Tuesday, July 14, 2026

1) Papuan pastor killed during military operation in Intan Jaya


2) Transmigration residents and Moi Aresi Clan challenge palmoil company over alleged unlawful land use in Sorong Regency
3) Civil Society Groups Oppose Plan to Turn Wanam, Merauke Into Defense Industrial Zone

------------------------------------------


1) Papuan pastor killed during military operation in Intan Jaya

On 29 June 2026, security forces reportedly shot dead Rev Elianus Agimbau, 20, a pastor of the Indonesian Tabernacle Church (GKII), whilst travelling through the Mbamogo Village area, located on the border between the Sugapa and the Agasiga districts. According to multiple sources, Mr Agimbau was unarmed and was travelling to Sugapa. His body was recovered one day later. The killing occurred amid intensified Indonesian military operations in Intan Jaya Regency. Church leaders, Indonesia’s Minister for Human Rights, and the Papua office of the National Human Rights Commission (Komnas HAM) condemned the killing, and called for an independent investigation.
Rev Elianus Agimbau and a relative left Kupia Village on the morning of 29 June 2026 after seeking shelter from the deteriorating security situation in Agisiga District. They travelled towards Sugapa to facilitate the release of village funds. Upon reaching the Mbamogo ojek base at approximately 11.00 am, security personnel reportedly opened fire at them. Mr Elianus Agimbau was reportedly shot and died at the scene, while his relative escaped by jumping down a ravine and subsequently hiding in the forest. The victim’s body was later recovered in the undergrowth and covered with grass (see photos and videos below, source: independent HRD). After Rev Agimbau’s relative reached Sugapa on the following day, he informed the family. Thereupon, members of the local conflict resolution team searched the area and recovered the body on 30 June 2026. Mr Elianus Agimbau’s body was buried on 1 July 2026.
Family members stated that they had not received any official explanation regarding the circumstances of the killing. According to the Ministry of Human Rights, the victim’s body bore five gunshot wounds, multiple cuts and signs of mutilation, including the reported loss of one ear. At the time of publication, neither the Indonesian National Armed Forces (TNI) nor the Indonesian National Police (Polri) had publicly clarified the circumstances surrounding the shooting or announced any criminal investigation into the incident.
The killing occurred during a broader escalation of violence in Intan Jaya. On the same day, Indonesian military personnel allegedly opened fire on a vehicle transporting Catholic clergy and parishioners returning from collecting construction materials for a church and bridge project in Titigi Village, injuring two civilians, Mr Daud Hagismijau and Mr Kiko Hagismijau. Both reportedly remained under the care of the Catholic Church after allegedly being prevented from receiving hospital treatment because security forces accused them of being members of the West Papua National Liberation Army (TPNPB). The military operations allegedly involved helicopters, drones, rockets and ground troops between 26 and 29 June, and resulted in attacks on civilian settlements, church facilities and widespread displacement in Agisiga and Sugapa districts.
The killing of Rev Elianus Agimbau triggered widespread condemnation from church leaders, HGOs and public figures Thousands of residents protested in Sugapa on 3 and 4 July 2026 (see photos and videos below, source: independent HRD), demanding an investigation into all civilian deaths in Intan Jaya, and calling for a review of the Indonesian military presence in Intan Jaya.
The chairman of the Papua Regional Office of Komnas HAM described the repeated attacks against civilians as human rights violations and called on President Prabowo Subianto to comprehensively review security governance and military operating procedures in West Papua. Indonesia’s Minister for Human Rights, Mr Natalius Pigai, publicly urged the Commander of the TNI and the Chief of Police to exercise stricter control over security personnel deployed in West Papua. Church leaders, including the Chairman of the GKII Central Papua Regional Synod demanded an independent, transparent investigation and renewed calls for a humanitarian approach and peaceful dialogue to resolve the conflict.

Human rights analysis

The above-described incident raises serious concerns regarding the arbitrary deprivation of life. Mr Agimbau was an unarmed civilian. Therefore, his killing constitute a violation of the right to life protected under Article 6 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR). Even if military operations were ongoing in the area, international humanitarian law requires parties to distinguish at all times between civilians and persons directly participating in hostilities and prohibits attacks against civilians.
The reported mutilation of the victim’s body and the alleged failure to promptly recover the remains further warrant an independent forensic investigation consistent with the Minnesota Protocol on the Investigation of Potentially Unlawful Death (2016). Indonesian authorities are under an obligation to conduct a prompt, impartial and effective investigation, identify those responsible and ensure accountability and effective remedies for the victim’s family.

