Background
The release of Susi Air pilot Philip Mark Mehrtens, who was held hostage for 19 months by the armed wing of the Free Papua Movement (Organisasi Papua Merdeka; OPM) led by Egianus Kogoya (Tempo, 2024), marks a significant development in the long-standing and complex conflict between separatist groups in Papua and the Indonesian state. While the successful negotiation is celebrated as a triumph of humanitarian and familial approaches, it also raises critical questions about the effectiveness of these strategies, the role of non-state actors in conflict resolution, and the deeper socio-political dynamics that underpin the ongoing insurgency in Papua. This article critically examines the incident, utilizing contemporary theoretical frameworks and recent empirical studies to provide a nuanced understanding of the implications of this event within the broader context of conflict resolution and state sovereignty.
Conceptual Analysis: Hostage Diplomacy
Hostage diplomacy refers to the strategic use of hostage-taking by state or non-state actors to achieve political or diplomatic objectives. It is a form of coercive bargaining where the hostage becomes a tool to exert pressure on a government or international community to concede to specific demands (Lapan & Sandler, 1988). This tactic exploits the vulnerabilities of democratic states, where public opinion and political accountability can be leveraged to force policy changes or negotiations (Murray, 2020).
The theoretical underpinnings of hostage diplomacy can be traced to Bargaining Theory, which suggests that actors use hostages as a means of signaling their resolve and the seriousness of their demands. The hostage, in this case, functions as a high-stakes bargaining chip that raises the cost of non-compliance for the opposing party (Fearon, 1995). This tactic is particularly effective in asymmetric conflicts, where the weaker party lacks conventional means to challenge a stronger state and therefore resorts to unconventional methods to gain political leverage (Zartman, 2001).
In the case of the Susi Air pilot, Philip Mehrtens, the Free Papua Movement (OPM) employed hostage diplomacy to draw attention to their longstanding demands for Papuan independence from Indonesia. The initial demand for the recognition of Papuan sovereignty in exchange for Mehrtens’ release was a clear manifestation of this strategy. By holding an international citizen, particularly one from a Western country like New Zealand, the OPM aimed to internationalize the Papuan conflict and pressure both the Indonesian government and the global community to engage with their political agenda (Wangi, 2021).
Furthermore, the OPM’s use of hostage diplomacy can be seen through the lens of Constructivist Theories of international relations, which emphasize the role of norms, identity, and discourse in shaping political behavior (Finnemore & Sikkink, 1998). By framing the hostage situation within the discourse of human rights and self-determination, the OPM sought to align their struggle with broader global norms that are more likely to resonate with international audiences. This rhetorical strategy attempts to transform their image from that of a militant group to one of legitimate political actors fighting for a recognized cause (Timmer, 2021).
From Indonesia’s perspective, the handling of the Mehrtens case involved a delicate balance between state sovereignty and international diplomacy. The Indonesian government’s reluctance to engage directly with the OPM’s demands reflects a strategic choice to avoid legitimizing the group and setting a precedent that could encourage similar tactics in the future. This approach is consistent with the deterrence model of conflict management, which posits that states must demonstrate a firm stance against coercive threats to maintain credibility and discourage further challenges (Schelling, 1966).
The use of hostage diplomacy in the Philip Mehrtens case reflects the tactical pragmatism of the OPM in their struggle for Papuan independence. By leveraging a high-profile hostage, they sought to internationalize their cause and exert pressure on the Indonesian state. However, the ultimate resolution of the crisis, facilitated by local mediators and framed within a humanitarian discourse, underscores the limitations of hostage diplomacy as a means of achieving political objectives in a complex and highly contested conflict environment. As such, the case offers valuable insights into the dynamics of coercive bargaining, the role of non-state actors in conflict resolution, and the influence of international norms on the behavior of armed groups in asymmetric conflicts.
Analysis of the Negotiation Process: From Coercion to Humanitarianism
The negotiation process leading to Mehrtens release demonstrates a shift from coercive tactics to a more humanitarian approach, influenced by both practical and symbolic considerations. Initially, the OPM’s position was uncompromising, using Mehrtens as a bargaining chip to force the Indonesian government into a politically untenable position. This aligns with the classical theory of hostages as a form of “political capital” (Lapan & Sandler, 1988), where the value of the hostage is measured not in economic terms but in the political leverage it provides.
