Saturday, October 3, 2026

1) Indonesia responds to Vanuatu


2) PM Defends UNGA81 Remarks on West Papua

3) Police officer ill-treat Uncen student leader during questioning of activists in Jayapura

4) Health Ministry expands healthcare services in Papua Highlands  
5) Three University of Science and Technology Jayapura students named suspects
6) Rome Agreement described as a deal made by ‘greedy’ people

----------------------------------


1) Indonesia responds to Vanuatu 
By Anita Roberts Oct 2, 2026

The Indonesian Government has exercised its right to reply during the 81st session of the United Nations General Assembly (UNGA) to respond to a statement made by Vanuatu on human rights in West Papua.

In his remarks, the Vanuatu Permanent Representative to the UN, Odo Tevi, urged action on the call made by Pacific Islands Forum (PIF) leaders in 2019 for Indonesia to allow the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights to visit West Papua to assess claims of widespread rights abuses.

Ambassador Tevi said Vanuatu remains deeply concerned about reports of serious human rights violations affecting indigenous Papuans in West Papua.

The same concerns were echoed by the Prime Minister of Solomon Islands. In its reply, the Indonesian Government rejected these remarks.

Indonesian diplomat Nona Gae Luna made it clear that any visit to West Papua must be agreed between Indonesia and the Office of the Human Rights Commissioner, as is the practice with all Member States, rather than being arranged through a regional body.

She said Indonesia rejects any attempt to present disinformation or misinformation about the human rights situation in Indonesia, as it remains grounded in democracy, human rights and the rule of law.

The Indonesian diplomat said human rights concerns deserve serious discussion and should not be used as a tool to justify violence or separatism.

Some countries had chosen to omit facts about civilian victims from their narratives while advancing allegations against Indonesia, which makes the concerns less credible, she stressed.

“Mr President, any serious discussion of Papua must reflect the full picture,” said the diplomat.

“Innocent civilians, teachers, health workers and many others have fallen victim to violence by armed criminal groups. In recent weeks, three civil servants were massacred after delivering livestock assistance to locals, a civilian driver transporting basic commodities was also killed, and nine women and children were abducted by an armed group. These are not acts of peaceful political expression. Attacking innocent civilians and murdering civil servants are criminal acts.

“Indonesia has a responsibility to protect all of its citizens.

“Law enforcement must and will remain subject to Indonesian laws and our international human rights obligations. We therefore categorically reject any attempt to present disinformation or misinformation about human rights situations in Indonesia. Indonesia will continue to engage constructively through relevant mechanisms.”

Indonesia currently holds the presidency of the UN Human Rights Council. The one-year term ends on December 31, 2026.

Human rights organisations and civil society groups have also raised concerns about Indonesia’s domestic human rights record and have called for greater accountability during its tenure.



————————————————————————



Solomon Star, Honiara

2) PM Defends UNGA81 Remarks on West Papua

PRIME Minister Matthew Cooper Wale has defended his remarks on the issue of West Papua and renewal of the call of the Pacific Islands Forum Leaders at the 81st Session of the United Nations General Assembly (UNGA81) for Jakarta to immediately facilitate the long-awaited visit of the UN High Commissioner of Human Rights to visit West Papua for an independent verification of the human rights violations against its indigenous Melanesian population.

Indonesian diplomat Nona Gae Luna, in exercise of Jakarta’s right of response to  Honiara’s remarks on West Papua, rejected claims of systematic human rights violations, saying Indonesia’s national institutions actively and seriously handle credible legal and human rights matters.

But speaking at a press conference in Honiara on Friday following his return from the UNGA81 in New York where he presented Solomon Islands National Statement to the assembly of world leaders, Wale said: “We are aware that after the UNGA, countries will have the right of reply so they have exercised that right of reply and responded.”

Wale said Jakarta obviously took note of the concerns that Solomon Islands raised over the historical and ongoing issues in West Papua, adding that if Jakarta is honest, it would be talking about its militarisation of West Papua.

He said there are more military in West Papua and the fact that the indigenous population are now a minority in their own land and that their land has been taken away to make massive plantations which the benefits do not go back to them are matters of genuine concern.

“Imagine if some people not of our own Melanesian race come and do that to us here. You need to put yourselves into their shoes to really understand the gravity of the violations against them.”

The PM said in his address at the UNGA he made the situation in West Papua very clear: “West Papuans are Melanesians living under Indonesian sovereignty.

“We recognise Indonesia’s sovereignty over West Papua, but the human rights situation is of great concern to us and all of Melanesia.”

For various reasons, Wale said not all Melanesian leaders are able to speak up on the subject, but everyone shares the same concern about how the Melanesians of West Papua are treated and the various atrocities that happen there, reducing the indigenous population to become a minority in their own land.

“It is just not right. It’s a matter of justice. So, we will continue to speak up for West Papua. They are voiceless. So, we must, as their Melanesian brothers and sisters, give our voice to their concerns.

