Friday, May 30, 2025

1) Indonesian security forces shoot five minors in Kimupugi Village, Dogiyai Regency

 


2) Government asked to protect West Papuans as renewed fighting escalates

3) The hoaxes and economic motives behind military operations in Intan Jaya  


————————————————————
Human Rights Monitor


1) Indonesian security forces shoot five minors in Kimupugi Village, Dogiyai Regency

On the morning of 23 May 2025, at approximately 10:00 am, five Papuan minors sustained bullet injuries as Indonesian joint security forces opened fire at them in Kimupugi Village, Dogiyai Regency, Papua Tengah Province. The shooting was triggered by an earlier incident involving an unidentified group throwing stones at the police post in the Pasar Lama Market in Mowanemani Town. Following the incident, security forces shot indiscriminately, injuring five minors. The incident prompted widespread panic, leading residents to flee to neighbouring villages and districts.
According to eyewitness reports from Kimupugi, the police began firing live ammunition shortly after a group of unidentified individuals threw stones at the police post across the Tuka River. According to the information received, the security forces came to Kimupugi village shortly after the incident and began opening fire on civilians. The victims are under 16 years old (see table below, source: WPCC). Human rights defenders found two bullet shells at the site of the crime (see photo pn top, source: WPCC)
Following the shooting, additional military reinforcements from the regencies of Nabire, Paniai, and Deiyai were deployed to Dogiyai (see video below: source: WPCC). The reinforcements included eight military vehicles equipped with war equipment passing through Kali Menou and Kali Bumi. Reports indicate that approximately 200 military personnel had already been deployed to Dogiyai in the week preceding the incident.
The shooting of unarmed minors constitutes a grave violation of international human rights and humanitarian law. Under the Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC), to which Indonesia is a party. Children must be afforded special protection in times of conflict and law enforcement operations. The indiscriminate use of live ammunition in a populated civilian area, especially targeting children, amounts to a breach of the right to life (Article 6, ICCPR) and the prohibition of arbitrary deprivation of life. Moreover, the failure to distinguish between civilians and those allegedly responsible for the stone-throwing incident reflects a systemic pattern of excessive and disproportionate use of force by Indonesian security forces in Papua. The forced displacement of civilians from Kimupugi further exacerbates the humanitarian impact of this operation.

Table of victims who sustained gunshot wounds during the shooting in Kimupugi Village on 23 May 2025

No.NameAgeInjury Description
1Marthen Tebai12Shot in the leg
2Pios Waine15Shot in the chest (serious injury)
3Nopentus Tebai13Shot in the ear
4Deserius Tebai12Shot in the leg
5Feri Tibakoto16Shot in the abdomen

Security forces driving to Dogiyai following the shooting of five minors on 23 May 2025  https://humanrightsmonitor.org/case/indonesian-security-forces-shoot-five-minors-in-kimupugi-village-dogiyai-regency/






-------------------------------------------



2) Government asked to protect West Papuans as renewed fighting escalates

Published on 30/05/2025 GMT+7  Reading time 5 minutes  Author: Gusty Da Costa  Editor: Imanuddin Razak

An escalation in fighting between Indonesian security forces and Papuan separatist armed groups in West Papua has threatened the security of the largely Indigenous population, Human Rights Watch said on Thursday, May 29, 2025.

Security forces’ military operations in the densely forested Central Highlands areas have allegedly killed and injured dozens of civilians with drone strikes and indiscriminate use of explosive munitions. The National Liberation Army of West Papua, the armed wing of the Free Papua Movement, has claimed responsibility in the killing of 17 alleged miners between April 6 and April 9, 2025.

“The Indonesian military has a long history of abuses in West Papua that poses a particular risk to the Indigenous communities,” Meenakshi Ganguly, deputy Asia director at Human Rights Watch, said. 

“Concerned governments need to press the Prabowo administration and Papuan separatist armed groups to abide by the laws of war.” she added. 

The fighting escalated after the attack on the alleged miners, which the armed group accused of being targeted soldiers or military informers. The Indonesian military escalated its ongoing operations, called Operation Habema, in West Papua’s six provinces, especially in the Central Highlands, where Papuan militant groups have been active for over four decades.

