third states or other bodies.
Video

—————————————————————
4) Asian churches for an end to violence in Papua through Chiang Main declaration
Nuevaterra Mambor October 8, 2026

About 40 people attended the symposium, including church leaders from Papua and other parts of Indonesia, regional and international ecumenical partners, Indigenous representatives, women and young people, academics, researchers, humanitarian workers and peace advocates.

Jayapura, Jubi – A symposium of Asian churches has called for an end to violence in Papua through a declaration adopted at an international meeting in Chiang Mai, Thailand.

Papua was not simply a subject of discussion at the symposium. Its representatives brought their own experiences and voices to the gathering

The International Symposium on Papua opened on 28 September 2026 with a period of contemplation rather than speeches or policy presentations.

Participants were surrounded by symbols of Papuan identity, including noken, betel nut and areca nut, and traditional Papuan fabrics. The sound of tifa drums accompanied a worship service led by Reverend Lenta Enni Simbolon, Deputy General Secretary on the Communion of Churches in Indonesia (PGI).

The cultural symbols were intended to bring Papuan life, community, identity, dignity and cultural voice into the ecumenical gathering.

Reverend Lenta encouraged participants to engage with Papua’s struggles by first listening to, feeling and mourning the suffering experienced by its people before discussing strategies for responding it.

Drawing on Nehemiah 2:17-18 from the Old Testament and Galatians 6:2 form the New Testament, Reverend Lenta reminded churches of their responsibility not to turn away from destruction and suffering.

She said that lament should not end with grief but could become a pathway towards the courage needed to rebuild.

“We gather in Chiang Mai today because of an urgent humanitarian call. From the ancestral land of Papua, we bring the dust of displacement, the laments of mothers in the interior, the cries of children whose futures have been cut short, and the blood and tears that have for too long soaked the land blessed by God,” Reverend Lenta said in her reflection, as quoted by pgi.or.id.

A commitment to choosing life

Four days later, on 1 October 2026, the symposium concluded with the reading of The Chiang Main Ecumenical Declaration for Papua.

The declaration was the outcome of the meeting organised by PGI and the Christian Conference of Asia (CCA) under the same there, “Choosing Life: Strengthening the Role of Churches in Humanitarian Protection, Justice, and Peace in Papua.”

 The theme was drawn from Deuteronomy 30:19: “Choose life, so that you and your descendants may live.”

The symposium used the biblical passage as a starting point for a broader question: what should churches do when human life remains under threat?

The declaration describes Choosing Life not simply as a theological imperative, but as an ethical commitment for churches.

It calls on churches to oppose violence and death, protect human dignity, defend vulnerable people, care for the land and creation, and work towards justice, reconciliation and peace.

Papua speaks for itself

About 40 people attended the symposium, including church leaders from Papua and other parts of Indonesia, regional and international ecumenical partners, Indigenous representatives, women and young people, academics, researchers, humanitarian workers and peace advocates.

Representatives from Papua included members of the Fellowship of Evangelical Churches in Papua (PGIW Tanah Papua), the Evangelical Christian Church in the Land of Papua (GKI-TP), the Kingmi Church of Papua, the Indonesian Christian Evangelical Church (GKII), the Protestant Church in Indonesia (GPI) Papua, the Indonesian Bible Christian Fellowship Church (GPKAI), the Holy Word Christian Church (GKKK), and the Fellowship of Churches in Papua (PGGP) Papua and West Papua.

Representatives of the Papuan People’s Council, women’s rights activists, academics from Cenderawasih University and several theological colleges in Papua also attended.

The range of denominations represented was significant. Through the participation of its churches, Papua was not simply presented as an issue for others to discuss. People from the region brought their own experiences, concerns and perspectives directly into the Asian ecumenical forum.

These perspectives were joined by representatives of international ecumenical organisations and networks, including the World Council of Churches (WCC), the World Communion of Reformed Churches (WCRC), the Christian Conference of Asia (CCA), Kerk in Actie, Mission 21 and the United Evangelical Mission (UEM). Young people were represented by the World Student Christian Federation (WSCF).

The General Chair of the Communion of Churches in Indonesia (PGI), Reverend Jacklevyn Frits Manuputty, described the symposium as an important milestone in the PGI’s advocacy work on Papua.

He said regional and international ecumenical networks needed to be strengthened so the concerns of Papuan churches and communities could reach a wider audience.

“PGI believes it is important to bring the genuine voices of Papuan people and churches in Papua to an international platform of churches in Asia. Papua’s voice should not simply be represented by others, but heard directly,” he said.

