Friday, September 18, 2026

1) Latest figures on West Papuan deaths tell a grim story


2) Indonesian military personnel arbitrarily detain five indigenous Papuans in Sugapa – Detainees released after community protest

3) Scientists warn: West Papua’s last glacier nears extinction

4) Police arbitrarily detain six KNPB members, including a minor, in Sentani

5) Amnesty International Indonesia calls for end to killings of civilians in Papua

6) Military personnel detain two Papuan civilians during overnight operation in Intan Jaya

7) New Report. Ever Shrinking Civic Spacetime in Papua

8) Dialogue and understanding Papua’s history key to peace, speakers say
-------------------------------------



NIT
1) Latest figures on West Papuan deaths tell a grim story
Andrew Mathieson
 Published September 18, 2026 at 5.00am (AWST) 

Indonesia's National Commission on Human Rights has counted 109 people have officially been killed or seriously injured in violence from the ongoing armed conflict across the West Papua territory in the first half of this year.

According to the release of records that the commission compiled covering the six Indonesian-administered Papuan provinces, 59 deaths and a further 50 other casualties have occurred from 42 separate violent incidents up until the end of June.

The body count appears to be on course to match or surpass the tally for the 2025 calendar year.

Figures indicated that 119 people died and a further 43 others were injured in the Indigenous Tanah Papua region over 97 recorded incidents inside a corresponding 12-month period.

"The violence and armed conflict have also displaced thousands of people across several areas of (West) Papua, including Jayapura, Nabire, Mimika, Wamena, Sorong and Teluk Bintuni," National Commission on Human Rights team leader, Atnike Nova Sigiro, said in a statement.


Further research of figures indicates that across the first six months of 2026, the Highland Papua and Central Papua provinces respectively had the highest recorded number of deaths and injuries across the West Papua territory with a combined 46 killed and 18 serious injuries.

Ms Sigiro said the situation across West Papua was becoming increasingly critical over the growing implications for human rights in the territory. 

She said this was reflected in the increasing intensity of violence and armed conflict, which has resulted in civilian deaths and the increased numbers of internally-displaced people. 

Indonesia's national commissioners on Human Rights met with Jakarta's Presidential Chief of Staff, Dudung Abdurachman, at the Presidential staff office last week to raise concerns about the high levels of violence that has continued to result in civilian deaths.

Ms Sigiro said its National Commission on Human Rights asked Mr Abdurachman to raise the issue with Indonesian President Prabowo Subianto to push further for policies aimed at reducing violence and armed conflict, as well as ensuring the basic rights of the internally displaced are respected. 

"This includes the right to adequate housing, healthcare, education for children and other basic needs," she said.

The National Commission on Human Rights proposed involving relevant government agencies in addressing these issues, including the Indonesian military, national police, Ministry of Primary and Secondary Education, Ministry of Social Affairs, Ministry of Health, and Ministry of Housing and Settlement Areas.


——————————————————————

2) Indonesian military personnel arbitrarily detain five indigenous Papuans in Sugapa – Detainees released after community protest

On 5 September 2026, personnel belonging to Infantry Battalion 509/Kostrad of the Indonesian National Armed Forces (TNI) reportedly detained five indigenous Papuans near the TNI J2 post in Wandoga Village, Sugapa District, Intan Jaya Regency, Central Papua Province. Local sources stated that military personnel accused the five men of acting as intermediaries for, or being affiliated with, the West Papua National Liberation Army (TPNPB). Their families and members of the local community rejected these allegations and maintained that all five were civilians. The men were reportedly held overnight at the military post before being released on 6 September 2026, following sustained pressure from relatives and local residents.
According to information from local sources, the five men were walking in the Sugapa area on the afternoon of 5 September when military personnel detained them near the J2 post at approximately 3:00 pm. Subsequent local reports stated that they were taken to the J2 post operated by personnel of Infantry Battalion 509/Kostrad. They were questioned or otherwise held on suspicion of supporting TPNPB combatants. No arrest warrant, formal criminal allegation, or other legal basis for their detention was presented to their families. Later that evening, residents from Bilogai and Yokatapa villages, relatives gathered outside the military post. They reportedly remained near the post around a bonfire (see photos and videos on top and below, source: independent HRD), demanding clarification concerning the grounds for the arrests and calling for the detainees’ release.
The community mobilisation continued into the evening of 5 September. Local residents called on government officials to intervene and facilitate communication with the security forces. The families repeatedly maintained that the five detainees were civilians and rejected claims that they were members or intermediaries of the TPNPB. The five men were ultimately released on 6 September 2026, after sustained pressure from their families and the surrounding community.

