Friday, September 5, 2025

1) AWPA-Open letter to Pacific Islands Forum Leader


2) Open Letter from Pacific CSOs to PIF on the Situation in West Papua

3) In Indonesia’s Rainforest, a Mega-Farm Project Is Plowing Ahead

4) Preview: 54th Pacific Islands Forum Leaders' Meeting


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

https://awpasydneynews.blogspot.com/2025/09/open-letter-to-pacific-islands-forum.html

Australia West Papua Association (Sydney)

4 September 2025

1) AWPA-Open letter to Pacific Islands Forum Leaders

Dear Pacific Islands Forum Leaders, 

I am writing to you concerning the human rights situation in West Papua. 

We understand   there are many issues of concern to discuss at the 54th Pacific Island Forum (PIF) Summit in Honiara and in particular that climate change is a priority issue for the Leaders and the People of the Pacific.  AWPA believes that the issue of human rights in West Papua is also a major issue of concern.  

I would first like to thank the PIF leaders for discussing  the human rights situation in West Papua at previous Forums and mentioning the issue in the official Forum Communiques.  Unfortunately, since last year’s Pacific Islands Forum Leaders’ meeting in Tonga , the human rights situation in West Papua has deteriorated further. AWPA will not go into great  detail  concerning the ongoing human rights abuses in West Papua  of which  the PIF Leaders would be  well aware.  

However, numerous recent reports have documented the human rights  violations in the territory, the burning of residential houses during military operations and the targeting of civilians, human rights defenders and local journalists.  Papuans are regularly intimidated  and arrested  by the Indonesian security forces for acts,  such as simply raising their national flag, the Morning Star or commemorating days of significance in their history as a way  of protesting the injustices they suffer under Indonesian rule. 

There are regular clashes between the security forces and the  West Papua National Liberation Army (TPNPB ) who are fighting for their independence.  Human Rights Monitor in its IDP update (August 2025) reported  there are more than 100,313 people in West Papua who  have been internally displaced as a result of armed clashes between the security forces and the TPNPB.   

In the most recent incident in West Papua, the Indonesian security forces cracked down on peaceful protestors in Sorong,  Southwest Papua Province on the 27 August.       

The demonstrators were protesting the transfer of 4  political prisoners from Sorong  to  Makassar City, South Sulawesi. They 4 prisoners have been charged with treason. The  demonstrators were peacefully protesting  the transfer of the prisoners and urging  the authorities to allow the prisoners to remain in West Papua where they would have the support of their families and friends.

The Indonesian security forces responded severely  to the peaceful  protests, firing tear gas and live ammunition. Up to 23 people were arrested. They were eventually released.  At a protest in Manokwari,  a resident is believed to have died due to the  effects of the tear gas. This  heavy-handed approach by the security forces was condemned by Amnesty International Indonesia. In a statement,  Amnesty’s Executive Director strongly condemned the brutality of the security forces during the demonstrations and urged the authorities to release the four Papuan political activists from all legal charges.

In light of the seriously deteriorating  human rights situation  in West Papua, AWPA urges the PIF Leaders to again discuss the human rights situation in the territory.  

 Its now 10 years since the PIF Leaders  at their 46th PIF meeting in Port Moresby in 2015, “requested the Forum Chair to convey the views of the Forum to the Indonesian Government, and to consult on a fact-finding mission to discuss the situation in Papua with the parties involved.” 

Ten years later there still has been no positive response from Jakarta. AWPA urges the Forum  Leaders  this year to vigorously follow up on their original request , urging Jakarta to not only allow a PIF fact finding mission to visit West Papua but to also urge Jakarta to invite the UN  High Commissioner for Human Rights to visit the territory.


AWPA believes that if enough outside attention is brought to  the issue of West Papua,  Jakarta may try to control its  military in the territory and stop the human rights abuses.

