Wednesday, July 5, 2017

1) Papuan bishop calls on people to stop selling land


2) Plane carrying five passengers loses contact in Papua

3) Piracy in Australia’s Neighbors  
——————————————————-
1) Papuan bishop calls on people to stop selling land

Giving in to corporations for financial gain 'means trading off cultural heritage, leads to poverty for future generations'


Bishop John Philip Saklil of Timika in Papua with local people in one of his parishes. Bishop Saklil has called on Papuans to stop selling their lands because they will lose their rights and identity if they do. (Photo by Benny Mawel)
A Papuan bishop has warned people that selling their land for money risks not only their future but also their cultural identity.
Bishop John Philip Saklil of Timika in Papua said land is part of the cultural identity of indigenous Papuans and selling it means they are trading off their cultural heritage.
"I’m worried that future generations of Papuans will have nothing; losing their rights to the land and its treasures," Bishop Saklil said.
"If you want to make money, stop moving to cities and remain in the villages to plant and cultivate the land," he said.
The bishop said he is afraid that if the congregation ignores his warning, Papuans will have no more land and will remain poor and destitute in their own country.
Wirya Supriyadi, coordinator of the Jayapura-based Papua People’s Network — an organization that provides advocacy for people's economic, social and cultural rights- said that losing property rights is a real threat to Papuans.
"It's a great concern that a large portion of land in Papua has been sold to developers," said Supriyadi.
He said that 441 mining and non-mining companies have already secured permits to operate in Papua and manage a concession area of about 29 million hectares from Papua's total landmass of more than 43 million hectares.
"Almost half of Papuan land has been bought up by corporations in a dishonest, deceitful way," he told ucanews.com on July 3.
John Gobay, chairman of the Papuan Customary Council, called on fellow Papuans to heed Bishop Saklil's warning as part of a campaign "or else corporations will control the whole of Papua."
"All communities must communally guard their land," he said.
He also called on the government to protect the rights of indigenous people, by creating a policy to prohibit people from selling their land, including sanctions for those breaching it.
"Without it, the bishop's call would be useless," he said, adding that the bishop's fear that Papuans will lose their ownership of land can become a reality one day if no action is taken.
Engelbertus P. Degey, head of Mapia Tengah district, agreed with the bishop, but asked the church to engage seriously with all parties.
"The church has a big influence. I hope Timika Diocese can be more focused in order that the ‘Stop Land Selling campaign' will be more effective," said Degey on July 3.
He hoped the church would unite all communities, government and non-governmental organizations to support the campaign.
————————————————
2) Plane carrying five passengers loses contact in Papua

Jayapura, Papua | Wed, July 5, 2017 | 09:20 pm
A small aircraft carrying five people has gone missing in the country's easternmost province of Papua.

The aircraft, belonging to PT Associated Mission Aviation, went missing at 11:08 a.m. local time on Wednesday after departing from Wamena in Jayawijaya.

The flight was scheduled to arrive in Darakma village at 11:30 a.m. However, only eight minutes after takeoff, the National Search and Rescue Agency (Basarnas) received an emergency locator transmitter from the aircraft.

"The aircraft lost contact on route from Wamena to Darakma at 2:08 UTC time or about 11:08 a.m. [local time]," PT AMA director Djarot Soetanto told The Jakarta Post on Wednesday.

The aircraft, piloted by Wouter Moulders and co-piloted by Valens Ido Naibaho, carried three passengers and 508 kilograms of cargo.
A land rescue operation is currently under way to locate the aircraft, Djarot said.