On May 14, the military said that it had killed 18 separatist fighters in Intan Jaya regency, and that it had recovered weapons including rifles, bows and arrows, communications equipment, and Morning Star flags, the symbol of Papuan resistance. Further military operations have allegedly resulted in burning down villages and attacks on churches. Papuan activists and pastors told Human Rights Watch that government forces tend to treat all Papuan forest dwellers who own and routinely use bows and arrows for hunting as combatants.

Information about abuses has been difficult to corroborate because the hostilities are occurring in remote areas in Intan Jaya, Yahukimo, Nduga, and Pegunungan Bintang regencies. Pastors, church workers, and local journalists interviewed by Human Rights Watch said that Indonesian forces have been using drones and helicopter gunships to drop bombs. 

Civilians from the Korowai tribe community, known for their tall treehouse dwellings, have been harmed in these attacks, and have desperately fled the fighting. Displaced villagers, mostly from Intan Jaya, have sought shelter and refuge in churches in Sugapa, the capital of the regency.

The armed group has made allegations, which Human Rights Watch could not corroborate, that the Indonesian military attacks harmed civilians. It reported that a mortar or rocket attack outside a church in Ilaga, Puncak regency, hit two young men on May 6, killing one of them, Deris Kogoya, an 18-year-old student.

The group said that the Indonesian military attack on May 14, in which the military claimed all 18 people killed were separatist combatants, mostly killed civilians. Ronald Rischardt Tapilatu, pastor of the Evangelical Christian Church of the Land of Papua, said that at least 3 civilians were among the 18 bodies. Human Rights Watch has a list of the 18 killed, which includes 1 known child.

The daughter of Hetina Mirip said that her mother was found dead on May 17 near her house in Sugapa, while Indonesian soldiers surrounded their village. She wrote that the soldiers tried to cremate and bury her mother’s body. A military spokesman denied the shooting.

One evident impact of the renewed fighting is that thousands of Indigenous Papuans have been forced to flee their ancestral lands. The Vanuatu-based United Liberation Movement for West Papua reported that the military had attacked seven villages in Ilaga with drones and airstrikes, forcing many women and children to flee their homes. Media reports said that it was in Gome, Puncak regency.

International humanitarian law obligates all warring parties to distinguish at all times between combatants and civilians. Warring parties are required to take all feasible precautions to minimize harm to civilians and civilian objects, such as homes, shops, and schools. Attacks may target only combatants and military objectives. Attacks that target civilians or fail to discriminate between combatants and civilians, or that would cause disproportionate harm to the civilian population compared to the anticipated military gain, are prohibited.

The Free Papua Movement has long sought self-determination and independence in West Papua, on the grounds that the Indonesian government-controlled “Act of Free Choice” in 1969 was illegitimate and did not involve Indigenous Papuans. It advocates holding a new, fair, and transparent referendum, and backs armed resistance.

The conflict areas, including Intan Jaya, are on the northern side of Mt. Grasberg, spanning a vast area from Sugapa to Oksibil in the Pegunungan Bintang regency, approximately 425 kilometers long. Sugapa is also known as the site of Wabu Block, which holds approximately 2.3 million kilograms of gold, making it one of Indonesia’s five largest known gold reserves. Wabu Block is currently under the licensing process of the Indonesian Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources….


——————————————————


3) The hoaxes and economic motives behind military operations in Intan Jaya  
Source Arah Juang – May 23, 2025

Sharon Muller – Indonesian military operations have again been launched in Intan Jaya regency, Central Papua province. This is the umpteenth time operations have been launched by the TNI (Indonesian Military) on the pretext of pursuing the West Papua National Liberation Army-Free Papua Organisation or TPNPB-OPM.

Kompas.com (5/16/25) reported that this time the TNI operation was launched by the joint TNI Habema Operations Command (Koops) under the control of the Joint Defence Area Command (Kogabwilhan) III. The operation was launched on May 13 in Sugapa and Hitadipa districts, Intan Jaya.

TNI Information Centre head Major General Kristomei Sianturi reported that the TNI managed to shoot dead 18 members of the TPNPB-OPM. Furthermore, it was added that the purpose of the TNI operation was not to frighten the communities, but would be measured and was solely to oversee development.

But this is a public lie!



Indonesian Communion of Churches (PGI) Papua bureau head Reverend Ronald Richad reported that three civilians were shot dead by the TNI. They were Elia Wandagau (a pastor), Mono Tapamina (a Hitadipa resident) and Ruben Wandagau (the Hitadipa village head). The three victims were shot right when the TNI entered the Hitadipa Village.