However, as the standoff continued, both the OPM and the Indonesian authorities faced increasing pressure. For the OPM, the prolonged captivity of Mehrtens risked alienating potential international supporters and portrayed them as violators of international norms. This shift is reflective of what Galtung (1996) describes as the “contradiction-violence” cycle, where protracted violence exacerbates the contradictions and underlying issues of the conflict, making it more difficult to achieve a resolution. The decision to release Mehrtens, therefore, can be seen as a strategic de-escalation, aimed at reframing the group’s image from that of a violent insurgency to a more rational actor capable of humane gestures.
On the Indonesian side, the government’s engagement in indirect negotiations through mediators allowed it to avoid the appearance of capitulating to separatist demands while still working towards a peaceful resolution. This approach is consistent with the concept of “mutually hurting stalemates” articulated by Zartman (2001), where both parties recognize that the continuation of the status quo is detrimental and seek an exit strategy that allows them to save face. By framing the release of Mehrtens as a humanitarian gesture, both sides were able to claim a form of moral victory without fundamentally altering the political landscape.
The Role of Humanitarian Norms and International Pressure
The invocation of humanitarian norms by the OPM during the negotiation process is a notable development in the rhetoric of the conflict. By aligning their actions with international standards of human rights and humanitarianism, the OPM sought to reframe their struggle in terms that resonate with global audiences. This tactic is consistent with the “norm life cycle” model proposed by Finnemore and Sikkink (1998), which suggests that non-state actors can gain legitimacy by aligning their actions with widely accepted international norms.
However, the use of humanitarian rhetoric also carries risks. As Sriram and Ross (2017) argue, the instrumentalization of human rights discourse can lead to a dilution of these norms, as actors on all sides of a conflict invoke them selectively to justify their actions. In the case of Papua, the OPM’s appeal to humanitarianism may be seen as a pragmatic move to gain international sympathy rather than a genuine shift in strategy. This raises questions about the sincerity and sustainability of such gestures, particularly in a context where violence and coercion have been the primary tools of political expression.
The Role of Non-State Mediators and Local Dynamics
One of the most significant aspects of the Mehrtens case is the role played by non-state mediators in facilitating his release. In regions like Papua, where state authority is contested and trust in government institutions is low, local leaders and organizations often serve as critical intermediaries. The involvement of religious and adat leaders in the negotiations reflects the importance of culturally grounded conflict resolution mechanisms, which can operate alongside or in place of formal state-led processes (McGibbon, 2018).
The use of such mediators also highlights the limitations of state-centric approaches to conflict resolution. As Lederach (1997) argues, sustainable peacebuilding requires the engagement of a broad range of stakeholders, including those who may not have formal political power but possess significant social capital. In the Papuan context, where traditional institutions remain influential, the inclusion of adat leaders in the negotiation process was crucial in building trust and ensuring the safety of the hostage.
Moreover, the use of local mediators can serve as a form of conflict containment, where the immediate crisis is managed without addressing the underlying issues. While this can prevent escalation in the short term, it may also perpetuate a cycle of violence and negotiation that fails to lead to substantive change. The challenge for both the Indonesian government and Papuan leaders is to move beyond crisis management towards a more comprehensive and inclusive dialogue that addresses the root causes of the conflict.
Conclusion: Lessons and Implications for Conflict Resolution
The release of Philip Mehrtens is a significant event in the ongoing conflict in Papua, but it is unlikely to herald a major shift in the broader dynamics of the struggle. The use of humanitarian and familial approaches in the negotiation process demonstrates the potential of non-coercive strategies in resolving immediate crises, but it also highlights the limitations of such approaches in addressing the deeper issues at stake.
For the Indonesian government, the challenge remains how to balance security concerns with the need for a more inclusive and responsive approach to Papuan grievances. The reliance on local mediators and indirect negotiations reflects the difficulty of engaging directly with separatist groups without undermining state sovereignty. However, without a more substantive dialogue that addresses the root causes of the conflict, such as political marginalization and economic inequality, the cycle of violence and repression is likely to continue.