“There’s no politics about it. They are our people. We’ve got to speak out. That was why I spoke out. Many of you will know this has been my personal position. I believe this is the right thing to do.”

The Foreign Affairs and External Trade Minister Rick Houenipwela who also attended the UNGA81 said Solomon Islands Government has the right to respond to the response by Jakarta but their delegation returned home and left it at that.

The Official Opposition had urged the PM to exercise diplomatic restraint on the issue of West Papua after Jakarta responded to his remarks on the subject.

By DELI-SHARON OSO

Solomon Star, Honiara



———————————————————————————

3) Police officer ill-treat Uncen student leader during questioning of activists in Jayapura

On 30 September 2026, members of the Jayapura City Police (Polresta Jayapura) allegedly assaulted Mr Wialo Silak, Chair of the Student Consultative Assembly (Majelis Permusyawaratan Mahasiswa, MPM) at Cenderawasih University (Uncen), at the Jayapura City Police Headquarters in Jayapura City, Papua Province. Mr Silak reportedly sustained bruising and scratches around his right eye after allegedly being struck in the face by a police officer.
During the incident, police officers reportedly checked the identities of more than a dozen Uncen students and temporarily seized their mobile phones and identity documents. The students had gathered at the police headquarters to accompany four members of the Uncen Student Executive Council (Badan Eksekutif Mahasiswa, BEM), who had been summoned for questioning in connection with a peaceful protest commemorating the New York Agreement on 15 August 2026.
According to the Papua Legal Aid Institute (LBH Papua), the four BEM Uncen members attended the Jayapura City Police Headquarters on 30 September 2026 in response to police summonses related to the protest held on 15 August 2026. The questioning reportedly lasted from approximately 11.00 am to 5.10 pm. A LBH Papua lawyer accompanied the four students during the questioning.
More than a dozen other Uncen students had reportedly gathered at the police headquarters to accompany their colleagues. Available information does not clarify the precise legal basis on which the students who had merely accompanied their colleagues were questioned or their personal belongings temporarily taken.
During these events, a police officer reportedly punched MPM Uncen Chair Mr Wialo Silak in the face by a police officer. The alleged assault reportedly caused swelling and an injury around his right eye (see photo on top, source: Jubi). LBH Papua called for an objective investigation into the alleged ill-treatment of Mr Silak. Jubi sought a response from the Chief of the Jayapura City Police regarding the allegations but had received no reply at the time of publication.

Human rights analysis

The alleged assault raises concerns regarding the right to security of person and protection from cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment. Article 7 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) prohibits torture and cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment, while Article 9 protects the right to liberty and security of person. Police officers are furthermore required to exercise their powers consistently with the principles of legality, necessity, proportionality and accountability.
If the alleged assault on Mr Wialo Silak occurred as reported and was neither necessary nor proportionate to a legitimate law-enforcement objective, it would constitute an unlawful use of force and could amount to ill-treatment. The fact that the alleged violence reportedly occurred inside a police facility is particularly relevant to the authorities’ duty to conduct a prompt, effective and impartial investigation capable of identifying those responsible and ensuring accountability.
The reported handling of students’ mobile phones and identity documents also raises concerns regarding privacy and procedural safeguards. Article 17 ICCPR protects individuals against arbitrary or unlawful interference with their privacy and correspondence. Any police examination, search, access to, or seizure of a mobile telephone must therefore have a lawful basis and must satisfy requirements of necessity and proportionality. These safeguards are particularly important for mobile phones because they may contain extensive private communications, contacts, photographs and other personal information.
Indonesia’s criminal procedural framework was substantially revised before this incident. Law No. 20 of 2025 on the Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP) entered into force on 2 January 2026 and replaced Law No. 8 of 1981. The new KUHAP expressly strengthens procedural rights and regulates coercive investigative measures, while the amended legislation governing the Indonesian National Police emphasises professionalism, proportionality, transparency and accountability.
The broader circumstances also raise concerns regarding the exercise of the rights to freedom of expression and peaceful assembly, protected under Articles 19 and 21 ICCPR. Police questioning concerned a student protest commemorating the New York Agreement. While authorities may investigate conduct reasonably suspected of constituting a criminal offence, law-enforcement measures against students participating in or associated with peaceful political expression must not be used to intimidate participants or impose unjustified restrictions on protected expression and assembly.