Following this, the TNI also shot a housewife named Junite Zanambani (in the left arm) and her child, Minus Yegeseni aged 5 years (in the left ear) and they were rushed to hospital.

While another report from the Intan Jaya regional government said that there were actually five shooting victims. One of them was a deaf woman and a mute named Mono and Agus Mirip (residents of Ndugusiga). As of Thursday evening, two other missing residents have still not been found (Kompas Daily, 16/5/25).

Furthermore, in a May 14 circular the Intan Jaya regent reported that due to Indonesian military operations, there had been a many casualties and injuries. Of course what are meant are civilian causalities. As of May 18, the number of people killed remains unclear.

The TNI claim that they shot 18 members of the TPNPB-OPM is also a lie. TPNPB-OPM spokesperson Sebby Sambom stated that only three members were killed. One was shot directly by the TNI and the other two were killed by mines hidden on the victim's body when they were about to be evacuated. Two other members survived and only suffered injuries (TPNPB-OPM Komnas 17/5/25).

At present, the situation in Intan Jaya is tense and the TNI limits all activities of citizens including access by journalists and human rights workers. Meanwhile around two hundred residents in Hitadipa and Sugapa have left their hometowns and fled to surrounding areas, including surviving in the jungles. The TNI operation adds to the long list of refugees in Papua.

National Human Rights Commission (Komnas HAM) member Anis Hidayah has questioned the TNI operations in Intan Jaya because at this time there is no urgency or policy foundation that requires the TNI to carry out military operations in the region (Kompas Daily, 16/5/25).

However, Habema Operation Media Task Force head Infantry Lieutenant Colonel Iwan Dwi Prahartono said that the operation was solely a peaceful mission in the form of health services and education for communities. In addition, it was also to secure the construction of a road to Hitadipa.

But once again, this is a public lie. The TNI entered Hitadipa at 5 am in the morning and immediately launched an attack. Residents fled and the TNI shot dead the village head and a priest. There was no development carried out at 5 am in the morning, except for the thieves and criminals who launched the attack.

The construction of the road to Hitadipa and Intan Jaya is also not a public service, but rather to facilitate access to the Wabu Block, a giant gold mining concession held by West Wits Mining from Australia and PT Tobacom Del Mandiri owned by National Economic Council Chairperson Luhut Binsar Pandjaitan.

In the minutes of meeting signed on October 5, 2016 by PT Tobacom and West Wits Mining, it was agreed that Tobacom would be allocated 30 percent of the shares as long as it helped smooth the permits from the Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources and the construction of the road to the Wabu Block (Narasi Newsroom 2023).

As a result, Pandjaitan, who then served as Coordinating Minister for Maritime Affairs in former president Joko "Jokowi" Widodo's Onward Indonesia Cabinet administration, moved quickly. By April 2017, one of the key documents, namely a clean and clear (CNC) permit, was completed at the Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources and the Wabu Block was ready to be exploited.

Another more detailed report is the Political Economy of Military Deployment in Papua: The Case of Intan Jaya published by 10 non-government organisations (NGOs) in 2021. It emphasises that there is no clarity and no urgency whatsoever in the military deployment and operations in Intan Jaya, and that it is purely economic in nature.

Military operations are used as a way to expel communities so that the extractive company's plan to occupy Intan Jaya can run smoothly. This was proven by a series of brutal operations that were not on target, and the insane military mobilisation to occupy Intan Jaya.

In April 2020 the TNI abducted the Zanambani brothers in Hitadipa and tortured them to death. Then on September 19, 2020, the TNI shot dead Reverend Yeremia Zanambani and then accused the TPNPB of being the perpetrators. Subsequent investigations showed that this was a false accusation and that TNI members were the perpetrators of the murder.

Following this, the TNI burned down two healthcare service houses occupied by civilians in Hitadipa. A few days later (October 26, 2020) the TNI shot dead Pastor Rufinus Tigau in Jalai Village. Then the TNI killed a 12-year-old boy named Megianus Kobogau.

In 2021 the TNI again conducted a military operation and shot three civilians dead (Jubi.co.id, 02/16/21). Furthermore, a child named Janius Bagau was shot in the left arm and his bones shattered. He was evacuated to the Bilogai Yokatapa Health Centre by his two older brothers, Justinus Bagau and Soni Bagau. That night, they were visited by the TNI and tortured resulting in the death of all three (Jatam, 2021).