Human rights analysis

The circumstances surrounding the detention raise concerns under the right to liberty and security of person. Article 9 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), to which Indonesia is a State Party, prohibits arbitrary arrest or detention and requires that any person deprived of liberty be informed promptly of the reasons for the arrest and of any criminal charges. Deprivation of liberty must not only have a basis in domestic law but must also be necessary, reasonable and proportionate in the individual circumstances. Detaining civilians merely on the basis of an unsubstantiated suspicion of association with an armed group, without transparent legal procedures or access to ordinary judicial safeguards, may therefore amount to arbitrary detention.
The alleged involvement of TNI personnel also raises significant questions concerning the legal basis and competence of military personnel to apprehend and detain civilians for ordinary criminal-law purposes. Criminal investigations concerning civilians should be carried out in accordance with Indonesia’s applicable criminal procedural framework and accompanied by the safeguards prescribed by law. Where military personnel temporarily apprehend an individual because of an immediate security situation, any continued deprivation of liberty must nevertheless have a lawful basis and be subject to appropriate civilian judicial safeguards. Holding civilians inside a military post without transparency regarding their legal status, the evidence against them or access to procedural safeguards increases the risk of arbitrary detention, coercive interrogation and ill-treatment.
The case must also be considered within the broader security context of Intan Jaya Regency, where armed confrontations between Indonesian security forces and the TPNPB have repeatedly affected civilians. International human rights obligations continue to apply in areas affected by armed conflict. Security forces must distinguish between civilians and persons directly participating in hostilities and may not treat residents as members or supporters of an armed group merely because of their place of residence, family connections or perceived political associations. Where there are reasonable grounds to suspect an individual of a criminal offence, authorities should rely on individualised evidence and procedures consistent with the principles of legality, presumption of innocence and due process.

Relatives and residents from Wandoga, Bilogai, Yokatapa and other villages gathered outside the J2 military post on 5 September 2026


Detailed Case Data
Document ID: HRM-CAS-121-2026
Location: 726J+5QG, Bilogai, Sugapa, Intan Jaya Regency, Central Papua 98768, Indonesia (-3.7395623, 137.0319626) Wandoga Village
Region: Indonesia > Central Papua > Intan Jaya > Sugapa
Total number of victims: 5
#Number of VictimsName, DetailsGenderAgeGroup AffiliationViolations
1.Yoas Japugau
maleunknown Indigenous Peoplesarbitrary detention
2.Daud Sondegau
maleunknown Indigenous Peoplesarbitrary detention
3.Noti Sondegau
maleunknown Indigenous Peoplesarbitrary detention
4.Paskalis Belau
maleunknown Indigenous Peoplesarbitrary detention
5.Rian Sondegau
maleunknown Indigenous Peoplesarbitrary detention
Period of incident: 05/09/2026 – 05/09/2026
Perpetrator: Republic Indonesia > Indonesian Security Forces > Indonesian Military (TNI) > Indonesian Army (TNI-AD)
Perpetrator details: Infantry Battalion 509/Kostrad
Issues: indigenous peoples
Related Cases:


————————————————————————

3) Scientists warn: West Papua’s last glacier nears extinction

The ice around Carstensz Peak in West Papua’s central highlands has shrunk to roughly 16 hectaresand could disappear entirely by late 2026 or early 2027, according to the World Meteorological Organisation. Once part of a wider system of “eternal snow” crowning peaks such as Mandala and Trikora, the Carstensz glaciers are now the only ones left, having lost more than 99 per cent of their extent since around 1850. The retreat has even reshaped the mountains themselves: Ngga Pulu, higher than Carstensz in 1936 thanks to its ice cap, has since sunk below its neighbour, making Carstensz the highest point in Oceania.
Czech glacial ecologist Marie Sabacka of Charles University, who studied the East Carstensz Glacier in March alongside Roberto Ambrosini of the University of Milan, says the ice is far from lifeless. Preliminary analysis of ice cores and dark sediment samples points to a distinctive community of microorganisms and microscopic animals, some belonging to lineages rarely seen in glaciers elsewhere. Because glacial communities are highly localised, no other site can substitute for East Carstensz once it melts, meaning an unexplored ecosystem and a climate archive of the tropical Pacific will vanish together. Sabacka attributes the loss primarily to human-driven atmospheric warming, which raises the freezing level and turns snowfall into rain, with El NiƱo events accelerating the process.
While the glaciers are too small to affect sea levels or local water supplies in rain-soaked Papua, Sabacka argues their disappearance carries a stark moral weight. Indigenous communities contribute almost nothing to global greenhouse gas emissions, yet they are watching irreversible changes unfold on their ancestral land. The same climate shifts are already hitting highland gardens through drought, extreme rainfall and crop-killing frost, effects she says may weigh far more heavily on daily life than the loss of meltwater. The vanishing ice is less a resource than a warning sign, and a symbol of how those least responsible for warming are among the first to bear its consequences.



-------------------------------------------------------------


4) Police arbitrarily detain six KNPB members, including a minor, in Sentani

On 17 September 2026, officers of the Jayapura District Police reportedly detained six political activists, including a 17-year old minor, affiliated with the West Papua National Committee (KNPB) at Old Sentani Market (Pasar Lama Sentani) in Jayapura Regency, Papua Province. They were transported to the Jayapura District Police Station in Doyo Baru and released after almost two hours in police custody.
According to the information received, members of the KNPB Sentani Weya Sector had gathered at Old Sentani Market on the evening of 17 September to conduct a coffee bazaar. At approximately 07:10 pm, police personnel reportedly arrived on three motorcycles and in one patrol vehicle. Officers then apprehended the six KNPB members and transported them to the Jayapura District Police Station in Doyo Baru (see video below, source: independent HRD). Witnesses and those affected reportedly received no explanation at the place of arrest concerning the suspected criminal offense or other legal grounds for taking the men into custody. Representatives of churches and lawyers subsequently engaged with the police in an effort to secure their release. At approximately 9:00 pm, all six were released without criminal charges (see photo on top, source: independent HRD).

Human rights and legal analysis

The case information raise concerns under Article 9 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), which protects every person against arbitrary arrest or detention and requires anyone who is arrested to be informed, at the time of arrest, of the reasons for the deprivation of liberty. Indonesia ratified the ICCPR through Law No. 12 of 2005. The UN Human Rights Committee has clarified that arbitrariness extends beyond formal unlawfulness and includes considerations of necessity, proportionality, predictability and due process. It has further emphasised that the protection of Article 9 applies from the moment a person is apprehended and is not dependent upon the duration of detention. Accordingly, the fact that the six men were released after less than two hours does not in itself remove the need for the authorities to demonstrate that their apprehension had a lawful, necessary and non-arbitrary basis.
The reported circumstances also require examination under Indonesia’s new Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP), Law No. 20 of 2025, which entered into force on 2 January 2026 and replaced Law No. 8 of 1981. Article 94 provides that arrest must be based on a minimum of two items of evidence. Under Article 95, police carrying out an arrest must show their official assignment order and provide the suspect with an arrest warrant identifying the person concerned, the reason for arrest, a brief description of the suspected criminal offence and the place where the suspect will be examined. Arrest without such an order is permitted in a caught-in-the-act situation. If the six KNPB members were neither apprehended while committing an offence nor provided with the procedural safeguards required by Articles 94 and 95, their arrests may have been incompatible with Indonesian criminal procedure as well as Article 9 ICCPR.
The apparent connection between the arrests and the victims’ membership in the KNPB additionally raises questions concerning the rights to freedom of expression and association under Articles 19 and 22 ICCPR. Where collective activities also constitute a peaceful assembly, Article 21 ICCPR is engaged. International human rights standards require restrictions on peaceful collective activity to have a clear legal basis and to satisfy strict requirements of necessity and proportionality. The Human Rights Committee has stressed that authorities should not restrict peaceful assemblies merely on the basis of the identity of participants or their relationship with the authorities. Membership of an organisation or participation in its peaceful activities, without evidence of individual criminal conduct, cannot by itself provide an adequate basis for arbitrary deprivation of liberty.
Particular concern arises from the arrest of SM, aged 17, who is legally a child under Indonesian law. Indonesia’s Child Protection Law defines a child as every person below the age of 18. Law No. 11 of 2012 on the Juvenile Criminal Justice System further requires the arrest of a child to be carried out humanely and with due regard to the child’s age and particular needs. International standards likewise require additional safeguards when children are deprived of their liberty, including prompt notification of parents, guardians or legal representatives of the arrest and its reasons.