For Jacklevyn, the theme Choosing Life also carries practical responsibilities for churches.

“Choosing life means affirming the dignity of every human being, protecting vulnerable people, seeking justice and working for peace. Churches cannot simply stand by when human life is under threat. They are called to listen to those who are suffering, speak the truth courageously, strengthen humanitarian work and create space for fair and dignified dialogue,” he said.

Solidarity begins with listening

Support for the symposium also came from international ecumenical networks.

The Moderator of the Central Committee of the World Council of Churches, Bishop Professor Dr Heinrich Bedford-Strohm, expressed the WCC’s solidarity with churches and communities in Papua.

He said churches were called to be present in practical ways amid human suffering and to turn solidarity into responsible action.

A similar commitment was expressed by Peter Prove, Director of the WCC’s Commission of the Churches on International Affairs.

The messages reflected a view that the situation in Papua is not solely the responsibility of churches in Papua or Indonesia. It is also part of the broader calling of churches around the world to uphold life, human dignity, justice and peace.

CCA General Secretary Reverend Jung Eun Grace Moon said solidarity begins with listening.

She called on churches and ecumenical partners to create space for people directly affected by violence, displacement, loss of homes and other consequences of the humanitarian crisis.

In this context, solidarity does not mean speaking on behalf of Papuan communities or taking control of their advocacy. Instead, it means walking alongside them and ensuring their experiences are heard in regional and international discussions.

WCRC General Secretary Reverend Philip Vinod Peacock also described the symposium as an important space for hearing from Papuans.

He reaffirmed the WCRC’s commitment to walking alongside Papuan communities experiencing suffering.

Five calls to action


After days of dialogue and testimony, the commitments made at the symposium were set out in a formal declaration.

The document expressed deep concern about the suffering of Papuan communities as a result of armed violence, displacement, loss of life, fear, threats to Indigenous land and livelihoods, and environmental destruction.

Participants also acknowledged the risk that repeated violence could eventually come to be regarded as normal.

The declaration sets out five calls to action.

First, all parties involved in the conflict in Papua are urged to end violence, protect civilians, and uphold human rights and the dignity of every person.

Second, the humanitarian and displacement crises must be addressed in a coordinated way. The government, churches, HONA (Humanitarian Outreach to Need Assistance initiative) and humanitarian partners are encouraged to ensure reliable data is available, along with basic services protection for vulnerable groups and support for affected communities to recover.

Third, the declaration calls for religious and humanitarian dialogue grounded in faith and Indigenous traditions.

Participants said the situation in Papua cannot be addressed through a security-based approach alone. They called for dialogue that is honest, equal, inclusive and dignified, with meaningful participation from Papuan communities.

Fourth, the rights of Indigenous Papuans to their land, identify, culture, and traditional livelihoods must be protected.

The declaration says development policies and natural resource management must respect those rights, ensure meaningful participation, protect the environment and uphold the principle of Free, Prior and Informed Consent (FPIC).

Fifth, the humanitarian crisis in Papua must receive sustained attention from international ecumenical networks.

Churches around the world and regional and global ecumenical networks are encouraged to strengthen evidence-based advocacy, using verified information, and ensure that the perspectives of Papuan churches and communities are represented directly in international ecumenical forums.

Not an end point

For participants, the declaration is not an endpoint. Instead, it provides a framework for turning solidarity into action.

Churches and ecumenical partners have committed to supporting communities displaced or affected by conflict, strengthening peace and reconciliation education in churches, schools, and communities and ensuring women, children and your people have meaningful roles in humanitarian action, peacebuilding and decision-making.

The commitments will be implanted thorough HONAI. PGI, CCA, WCC and the wider ecumenical network are also expected to translate the declaration into pastoral support, practical solidarity and accountable action.

The journey that began with a period of contemplation on the first day of the symposium had taken on a more concrete form.

The lament brought from Papua did not remain an expression of grief. It became a shared awareness, a commitment to solidarity and a call to action.

In Chiang Mai, the churches chose not to allow Papua’s suffering to remain unheard.