The airline has sent its representatives to Wamena, namely senior pilot Eric Roberts and Nobertus Tunyanan, who is also a representative of the National Transportation Safety Commission (KNKT) in Papua. (afr/ika)
———————————————————


3) Piracy in Australia’s Neighbors  


Capacity-building in Melanesia will have a direct impact on Australian security.
By Nathan Page July 05, 2017

Contemporary piracy conjures images of Somali pirates off the horn of Africa. Taking advantage of a region of fragility, these groups venture into international maritime trade routes well-armed in fast boats.
The issue of Somali piracy and the international response is widely covered. What is less covered is that in 2016 Southeast Asia had the second-highest incidence of piracy globally; the individual state with the highest incidence of piracy was Indonesia. This is a worrying trend as violent armed piracy grew in 2016, with 110 seafarers taken hostage and 49 held for ransom.
This piece examines the risk of piracy to Australian trade should it spread, or relocate, from Indonesia across the border to the Melanesian “arch of instability.” Australia is a country that relies on maritime trade for its economic prosperity, and subsequently, existing piracy is of grave concern.
Enjoying this article? Click here to subscribe for full access. Just $5 a month.
Security in Indonesia is vital for global trade. Half of the world’s total annual seaborne trade passes through the Malacca, Sunda, and Lombok Straits. Combined, these straits comprise the vital linkage for Indo-Pacific trade. The Asia-Pacific region accounts for over 40 percent of global GDP and approximately one-third of the world’s merchandise exports. Arguably, the Malacca Strait is now, or is destined to be, the world’s most important strait. A disruption in the Malacca Strait would financially impact approximately 400 shipping lanes that link 700 ports worldwide.
Trans-Indian Ocean trade bypassing the Malacca Strait would need to traverse the Sunda Strait, which is too shallow for most container ships, and at an average speed of 15 knots would add 1.5 days of travel time for docking at Singapore. The Lombok Strait is farther still and would require an additional 3.5 days of travel time. These kinds of delays would have a significant economic impact on Australia in terms of imports and exports. However, there is little regional coordination planned to combat disruptive piracy.
What if piracy moves east? Fragile states are conflict prone, with limited reach of law and order into provinces. These conditions provide operational space for piracy and maritime terrorism. State fragility in Melanesia is thus of concern to Australia’s maritime security, as these states press against Australia’s exclusive economic zone.
The Torres Strait links the Arafura and Coral Seas and the Vitiaz Strait requires passage through the Coral, Solomon, and Bismarck Seas. Consequently, Australia’s eastern seaboard trade routes are severed by an “arch of instability.”
In fact, Australia and Papua New Guinea are so close that a special relationship was negotiated allowing free cross-border movement of people from 14 Australian island communities and a further 13 Papua New Guinea villages. This bilateral relationship is an admission that, when it comes to the day-to-day lived experience of the Torres Strait peoples, the dividing border is a political fiction.
If a Melanesian state failed this may facilitate local access to high-powered small-arms. This sequence of events would make it very difficult for Australia to completely control its borders and prevent piracy and maritime terrorism in this vital northern trading route.
Melanesia has a history of weapons leakage from government stockpiles and arms flow across borders. A looming threat of a breakdown in law and order in PNG or Solomon Islands may facilitate trans-national criminal networks operating out of these safe havens with increased access to Australian trade routes or even the mainland.
Alternatively, effective policing in Southeast Asia could push transnational piracy operations to migrate across neighboring borders. Hence, these threats should be factored into contingency plans when considering the worth of expending Australian blood and treasure in security capacity building in Melanesia.
Prevention is always more desirable from a humanitarian perspective, and more cost effective, than remedy. Criticism of Australia’s security and stabilization interventions in Melanesia ought to remember the alternatives of a return to violence.
Australia needs to remain committed to capacity building in Melanesian states to counter the threat of piracy. A commitment to Australia’s Pacific Maritime Security Program, and specifically the Patrol Boat Program, is necessary for supporting the regional security architecture. Australia should assist PNG’s Maritime Security Division through financial assistance and technology, training, and knowledge exchange to enable better coordination.
Regional stability through increased security cohesion is a win-win for states involved. Australia needs to collaborate with Melanesian countries to improve regional resilience to piracy. Of its neighbors, Australia is the only state member of the Regional Cooperation Agreement on Combating Piracy and Armed Robbery against Ships in Asia (ReCAAP).
Security in its northern neighbors secures Australia because those jurisdictions are custodians of Australia’s northern approaches. Better information sharing and security coordination presupposes that there is systematic information gathering to be shared and capable security infrastructure for Australia to coordinate with. In this, Australia should assist in capacity-building to reap long-term benefits. Anti-piracy in Melanesia will require investment, gifting, and effective diplomacy on Australia’s behalf for Australia’s benefit.
Nathan Page has a Masters of Development Studies from University of Melbourne specializing in conflict and development. Nathan is policy consultant with the Center for Armed Violence Reduction. 

