1) Indonesia
Summons Australian Ambassador Over Spying Report
2) Defence
Force may have known of West Papua atrocities
3) Another Proliferation of
Papua is not a smart move
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.thejakartaglobe.com/news/indonesia-summons-australian-ambassador-over-spying-report/
1) Indonesia Summons Australian Ambassador Over Spying Report
The government said Thursday it was summoning the Australian ambassador after a report that his embassy in Jakarta was being used for surveillance as part of a US-led spying network.
Ambassador Greg Moriarty will face questions at the foreign ministry Friday over the “totally unacceptable” activities reported in the Sydney Morning Herald, the ministry said.
The report said Australian embassies were being secretly used to intercept phone calls and data across Asia as part of a US-led global spying network. It cited information from fugitive analyst Edward Snowden and a former Australian intelligence officer.
The paper said the clandestine surveillance facilities at embassies were being operated without the knowledge of most Australian diplomats.
The summons was just the latest diplomatic fallout related to the US surveillance controversy, which began as a row between Washington and its European allies.
“Responding to reports in the Sydney Morning Herald newspaper on October 31, 2013 about the existence and use of wiretapping facilities at the Australian embassy in Jakarta and other countries in the region, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs is demanding an explanation from the Australian embassy in Jakarta,” the foreign ministry statement said. “The Australian ambassador in Jakarta has been summoned to come to the foreign ministry… on November 1, 2013, to provide an official explanation from the Australian government about the report…. As a friendly neighbouring country, such an act as reported does not reflect the spirit of friendly relations which has been established and is something that’s totally unacceptable to the government of Indonesia.”
A spokesman for the Australian foreign ministry said: “As a matter of principle and longstanding practice, the Australian government does not comment on intelligence matters.”
Indonesia’s anger came a day after it protested strongly to the United States after a report in the same newspaper said Washington had been monitoring phone calls and communication networks from its embassy in Jakarta.
The Asia-Pacific row came after Europe and Washington traded more spying accusations Wednesday, as envoys met to seek ways to rebuild trust after the shock revelations about the scale and scope of US surveillance of its allies.
Agence France-Presse
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.smh.com.au/national/defence-force-may-have-known-of-west-papua-atrocities-20131031-2wlv0.html
2) Defence Force may have known of West Papua atrocities
November 1, 2013
Deborah Snow
Two recent accounts by former Australian defence force personnel who worked in the Indonesian province of Irian Jaya (now West Papua) in 1977 suggests there was ADF knowledge at that time of alleged atrocities committed by Indonesian troops.
The Defence Department has issued a qualified denial of a claim made by the Asian Human Rights Commission that military aircraft supplied by Canberra were used in bombing runs over Papuan villages resisting Indonesian rule.
Defence told Fairfax Media that ''an initial search of Defence archives does not support the claim that two Iroquois helicopters were supplied by Australia to Indonesia in the 1970s''.
But it side-stepped questions about ADF knowledge of the alleged massacres detailed in the report. The commission claims, in a report released on October 24, that both US-supplied Bronco aircraft and Iroquois helicopters were used in bombing and strafing runs over Papuan villages that were suspected of aiding the Free Papua Movement (or OPM). It said at least 4000 and possibly up to 9000 Papuan civilians died in air and ground attacks launched by Indonesian troops in 1977-78.
Advertisement
Now two accounts from former ADF members operating in the region at the time have come to light. The Australians were part of Operation Cenderawasih, a mapping exercise of Irian Jaya being carried out by an army survey team, supported by RAAF Iroquois helicopters and Caribou and Hercules aircraft.
The first account, by former major Don Swiney and former sergeant Peter Jensen, was published in 2011 in an Australian survey corps association newsletter.
The authors say ''The Indonesian Army [in July 1977] was conducting an intense operation against the OPM, including setting villages alight with rockets from the air and accompanying ground operations.''
Mr Swiney was the commander of the Australian field survey squadron. He told Fairfax that ''I was aware of a ground operation based at Wamena and I estimated at the time of in excess of a battalion of [Indonesian] troops supported from the air by an OV-10 [Bronco] aircraft. This aircraft was armed with rockets. I witnessed from the air, huts in villages that had been burnt out but how that was done, I can only surmise.'' The Australians had a forward base at Wamena near the Baliem Valley ( a focus of OPM activity ) and were sharing an airfield with the Indonesian army from which they observed rockets being loaded onto Indonesian-operated aircraft.
The second account, written recently by former RAAF crewman Paddy Sinclair for a squadron reunion, also refers to Indonesian atrocities.
Mr Sinclair was on board a RAAF Iroquois helicopter that crashed while on survey operations in July 1977 on a steep, jungle-clad ridge near the Baliem Valley. An Indonesian army surveyor was also on board. In his account of the crash and subsequent rescue, Mr Sinclair reports that he and another crewman had used masking tape to write the word ''AUSTRALIA'' in makeshift letters on the tail of the helicopter.
Mr Sinclair says this was because ''Indonesian military were allegedly carrying out atrocities against the local population using Bell Iroquois aircraft painted in the same livery as the RAAF helicopters.''