Yours sincerely

Joe Collins

AWPA (Sydney)


------------------------------------------ 


2) Open Letter from Pacific CSOs to PIF on the Situation in West Papua

1st September 2025

Upholding Our Pacific Humanitarian Values in West Papua

Pacific Greetings,
We, the undersigned civil-society organizations from West Papua and across the Pacific, write with urgency ahead of the Pacific Islands Forum Leaders’ Meeting in September. For nearly two decades, the Pacific Island Leaders Forum has made commitments to the people of West Papua, but these have been largely unfulfilled, and the situation on the ground continues to worsen. Now
is the time for decisive action.
Attacks and oppression of the people of West Papua have escalated, leading to a significant deterioration in the region’s humanitarian and human rights situation. The number of internally displaced people and refugees has surpassed 100,000*, a grim milestone that underscores the gravity and scale of the crisis. Most of those displaced are women, elderly persons and children, forced from their homes by ongoing violence and insecurity. Essential services have been disrupted, and there are widespread reports of intimidation and arbitrary arrests.
Despite concerns by West Papuan groups, Pacific civil society organisations, international human rights groups and respective Pacific Leaders, there has been insufficient action and attention to the ongoing human suffering and oppression. These realities challenge our shared vision of a peaceful, people-centered “Blue Pacific” and an “Ocean of Peace.”

Pacific Responsibility: Honouring Commitments and Taking Action on West Papua

From the 31st Pacific Islands Leaders Forum (PIF) in Tarawa, Kiribati (2000) to the 50th Forum in Tuvalu (2019), and across Melanesian Spearhead Group (MSG) Summits from 2014 to 2025, Pacific leaders have consistently adopted resolutions expressing grave concern over the escalating crisis in West Papua.
Time and again, Forum communiqués have acknowledged the root causes of the conflict, the persistence of state violence, and the deteriorating human rights situation facing the people of West Papua, our own Pacific family. Leaders have reiterated their commitment to a fact-finding mission and entrusted the Forum Chair with engaging Indonesia in meaningful dialogue.
One of the region’s clearest and most consistent calls has been for the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights to be granted unimpeded access to West Papua, a call echoed again at the 2023 MSG Summit. In support of this, Special Envoys, the Prime Ministers of Fiji and Papua New Guinea, were appointed to engage with Indonesia and report back to the Forum. Yet, their mandate expired in November 2023 without clear results. As of mid-2025, neither envoy has visited West Papua.
Meanwhile, Indonesia has deepened its presence in regional platforms, maintaining associate membership in the Melanesian Spearhead Group (MSG), holding dialogue partner status with the Pacific Islands Forum (PIF), and strengthening bilateral ties with individual Forum members. These relationships should not be seen as diplomatic constraints, but as opportunities: channels through which Pacific leaders can assert their collective voice, exercise moral authority, and demand that Indonesia uphold its international obligations.
The 2024 Forum Communiqué merely “noted” the Envoys’ report from their visit to Jakarta. This muted response, while a resurgent humanitarian crisis deepens, sends a troubling message to those on the ground: their suffering is being acknowledged, but not acted upon.
This is not a remote crisis, it is a Pacific crisis. West Papuans are part of our Melanesian family, part of the soul of this region. And yet, action has been lacking. Insufficient urgency. Insufficient solidarity.
This reality stands in striking contrast to the principles we proudly uphold as a region committed to a peaceful, people-centered “Blue Pacific”, self-determination and an “Ocean of Peace”. How can we claim such a vision while turning away from the cries of our own people in pain? Now is the time for courage. For unity. For decisive leadership.
We call on the incoming Chair of the Pacific Islands Forum to honour their past commitments, through action. Let us collectively urge Indonesia to demonstrate real accountability by allowing immediate and unrestricted access to West Papua for independent human rights observers, including the UN High Commissioner.
Our call to action:
  1. Fulfill outstanding commitments to independent scrutiny.
    ○ Re-issue, with clear timelines, the invitation for an Office of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) mission.
    ○ Implement the previously committed Pacific Islands Forum fact-finding mission which must report back to the 2026 Forum Foreign Ministers Meeting.
    ○ Linked to the PIF Fact Finding Mission, facilitate a civil-society-led “People’s Mission” to ensure West Papuan voices are credibly heard.
  2. Ensure a rapid, needs-based humanitarian response.
    ○ Activate and facilitate neutral, humanitarian mechanisms to deliver food, shelter, medical care, and protection for internally displaced communities and assist those seeking refuge in Papua New Guinea.
    ○ Resource and protect local relief responders from West Papua
  3. Champion a mediated ceasefire and adherence to international humanitarian law.
    ○ Use the Forum’s good offices and leadership capacities, in partnership with civil society–especially with women-led mediation capacities in multi-track peace
    efforts–to actively encourage all parties to enact and monitor a ceasefire.
    ○ Press for full respect of civilian protections under the Geneva Conventions and unimpeded humanitarian access.
One of the region’s clearest and most consistent calls has been for the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights to be granted unimpeded access to West Papua, a call echoed again at the 2023 MSG Summit. In support of this, Special Envoys, the Prime Ministers of Fiji and Papua New Guinea, were appointed to engage with Indonesia and report back to the Forum. Yet, their mandate expired in November 2023 without clear results. As of mid-2025, neither envoy has visited West Papua.
*As of mid-August 2025, European NGO, Human Rights Monitor, which is tracking displacement numbers in West Papua, highlighted that more than 100.313 people remain internally displaced as a result of armed conflict between Indonesian security forces and the West Papua National Liberation Army (TPNPB), with new displacements reported in the regencies of Jayawijaya, Intan Jaya, Yahukimo, Puncak, and Nduga. Report at https://humanrightsmonitor.org/reports/idp-update-august25- humanitarian-crisis-amidst-ongoing-military-operations/ (accessed at 2 Sep 2025). In addition to those internally displaced, the Immigration & Citizenship Services Authority (ICSA) of Papua New Guinea, estimated about 10,000 refugees who had cross the border from West Papua region (Indonesia) into PNG https://ica.gov.pg/refugees/facts-and-figures-about-refugees-in-png(accessed at 2 Sep 2025).