In fact the TNI has been actively conducting operations in Intan Jaya since 2019, followed by the construction of military posts in Sugapa. From satellite imagery monitoring, it was recorded that in Sugapa the TNI established a Military District Command (Kodim) and a Sub-District Military Command (Koramil). There is also the Intan Jaya District Police (Polres) and the Sugapa Sectoral Police (Polsek). From a map seen by the 10 NGOs, it is clear that the construction of these posts is right around the Wabu Block mining area.

From the report by the same 10 NGOs, it was also proven that the majority of the senior positions in the companies holding concessions in the Wabu Block are filled by TNI generals and retired military officers. Names such as Agus Surya Bakti, Bambang Sunarwibowo, Paulus Prananto and Luhut Binsar Pandjaitan are directly involved in the project.

Their involvement is to provide security services. This was clarified personally by the Minister of Energy and Mineral Resources during the Widodo era, Erick Thohir, who said that in mining there are sometimes conflicts, both regarding land as well as overlapping permits, there are also social issues in our society.

This is the general pattern that is pursued not only in Papua, but throughout Indonesia. Massive military operations are launched, creating chaos and fear, then investors come in to dig for gold. This is what the giant gold-and-copper mining company PT Freeport did in 1967, and today it is being applied again in Intan Jaya.

– Sharon Muller is a leading member of the Socialist Union (Perserikatan Sosialis, PS)

[Translated by James Balowski. The original title of the article was "Hoax dan Motif Ekonomi Dibalik Operasi Militer TNI/ POLRI di Intan Jaya, Papua".]

Source: https://www.arahjuang.com/2025/05/23/hoax-dan-motif-ekonomi-dibalik-operasi-militer-tni-polri-di-intan-jaya-papua/


----------------

Thursday, May 29, 2025

1) ‘We Are Witnessing Ecocide in West Papua, One of the World’s Richest Biodiversity Centres’



2) Indonesia: Renewed Fighting Threatens West Papua Civilians
-------------------------------


1) ‘We Are Witnessing Ecocide in West Papua, One of the World’s Richest Biodiversity Centres’ 

by CIVICUS Thursday, May 29, 2025 Inter Press Service

May 29 (IPS) - CIVICUS discusses the devastating impact of palm oil extraction in West Papua with Tigor Hutapea, legal representative of Pusaka Bentala Rakyat, an organisation campaigning for Indigenous Papuan people’s rights to manage their customary lands and forests.

In West Papua, Indigenous communities are boycotting palm oil products, accusing major corporations of profiting from environmental devastation and human rights abuses. Beyond environmental damage, Indigenous leaders are fighting what they describe as an existential threat to their cultural survival. Large-scale deforestation has destroyed ancestral lands and livelihoods, with Indonesian authorities enabling this destruction by issuing permits on contested Indigenous territories. Local activists characterise this situation as ecocide and are building international coalitions to hold companies and government officials accountable. 

What are the problems with palm oil?

n West Papua, one of the world’s richest biodiversity centres, oil palm plantation expansion is causing what we call ecocide. By 2019, the government had issued permits for plantations covering 1.57 million hectares of Indigenous forest land to 58 major companies, all without the free, prior and informed consent of affected communities. 

The environmental damage is already devastating, despite only 15 per cent of the permitted area having been developed so far. Palm oil plantations have fundamentally altered water systems in regions such as Merauke, causing the Bian, Kumbe and Maro rivers to overflow during rainy seasons because plantations cannot absorb heavy rainfall. Indigenous communities have lost access to forests that provided food and medicine and sustained cultural practices, while monoculture crops have replaced biodiverse ecosystems, leading to the disappearance of endemic animal species.

How are authorities circumventing legal protections?

There’s unmistakable collusion between government officials and palm oil companies. In 2023, we supported the Awyu Indigenous people in a landmark legal case against a Malaysian-owned company. The court found the government had issued permits without community consent, directly violating West Papua’s special autonomy laws that require Indigenous approval for land use changes.

These actions contravene national regulations and international law, including the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, which guarantees the right to free, prior and informed consent. Yet despite clear legal violations, authorities continue defending these projects by citing tax revenue and economic growth. They are clearly prioritising corporate profits over Indigenous rights and environmental protection.