A rescue team discovered and recovered the body of Rev Elianus Agimbau on 30 June 2026



Detailed Case Data
Document ID: HRM-CAS-103-2026
Location: Mbamogo, Agisiga, Intan Jaya Regency, Central Papua, Indonesia (-3.6708932, 137.0680343) 
Region: Indonesia > Central Papua > Intan Jaya > Agisiga
Total number of victims: 1
#Number of VictimsName, DetailsGenderAgeGroup AffiliationViolations
1.Elianus Agimbau
male20 Indigenous Peoples, Religious Groupright to life, unlawful killing
Period of incident: 29/06/2026 – 29/06/2026
Perpetrator: Republic Indonesia > Indonesian Security Forces
Issues: indigenous peoples, security force violence
Sources:
BBC Indonesia
BBC Indonesia
Suara Papua
Related Cases:


———————————————————————


2) Transmigration residents and Moi Aresi Clan challenge palmoil company over alleged unlawful land use in Sorong Regency

Two separate land disputes involving PT Inti Kebun Sejahtera (PT IKS) escalated in June 2026 as former transmigration residents in Klasof Village, Moisegen District, Sorong Regency, Southwest Papua Province, and members of the Moi indigenous Aresi clan sought legal remedies over alleged unlawful occupation and use of their land for oil palm plantations. The disputes concern allegations that the company has cultivated land without obtaining the free consent of landholders since 2007. Community representatives and legal advocates also accused the company of criminalising indigenous people defending their customary land rights.

Former transmigration residents seek compensation for 19 years of land use

On 24 June 2026, transmigration residents from Klasof Village, organised through the Klasof Village Nusantara Community Forum, participated in a mediation meeting facilitated by the Sorong Regency Government and LBH Papua Pos Sorong. The meeting addressed allegations that PT IKS had planted oil palm on privately owned land covered by Certificates of Freehold without the owners’ consent since 2007.
Representing the community, forum chairman Martinus Paru stated that residents had repeatedly protested the company’s activities over the years but had never received an adequate response. Company representatives acknowledged that an internal review had failed to identify any written agreements authorising the use of the residents’ land, although the company maintained that verbal consent had been provided when operations commenced. PT IKS further argued that its current management, which assumed responsibility after 2020, should only be liable for claims arising from that period onwards.
LBH Papua Pos Sorong rejected this position, arguing that changes in corporate ownership or management do not extinguish existing legal obligations. The legal aid organisation argued that using land without the owner’s consent may constitute an unlawful act giving rise to civil liability.
The mediation produced two provisional agreements. PT IKS agreed to coordinate with the National Land Agency (BPN) to conduct a new survey confirming the extent of residents’ land occupied by oil palm plantations. The company also agreed to consult its central management regarding compensation for land use between 2020 and 2025, based on a proposed rate of Rp250,000 per hectare per month. The community formally requested that the Sorong Regent ensure compensation is paid for the entire period from 2007 to 2026 and called for a clear written agreement governing any future use of residents’ land.

Moi Aresi clan alleges occupation of customary land without consent

In a separate but related dispute, LBH Papua Pos Sorong issued a public statement on 24 June 2026 supporting the Moi indigenous Aresi clan. Aresi Clan members alleged that PT IKS has carried out oil palm plantation activities within the clan’s customary land without obtaining their consent since the company’s arrival in 2007.
According to LBH, the Aresi clan never released or transferred its customary land to the company and had publicly rejected the plantation project through a customary oath when PT IKS first entered the area. The organisation further alleged that consultations and boundary demarcation processes failed to involve all members of the clan. The community only became aware of official maps covering their customary territory following a boundary survey conducted in February 2024.
LBH stated that community members had erected traditional barriers on four occasions to oppose plantation activities but alleged that PT IKS employees had removed these barriers and continued forest clearing without the community’s permission. The organisation also questioned whether PT IKS possessed the necessary legal authorisations, stating that during mediation at Sorong Police Station on 22 June 2026, company representatives reportedly acknowledged that the Business Use Right (Hak Guna Usaha – HGU) for the disputed plantation area was still being processed.
The land dispute has also resulted in criminal proceedings against members of the Aresi clan. According to LBH Papua Pos Sorong, PT IKS filed a police complaint on 11 June 2026, registered under STLB/69/VI/2026/SPKT-I/Sorong Police Station/Southwest Papua, alleging criminal fraud by several members of the indigenous community.
LBH characterised the complaint as an attempt to criminalise indigenous people defending their customary land rights and called on the Sorong District Police and Southwest Papua Regional Police to close the investigation against Aresi clan members. LBH also urged authorities to investigate allegations that forest clearing, occupation of customary land and oil palm cultivation had proceeded without the required permits, while calling on the Sorong Regent to establish a dispute resolution team under Sorong Regency Regional Regulation No. 10 of 2017 on the Recognition and Protection of the Moi Customary Law Community.
At the time of reporting, no official response had been issued by either PT IKS or the police addressing LBH’s demands.