For the OPM and other Papuan leaders, the challenge is to build on the momentum of the Mehrtens case to push for a broader dialogue that includes a wider range of stakeholders. While the use of humanitarian rhetoric has helped to reframe their struggle in more positive terms, the ultimate goal of self-determination remains distant. Achieving this will require not only strategic flexibility but also a willingness to engage with the complexities of the Papuan situation in a way that goes beyond the binary of independence versus integration.
In the end, the Mehrtens case serves as a reminder of the complexities and contradictions of conflict resolution in deeply divided societies. It illustrates the potential and limitations of humanitarian approaches and the need for a more holistic and context-sensitive understanding of peacebuilding in Papua and beyond.
"We hope that the National Land Agency's (BPN's) Papua Regional Office can find solutions so that the community can use the customary lands but at the same time not damage the environment," Acting Governor of Papua Ramses Limbong remarked here on Tuesday.
Limbong made the statement while speaking at the Agrarian and Spatial Affairs Day (Hantaru) at the BPN Papua Office.
The acting governor called for a solution, such as a supportive law for customary land, so that the community can truly feel the benefits of its utilization and not damage the environment.
"In addition, the status of customary lands in Papua must be clarified with certificates," he stressed.
He emphasized that protected zones and forests in customary lands cannot be exploited or sold.
Related news: Minister Tjahjanto gives land certificates to indigenous Papuans
He expects the BPN Papua Regional Office to continue improving public services, especially for those without land rights certificates.
Meanwhile, office head, Roy Eduard Wayoi, stated that currently, all land offices across Papua have carried out the certification process electronically in accordance with the Agrarian Affairs and Spatial Planning Ministry's policy.
Wayoi expressed hope of a synergy being fostered between the ministry, local governments, stakeholders, and indigenous peoples in identifying and mapping customary areas before the certification process is carried out.
He emphasized that this aims to protect the customary rights of indigenous peoples in Papua.
"The issuance of certificates to indigenous peoples is free because the Agrarian Affairs and Spatial Planning Ministry has allocated a budget, so it is the local governments' turn to respond to this, so that the (land certification) program runs well," he explained.
Related news: Home Affairs Ministry collaborates for customary land certification
Translator: Ardiles L, Kenzu
Editor: Yuni Arisandy Sinaga
Head of the West Papua Food Security Office, Lasarus Ullo, stated on Wednesday that the rice reserve is designated for communities in need, particularly during emergencies such as natural disasters.
"For instance, we distributed food aid to landslide victims in the Arfak Mountains district," Ullo noted.
He explained that the goal of distributing food aid to disaster victims is to prevent hunger.
His office is also conducting careful data collection to ensure the targeted distribution of aid and is coordinating with relevant agencies during natural disasters or food crises that may affect regional stability.
"Intervention measures must rely on accurate data to ensure the distribution reaches those who need it most," Ullo emphasized.
Currently, the West Papua Food Security Office is using a warehouse owned by the State Logistics Agency (Bulog) in Manokwari to store the rice supplies, he added.
Earlier, the National Food Agency requested that the provincial government build an inclusive warehouse to store community food reserves.
Ullo also revealed that an additional 36 tons of rice will be distributed to seven districts in West Papua, including Manokwari, South Manokwari, Arfak Mountains, Bintuni Bay, Wondama Bay, Kaimana, and Fakfak.
"The distribution of social aid is part of efforts to combat extreme poverty, reduce stunting, and control inflation in West Papua," he said.
The rice supplies were sourced from outside the province due to increased local rice prices, which strained the budget, he added.
Related news: West Papua can be rice barn for four provinces: minister
Related news: Government distributes 24,540 kg of rice aid to West Papuans
Translator: Fransiskus W, Kenzu
Editor: Anton Santoso
TEMPO.CO, Jakarta - The Indonesian government is developing a new food estateprogram in Merauke, South Papua. This mega project, listed as a national strategic project (PSN), encompasses a vast area of 2.29 million hectares, seventy times the size of Jakarta. This project includes rice cultivation, sugarcane plantations, and the establishment of sugar and bioethanol factories.
The government's primary objective is to achieve rice self-sufficiency by 2027 and meet the growing demand for sugar and bioethanol a year later.