The government’s response to opposition is particularly troubling. There is a systematic pattern of human rights violations against people defending their lands. When communities protest against developments, they face arbitrary arrests, police intimidation and violence. Police frequently disperse demonstrations by force, and community leaders are threatened with imprisonment or falsely accused of disrupting development. In some cases, they are labelled as separatists or anti-government to delegitimise their activism and justify repression.

What tactics are proving effective for civil society?

Indigenous communities are employing both traditional and modern resistance approaches. Many communities have performed customary rituals to symbolically reject plantations, imposing cultural sanctions that carry significant spiritual weight in their societies. Simultaneously, they’re engaging with legal systems to challenge permit violations.

Civil society organisations like ours support these efforts through environmental impact assessments, legal advocacy and public awareness campaigns. This multi-pronged approach has gained significant traction: in 2023, our Change.org petition gathered 258,178 signatures, while the #AllEyesOnPapua social media campaign went viral, demonstrating growing international concern.

Despite these successes, we face an uphill battle. The government continues pushing ahead with new agribusiness plans, including sugarcane and rice plantations covering over two million additional hectares of forest. This threatens further environmental destruction and Indigenous rights violations. Supporters of our movement are increasingly highlighting the global climate implications of continued deforestation in this critical carbon sink region.

What specific international actions would help protect West Papua?

Consumer power represents one of our strongest allies. International consumers can pressure their governments to enforce laws that prevent the import of products linked to human rights abuses and deforestation. They should also demand companies divest from harmful plantation projects that violate Indigenous rights.

At the diplomatic level, we need consistent international pressure on Indonesia to halt large-scale agribusiness expansion in West Papua and uphold Indigenous rights as defined in national and international laws. Foreign governments with trade relationships must make human rights and environmental protection central to their engagement with Indonesia, not peripheral concerns.

Without concerted international action, West Papua’s irreplaceable forests and the Indigenous communities who have sustainably managed them for generations face an existential threat. This isn’t just a local issue: the destruction of one of the world’s most biodiverse regions affects us all.





--------------------------------------------
May 29, 2025 12:00AM EDT | News Release

2) Indonesia: Renewed Fighting Threatens West Papua Civilians
Governments Should Urge Prabowo Administration to Protect Indigenous Peoples





Villagers fleeing fighting between the Indonesian military and the West Papuan militants to Sugapa, the capital of Intan Jaya regency. © 2025 Suara Papua 

(New York, May 29, 2025) – An escalation in fighting between Indonesian security forces and Papuan separatist armed groups in West Papua has seriously threatened the security of the largely Indigenous population, Human Rights Watch said today. All parties to the conflict are obligated to abide by international humanitarian law, also called the laws of war.

The security forces’ military operations in the densely forested Central Highlands areas have allegedly killed and injured dozens of civilians with drone strikes and the indiscriminate use of explosive munitions, and displaced thousands of Indigenous Papuans. The National Liberation Army of West Papua, the armed wing of the Free Papua Movement, has claimed responsibility in the killing of 17 alleged miners between April 6 and April 9, 2025.

“The Indonesian military has a long history of abuses in West Papua that poses a particular risk to the Indigenous communities,” said Meenakshi Ganguly, deputy Asia director at Human Rights Watch. “Concerned governments need to press the Prabowo administration and Papuan separatist armed groups to abide by the laws of war.”

The fighting escalated after the attack on the alleged miners, which the armed group accused of being targeted soldiers or military informers. The Indonesian military escalated its ongoing operations, called Operation Habema, in West Papua’s six provinces, especially in the Central Highlands, where Papuan militant groups have been active for over four decades.

On May 14, the military said that it had killed 18 separatist fighters in Intan Jaya regency, and that it had recovered weapons including rifles, bows and arrows, communications equipment, and Morning Star flags, the symbol of Papuan resistance. Further military operations have allegedly resulted in burning down villages and attacks on churches. Papuan activists and pastors told Human Rights Watch that government forces tend to treat all Papuan forest dwellers who own and routinely use bows and arrows for hunting as combatants.

Information about abuses has been difficult to corroborate because the hostilities are occurring in remote areas in Intan Jaya, Yahukimo, Nduga, and Pegunungan Bintang regencies. Pastors, church workers, and local journalists interviewed by Human Rights Watch said that Indonesian forces have been using drones and helicopter gunships to drop bombs. Civilians from the Korowai tribe community, known for their tall treehouse dwellings, have been harmed in these attacks, and have desperately fled the fighting. Displaced villagers, mostly from Intan Jaya, have sought shelter and refuge in churches in Sugapa, the capital of the regency.