Human rights analysis

Both disputes raise concerns regarding the protection of property rights and the rights of indigenous peoples to own, control and use their traditional lands. Allegations that land has been occupied and cultivated without the free consent of landholders for nearly two decades, together with claims that indigenous communities opposing plantation development have been subjected to criminal proceedings, warrant independent investigation. The reported absence of documented agreements, questions concerning land tenure and plantation permits, and allegations of inadequate consultation further highlight the importance of ensuring that commercial activities affecting indigenous territories comply with domestic law and Indonesia’s international human rights obligations.
Detailed Case Data
Document ID: HRM-CAS-102-2026
Location: Klasof, Moisegen District, Sorong Regency Klasof Village, Moisegen District, Sorong Regency
Region: Indonesia > Southwest Papua > Sorong > Moisegen
Total number of victims: hundreds
#Number of VictimsName, DetailsGenderAgeGroup AffiliationViolations
1.hundreds 
mixedunknown Indigenous Peoples, Peasantcriminalisation
Period of incident: 24/06/2026 – 23/07/2026
Perpetrator: Private Company
Perpetrator details: PT Inti Kebun Sejahtera
Issues: business, human rights and FPIC, indigenous peoples
Related Cases:

———————————————————————


3) Civil Society Groups Oppose Plan to Turn Wanam, Merauke Into Defense Industrial Zone

News Desk July 14, 2026 4:06 pm 


Jayapura, Jubi – Indonesian Army Deputy Chief of Staff Lt. Gen. Muhammad Saleh Mustafa, accompanied by senior military officers and representatives of state-owned defense manufacturer PT Pindad, attended a groundbreaking ceremony on Sunday (July 5, 2026) for the construction of the Yonif TP 861/Maleo Kamur Territorial Development Infantry Battalion headquarters and the Merah Putih Propellant Plant in Merauke, South Papua.

According to media reports and information shared on social media, PT Pindad said the Phase III Merah Putih Propellant Plant and an ammunition manufacturing facility will be built on a 226-hectare site at Kilometer 58 in Wanam, Ilwayab District, Merauke Regency.

The facilities are expected to produce 1,250 metric tons of propellant and 170 million rounds of ammunition annually, supporting Indonesia’s goal of achieving self-sufficiency in the production of ammunition for small-caliber weapons within the next two to three years.


Plans to allocate land in Wanam for a propellant manufacturing facility were first disclosed by Coordinating Minister for Food Affairs Zulkifli Hasan in September last year, four days after the issuance of Coordinating Minister for Economic Affairs Regulation No. 16 of 2025, which amended the list of National Strategic Projects (PSN).

At the time, Zulkifli said the planned release of 481,000 hectares of forest land would support not only food production but also the construction of a propellant factory.

Since then, however, no detailed planning documents for the project have been made publicly available. Field observations also indicate that many local residents were unaware of the proposed development.

The government is developing Wanam, Merauke, and surrounding areas under the National Strategic Project framework as part of the National Food, Energy, and Water Self-Sufficiency Zone (KSPEAN) in South Papua.

The initiative includes the development of large-scale modern rice fields, sugarcane and oil palm plantations, biodiesel and bioethanol industries, and the expansion of Indonesia’s defense industry, including the construction of the planned propellant plant.

In 2025, the government approved the release of 486,939 hectares of forest land to support KSPEAN projects across South Papua.

“The entire National Strategic Project and KSPEAN area in South Papua lies within the customary territories of Indigenous Papuans and consists of ancestral land belonging to local Indigenous communities,” said Frangky Samperante, executive director of the Pusaka Bentala Rakyat Foundation.

“The planned development will have significant social, economic, cultural, spiritual, and environmental impacts, particularly on the safety and well-being of Indigenous communities and other vulnerable groups living in and around the project area,” he said.


Samperante said previous experiences with extractive industries and military infrastructure projects in Papua have repeatedly caused social, economic, and political disruption within Indigenous communities.

He said such developments have often been accompanied by arbitrary and excessive use of force, violence, suppression of dissent, arbitrary arrests and detention, displacement of residents, and loss of life, with the scale of both the conflict and its human impact continuing to grow.