Mr Wialo Silak receiving medical treatment following the attack by a police officer in Jayapura on 30 September 2026



Detailed Case Data
Document ID: HRM-CAS-141-2026
Location: Jl. Ahmad Yani No.17, Gurabesi, Kec. Jayapura Utara, Kota Jayapura, Papua 99222, Indonesia (-2.5427941, 140.7034638) Polresta JAaapura
Region: Indonesia > Papua > Jayapura > North Jayapura
Total number of victims: 5
#Number of VictimsName, DetailsGenderAgeGroup AffiliationViolations
1.1Wialo Silak
diverseadultIndigenous Peoples, Studentill-treatment
2.4
maleadultIndigenous Peoples, Studentfreedom of assembly, freedom of expression
Period of incident: 30/09/2026 – 30/09/2026
Perpetrator: Republic Indonesia > Indonesian Security Forces > Indonesian Police > POLRES
Perpetrator details: Polresta Jayapura
Issues: indigenous peoples, security force violence
Related Cases:

———————————————————

4) Health Ministry expands healthcare services in Papua Highlands  
October 3, 2026 17:53 GMT+700
Wamena, Papua Highlands (ANTARA) - The Ministry of Health is strengthening healthcare services across Indonesia, including in the Papua Highlands region, to improve the quality of public health services.

The ministry’s Director of Referral Healthcare Facilities, Ghotama Airlangga, emphasized in a statement on Saturday that healthcare services should be distributed evenly across Indonesia.

“The Ministry of Health’s future program is to provide equitable healthcare throughout the country, especially in the Papua Highlands region and other parts of Papua,” Airlangga said.

According to him, the ministry is facilitating partnerships between all regional general hospitals in the Papua Highlands and major hospitals across Indonesia to provide treatment for cancer, heart disease, stroke, uronephrology, maternal and child health, tuberculosis, pre-existing diseases (EID), diabetes, gastrohepatology, mental health, and eye diseases.

“We hope that in the future, healthcare services for heart disease, stroke, and other serious illnesses will no longer need to be referred outside the Papua Highlands and can be handled here,” he said.

Airlangga emphasized that the program is part of efforts to ensure equitable healthcare across Indonesia through a mentoring approach that supports healthcare workers in the Papua Highlands and enables them to manage chronic diseases.

“We greatly appreciate the support of the Governor of the Papua Highlands for this mentoring program, which will help further improve and advance healthcare services in the region,” he continued.

He added that eight regional general hospitals in the Papua Highlands will have their accreditation upgraded from Class D to Class C to support the delivery of optimal healthcare services.

“Class C hospitals generally serve as referral centers for community health centers (Puskesmas). These facilities provide more comprehensive specialist medical services, particularly in the four basic specialties, internal medicine, including cardiology, pediatrics, surgery and obstetrics and gynecology,” he explained.

Related news: Health Ministry strengthens critical care in Highland Papua

Related news: TNI provides free health services to Highland Papua residents

Translator: Yudhi Efendi, Resinta Sulistiyandari
Editor: Primayanti

————————————————————

5) Three University of Science and Technology Jayapura students named suspects

News Desk October 3, 2026

Jayapura, Jubi – Three of four students from the University of Science and Technology Jayapura (USTJ) arrested by Jayapura City Police have been named suspects.

The four students were arrested while taking part in a protest with other students to mark the 64th anniversary of the Rome Agreement on 30 September 2026.

The Rome Agreement was concluded in Rome, Italy, on 30 September 1962, following the New York Agreement signed on 15 August 1962.

The Rome Agreement, signed by Indonesia, the Netherlands and the United States, contained 29 articles under the framework of the New York Agreement.

Articles 14 to 21 addressed self-determination, which was to be based on international practice, including one person, one vote.

Articles 12 and 13 addressed the transfer of administration from the United Nations Temporary Executive Authority (UNTEA) to Indonesia.

Under the agreement, Indonesia’s claim over Papua was implemented following the transfer of administrative authority over West Papua from the Netherlands to Indonesia through UNTEA on 1 May 1963.

However, the Rome and New York agreements were concluded without any representatives of the Papuan people being involved, despite the agreements concerning the future of the Papuan people.

Reinhart Kmur of the Papua Legal and Human Rights Enforcement Coalition, which is providing legal assistance to the students, said the three students named as suspects were Apniel Jagani, Inios Enembe and Mikael Obaipa.

The fourth student was released after questioning because investigators found no indication that he had committed a criminal offence.

“Representatives of the Papua Legal and Human Rights Enforcement Coalition provided legal assistance to four students who had previously been arrested and detained at the Jayapura City Police detention facility following a protest commemorating the Rome Agreement at the USTJ campus,” Kmur said in an electronic message on Friday (2/10/2026).

He said the four students underwent initial questioning by investigators after being arrested and taken to the Jayapura City Police headquarters.

Following the initial questioning, investigators held a case conference to determine the legal status of each student.

Kmur said Fangky Salak was subsequently questioned as a witness and released after the questioning was completed.

“Meanwhile, Apniel Jagani, Inios Enembe and Mikael Obaipa were named suspects. The three underwent formal questioning by investigators on 1 October 2026, from 3pm to 9.20pm Papua time,” he said.

During the questioning, the three students gave statements to investigators, which were recorded in official examination reports, he said.

