On 14 Sep 2016, at 9:59 AM, Arndt, Peter <email@example.com> wrote:Hey JoeWas Johnny Blades the correspondent for the article below?I note he didn’t quote any people from CSOs in the Pacific. As I said in my feedback to people in our solidarity network, the CSOs present from all over the Pacific were initially stunned by the weakness of the words in the text, but, when our reps talked to the leaders present the next day, we realised that the Pacific leaders were incredibly committed to action at the UN. Australia has meddled with the text of the communiqué, but there is no doubt that leaders are determined to take West Papua to the UN and push for action.Ask Emele, who led the CSO delegation, if you want confirmation about that. She’s been in contact with the leaders and Dame Meg after the meeting and she knows what they are thinking.PeacePetePeter ArndtExecutive OfficerCatholic Justice & Peace Commission of BrisbaneP: +61 7 3324 3441F: +61 7 3336 9177M: +61 409 265 476
1) Forum called out for hollow talk on Papua2) Geo-politics at play over Leader’s lack of expressed commitment on West Papua——————————————————————————————1) Forum called out for hollow talk on Papua43 minutes agoPacific Islands Forum leaders have been accused of hollow talk about listening to the people of the region on important issues like West Papua.Following last week's Forum leaders summit in Pohnpei, regional civil society groups have voiced disappointment at what they see as a lack of any outcome or substance on the issue of West Papua.Papua had been one of the big regional issues identified by the Forum secretary-general Dame Meg Taylor as being on the leaders' agenda, ahead of the summit.However in the end, leaders merely concluded that the issue of alleged human rights violations in West Papua should remain on their agenda.Furthermore, after the resolution of last year's Forum summit to urge Jakarta to allow a fact-finding mission to West Papua, the matter appears to have dropped off the table.Dame Meg confirmed in Pohnpei that Indonesian sensitivity over the term “fact-finding" in relation to Papua meant that it would not accept such a mission.They identified West Papua as among the key issues needing the Forum's attention and development of meaningful policy discussions.Taking stock of the Pohnpei summit, Joe Collins of the Australia West Papua Association said that while it was encouraging that Papua was mentioned in the communiqué, there was no specific action taken."There's no doubt there's a huge groundswell of support from the people, civil society organisations and church groups in support of West Papua," he said.“And for all the talk about (the Forum) being inclusive and listening to the people, the fact that it's not really on the agenda that much would indicate that the leaders are not really listening to the people."——————————————————————2) Geo-politics at play over Leader’s lack of expressed commitment on West Papua
11:01 pm GMT+12, 12/09/2016, FijiPacific leaders’ lack of expressed commitment to action the case of West Papua at their meeting in Federated States of Micronesia may be due to geo politics says Pacific Islands Association of NGOs (PIANGO) executive director, Emele Duituturaga.
“Generally, the result of the 47th Pacific Islands Forum Leaders meeting as articulated in their communiqué was a mixed one for civil society,” Duituturaga said.
“We are happy that some of the issues we pushed for like the Pacific Framework for the Rights of Persons with Disability, Climate Change and disaster risk management, and coastal fisheries were endorsed by the leaders and reflected in the communiqué.”
“For West Papua – while the human rights violations were mentioned, the push by CSOs to have West Papua raised at the United Nations is not reflected,” she said.
On West Papua, the 47th PIF Leaders meeting communiqué stated that “… Leaders recognised the political sensitivities of the issue of West Papua (Papua) and agreed the issue of alleged human rights violations in West Papua (Papua) should remain on their agenda. Leaders also agreed on the importance of an open and constructive dialogue with Indonesia on the issue…”
“An achievement is the agreement to keep the issue of human rights violations should remain on the leaders agenda. We know that a couple of members had hoped the issue of West Papua would be removed altogether.”
“We understand from talking individually to leaders and officials that there were robust discussions by the leaders that was quite encouraging. We also know that the draft text reflected their intention to take West Papua to the UN but when the final communiqué was released, it had been watered down,” Duituturaga said.
“It is obvious that geo politics were at play which brings to question whether infact our leaders can be bold and courageous in the presence of neighbouring powers like Australia and New Zealand.”
She said that the 16 CSO representatives at the TROIKA leader’s breakfast dialogue felt successful and promising discussions were held on the issue.
“All those present expressed sentiments that the issue of West Papua – both in terms of human rights violations and self-determination were important. What those leaders at the breakfast articulated was that there are provisions in the UN that needed to be followed and utilised to bring the issue to the UN.”
“We are concerned that this promising dynamic in the discussion civil society organisation representatives had with leaders at the breakfast was not present at all in the communiqué.”
“Perhaps there is limited value to just talking to a handful and whether that makes an impact to the final discussions that leaders have at the retreat.”
“The Samoan Prime Minister, who is the next PIF Chair had stated at the breakfast meeting that the CSO dialogue needed to take place with all the 16 leaders and not just TROIKA and he will see to that for next year’s PIF programme. This result (Communiqué) seems to confirm that this is really what’s needed to be done in order for leaders to commit to taking the issue to the UN.”
However, Duituturaga said the Pacific Islands Coalition on West Papua (PICWP), which includes Solomon Islands, Vanuatu, Republic of Marshall Islands, Nauru and Tuvalu and PIANGO, is an avenue which CSOs will tap into to continue to push the West Papua agenda at the UN.
“What is encouraging and positive however, is how PICWP member countries have visibly shown their commitment to take up the issue.”
Duituturaga said PIANGO will now work individually with those countries for UN intervention on human rights violations and to push for self-determination for West Papua at the UN General Assembly, the UN Human Rights Council and raise these matters with the UN Secretary General