Six KNPB activist are brought to the Jayapura District Police Station in Doyo Baru in a police patrol car on 17 September 2026



Detailed Case Data
Document ID: HRM-CAS-123-2026
Location: Sentani Kota, Sentani, Jayapura Regency, Papua, Indonesia (-2.5685926, 140.5238784)Pasar Lama Sentani
Region: Indonesia > Papua > Jayapura Regency > Sentani
Total number of victims: 6
#Number of VictimsName, DetailsGenderAgeGroup AffiliationViolations
1.SM
male17 Activist, Indigenous Peoplesarbitrary detention
2.Mendanus Wisal
male22 Activist, Indigenous Peoplesarbitrary detention
3.Yulianus Wisal
male20 Activist, Indigenous Peoplesarbitrary detention
4.Yusak Wisal
male20 Activist, Indigenous Peoplesarbitrary detention
5.Ipenua Kwem
male24 Activist, Indigenous Peoplesarbitrary detention
6.Agus Deal
male19 Activist, Indigenous Peoplesarbitrary detention
Period of incident: 17/09/2026 – 17/09/2026
Perpetrator: Republic Indonesia > Indonesian Security Forces > Indonesian Police > POLRES
Perpetrator details: Polres Jayapura
Issues: indigenous peoples
Related Cases:
———————————————————————


5) Amnesty International Indonesia calls for end to killings of civilians in Papua

News Desk September 18, 2026

Jayapura, Jubi – Amnesty International Indonesia has called for an end to the killing of civilians in Papua by armed groups, including the West Papua National Liberation Army (TPNPB).

The call came in response to recent cases involving the alleged abduction, hostage-taking and killing of civilians in Papua by the TPNPB.

Amnesty International Indonesia executive director Usman Hamid said the organisation condemned a series of killings of civilians in Papua over the past week, describing them as serious crimes under international humanitarian law.

“We extend our condolences to the victims’ families. We call on the state to investigate the killings and prosecute those responsible,” Usman Hamid said in an electronic message on Wednesday night (16/9/2026).

He said all parties involved in the armed conflict in Papua, including the military and pro-independence armed groups such as the TPNPB, were required to comply with international humanitarian law. He also added that the right to life was non-negotiable.

According to Usman Hamid, the incidents reflected an escalation of the armed conflict in Papua.

He warned against the conflict developing along the lines of Sudan, resulting in large numbers of civilian casualties.

“The killing of civilians violates the humanitarian principles of international humanitarian law. There is no justification for such crimes. The right to life is an absolute right that must be protected,” he said.

Amnesty International Indonesia also condemned the abduction and hostage-taking of nine women in Mimika on 17 August.

“We oppose killings in any form. Whatever the reason, including political motives, such acts are unacceptable and are not justified under international law. Politically motivated killings and hostage-taking are prohibited both in international armed conflicts and internal armed conflicts,” he said.

Usman Hamid said survivors and victims’ families had the right to know what happened, who was responsible and what concrete steps Indonesia would take to deliver justice.

He said proper investigations and fair trials were necessary to help ease the conflict.

“Anyone responsible for killing civilians must be held accountable through legal proceedings, and authorities must take steps to prevent similar incidents.”