Investigators have charged the three students under Articles 192 and 234 of Law No. 1 of 2023 on the Indonesian Criminal Code.

Article 192 covers the offence of treason involving an intention to separate from Indonesia or place part or all of the territory of the Unitary State of the Republic of Indonesia under foreign control. The offence carries a maximum penalty of death, life imprisonment or imprisonment for up to 20 years.

Article 234 prohibits acts including damaging, tearing, stepping on or burning the national flag with the intention of insulting or degrading the honour of the Indonesian flag. The offence carries a maximum sentence of three years’ imprisonment or a Category IV fine.

Law No. 1 of 2023 has been in force since 2 January 2026 and was amended by Law No. 1 of 2026.

Earlier, clashes broke out between USTJ students and police officers during a protest marking the 64th anniversary of the Rome Agreement at the USTJ campus in Padang Bulan, Abepura District, Jayapura City, Papua.

During the protest, students raised the Morning Star flag on a flagpole on the campus grounds.

Soon afterwards, Jayapura City Police Chief Fredrickus Maclarimboen arrived at the campus to remove the flag.

When the police chief and officers attempted to take down the flag, students protested, triggering a confrontation.

At the time, Jayapura City Police Chief Commissioner Fredrickus Maclarimboen said police had attempted to negotiate with the students to have the flag lowered.

He said police officers were pelted with stones as they attempted to remove the flag.

“Security personnel responded with tear gas and a water cannon to push the crowd back. So, in fact, the crowd had already prepared for the action,” Maclarimboen said. (*)



————————————————————

6) Rome Agreement described as a deal made by ‘greedy’ people

News Desk October 3, 2026

Jayapura, Jubi – The Jayawijaya chapter of the Indonesian National Youth Committee (KNPI), Cipayung youth and community organisations (OKP), and the West Papua National Committee (KNPB) have described the Rome Agreement, signed in Rome, Italy, on 30 September 1962, as an agreement made by what they called “greedy people”.

Jayawijaya KNPI chairman Hengki Hilapok said his organisation, together with Cipayung OKP and KNPB, rejected the Rome Agreement.

The groups expressed their opposition through a protest held at the KNPB Balim regional secretariat on 30 September 2026, marking the 64th anniversary of the agreement.


“We all reject the Rome Agreement, which was agreed by what we consider to be greedy parties. Unity and solidarity today show that the last line of defence for the Papuan people lies in the movement. Therefore, we will continue to fight for the dignity and rights of Papuan people,” Hilapok said in a video recording after the protest.

Hilapok called on members of the Indonesian House of Representatives (DPR RI) and Regional Representative Council (DPD RI) representing the six provinces in Papua to urge President Prabowo Subianto to allow international journalists and the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights to visit Papua.

“When Cipayung youth organisations and Papuan people take to the streets, it means Papua is not in a good situation. Therefore, we ask the international community to come to Papua and investigate alleged human rights abuses in the region,” he said.

He also said the groups rejected a Papua Progressive Youth event, which he claimed was organised by individuals pursuing vested interests.

He said Papuan people were not simply demanding access to food and basic necessities, but were calling for an international dialogue facilitated by a neutral party, rather than by those involved in the conflict.

“We thank the Marshall Islands and Solomon Islands for raising the issue of the Papuan people. We support countries that speak about us as Papuans, because Indonesia is colonising us today,” he said.

KNPB Central Executive Board deputy chairman Warpo Wetipo said the struggle facilitated by KNPB was a peaceful, non-violent movement.

He said the group was demanding justice, truth, honesty, respect for human dignity and freedom.

“We are demanding the restoration of our sovereign rights, which have been taken away and undermined by the ambitions and greed of colonialism, imperialism, American capitalism and its allies,” Wetipo said.

Wetipo said KNPB would continue to facilitate Papuan communities in demanding what it considers to be their rights, which had been taken away by Indonesia.

Meanwhile, the Toli regional chapter of KNPB, together with the West Papua People’s Movement (GRPB), the West Papua Liberation People’s Movement (GR-PWB), and thousands of residents of Tolikara, also held a peaceful protest at the Gospel Monument in Karubaga, Tolikara Regency, Highland Papua, on 30 September 2026.

Toli KNPB secretary Lanny Wanimbo, who was responsible for organising the protest, said the Rome Agreement was connected to the 1969 Act of Free Choice.

The group called on the central government to allow Papuans to determine their own political future through a referendum, which it described as the best solution.

“We are holding a peaceful protest to urge Jakarta to open itself up and give us an opportunity for a referendum, so that the conflict in Papua can end,” Wanimbo said.

Protest coordinator Neky Yigibalom said the Rome Agreement did not involve Papuan representatives as parties with rights over the territory covered by the agreement.

He also questioned the implementation of the Act of Free Choice, saying it did not use a one-person, one-vote mechanism.

“We are protesting the Rome Agreement and the New York Agreement because Papuans were not involved as subjects in those agreements,” Yigibalom said.