The armed group has made allegations, which Human Rights Watch could not corroborate, that the Indonesian military attacks harmed civilians. It reported that a mortar or rocket attack outside a church in Ilaga, Puncak regency, hit two young men on May 6, killing one of them, Deris Kogoya, an 18-year-old student.

The group said that the Indonesian military attack on May 14, in which the military claimed all 18 people killed were separatist combatants, mostly killed civilians. Ronald Rischardt Tapilatu, pastor of the Evangelical Christian Church of the Land of Papua, said that at least 3 civilians were among the 18 bodies. Human Rights Watch has a list of the 18 killed, which includes 1 known child.

The daughter of Hetina Mirip said that her mother was found dead on May 17 near her house in Sugapa, while Indonesian soldiers surrounded their village. She wrote that the soldiers tried to cremate and bury her mother’s body. A military spokesman denied the shooting.

One evident impact of the renewed fighting is that thousands of Indigenous Papuans have been forced to flee their ancestral lands. The Vanuatu-based United Liberation Movement for West Papua reported that the military had attacked seven villages in Ilaga with drones and airstrikes, forcing many women and children to flee their homes. Media reports said that it was in Gome, Puncak regency.

International humanitarian law obligates all warring parties to distinguish at all times between combatants and civilians. Civilians may never be the target of attack. Warring parties are required to take all feasible precautions to minimize harm to civilians and civilian objects, such as homes, shops, and schools. Attacks may target only combatants and military objectives. Attacks that target civilians or fail to discriminate between combatants and civilians, or that would cause disproportionate harm to the civilian population compared to the anticipated military gain, are prohibited. Parties must treat everyone in their custody humanely, not take hostages, and facilitate the delivery of humanitarian aid.

The Free Papua Movement has long sought self-determination and independence in West Papua, on the grounds that the Indonesian government-controlled “Act of Free Choice” in 1969 was illegitimate and did not involve Indigenous Papuans. It advocates holding a new, fair, and transparent referendum, and backs armed resistance.

The conflict areas, including Intan Jaya, are on the northern side of Mt. Grasberg, spanning a vast area from Sugapa to Oksibil in the Pegunungan Bintang regency, approximately 425 kilometers long. Sugapa is also known as the site of Wabu Block, which holds approximately 2.3 million kilograms of gold, making it one of Indonesia’s five largest known gold reserves. Wabu Block is currently under the licensing process of the Indonesian Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources.

“Papuans have endured decades of systemic racism, heightening concerns of further atrocities,” Ganguly said. “Both the Indonesian military and Papuan armed groups need to comply with international standards that protect civilians.”


----------------------------------------

Tuesday, May 27, 2025

1) West Papua calling

2) Pacific Unity: Solomon Islands, Fiji & West Papua join PNG’s 50th anniversary bash

--------------------------------------------------------------

Communist Party of Australia 

https://cpa.org.au/guardian/issue-2146/west-papua-calling/


1) West Papua calling

 BY MARCUS BROWNING THE GUARDIAN ISSUE #2146 MAY 26, 2025 


The United Liberation Movement for West Papua provisional government interim president Benny Wenda warns that since Indonesian president Prabowo Subianto took office last October his coming marks the return of “the ghost of Suharto,” the brutal dictator who ruled over the nation for three decades.

Wenda, an exiled West Papuan leader, says that Indonesian forces are carrying out ethnic cleansing in multiple regencies, as thousands of West Papuans were being forced out of their villages and into the bush by soldiers. 

The entire regency of Oksop has been emptied, with over 1,200 West Papuans displaced since an escalation began in Nduga regency in 2018. 

Prabowo coming to office has a particular foreboding for West Papuans, who have been occupied by Indonesia since 1963. Over his military career – which spanned from 1970 to 1998 and saw rise him to the position of general, as well as mainly serving in Kopassus (special forces) – the current president allegedly perpetrated multiple alleged atrocities across Timor Leste and West Papua.

According to Wenda, the incumbent Indonesian president can “never clean the blood from his hands for his crimes as a general in West Papua and East Timor.” Wenda made it clear that Prabowo’s acts since taking office reveal that he is set on “creating a new regime of brutality” in Papua.