Usman Hamid said armed conflicts were subject to minimum standards for humane treatment, including prohibitions on torture, politically motivated killings and hostage-taking.

He said all parties involved in armed conflict were required to uphold those standards.

Amnesty International Indonesia called on the government to end all forms of violence in Papua through conflict-resolution efforts.

It cited the Papua Road Map study, which describes the armed conflict in Papua as Indonesia’s longest-running conflict following the end of the conflicts in Aceh and East Timor.

Amnesty said the prolonged conflict was linked to the continued use of a militaristic approach.

“We urge the Indonesian government and the House of Representatives to immediately open peace negotiations or humanitarian dialogue to resolve the armed conflict in Papua. Peace dialogue must involve all stakeholders in Papua to ensure a dignified solution to this prolonged conflict,” Usman Hamid said.

Amnesty International Indonesia said a series of killings and other acts of violence against civilians had occurred in Papua in recent weeks.

Among the incidents was the killing of a driver who was shot by the West Papua National Liberation Army-Free Papua Movement (TPNPB-OPM) Kodap III Ndugama Derakma on the Trans Wamena-Nduga Road in Papua Highlands province on 15 September 2026.

TPNPB-OPM accused the victim of being an Indonesian military intelligence agent. The killing was also confirmed by Habema Operations Command spokesperson M Wirya Arthadiguna, who said the travel driver was found inside a burnt vehicle.

Earlier, TPNPB-OPM Kodap III killed three civil servants in Jayawijaya Regency on 9 September.

The victims were travelling back to Wamena after carrying out duties involving livestock assistance and agricultural extension services for local communities.

The victims were also accused of being Indonesian military intelligence agents, according to TPNPB-OPM.

In relation to the alleged hostage-taking of nine women in Mimika Regency, Central Papua, the TPN OPM Kodap X Keneyam has been accused of involvement, according to TPN OPM.

The incident was linked to an attack on Indonesian military personnel in Jila District, Mimika Regency, between 12 and 17 August 2026.

Two of the nine women reportedly escaped while being taken by TPN-OPM. When they were found by local residents, one of the two women was already dead. (*)




----------------------------------------------------------------------

6) Military personnel detain two Papuan civilians during overnight operation in Intan Jaya

Military personnel reportedly detained Mr Melkias Hagismijau, 25, and Mr Pius Emani, 27, during an overnight military operation in Eknemba Village, Sugapa District, Intan Jaya Regency, Central Papua Province, beginning around midnight on 8 September 2026. Both were reportedly detained at the Eknemba TNI Outpost until local residents and community representatives intervened. They were released on the morning of 9 September and allowed to return home.
According to the information received by local sources, Indonesian military personnel conducted an operation in the Sugapa area during the night of 8 September. Local sources state the operation continued into the morning of 9 September 2026. During the operation, soldiers apprehended Mr Melkias Hagismijau, a 25-year-old resident of Eknemba Village, and Mr Pius Emani, aged 27, from Sawenepa Village. Both men were taken to the Eknemba TNI Outpost. After learning of their detention, residents of Eknemba Village, accompanied by local community representatives and intellectuals, approached the commander of the military post and entered into negotiations concerning their release. The two civilians were subsequently released in the morning of 9 September 2026 without criminal charges (see photo pon top, source: independent HRD).
The incident occurred only several days after another case of civilian detention by Indonesian military personnel in Sugapa District. On 5 September 2026, personnel reportedly belonging to Infantry Battalion 509/Kostrad detained five indigenous Papuans near a TNI post in Sugapa. The five civilians were reportedly accused of involvement with the West Papua National Liberation Army (TPNPB). Their families and other residents subsequently gathered outside the military post and demanded their release. After approximately 24 hours of questioning, all five men were released after the authorities reportedly failed to establish evidence substantiating the allegations against them.