------------------------------ 
 

3) In Indonesia’s Rainforest, a Mega-Farm Project Is Plowing Ahead

 

The Indonesian government is fast-tracking a massive agricultural project that is turning 7 million acres of tropical forest into rice and sugarcane farms. Critics say it is the world’s largest deforestation project and would upend the lives of thousands of Indigenous people.

 

BY FRED PEARCE  • SEPTEMBER 2, 2025

 

It was an unlikely destination for the first field visit by the new president of Indonesia. Last November, two weeks after taking office, Prabowo Subianto traveled more than 2,000 miles from his presidential palace in Jakarta to the remote coastal village of Wanam on the island of New Guinea. But Prabowo, a former military commander, had a purpose that Sunday morning — to showcase his plan to turn a huge expanse of biodiverse forests and wetlands in his country’s easternmost province into a mega-farm the size of Maryland that would grow rice and sugarcane. 

That day, he drove a combine harvester for the cameras, while his agriculture minister Amran Sulaiman declared that the hundreds of giant excavators recently shipped from China to the village would help fulfill Prabowo’s campaign promise to make the world’s fourth most populous country self-sufficient in food within four years.  

The president’s trip won national headlines. But the inhabitants of Wanam, an Indigenous clan with their own language spoken nowhere else, soon said the excavators were destroying the land where they hunt and fish. The machinery and engineers had arrived without their consent, or even prior knowledge. And when they protested, armed soldiers told them that their land belonged to the government, and they had no right to resist. 

 

The government aims to grow enough rice to end the country’s reliance on imports and provide sugarcane to make biofuel.



  The plight of the people of Wanam and the wider area earmarked for the project has been garnering international attention. Envoys from the United Nations warned in March that Prabowo’s megaproject jeopardizes the livelihoods and traditions of tens of thousands of forest dwellers. Meanwhile, environmentalists charge that Prabowo’s scheme is the largest deforestation project currently underway anywhere in the world. 

 

Located in the Merauke Regency of the province of South Papua, on the island of New Guinea, the project — known as the Food and Energy Estate — has long been a goal of the Indonesian government. In 2023, it was relaunched by Prabowo’s predecessor Joko Widodo as a national strategic project, allowing it to fast-track the red tape.

 

Now, under Prabowo, it is being expanded to cover more than 7 million acres and dramatically accelerated. He also plans another smaller estate on the island of Borneo. The aim is to grow enough rice to end the country’s reliance on imports and to provide millions of tons of sugarcane to make ethanol, a biofuel that will help achieve Prabowo’s parallel pledge for national energy self-sufficiency. But the collateral damage will be high, conservationists and human rights advocates say. 