1) Freeport Contract Extension yet to be Decided: Official


2)  ‘Breaking arrow’ ritual ends Puncak Jaya election conflict
3) Plane with 5 aboard reported missing in Indonesia’s Papua
————————————————————————


WEDNESDAY, 05 JULY, 2017 | 08:52 WIB
1) Freeport Contract Extension yet to be Decided: Official

                                                           Freeport mining site. ANTARA/Muhammad Adimaja
TEMPO.CO, Jakarta - Energy and Mineral Resources Ministry special staff Hadi M. Djuraid said that the government has yet to make any decision on PT Freeport Indonesia’s contract extension.
According to him, a coordinated meeting held yesterday at the Finance Ministry building did not specifically discuss PT Freeport Indonesia contract extension.
Hadi explained that the main topics being discussed were divestment and investment guarantee.
The statement was made to clarify the news titled “Indonesia Extends Freeport Operation Permit” published on Tempo.co yesterday.
Hadi stressed that PT Freeport Indonesia operating permit has not been extended to 2041 as written on Tempo.co by quoting the statement issued by Fajar Harry Sampurno, Deputy for Mining, Strategic Industry and Media of State-Owned Enterprise Ministry, one of the attendees of the meeting.
According to Hadi, the Energy Ministry did not approve of Freeport operating permit. The contract extension is currently being discussed by the government and the mining company and no decision has been made.
In accordance with the applicable laws and regulations, the contract may be extended twice, for periods of ten years maximum, with the following requirements: to build a smelter and to divest 51 percent of shares. "In addition, it has to meet other requirements in relation to corporate performance, environmental issues and post-mining guarantee," Hadi said.
Hadi added that the implementation of the requirements is still being discussed by the government and Freeport.
Earlier, Fajar Harry Sampurno, Deputy for Mining, Strategic Industry and Media of State-Owned Enterprise Ministry, said that yesterday’s coordinated meeting discussed four issues: Freeport’s operating permit extension, smelter construction, divestment and investment stability.
 
SETIAWAN ADIWIJAYA
————————————————————

2)  ‘Breaking arrow’ ritual ends Puncak Jaya election conflict

Jakarta | Tue, July 4, 2017 | 09:55 pm


Opposing parties of the Puncak Jaya regional elections have agreed to end a conflict in the region, marked by a "breaking arrow" ritual performed by representatives of the three candidates' respective supporters.
The ritual was organized in Mulia city, witnessed directly by Puncak Jaya Regent Henok Ibo, Puncak Jaya Police chief Adj. Sr. Comr. Marthen Hutabarat, Regional Military Command commander Lt. Col. Inf. Hindratno Devidanto, local house speaker Mendi Wonorengga and Rev. Dainus Game, among other local figures.
In addition to the ritual carried out by representatives Erenias Kogoya, Matius Kiwo, Yeki Telenggen and Kire Wonda, all parties also agreed to prohibit the possession of arrows and machetes in the city to minimize the potential for future conflicts.
“We will seize arrows and machetes from anyone coming into the city,” Henok Ibo said.
Papua Police chief Insp. Gen. Boy Rafli Amar had deployed two mobile brigade units and 200 security personnel as additional reinforcement to maintain order in the region.
The conflict has so far claimed one life, injured dozens and destroyed 21 houses and eight motorcycles.
The conflict started following the election victory of Yuni Wonda and Deinas Geley on June 15. They had won the vote in six districts over the then incumbent pair of Henok Ibo and Rinus Telenggen and the pair of Yustus Wonda and Kirenius Telenggen. (dic)