“Militarization has also been linked to economic crimes and environmental destruction through security-related business activities and involvement in the exploitation of natural resources. It has also enabled the expansion of extractive industries and environmentally destructive projects, displacing Indigenous communities from their ancestral lands and traditional livelihoods while undermining their rights to land and natural resources,” said Teddy Wakum, director of the Papua Legal Aid Institute (LBH Papua) Merauke Office.

Teddy said government policies and development projects centered on large-scale food and energy industries, along with the ongoing militarization of the region, should be brought to an end if they continue to fuel injustice, exploit natural resources, deepen social divisions, and undermine the lives and livelihoods of Indigenous communities.

“These policies run counter to the principles of sustainable development and democracy. They also violate Indonesia’s Constitution, national laws, and international human rights and environmental standards,” Teddy said.

Violation of Indigenous rights

Frangky and Teddy argued that the government’s KSPEAN development program, together with plans to expand the defense industry by building a propellant plant and military headquarters on customary land, infringes on the rights of Indigenous communities.

They said the projects conflict with Articles 18B(2) and 28I(3) of Indonesia’s 1945 Constitution, which recognize and protect the rights of Indigenous peoples. They also cited Articles 2, 4, and 9 of Law No. 39/1999 on Human Rights, which guarantee fundamental rights, including the rights to life and liberty.

They further argued that environmental degradation and the exploitation of natural resources violate the public’s constitutional right to a healthy environment, as protected under Article 28H(1) of the Constitution and Law No. 32/2009 on Environmental Protection and Management.

According to them, the government’s failure to ensure meaningful participation by Indigenous communities in decisions affecting development projects also contradicts the participatory principles set out in Law No. 2/2012 on Land Acquisition for Public Interest.

“International human rights instruments—including Article 30 of the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP) and ILO Convention No. 169 on Indigenous and Tribal Peoples—make clear that military facilities, including defense industries, propellant factories, military bases, and other military infrastructure, should not be established on Indigenous lands,” Frangky said.

He added that such projects should only proceed when justified by an overriding public interest and only after the government has conducted genuine consultations with affected Indigenous communities through customary decision-making processes and obtained their Free, Prior and Informed Consent (FPIC) before using customary land for military purposes.

The two activists also argued that the proposed propellant plant in Merauke conflicts with the humanitarian principle of maintaining a safe distance between military objectives and civilian populations, a concept recognized under international humanitarian law.

Under international humanitarian law, they noted, weapons and ammunition production facilities may be classified as military objectives, making them lawful targets during armed conflict.


Map identifying the proposed National Food, Energy, and Water Self-Sufficiency Zone (KSPEAN) in South Papua – Coordinating Ministry for Food Affairs

“For that reason, such facilities should be located at a safe distance from residential areas to reduce the risk of civilian casualties and damage to civilian property should they ever become military targets,” Teddy said.

He added that even outside situations of armed conflict, civilians remain vulnerable to accidents, negligence, or failures in ammunition management. He pointed to the deadly explosion during the disposal of obsolete ammunition in Garut as an example of the risks such facilities can pose to nearby communities.

Teddy said the construction of strategic defense facilities should therefore be based on comprehensive risk assessments, careful site selection that meets safety standards and humanitarian distance principles, and measures that ensure the highest level of protection for civilians.

“We, the coalition of civil society organizations, human rights and environmental defenders, and Indigenous leaders affected by the KSPEAN National Strategic Project, united under the Merauke Solidarity coalition, strongly urge the President to review the KSPEAN development program and immediately halt plans to establish a defense industrial zone and propellant plant in South Papua Province,” Frangky said.

He said the coalition believes the project carries a significant risk of triggering serious human rights violations, environmental degradation, and escalating conflict. For that reason, it is calling on the government to implement the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (UNGPs) by requiring both state-owned and private project developers to identify, prevent, mitigate, and monitor potential human rights risks at the earliest stages of project planning and implementation.

“The state should no longer grant permits or provide public support to companies whose business activities risk causing serious human rights violations, particularly if they refuse to cooperate in addressing those risks,” Frangky said.

Teddy also called on PT Pindad, as well as companies involved in energy, food, and infrastructure projects under the KSPEAN initiative in South Papua, to comply with international human rights standards.

“We urge PT Pindad and all companies investing in and developing defense, energy, food, and supporting infrastructure projects under the KSPEAN program in South Papua to conduct comprehensive human rights due diligence and obtain the Free, Prior and Informed Consent (FPIC) of Indigenous communities before proceeding with any investment or project development,” Teddy said. (*)


-----------------------------------------------

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.