 

Until now, the area planned for the estate has remained “largely intact — protected by its remoteness, extreme climate [and a] strong Indigenous presence,” says landscape ecologist David Gaveau, who runs TreeMap, a consultancy that monitors deforestation in Indonesia. The project would also be entirely within one of New Guinea’s most treasured ecoregions, the TransFly, a patchwork of flooded grasslands, forest, and savanna that stretches across the south of the island from Indonesian Papua into the neighboring nation of Papua New Guinea.  

Named after the Fly River that crosses it, the TransFly has long been inhabited and protected by Indigenous Marind and other related tribes. It contains a heady mixture of both tropical rainforest species, including the endemic New Guinea crocodile, and Australian savanna species such as tree kangaroos, wallabies, gliding possums, and the dusky pademelon, one of the world’s smallest marsupials. 

The TransFly is also home to half of the 800 or so bird species on New Guinea, including numerous species of birds of paradise, famed for their plumage, and the cassowary, a giant flightless ostrich-like bird whose feathers have long been highly prized for tribal headdresses. And its wetlands serve as an important stopping-off point for birds migrating between Siberia and Australia. 

 

A U.N. report found the mega-farm jeopardized “the survival of wildlife and endangered the cultural heritage” of communities.

Michele Bowe, formerly the TransFly Ecoregion Coordinator for the environment group WWF, says parts of the region have suffered from palm-oil cultivation and a wildlife trade in turtles and cockatoos, “but there are still substantial tracts of amazing forests and wetlands that are vital to protect.” She spent years developing a transboundary conservation plan that was agreed with Indigenous people and government officials a decade ago. But only three small areas in the Indonesian TransFly are currently protected. And now they too are threatened. 

The new mega-farm will surround the protected areas and altogether consume a fifth of the entire TransFly ecozone, including about half the area inside Indonesian Papua, according to a mapping study by Mighty Earth, a Washington D.C.-based advocacy group, which monitors deforestation in Indonesia. 


The Merauke Food and Energy Estate is a combined effort of the Indonesian Ministry of Defense and a handful of major Indonesian corporations with reported links to the president. The Jhonlin Group, headed by palm-oil magnate Andi Syamsuddin Arsyad, is developing the roughly 2.5 million acres of rice paddy earmarked for the west of the regency. Last year, the group bought 2,000 land excavators from Chinese company Sany at a cost of $250 million to clear land and dig irrigation channels. Meanwhile, the Merauke Sugar Group, owned by the family of Indonesian oligarch Martias Fangiono, has to date been awarded more than 1.25 million acres of concessions for growing sugar. 

 
 

Military engineers and guards will be a constant presence. Local news reports say that in recent months the Ministry of Defense has sent five infantry battalions, with more than 3,000 personnel, to the area. Their job is “to assist the government in accelerating development,” according to their commander General Agus Subiyanto

The pace of that acceleration is creating confrontations with the local people. According to Margareth Aritonang, formerly of the Gecko Project, a U.K.-based nonprofit investigative news service, the first that some villagers heard of the estate plan is when soldiers arrived and planted stakes on their land, closely followed by excavators tearing down their forest.  

In March, nine U.N.-appointed special rapporteurs — independent advisors on human and environmental rights — visited the area. They reported that the mega-farm was “jeopardizing the survival of local wildlife and endangering the cultural heritage of Indigenous communities that depend on them.” The team found that “more than 50,000 Indigenous people living in 40 villages… will be directly affected by its implementation” and that many were being “criminalized for advocating for their rights.” 

Across the project area, an ecologist found, 55,000 acres of natural ecosystems have already been cleared.

Indonesian media reported last year on an unpublished study by the government’s own land inspection body, Sucofindo, that appeared to contradict this. It reportedly complained about the absence of environmental impact assessments for the project and warned that 80 percent of the earmarked land is on the communal territories of Indigenous people. The government did not respond to requests for further comment. But in a formal response to the U.N. rapporteurs, the government said it always protected human rights, denied allegations of misconduct, and insisted the project was taking place on land designated by the state for development.

 
 
 

Whatever the legal issues, “the situation has become a disaster, particularly for Indigenous Papuans,” says Hipolitus Wangge, a researcher specializing in Indonesian politics at the Universiti Sains Malaysia in Penang, Malaysia.  “For them, land and nature are not just places to live, they embody their identity, culture, and way of life,” he says.


In recent years, there have been high expectations that Indonesia had turned a corner on curbing deforestation, which once rivaled that in Brazil. Forest loss has declined dramatically in former hotspots such as Sumatra and Borneo since 2019, when then-president Widodo announced a permanent moratorium on both forest destruction and drainage of peatlands. 