To run this initiative, President Joko "Jokowi" Widodo appointed Bahlil Lahadalia, then Minister of Investment, as the Chairman of the Sugar Self-Sufficiency and Bioethanol Acceleration Task Force in Merauke. Bahlil and the government subsequently partnered with multiple companies to develop the sugarcane project.
Corporate Involvement in the Sugarcane Project
A report by Tempo Newspaper revealed that ten companies, organized into four consortiums, are involved in the food self-sufficiency project. These companies are managing the initial phase of the sugarcane project, encompassing 637,429 hectares of land in cluster 3 designated for sugarcane plantations, as well as sugar and bioethanol factories.
The participating companies include:
1. PT Global Papua Abadi: Managing a concession area of 30,777 hectares.
2. PT Andalan Manis Nusantara: Managing a concession area of 60,786 hectares.
3. PT Semesta Gula Nusantara: Managing a concession area of 66,056 hectares.
4. PT Dutamas Resources International: Managing a concession area of 60,879 hectares.
5. PT Borneo Citra Persada: Managing a concession area of 50,772 hectares.
6. PT Global Papua Makmur: Managing a concession area of 60,364 hectares.
7. PT Murni Nusantara Mandiri: Managing a concession area of 52,395 hectares.
8. PT Berkat Tebu Sejahtera: Managing a concession area of 60,342 hectares.
9. PT Agrindo Gula Nusantara: Managing a concession area of 60,679 hectares.
10. PT Sejahtera Gula Nusantara: Managing a concession area of 60,606 hectares.
Allegations of First Resources Affiliation
President Jokowi attended the inaugural sugarcane planting event within the PT Global Papua Abadi concession in Sermayam Indah Village, Tanah Miring District, on July 23, 2024. Notably, he was accompanied by several parties, including Martias Fangiono, the founder of the palm oil corporation First Resources, and his daughter Wirastuty Fangiono.
Based on Tempo Newspaper's report, Franky Samperante, Director of the Pusaka Bentala Rakyat Foundation, suspected that several companies involved in the sugarcane project are affiliated with First Resources.
“We believe they are affiliated with First Resources, especially given the presence of Martias Fangiono and his daughter Wirastuty Fangiono at the first sugarcane planting event with President Jokowi,” Franky said.
He also speculated that First Resources not only secured sugarcane and bioethanol factory concessions through PT Global Papua Abadi but also through four other companies. They are PT Andalan Manis Nusantara, PT Semesta Gula Nusantara, PT Borneo Citra Persada, and PT Dutamas Resources International.
First Resources denied these allegations. In response to Tempo's interview request, the company affirmed that they have no connections with the corporations developing sugarcane plantations in Merauke.
“We would like to clarify that the names mentioned in your email are not connected to First Resources,” they wrote on September 20, 2024. First Resources further explained that their primary operations are in the palm oil sector, concentrated in Riau, East Kalimantan, and West Kalimantan.
RADEN PUTRI | AVIT HIDAYAT
Editor's Choice: The Problem with Our Food Estate Program
TEMPO.CO, Jakarta - The Indonesian Military's TNI headquarters has confirmed that it will not withdraw or increase its troop presence in Papua despite the completion of an operation to free Susi Air pilot Philip Mark Mehrtens from hostage.
TNI Information Center chief Major General Hariyanto said the presence of TNI soldiers and National Police Polri personnel in Papua was to help the government improve local development, the economy, and public welfare.
"Our presence there is to maintain stable conditions and ensure public safety," Hariyanto said via text message on Wednesday, Sept. 25.
The presence of the TNI-Polri, particularly in Nduga Nduga Regency, has had a positive impact in preventing unrest from separatist movements.
According to Hariyanto, the frequent riots by separatist groups in Nduga have caused abnormalities in the social lives of the people of Nduga.
"The narrative of troop withdrawal is OPM propaganda. But one thing is clear, we will not withdraw or increase our troops in view of the regional elections," Hariyanto said.
New Zealand pilot Philip Mark Merhtens was taken hostage by Egianus' militia after landing a Susi Air plane with registration code PK-BVY at Paro airport in Nduga regency on September 7, 2023.
After nearly twenty months as a hostage, he was released by the TPNPB militia led by Egianus Kogoya on September 21.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.