Human rights analysis

The deprivation of liberty of Mr Hagismijau and Mr Emani engages Article 9 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), to which Indonesia is a State Party. Article 9 protects every person against arbitrary arrest and detention and requires any deprivation of liberty to have a clear legal basis following procedures established by law. The UN Human Rights Committee has emphasised that arbitrariness extends beyond formal illegality and includes considerations of inappropriateness, injustice, unpredictability, lack of due process, necessity and proportionality. Importantly, even detention lasting only a few hours constitutes a deprivation of liberty for the purposes of Article 9; there is no minimum duration before these safeguards become applicable.
The case also raises questions concerning compliance with Indonesia’s domestic criminal procedural safeguards. Law No. 20 of 2025 on the Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP) has been in force since 2 January 2026 and replaced the former Law No. 8 of 1981. Under Articles 93–96 of the new KUHAP, arrest is regulated as a coercive criminal-procedure measure. The law provides that arrests are conducted by authorised investigators or, in specified circumstances, other legally empowered investigators; an arrest must generally be based on at least two items of evidence. Investigators must present their assignment documentation and provide an arrest warrant identifying the suspect, the reason for arrest, the alleged offence and the place of examination, except in cases of arrest in flagrante delicto. The ordinary maximum duration of an arrest is 1 x 24 hours, unless another law provides otherwise.
On the information presently available, there is no indication that Mr Hagismijau or Mr Emani were apprehended pursuant to an arrest warrant, informed of a specific criminal allegation, presented with the evidence forming the basis of their arrest, or detained under the authority of a competent criminal investigator. The fact that a military security operation was being conducted in Intan Jaya Regency does not in itself remove the procedural safeguards protecting civilians against arbitrary deprivation of liberty. While the amended TNI Law, Law No. 3 of 2025, permits military operations other than war for specified purposes, including responding to armed separatist movements, such provisions cannot be interpreted as removing the statutory safeguards governing deprivation of liberty under Indonesian criminal procedure or Indonesia’s obligations under international human rights law.
The recurrence of short-term civilian detentions during military operations is particularly concerning in the context of Intan Jaya Regency, where military personnel operate amongst civilian communities affected by the continuing armed conflict. The detention of Mr Hagismijau and Mr Emani only days after a similar incident raises concern over an emerging pattern in which civilians are apprehended by military personnel during security operations. Security forces must distinguish between persons directly participating in armed activities and the civilian population. Family relationships, ethnicity, political opinion or unsubstantiated allegations of association with an armed group do not provide sufficient grounds for deprivation of liberty. Any security-related arrest must be individualised, based on law and evidence, and accompanied by effective procedural safeguards.
Detailed Case Data
Document ID: HRM-CAS-122-2026
Location: 726J+5QG, Bilogai, Sugapa, Intan Jaya Regency, Central Papua 98768, Indonesia (-3.7395623, 137.0319626) Eknemba Village
Region: Indonesia > Central Papua > Intan Jaya > Sugapa
Total number of victims: 2
#Number of VictimsName, DetailsGenderAgeGroup AffiliationViolations
1.Melkias Hagismijau
male25 Indigenous Peoplesarbitrary detention
2.Pius Emani
male27 Indigenous Peoplesarbitrary detention
Period of incident: 08/09/2026 – 09/09/2026
Perpetrator: Republic Indonesia > Indonesian Security Forces > Indonesian Military (TNI)
Issues: indigenous peoples
Related Cases:


———————————————————————————
7) New Report
Ever Shrinking Civic Spacetime in Papua

CoDA Series 2: Papua

This report on shrinking civic spacetime in Papua is the second of the CoDA series (to access the first series, you may go to this link.
Developed by the Institute of International Studies (IIS) Universitas Gadjah Mada, CoDA is part of Connect, Defend, Act (CDA), a project conceived by Hivos and Humanis, with the support of the Norwegian Agency for Development and Cooperation (NORAD).
In Papua, CoDA was co-designed and co-implemented by IIS UGM and Papua Democratic Institute (PD-Institute). Drawing on interviews and reviews of the literature, the report elaborates how civil society actors (CSAs) in Papua live their civic life amidst profound political, territorial, ecological, demographic, economic, and security onslaughts.
Rather than assessing civic spacetime solely through institutional guarantees towards civil liberties and elections, CoDA delves into the capacities of CSAs to connect with one another, defend against physical and digital attacks, as well as act to push back against shrinking civic spacetime………


————————————————————————————

8) Dialogue and understanding Papua’s history key to peace, speakers say

 News Desk September 18, 2026

Jayapura, Jubi — Pastor Yance Douw of the Jayapura Diocese says dialogue, access to information, solidarity and a better understanding of Papua’s history are important to addressing the ongoing conflict and humanitarian issues in the region.