—————————————————————


3) Plane with 5 aboard reported missing in Indonesia’s Papua

 By Associated Press PUBLISHED: 18:02 +10:00, 5 July 2017 | UPDATED: 18:02 +10:00, 5 July 2017 

JAKARTA, Indonesia (AP) - A small plane with five people on board has gone missing in Indonesia's easternmost province of Papua.
Melkianus Kutta, head of the local search and rescue agency, said the aircraft from PT Associated Mission Aviation went missing on a short flight from Wamena, 
the capital of the mountainous district of Jayawijaya, to Derakma in neighboring Nduga district.
He said the Pilatus Porter PC-6 took off at 11:00 a.m. (0400 GMT) and lost contact minutes before it was scheduled to land at around 11:25 (0425 GMT).
On board the aircraft were two pilots, one Indonesian and one from the Netherlands, along with three Indonesian passengers.
Flying is one of the main transportation means in the mountainous and jungle clad easternmost provinces of Papua and West Papua.
——————————————————

Tuesday, July 4, 2017

Samsung partnership with Korindo ignites another fire scandal



Samsung partnership with Korindo ignites another fire scandal

By Deborah Lapidus Tuesday 4 July 2017

Because controversies about exploding phones and corruption weren’t enough, Samsung has entered into a joint venture with deforestation-linked Korean-Indonesian conglomerate Korindo, reveals Mighty Earth’s Deborah Lapidus.



                  Forest clearance in Korindo's PT Papua Agro Lestari concession in Papua, Indonesia. Image: Mighty


Samsung’s phones are not the only thing in their business catching on fire. Samsung IT subsidiary, Samsung SDS, announced on June 19 that it has entered into a partnership with the notorious forest destroyer, Korindo Group, to form a joint venture in the logistics sector in Indonesia. As we documented in our Burning Paradise report, Korean-Indonesian agribusiness Korindo has cleared 30,000 hectares of rainforest and had nearly 900 fire hotspots on its palm oil concessions in Papua and North Maluku, Indonesia since 2013. We also found that Korindo has taken land from indigenous communities without their consent. Yet, just as Korindo has been losing more and more major global customers over its bad track record and is now being investigated by the Forest Stewardship Council, Samsung decided to proudly announce a new partnership with the company. Samsung is no stranger to these types of allegations itself.  A report released in December 2016 by a group of Korean human rights lawyers called Korean Transnational Corporations Watch (KTNC Watch) documents deplorable human rights violations that they observed on their field investigation to Samsung palm oil plantations in Riau province of Sumatra, Indonesia. The Samsung plantation companies are called PT Inecda and PT Gandaerah, and are part of a joint venture with the Indonesian Ganda Group.  Ganda Group has a well documented history of human rights abuses, including coming under scrutiny in 2013 for forcibly evicting villagers from their homes and destroying them. The report describes how the indigenous communities who have lived on this land for centuries have seen it snatched by Samsung’s plantations, with important ancestral and cultural sites taken over by the plantation. The company has diverted the rivers to irrigate the palm oil plantation, leaving the rest of the surrounding area with a severe water shortage. In addition, the pesticides and other toxic chemicals used on the plantation are polluting the waterways.  Local communities can no longer get the clean water they need to drink, clean, or wash. The plantations are also resulting in a major loss of biodiversity, which threatens the food and livelihood of the indigenous communities.
Samsung has been found offering bribes to discourage efforts to claim communal rights to the land, paying certain community members to spy on their neighbors and report back.