 

But critics question how the rules are being applied in Papua. Mighty Earth has shown major overlaps between the Merauke Sugar Group’s concessions and the government’s maps of primary forest and peatlands supposedly covered by the moratorium. 

Meanwhile, the clearing of the land is under way. Analysis of satellite images by Gaveau at the end of June, showed the military had already completed 25 miles of an 84-mile access road penetrating swamp forests east of Wanam. The road will link up to the existing Trans-Papua Highway, “creating a continuous road corridor across southern Papua… opening access to forests,” says Gaveau. 

On either side of the road, almost 16,000 acres of former swamp forest have so far been cleared and drained for rice farms, according to the satellite images, while workers on the Fangiono sugar concessions have cleared more than twice as much. Across the whole Merauke estate, Gaveau found that 55,000 acres of natural ecosystems have been cleared, almost half forest, and the rest swamp, savanna, and grassland. Mighty Earth cites such evidence in making its claim that the Merauke estate is now “the world’s largest deforestation project.” 

New Guinea was once famous for providing feathers from birds of paradise for the hats of fashionable European women.

Critics say Prabowo’s push to food self-sufficiency harks back to the worst days of the country’s disgraced dictator from 1967 to 1998, President Suharto, who once mentored the young soldier Prabowo and became his father-in-law. Suharto’s liking for major agricultural projects included his flagship Mega-Rice project in the peat swamps of Borneo. It drained 2.5 million acres, but was abandoned as soils acidified and fires took hold in the dried peat. Some soil scientists familiar with the two areas say the Merauke project faces the same fate

Government ministers have said they can counter the acid soils in Merauke by applying lime.  But Wirastuti Widyatmanti, a geographer at the Gadjah Mada University in Yogyakarta, warns that soil studies carried out for the government have never been published, so this hope cannot be independently corroborated. 

“I am worried that in 20 years people will visit the Papua project and see an ecological wasteland without much agricultural production to show for it. Just like the Mega-Rice project,” says Glenn Hurowitz, CEO of Mighty Earth.

 
 

In a second reprise of his former mentor’s policies, Prabowo has also called for Indonesians from other islands to sign up to work the new fields. Critics see this as a revival of Suharto’s widely disparaged transmigration schemes, when around a million farmers from Java and other densely populated islands were moved to Papua, eventually outnumbering natives in some areas. 

The fear is that however successful it may be at growing food crops, the project will inflame long-standing tensions between the people of Papua and the Indonesian government. Papua has a distinct identity. Its inhabitants are mostly Melanesian tribes, who are predominantly Christian, whereas the rest of Indonesia comprises the world’s largest Muslim nation. 

Unlike East Timor, which gained independence from Indonesia in 2002, there has never been outright insurrection in Papua. But tensions persist, and a separatist Free Papua Movement has engaged in sporadic activity, attacking both civilian and military targets. The mega-farm could become a new focus for armed resistance, warns Wangge. 


A century ago, the island of New Guinea was famous for supplying colorful plumage from birds of paradise that adorned the hats of fashionable women in Paris, London, and New York. Before finding movie fame, a young Errol Flynn spent time there, hunting the birds for their plumes. 

 
 

The trade was eventually banned. But Errol Fuller, author of The Lost Birds of Paradise, documents how one of the last big seizures of contraband plumes, made in England in 1923, included boxes from Merauke that contained 60 feathered skins of what turned out to be an unknown hybrid sub-species. Ornithologists eventually named it Lupton’s Bird of Paradise, after the border guard who found them. 

The hybrid is thought to persist in the swamp forests of the TransFly. Whether it can survive the arrival of the mega-farm remains to be seen. 

 

Fred Pearce is a freelance author and journalist based in the U.K. He is a contributing writer for Yale Environment 360 and is the author of numerous books, including The Land GrabbersEarth Then and Now: Amazing Images of Our Changing World, and The Climate Files: The Battle for the Truth About Global Warming. MOREABOUT FRED PEARCE →





---------------------------------


4) Preview: 54th Pacific Islands Forum Leaders' Meeting

2:38 pm today 

Pacific Islands Forum (PIF) leaders are en route to the Solomon Islands for their annual meeting, which kicks off Monday.