Yigibalom called on the United States, the Netherlands and the United Nations to take responsibility and review the decision-making processes associated with the two agreements and the Act of Free Choice.

The Rome and New York agreements have been described by the protesters as the basis for Indonesian military operations in Papua from that period to the present, which they say have resulted in human rights violations.

The Rome Agreement was concluded in Rome, Italy, on 30 September 1962, following the New York Agreement signed on 15 August 1962.

The Rome Agreement, signed by Indonesia, the Netherlands and the United States, contained 29 provisions under the framework of the New York Agreement.

Articles 14 to 21 addressed self-determination, which the article says was to be based on international practice, including one person, one vote.

Articles 12 and 13 addressed the transfer of administration from the United Nations Temporary Executive Authority (UNTEA) to Indonesia.

Under the agreement, Indonesia’s claim over Papua was implemented following the transfer of administrative authority over West New Guinea from the Netherlands to Indonesia through UNTEA on 1 May 1963.

However, the Rome and New York agreements were concluded without any representatives of the Papuan people being involved, despite the agreements concerning the future of the Papuan population. (*)

------------------------------

Thursday, October 1, 2026

1) Morning Star flag flown at USTJ campus in Jayapura



2) Conflicting accounts surround killing of four indigenous Papuans during military operation in Intan Jaya

3) Civil servant arbitrarily detained and tortured at Marine Post in Maybrat


4) Papuan activist reportedly detained during land eviction solidarity action in Makassar

5) West Papua government criticised over response to forest and land fires
--------------------------------------------------


1) Morning Star flag flown at USTJ campus in Jayapura

News Desk October 1, 2026


Jayapura, Jubi – Hundreds of students at the University of Science and Technology Jayapura (USTJ) in Padang Bulan, Abepura District, Jayapura City, Papua, raised the Morning Star flag on a flagpole on the university campus on Wednesday afternoon, 30 September 2026.

The students raised the flag to mark the 64th anniversary of the signing of the Rome Agreement on 30 September 1962.

As the Morning Star flag flew, the students gathered holding banners and placards calling for, among other things, United Nations Human Rights Council intervention in West Papua, self-determination for West Papua and accountability from the Vatican over the Catholic Church’s social teachings.

They also held and displayed Morning Star and Free Aceh Movement (GAM) flags.

Students took turns addressing the crowd, while fellow students and police officers watched. Police entered the USTJ campus grounds during the protest.

“We will not take down the Morning Star flag because it represents the many people who have died — children who have been shot, mothers who have been shot, and forests and land that have been taken. We will let it fly until sunset,” one speaker said.

“The Catholic Church must be held responsible for the signing of the Rome Agreement, which has caused people to suffer all this time,” another speaker said.

The speaker said the students would not take down the Morning Star flag and claimed that anyone who removed it would be a “coloniser”.

“Whoever dares to take down this Morning Star flag is committing a crime against humanity in Papua. The Indonesian Red and White flag flying in Papua is illegal,” the speaker said.

Dozens of Jayapura City police officers entered the USTJ campus. Police also brought a water cannon vehicle and several crowd-control units onto the grounds.

The students were still at the campus as of Wednesday afternoon, continuing to deliver political speeches. (*)



—————————————

https://humanrightsmonitor.org/case/conflicting-accounts-surround-killing-of-four-indigenous-papuans-during-military-operation-in-intan-jaya/


2) Conflicting accounts surround killing of four indigenous Papuans during military operation in Intan Jaya

On 25 September 2026, members of the 315th Infantry Battalion/Garuda and the Taipur Team of the TNI Habema Operations Command conducted a military operation in Danggomba Village, Hitadipa District, Intan Jaya Regency, Central Papua Province, resulting in the instant death of Mr Hermanus Hogajau and Mr Malobega Hogajau. Mr Aguni Hogajau was reportedly shot in the chest. Witnesses saw Mr Ebelon Hogajau alive as he was apprehended by security force personnel. Local sources and the West Papua National Liberation Army (TPNPB) confirmed that Mr Hermanus Hogajau was a TPNPB member while his three brothers were civilians. Following the shooting, the military (TNI) commanders alleged that his men had killed four members of an armed group an armed clash in Balamai Village, Hitadipa, Intan Jaya Regency.