“From Chiang Mai, we choose life”, to end violence, protect life, genuinely listen to the voices of Papuan communities, pursue justice and refuse to allow their suffering to continue in silence. (*)

—————————————————
5) Police arbitrarily detain and torture Papuan civilian in Dogiyai Regency
On 30 September 2026, officers of the Dogiyai District Police apprehended Mr Zeth Giyai in front of the Kamuu District Office in Mauwa Village, Dogiyai Regency, Papua Tengah province. He was detained at the Dogiyai District Police Headquarters for approximately two days before being released on 2 October 2026 (see photo on top, source: independent HRD). Community representatives alleged that police officers tortured Mr Giyai during his detention. Questions also remain concerning the legal grounds for his arrest, the examination of his mobile phone, and the conditions imposed upon his release.
Police officers conducting a night patrol stopped Mr Giyai and attempted to inspect a mobile phone he was carrying at approximately 7:30 pm. Mr Giyai threw the device into nearby bushes when officers sought to inspect it. Thereupon, the officers retrieved the phone and took him to the Dogiyai District Police Headquarters, suspecting that the phone had been stolen. Community representatives subsequently visited the police station and demanded clarification and Mr Giyai’s release. Police investigators declined to release him, stating that the contents of the mobile phone still had to be examined.
On 2 October, representatives of the Papuan People’s Solidarity (Solidaritas Rakyat Papua, SRP), members of the Dogiyai Regency People’s Representative Council (DPRK), tribal and traditional leaders, community representatives and youth leaders met with the Dogiyai District Police Chief. According to SRP, police initially provided no clear explanation for the arrest. Community representatives stated that allegations linking Mr Giyai to the West Papua National Liberation Army (TPNPB) only emerged after officers had examined the contents of his mobile phone. Mr Giyai was released later that day but was reportedly ordered by the Dogiyai District Police Chief to report to the police station twice a week. He did not provide an official response concerning the torture allegations or the evidentiary basis for the allegation of TPNPB engagement.

Human rights and legal analysis

The circumstances raise serious concerns regarding arbitrary arrest and detention. Indonesia’s new Code of Criminal Procedure, Law No. 20 of 2025 (KUHAP), has been in force since 2 January 2026 and replaced Law No. 8 of 1981. Under Articles 94 and 95, an arrest must generally be based on at least two items of evidence, and officers must show their assignment letter and provide an arrest warrant specifying the suspect’s identity, the grounds for arrest, the alleged criminal offence and the place of examination, except in cases of arrest in flagrante delicto. Article 96 limits arrest to a maximum of 1 x 24 hours unless another statutory basis applies. Formal detention is subject to additional requirements under Article 100.
If Mr Zeth Giyai remained deprived of his liberty for approximately two days without a lawful detention order and the required evidentiary and procedural safeguards, his detention may have violated Indonesian criminal procedure as well as the prohibition of arbitrary detention under Article 9 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR).
The examination of Mr Giyai’s mobile phone also requires independent scrutiny. Under Articles 112 and 113 of the 2025 KUHAP, searches may extend to electronic information and electronic documents, but investigators must generally obtain prior authorisation from the competent district court. An exception exists in urgent circumstances, in which case judicial approval must subsequently be sought within the prescribed period. Examination of private communications and digital information without an adequate legal basis may additionally engage the protection against arbitrary or unlawful interference with privacy under Article 17 ICCPR. The UN Human Rights Committee has emphasised that the confidentiality of correspondence and communications must be protected against arbitrary State interference.
Of particular concern are allegations that officers tortured Mr Giyai whilst he was in police custody. Such conduct, if substantiated, would violate the absolute prohibition of torture and cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment under Article 7 ICCPR. The allegations also trigger Indonesia’s obligation under Articles 12 and 13 of the Convention against Torture (CAT) to ensure a prompt and impartial investigation wherever there are reasonable grounds to believe that torture or other prohibited ill-treatment has occurred and to enable victims to submit complaints without intimidation. A prompt independent medical examination and proper documentation of any injuries are therefore essential both for Mr Giyai’s treatment and for the preservation of potential evidence.
Detailed Case Data
Document ID: HRM-CAS-144-2026
Location: X2RJ+9JX, Jl. Trans Nabire, Kimupugi, Kec. Kamu, Kabupaten Dogiyai, Papua Tengah 98862, Indonesia (-4.009014, 136.0316161) arbitrary detention occurred at the Kamuu District Office. Officers allegedly tortured Mr Giyai during detention at the Polres Dogiyai
Region: Indonesia > Central Papua > Dogiyai > Kamuu
Total number of victims: 1
#Number of VictimsName, DetailsGenderAgeGroup AffiliationViolations
1.1Zeth Giyai
diverseapproximateIndigenous Peoplesarbitrary detention, torture
Period of incident: 30/09/2026 – 02/10/2026
Perpetrator: Republic Indonesia > Indonesian Security Forces > Indonesian Police > POLRES
Perpetrator details: Dogiyai District Police
Issues: indigenous peoples
Related Cases:

---------------------------------------------------