He said churches had an important role in equipping and empowering their congregations so peace and humanitarian initiatives could continue in a sustainable way.

He said young people needed to be prepared to carry forward efforts to promote peace, humanitarian protection, environmental protection and religious tolerance.

Pastor Douw made the comments during a public dialogue titled “Assessing the Role and Response of Religious Communities to Humanitarian Dynamics and Peace Challenges in Papua”, organised by the Papua Muslim Council in Kotaraja, Abepura District, Jayapura, on Thursday (17/9/2026).

“What is needed is to equip our communities with understanding, empower and motivate them, and provide the support needed so the peace movement can move forward effectively,” Pastor Douw said.

He said sustaining peace initiatives also required support from various sectors, including the government.

The government, he said, should respond positively and support the work of churches and other religious organisations in carrying out humanitarian activities.

Pastor Douw said the church regarded people affected by violence as part of its concern, including both Indigenous Papuans and non-Papuans living in Papua.

He said the suffering experienced by Indigenous and non-Indigenous people who had become victims of violence was also a wound felt by the church and its leaders.

He said the church had several ways of responding to violence. As well as praying for victims, the church sought reliable and accurate information before deciding what action to take.

Once information had been verified, Pastor Douw said the church could provide support to victims, work with other organisations on advocacy, or monitor developments depending on the circumstances.

He said peace required networks of communication and dialogue, both within religious communities and between different faiths.

Religious leaders, he said, could build communication with various groups to create opportunities for dialogue.

He said meetings involving religious leaders, government officials, security forces and groups involved in the conflict were important for creating space for peaceful solutions.

Dialogue, he said, needed to be based on respect for human dignity. It also needed to be accompanied by solidarity because justice and truth were difficult to pursue without it.

“By standing together to pursue justice and truth, peace can be achieved because that process involves respecting human dignity,” he said.

Meanwhile, historian Dr Bernarda Meteray said a better understanding of Papua’s history should be an important part of efforts to resolve the conflict in the region.

Meteray said Papua’s history had often been a sensitive subject to discuss. Different views about Papua’s integration into Indonesia, she said, needed to be discussed openly so the roots of the conflict could be better understood.

“If we want to understand the conflict, we have to start with history,” Meteray said.

She said physical development alone was not enough to address the fundamental issues facing Papuan communities.

She pointed to the continuing conflict despite various development programs as evidence that development had not resolved the underlying problems.

“Development is needed by everyone in Papua. But development has not addressed the problems because the conflict continues,” she said.

Meteray said the government needed to accept criticism from Indigenous Papuans as part of the process of developing the region.

Criticism, she said, should not always be viewed as a threat, but could instead provide useful input for improving development policies.

She said policymakers should seek to understand Papuan communities before policies were developed, rather than the other way around.

That understanding, Meteray said, required time because Papuan communities had different characteristics, historical experiences and social and cultural contexts.

Meteray also highlighted the importance of helping young people understand Papua’s history.

She said young people received accounts of Papua’s history from their families and communities. Differences between family accounts and information obtained from other sources could influence how young people understood the conflict.

She said historical resources were therefore needed to help young people develop a more comprehensive understanding of Papua’s history.

“The state has not yet produced a good standard history book that generations can understand about this long historical journey,” she said.

Meteray said peacebuilding was not solely the responsibility of the government. All sections of society, including religious and community leaders, had a role to play in building peace in Papua.

“We are all responsible for building peace in Papua and ending conflict, with dialogue as the best path towards peace in Papua,” she said.

Forums that bring together different sections of society were particularly important while Papua continued to face humanitarian concerns and conflict.

The involvement of religious communities in responding to humanitarian issues in Papua could also form an important part of efforts to build peace through dialogue. (*)

-------------------------------