Conflicting accounts of the operation

According to information attributed to sources on the ground, members of Task Force 315 entered the Danggomba Village, Hitadipa District, where they reportedly raided a traditional house in which security force personnel suspected TPNPB members. According to local informants Mr Hermanus Hogajau was affiliated with the TPNPB, whereas Mr Malobega Hogajau, Mr Aguni Hogajau and Mr Ebelon Hogajau were civilians. Malobega and Hermanus were reportedly shot dead while Aguni sustained a bullet wound in the chest. Ebelon was seen alive being taken by security force personnel to an unknown location.
The TPNPB subsequently confirmed that Hermanus Hogajau was affiliated with the TPNPB Kodap VIII Intan. According to the TPNPB account, Indonesian security forces surrounded the house before opening fire at the wooden house. The TPNPB further alleged that no exchange of fire occurred.
The TNI Habema Operations Command provided a substantially different account. Brigadier General Riyanto stated that TNI personnel had received information concerning the presence of an armed group associated with TPNPB. According to this version, an exchange of fire occurred after TNI personnel approached the area, resulting in four alleged members of the armed group being killed. Two bodies were reportedly recovered near the scene, while two others allegedly fell into a ravine. The TNI reported recovering firearms, ammunition, communication equipment and a Morning Star flag following the operation (see photo on top, source: independent HRD).
A further TNI account attributed to Lieutenant General Lucky Avianto, Commander of the Joint Defence Region III, stated that security forces detected the movement of Daniel Aibon Kogoya’s group through drone surveillance during the early hours of 25 September 2026. According to this version, security personnel attempted to approach the group before being fired upon, resulting in an exchange of fire in which four alleged TPNPB members were killed. No TNI personnel were reportedly injured.

Human rights and humanitarian law analysis

The contradictory accounts raise serious concerns requiring an independent investigation. The decisive factual questions include whether Malobega, Aguni and Ebelon Hogajau were civilians or members of an organised armed group; whether any of them directly participated in hostilities; whether an exchange of fire actually occurred; whether any of the victims had surrendered, were wounded or otherwise hors de combat when force was used against them; and what ultimately happened to Aguni and Ebelon Hogajau. The mere fact that the four men were relatives of an acknowledged TPNPB member would not remove their protection as civilians under international humanitarian law. Civilians remain protected against direct attack unless and for such time as they directly participate in hostilities, while membership in an organised armed group for targeting purposes requires more than family association or general support. The ICRC emphasises that feasible precautions must be taken when determining a person’s status and that, in case of doubt, civilian protection applies.
If the operation formed part of the ongoing non-international armed conflict in West Papua, customary international humanitarian law required the parties to distinguish at all times between persons who could lawfully be targeted and civilians protected against direct attack. Even a member of an organised armed group may not lawfully be attacked once that person has surrendered or otherwise become hors de combat. The available information is presently insufficient to determine whether Hermanus Hogajau was actively fighting, whether he had an opportunity to surrender, or whether he was already hors de combat when killed. Consequently, his acknowledged TPNPB membership does not, on its own, resolve the legality of his killing. The circumstances in which lethal force was actually employed must be established.
The allegations concerning Mr Aguni Hogajau and Mr Ebelon Hogajau require particularly urgent clarification. Preliminary field information states that Mr Aguni remained alive after sustaining a gunshot wound to the chest and that Mr Ebelon was alive when security personnel apprehended him. If accurate, the authorities would have been required to protect them against further violence and provide appropriate treatment once they were wounded, detained or otherwise hors de combat. Their subsequent whereabouts and condition should therefore be disclosed without delay. Any death occurring after capture, surrender or incapacitation would require especially rigorous investigation. International humanitarian law requires persons who no longer participate in hostilities to be treated humanely and prohibits attacks against persons hors de combat.
The profound differences between the accounts also make a prompt, independent and impartial investigation essential. Investigators should establish the exact site of the operation, identify the units and individual personnel involved, determine the sequence and direction of gunfire, document the location and condition in which each victim was found, establish whether weapons were located on or near individual victims, secure ballistic, photographic, drone and communications evidence and interview surviving witnesses. Attention should be given to the TNI’s reported drone surveillance, which may provide crucial contemporaneous evidence concerning the victims’ conduct immediately before and during the operation. The bodies of those killed should be subject to independent forensic examination consistent with the Minnesota Protocol on the Investigation of Potentially Unlawful Death (2016).

Mr Hermanus Hogajau and Mr Malobega Hogajau died at the scene during the military operation in Hitadipa District on 25 September 2025


Detailed Case Data
Document ID: HRM-CAS-139-2026
Location: Hitadipa, Intan Jaya Regency, Papua, Indonesia (-3.6054679, 136.8640458) Danggomba Village (coordinates: https://mapcarta.com/de/37156080)
Region: Indonesia > Central Papua > Intan Jaya > Hitadipa
Total number of victims: 3
#Number of VictimsName, DetailsGenderAgeGroup AffiliationViolations
1.1 
maleadult Indigenous Peoplesexecution, right to life, unlawful killing
2.1 
maleadult Indigenous Peoplesexecution, right to life, unlawful killing
3.1 
maleadult Indigenous Peoplesdisappearance, right to life
Period of incident: 25/09/2026 – 25/09/2026
Perpetrators:
Republic Indonesia > Indonesian Security Forces
Republic Indonesia > Indonesian Security Forces > Indonesian Military (TNI)
Issues: drones and clusterammunition, indigenous peoples, security force violence
Related Cases:


—————————————————————


3) Civil servant arbitrarily detained and tortured at Marine Post in Maybrat

On 26 September 2026, Indonesian Marine personnel allegedly apprehended Mr Wilem Wakom, a civil servant (ASN) and resident of Wakom Village, East Aifat District, Maybrat Regency, Papua Barat Daya Province. Military members subsequently took him to a Marine post in Aisa Village, East Aifat District. Where the soldiers allegedly detained and tortured Mr Wakom inside the military post. Relatives and members of the local community were prevented from seeing him or verifying his physical condition, while the legal grounds for his detention remained unclear.
According to media reports published on 28 September 2026, Marine personnel detained Mr Wilem Wakom on 26 September 2026 at the Marine post stationed in Aisa Village. Information by LBH Kaki Abu indicated that Mr Wakom was subsequently locked inside the post and subjected to acts of violence. When family members and residents came to the post to look for Mr Wakom, military personnel reportedly denied access to him. The reason for the detention, the legal basis for his deprivation of liberty, the authority that ordered the operation, and the duration and conditions of his detention remained unknown.
On 28 September 2026, LBH Kaki Abu in Sorong publicly condemned the alleged treatment and called for an immediate and comprehensive investigation stressing that any investigation of a civilian suspected of an offence or security-related activity must be conducted under applicable law and procedural safeguards. LBH Kaki Abu demanded clarification regarding Mr Wakom’s detention, the grounds for his deprivation of liberty, and immediate access for lawyers and relatives.

Human rights analysis

The circumstances reported in the case raise concerns under Article 9 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), which protects everyone against arbitrary arrest and detention. A deprivation of liberty must have a lawful basis and be accompanied by procedural safeguards. The reported detention of Mr Wakom inside a military post, without publicly disclosed grounds and with his family allegedly unable to ascertain his condition, therefore requires urgent clarification by Indonesian authorities. The fact that the alleged detention was carried out by Marine personnel also raises questions regarding the legal authority under which military personnel deprived a civilian of liberty. Indonesian criminal procedure assigns arrest powers in ordinary criminal investigations to legally authorised investigators and requires statutory procedures to be followed.
The allegations of physical violence engage the absolute prohibition of torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment, including under Article 7 ICCPR and the UN Convention against Torture (CAT). Violence against a person in custody may constitute prohibited ill-treatment and must be investigated. The victim should therefore receive prompt access to an independent medical examination capable of documenting possible injuries and other evidence of ill-treatment.
Detailed Case Data
Document ID: HRM-CAS-140-2026
Location: Wakom Village, Aifat Timur District, Maybrat Regency
Region: Indonesia > Southwest Papua > Maybrat > East Aifat
Total number of victims: 1
#Number of VictimsName, DetailsGenderAgeGroup AffiliationViolations
1.1 Wilem Wakom
maleadult Indigenous Peoplesarbitrary detention, torture
Period of incident: 26/09/2026 – 26/09/2026
Perpetrator: Republic Indonesia > Indonesian Security Forces > Indonesian Military (TNI) > Indonesian Navy (TNI-AL)
Issues: indigenous peoples, security force violence
Sources:
Satukan Indonesia
Jubi
Suara Papua
Related Cases:

—————————————————————————

4) Papuan activist reportedly detained during land eviction solidarity action in Makassar

On 30 September 2026, police officers reportedly arrested Tilius Telenggen, 26, an activist and member of the West Papua National Committee (KNPB) Makassar branch (see photo on top, source: KNPB), in the Bara-Baraya neighbourhood of Makassar City, South Sulawesi Province. Telenggen, who originates from Puncak Regency, Papua Tengah Province, was reportedly participating in a solidarity activity with Bara-Baraya residents affected by a land eviction dispute when police officers took him into custody.
According to preliminary information received from local sources, Mr Telenggen was with residents of Bara-Baraya in the early hours of 30 September when police officers arrested him at approximately 03.00 pm. He was subsequently brought to the Makassar Metropolitan Police (Polrestabes Makassar), he remained in detention. Human rights defenders in Makassar currently investigate and verify the circumstances of the arrest, including the precise grounds for the arrest, Mr Telenggen’s legal status, the legal basis for any continued detention and whether the authorities informed him promptly of the reasons for his arrest and any allegations against him. The Makassar Legal Aid Institute (LBH Makassar) has been informed about the case and has initiated preliminary legal assistance.