ENHANCING THE OCCUPATION

“Foreign governments should not be fooled by Prabowo’s PR campaign,” Wenda said. “He is desperately seeking international legitimacy through his international tour, empty environmental pledges and the amnesty offered to various prisoners, including eighteen West Papuans and the remaining imprisoned members of the Bali Nine.”

Former Indonesian president Suharto ruled over the Southeast Asian nation with an iron fist from 1965 until 1998.

Wenda maintains that the proof Prabowo is something of a reincarnation of Suharto is that he’s set about forging “mass displacement, increased militarisation” and “increased deforestation” in the Melanesian region of West Papua. He’s restarted the transmigration program of the Suharto days, which involves Indonesians being moved to West Papua to populate the region.

Indonesia’s initial transmigration program resulted in West Papuans, who made up 96 per cent of the population in 1971, only comprising 49 per cent in their own homelands at that current time.

Wenda considers the “occupation was entering a new phase,” when former Indonesian president Joko Widodo split the region of West Papua into five provinces in mid-2022. The West Papuan leader advises that Prabowo is set to establish separate military commands in each province, which will provide “a new, more thorough and far-reaching system of occupation.”

West Papua was previously split into two regions, which the West Papuan people did not recognise, as these and the current five provinces are actually Indonesian administrative zones.

“By establishing new administrative divisions, Indonesia creates the pretext for new military posts and checkpoints,” Wenda argues. “The result is the deployment of thousands more soldiers, curfews, arbitrary arrests and human rights abuses. West Papua is under martial law.”

ECOCIDE

Prabowo paid his first official visit to West Papua as president last November, visiting the Merauke district in South Papua province, which is the site of the world’s largest deforestation project, with clearing beginning in mid-2024. Merauke will eventually have two million deforested hectares turned into giant sugarcane plantations, via the destruction of forests, wetlands and grasslands.

Five consortiums, including Indonesian and foreign companies, are involved. Despite promises that the megaproject would not harm existing forests, these areas are being torn down regardless. Part of this deforestation includes razing of forest  previously declared protected by the government.

A similar program was established in Merauke district in 2011, by Widodo’s predecessor president Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono, who established rice and sugarcane plantations in the region, aiming to turn it into a “future breadbasket for Indonesia.” However, the plan was a failure, and the project was rather used as a cover to establish hazardous palm oil and pulpwood plantations.

“It is not a coincidence Prabowo has announced a new transmigration program at the same time as their ecocidal deforestation regime intensifies,” Wenda said. “These twin agenda represent the two sides of Indonesian colonialism in West Papua: exploitation and settlement.”

Wenda added that Jakarta is only interested in West Papuan land and resources. Indonesia has killed at least half a million West Papuans since 1963. While the occupying nation is funding other projects with the profits it’s been making on West Papuan palm oil, gold and natural gas, the West Papuan provinces are the poorest in the Southeast Asian nation.

BACKGROUND

When Indonesia gained its independence after centuries of Dutch colonialism Australian waterside workers and seamen played a significant role: they prevented the return to Indonesia of a Dutch military force which had intended to re-occupy the archipelago. This saved the Indonesians from a war of independence that would have followed akin to that fought by the Vietnamese people against re-colonisation by the French.

The first independent Indonesian government was formed by those who had fought against the Japanese occupation during WW2, and was led by President Soekarno. In the immediate post-independence years the Communist Party of Indonesia grew rapidly. These were also the years during which the world-wide sweep of the national liberation movement liberated colonies of Britain, France, the Netherlands, and other European imperialist countries.

In Australia, Prime Minister Menzies was proclaiming the “yellow peril” and the “domino theory” by which one country after another would fall to communist revolution. Australia’s interventions, under the US umbrella, in Korea and Vietnam were the application of these anti-communist cold war pretexts.

Reactionary political circles in Australia did not support or welcome the liberation of Indonesia from Dutch colonialism. Neither did they protest when General Suharto, in a bloody military coup that overthrew President Sukarno’s government, seized power during which upwards of one million communists, their friends, families and sympathisers, were murdered by Suharto’s military forces.

Ever since then Indonesia has been largely under the control of right-wing military forces. They invaded and seized control of Timor Leste and in a fraudulent referendum took control of West Papua from the Dutch colonialists. All these events were supported by successive Liberal and Labor governments. The Australian government was the only government in the world to recognise the forcible incorporation of East Timor as part of Indonesia.