So far, the lead-up has been marred by geopolitical tussles and threats of leaders not attending.
The PIF Leaders' Summit is when the 18 member states and territories, including New Zealand and Australia, discuss the big issues facing the region
It is typically attended by over two dozen dialogue partners, including China, France, United States, the United Kingdom, Japan, and Taiwan.
However, this year's host, Solomon Islands Prime Minister Jeremiah Manele, blocked all external partners from the event.
His reason: to give Pacific leaders space to focus on reviewing how the Forum engages with partners, as part of reforms under its Partnership and Engagement Mechanism.

 

 The issues on the table for consideration at the retreat - a leaders-only event held on the second to last day away from the action - include:

In 2023, leaders travelled to Aitutaki in Cook Islands, while in 2024, they spent a day on the pristine waters of Vava'u in Tonga.
This year, the setting for the heart-to-heart leaders' conversation is Munda, in the Western Province of Solomon Islands.
Munda, a tourism hub, is home to the country's only other international airport in the country, which was co-funded by New Zealand, Australia and the Solomon Islands.
Every Pacific leader to attend
Despite the leaders of Fiji and Tuvalu threatening not to go to the summit, Manele has confirmation that 17 out of 18 PIF leaders will attend.
"I'm happy to note that all Forum leaders will be attending the Honiara forum leaders meeting at the leaders level. Samoa, we understand, because of the elections... [will] be represented at the very senior officials' level," Manele told Pacific Waves on Thursday.
New Zealand dependent territory Tokelau, an associate member, has confirmed its Ulu-o-Tokelau or head of government national, will not be in Honiara due to "urgent consultations".
The Honiara Summit will be the first attended by Guam and American Samoa as PIF associate members.

Meetings on the side

As the final touches are put in place ahead of the start of the meeting, the attention also turns to who might engage unofficially on the sidelines.
Massey University's associate professor in security studies Anna Powles believes it is likely countries with diplomatic missions in the Solomon Islands - such as China, Japan, the UK and the US - will hold meetings on the sidelines of the PIF.
However, she does not think the other dialogue partners will hold such meetings.
"It's very unlikely that dialogue partners, such as Norway or Singapore, who do not have diplomatic representation in Honiara as they have not been invited," Powles said.
France has been a dialogue partner since 1989. Their delegation has cancelled flights and accommodation.
But France's ambassador to the Pacific Véronique Roger-Lacan expressed frustration at PIF's decision to exclude donors.
She told RNZ Pacific that if France finds that, despite the ban on external partners, some are attending the meeting, it will seek an explanation from PIF.

'Every man and his dog coming into the Pacific'

In May, Samoa's caretaker Prime Minister Fiame Naomi Mata'afa told RNZ Pacific that the contest to get a seat even for a peripheral position within the PIF has been intense.
"Every man and his dog [is] coming into the Pacific," Fiame said at the time.
She pointed out the persistent "conflict between the collective and national interests" of PIF member states.
Despite this, Manele said this year's meeting serves as a message to the world that the Pacific stands united, with the theme of "Iumi Tugeda: Act Now for an Integrated Blue Pacific Continent".

Regional architecture review

A key initiative before the leaders this year is the Regional Architecture Review, which is expected to be endorsed in the Solomon Islands.
The much anticipated review is the leaders' response to increasing interest from a growing number of forum dialogue partners wanting a seat, and influence, at the regional decision-making table.
A former PIF insider, now Auckland University of Technology lecturer, Sione Tekiteki told RNZ Pacific that external powers had been pitting Pacific Islands Forum members against each other.
"The real tragedy lies in the fact that this so-called 'divisive issue' is neither of our making, nor particularly central to our own strategic or developmental priorities," Tekiteki said last month.
Manele has dismissed claims that blocking the countries was due to pressure from Beijing, which opposes Taiwan's presence at the event. He said it is a sovereign decision taken by Solomon Islands in the region's best interests, and not one coming from outsiders.
"We acknowledge public concerns and media narratives regarding forum matters, but let me be very clear, Solomon Islands is a sovereign nation," Manele said.
"Our government acts in the best interest of our people and the region, decisions related to the Pacific Islands Forum are made collectively by forum members through established processes grounded in the Pacific Way, emphasising respect dialogue and consensus.”
-------------------------------

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.