Human rights analysis

Article 9 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) prohibits arbitrary arrest and detention and requires any deprivation of liberty to be based on grounds and procedures established by law. A person who is arrested must be informed, at the time of arrest, of the reasons for the arrest and must be promptly informed of any charges. The UN Human Rights Committee has emphasised that the prohibition of arbitrariness extends beyond formal compliance with domestic law and encompasses requirements of reasonableness, necessity, proportionality, predictability and due process.
The circumstances of Mr Telenggen’s participation in the Bara-Baraya solidarity activity also require examination in relation to the rights to freedom of expression, peaceful assembly and association. Indonesian Law No. 9 of 1998 on Freedom to Express Opinions in Public provides the domestic legal framework governing public expression and assembly. Under international human rights law, arrest or detention imposed as punishment for the legitimate exercise of rights protected by the ICCPR, including freedom of expression, peaceful assembly and association, may constitute arbitrary detention.
Detailed Case Data
Document ID: HRM-CAS-138-2026
Location: Bara-Baraya, Makassar, Makassar City, South Sulawesi, Indonesia (-5.1436926, 119.4288149) 
Region: Indonesia > South Sulawesi > Makassar
Total number of victims: 1
#Number of VictimsName, DetailsGenderAgeGroup AffiliationViolations
1.1 Tilius Telenggen
male26 Activistarbitrary detention
Period of incident: 30/09/2026 – 30/09/2026
Perpetrator: Republic Indonesia > Indonesian Security Forces > Indonesian Police > POLRES
Perpetrator details: Polrestabes MAkassar
Issues: indigenous peoples
Related Cases:

————————————————————
https://en.jubi.id/west-papua-government-criticised-over-response-to-forest-and-land-fires/?_gl=1*ltu5wb*_ga*MTU0NTkyNDAxLjE3NzM5NjI3MDk.*_ga_ZZTT8RG182*czE3OTA4ODg2ODAkbzI0MCRnMSR0MTc5MDg4ODk1NSRqNjAkbDAkaDA.*_ga_CNWVJ6KFKD*czE3OTA4ODg2ODAkbzIyOCRnMSR0MTc5MDg4ODk1NSRqNjAkbDAkaDA.

5) West Papua government criticised over response to forest and land fires

News Desk October 1, 2026

Manokwari, Jubi – The West Papua provincial government has been criticised for its response to forest and land fires, with smoke haze continuing to affect several parts of the province.

West Papua Legislative Council (DPR Papua Barat) chairman Orgenes Wonggor said the provincial government had not done enough to tackle the fires, which have caused haze in several areas.

Forest and land fires, smoke haze and a clean water crisis have affected Fakfak, Teluk Bintuni, Kaimana, Teluk Wondama and South Manokwari regencies. Wonggor said emergency disaster funds were allocated every year to deal with such situations.

The situation is particularly severe in Fakfak, where smoke haze has begun affecting residents in urban areas and communities have faced a clean water shortage in recent months.

“The provincial government, particularly the relevant agencies, has not done enough to address this problem. When the season changes from the wet season to the dry season, there should already be a team in place. For example, the Forestry Agency should know its role, as should the Health Agency, the Plantation Agency and the Regional Disaster Management Agency,” Wonggor said on Wednesday, 30 September 2026.

He said smoke from the fires could cause respiratory illnesses, while drought was making it difficult for residents to access clean water and causing farmers’ crops to fail.

“The team should already be in place and ready to respond as soon as a disaster occurs. We should not wait for a disaster to happen before forming a team,” said Wonggor, a Golkar Party politician.

He said disaster response should not be left solely to district governments and that the provincial government also had a role to play.

In Karas District, Fakfak Regency, West Papua, residents are dealing with both smoke haze from forest and land fires and a drought that has lasted for the past three months.

“Forest fires have started appearing during this dry season, from behind Pulau Tiga to the area beside Karas Port,” said Rizal Rumodar, a resident of Malakuli village in Karas District.

Rumodar said the fires had been burning for about two weeks. Nutmeg trees have been destroyed by the flames, while several residents’ gardens have also been affected.

“The fire started inside the forest, and people in Karas District don’t know exactly what caused it. All we know is that it spread because of the hot and dry conditions,” he said.

As smoke haze spread across Karas District, the Fakfak Education, Youth and Sports Agency temporarily suspended classroom activities at several schools.

The affected schools include Karas State Primary School, Karas State Junior High School and Karas Senior High School.

Poor visibility caused by the smoke haze has also forced some fishermen in Karas District to stay on shore.

Rolly, who has not gone fishing for two weeks because of the haze, said visibility at sea had become too poor. “We’ve stopped going out to sea because of these conditions. For now, we just have to stay home and get through it. You can’t see clearly when you’re out at sea because of the haze,” Rolly said.

He said there was little residents could do but adapt to the conditions.

“What else can we do? We are afraid something could happen if we force ourselves to go out to sea. So it’s better to stay at home and do whatever work we can,” he said.

Fakfak Police chief AKBP Naim Ishak said police had spent the past several days educating residents about the haze and distributing masks at several locations.

“Today, we distributed around 600 masks to schoolchildren and residents at schools, including Fakfak State Junior High School 1 and Fakfak State Primary School 2,” Naim Ishak said. (*)

-------------------------------------------------