It is the consequence of these unprincipled decisions by right-wing political forces in both Indonesia and Australia that are now coming home to roost.

Times have changed. The East Timorese, after a long struggle, liberated themselves from Indonesian colonialism. Eventually the Australian government was forced to give back-handed support for East Timor’s independence. There was widespread support among Australians for the East Timorese struggle just as there is now considerable support for the struggle of the people of West Papua for their independence.

As with most other colonial powers the Dutch were forced to give up their colonies after WW2 as national liberation movements wrested control from the imperialist powers.

For a time the Dutch held on to their West Papuan colony. It was agreed in the early 1960s that Indonesia would assume control of West Papua for a “specified” period after which the Papuan people would be granted the right of self-determination. The UN was to supervise a referendum on this question and a “referendum” was held in 1969.

Even at this time the overwhelming majority of the Papuan people wanted independence so the referendum had to be manipulated. Although the territory had a population of an estimated one million people, only 1,022 persons voted in the referendum and even those who voted had to be terrorised into voting for Indonesian annexation.

This faked referendum was, however, accepted by the UN, and West Papua became a province of Indonesia.

In subsequent years the resistance of the Papuan people steadily increased. Today their struggle has reached a high level, including armed struggle.

For its part, Indonesia has pursued the same methods of military oppression as were used to occupy Timor Leste. The transmigration program is clearly aimed at altering the demographic composition of the population to ensure that, in the future, those of Indonesian ethnic origin will make up the majority of the population.

West Papua is extremely rich in minerals and forest timber. The Freeport McMoran mine on the territory’s north coast is one of the largest gold and copper mines in the world.

COMMUNIST PARTY OF AUSTRALIA RESOLUTION

The following resolution was adopted by the CPA Central Committee executive at its meeting on 27-28 April 2006.

The arrival of 43 refugees from West Papua and the acceptance of 42 as refugees by the Australian government has highlighted the plight of many West Papuan Indigenous people and their long struggle for freedom and independence from Indonesian rule. The 43rd refugee still faces the possibility of deportation back to Indonesia.

The CC Executive of the CPA supports the call of the West Papuan freedom movement for independence and sovereignty and pledges to support them and their call, in whatever way possible. A recent public opinion poll showed that a large majority of the Australian people also support their struggle for independence.

INDEPENDENCE

The CC statement continues: 

Their call for independence is justified by the fact that the Indigenous people of West Papua are ethnic Melanesians and that the 1969 referendum, which it was claimed voted for Indonesian sovereignty over the West Papuan territory, was a fraud.

Only a little more than 1,000 votes were cast in this referendum whereas the population of West Papua was, at that time, upwards of one million. The referendum was a travesty yet it was used by the Indonesian and Australian governments and others to justify the incorporation of West Papua as a part of Indonesia. West Papua is also part of the land mass making up the island often called New Guinea.

The fact that the demand for independence runs deeply and is widely supported by the West Papuan people is confirmed by their long struggle for this cause in the course of which many have lost their lives at the hands of the armed forces of Indonesia.

NEW REFERENDUM

The time has come for a new referendum to be held under the auspices of the UN Security Council in which all West Papuan nationals should be entitled to vote and be encouraged to vote. At the time of a new referendum all Indonesian armed forces should be confined to barracks.

We reject the protests of the Indonesian government and their demand that the West Papuan refugees be forcibly repatriated to West Papua where they will face almost certain torture and death at the hands of Indonesian authorities.

We also reject the amendments to the migration laws introduced by the Howard government which are clearly intended to discriminate against West Papuans. Particularly obnoxious is the intention that refugees seeking refuge in Australia may be shipped off to some third country if their application is turned down by the Australian government.*

By this action the Australian government has shown that it will allow the Indonesian government to determine Australia’s migration and refugee policies. Other measures also being taken by the Australian government show that it is willing to collaborate with the armed forces of Indonesia to prevent the arrival in Australia of other West Papuans who seek refuge in Australia.

The fact that West Papua is rich in a number of valuable minerals and that they are being exploited by rapacious corporations is yet another reason to support the struggle of the West Papuans for independence.

We encourage Party organisations to invite representatives of the Papua Freedom Movement (OPM) to address party gatherings on their struggle and help in whatever practical ways that are within the scope of their resources.

* editor’s note: this seems to still be the policy now




---------------------------------------

----------------------------------