However, another ADF source disputes this, saying ''AUSTRALIA'' was emblazoned on the tail as a way of alerting the OPM not to mistake the RAAF helicopter for an offensive aircraft.
Richard Woolcott, who was Australian Ambassador to Jakarta in 1977, said he had not received reports about atrocities from Australian defence attaches at the embassy.
The Hong-Kong based Asian Human Rights Commission claims the Indonesian army's 1977-78 assaults against Papuan villages constituted a '' neglected genocide''.
http://pacific.scoop.co.nz/2013/10/another-proliferation-of-papua-is-not-a-smart-move/
3) Another Proliferation of Papua is not a smart move
While waiting for approval from government upon the decision of House of Representative to form new administrative areas and create new provinces in Indonesia called as proliferation (Pemekaran), people are divided whether the decision is a smart move …
Another Proliferation of Papua is not a smart move
by Petrus K. Farneubun
October 30, 2013
October 30, 2013
While waiting for approval from government upon the decision of House of Representative to form new administrative areas and create new provinces in Indonesia called as proliferation (Pemekaran), people are divided whether the decision is a smart move or not. Certainly, any political decisions will spark controversy and suspicions among communities and elites and naturally it is divisive.
In regard to the distrbution, the most interesting thing is in the case of Papua. It is intersting because public wonders why majorities of the newly formed areas will take place in both Papua and West Papua provinces while the reality shows that in terms of number of population, available insfrastructers and local leadership capacities might not be ready. Both these areas will have 33 newly formed autonomies: 30 new districts and 3 new provinces.
Thus, most Papuans say that the formation of the new administration areas is not a smart move.
The opposing parties claim that the new formation demonstrates another systematic plan of Jakarta to silence Papua ongoing aspirations and deliberalely to divide Papuans.
Papuas have learned that special autonomy granted in 2001 was a political compromise; Papuans called it “gula-gula politik (Political candies). Central government believes that providing special autonomy to Papua which is to promote the welfare of Papua, the demand of indepence will be waning.
The logic is, of course, once Papuans are happy being prosperous, it is unlikely that they will ask for independece. But this assumption is proven wrong as Papuans do not see the benefits of special autonomy. They even decided to return special autonomy during massive rallies on 12 August 2005 and again on 18 June 2010. The same rejection has been done for numerous proliferations taking place in Papua since special autonomy was granted.
Thus, special autonomy and pemekaran is not the solution as this welfare approach does not answer the basic need of Papuans.
Head of Evangelical Church in Papua (GKI), Rev. Alberth Yoku, as quoted by local outlet Bintang Papua says that the plan to form more new areas should be postponed because it will not be the best solution to the problems in Papua.
He says, “The formation of new administrative areas is not the solution of humanitarian and economic problems in Papua rather it is to serve the interests of political elites who have failed to become member of parliaments and head of districts.”
Not only the church leaders raise their oppositions but also governor of Papua, Provincial House of Representatives, West Papua National Freedom Army (TPN/OPM), Central Highland Students Association Communication Forum (FKPMPTP) and Papua Students Alliance (AMP) and West Papua National Committee (KNPB).
Governor of Papua, Lukas Enembe, for example, as quoted by local outlet Majalah Selangkah, says, “the people of Papua does not need pemekaran in the land of Papua. Therefore, I totally reject any plans of formation of new administrative areas.”
Similarly, head of commission A Provincial House of Representatives claim that the formation of new administrative areas is not a rational decision and absurd. He says, “ the formation of new areas is to serve the opportunists interests who failed in governorial election. This is not for the sake of development.“
The arguments that the proliferation benefits local people; shorten the line of authority, increase local welfare and bring locals closer to public services such as health and education facilities clearly does not seem to work in Papua.
Anderson in his article, “The Failure of Education in Papua’s Highlands” believes that pemekeran brings more harm than good.
He says, pemekaran “allows local elites to access funds while pushing ordinary Papuans further away from the services that could improve their lives. Special autonomy has created a dividing line between Papuan elites who benefit directly from it, and the majority of Papuans, who receive a pittance.”
Looking at Human Development Index (HDI) released by Central Statistics Agency (Badan Pusat Statistik Indonesia, BPS) in February 2012 shows that the the percentage of poverty in Papua Province and West Papua province still above 20 percent, much higher than the national average.
The percentage of poor people in Papua Papua Province and West Papua province in 2011 are the highest respectively 31,24 and 28,53 while special autonomy law was introduced in 2001, ten years ago. Similarly, BPS data shows that 32 percent of Papua children under 15 years of age were illiterate. This is the highest illiterate rate in Indonesia.
Meanwhile, it has been reported many times that there is a high absenteism among local leaders including head of districts and state officials when communities urgently need for service. Public services are usually found closed including health and education services.
This situation shows that government needs to take smart move to gain trust from Papuans. Special autonomy, pemekaran, welfare approach, autonomy plus are not a smart move.
If the government insist on granting more pemekaran to Papua despite strong rejection from governor of Papua Province, church leaders, parliament and students and youth associations, it will convince Papuans that central government is more interested in preserving its political, economy and security interests than the interests of Papuans. It is againsts the will of Papuans majority. Also, it will create stronger resistance against any further government plans to implement in Papua.
ENDS
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.