The report also documents extensive human rights violations of workers on Samsung’s plantations. There are frequent instances of child labor identified on the plantations and many workers report bringing their children or spouses to work to help them meet the high daily quotas set by Samsung. Workers are expected to handle toxic chemicals and work in a setting with inadequate safety conditions. There are no formal contracts, very low wages, high daily quotas, and long hours. Workers that live on the plantations are also subject to very poor, unhealthy living conditions. Given the unsavory operations of both Korindo and Samsung in Indonesia, it is no surprise that these companies would see eye to eye on how to conduct business in the country.  But just as this new partnership brings new opportunities for growth to both companies, it also brings new opportunities for Samsung’s millions of consumers around the globe to take action to end both companies’ abuses in Indonesia.
Given the unsavory operations of both Korindo and Samsung in Indonesia, it is no surprise that these companies would see eye to eye on how to conduct business in the country. 
Samsung can’t afford another PR nightmare right now, as it’s working to build back its reputation following the recall of 2.5 million phones and as its CEO is on trial for massive corruption scandals in South Korea. The last thing Samsung needs is to be caught up in a scandal over forest destruction and species extinction. If enough Samsung customers take action, we can convince them to drop the partnership with Korindo, sending a clear message to Korindo that forest destruction is bad for business.  Sign the petition demanding that Samsung end its partnership with forest destroyer Korindo and adopt and implement a comprehensive zero-deforestation and human rights policy.
Deborah Lapidus is campaigns director, Mighty. This post is republished from Mighty with permission. 
-----------------------------------

Monday, July 3, 2017

Govt warns Freeport about laying off 4,000 employees

Govt warns Freeport about laying off 4,000 employees
Jakarta | Mon, July 3, 2017 | 02:32 pm


PT Freeport Indonesia workers display a banner calling on the gold and copper mining company to fulfill their rights during a demonstration in Mimika, Papua, on May 1. Thousands of workers were involved in the demonstration. (Antara/Wahyu Putro A)



The Energy and Mineral Resources Ministry has sent a warning letter to gold and copper miner PT Freeport Indonesia after it laid off 4,000 employees.
The layoffs took place following a strike by Freeport Indonesia workers belonging to the All-Indonesia Workers Union Confederation (KSPSI) from May 1 to June 16 in Mimika regency, Papua, the site of the gold and copper mine.
The ministry has demanded that Freeport Indonesia act in accordance with labor laws , said the ministry's coal and mineral mining director general, Bambang Gatot Ariyono, on Sunday.
“We have warned [Freeport] to abide by the law when dismissing [employees],” Bambang said as quoted by tribunnews.com in Jakarta on Sunday.
Separately, Freeport has claimed it followed regulations when laying off the employees.
“We took action in accordance with the guidelines and laws on industrial relations,” said Freeport Indonesia spokesman Riza Pratama.
The company, for example, called on the striking employees to return to work, said Riza, adding that the law allowed a company to terminate employees who were absent and ignored a company’s summons for five consecutive days.
Freeport said the company would not pay compensation to the laid-off employees.
Freeport Indonesia also let go 2,000 employees in February in a company efficiency program.
The employees, however, were offered early retirement packages and furloughs. (dea/bbn)

Sunday, July 2, 2017

1) Benny Wenda: I can not stop talking about Papua Merdeka

2) Workshop aimed at luring tourists to remote Papuan islands

3) Help to end the genocide in West Papua

———————————————————————

A google translate. Be-aware google translate can be a bit erratic.

Original bahasa link at

http://tabloidjubi.com/artikel-7389-benny-wenda-saya-tidak-bisa-dihentikan-bicara-tentang-papua-merdeka.html

1) Benny Wenda: I can not stop talking about Papua Merdeka

Minggu, 02 Juli 2017 — 19:04

Jubi | News Portal No. 1 in Tanah Papua



                                                     Benny Wenda while campaigning in NZ - Jubi / IST
Jayapura, Jubi - Benny Wenda, spokesperson for the United Liberation Movement for West Papua considers the statement of Ambassador (Ambassador) of the Republic of Indonesia to New Zealand (NZ), Tantowi Yahya as a statement showing Indonesia losing political arguments in the West Papua case more recently Discussed in the Pacific as well as other international forums.
 "Indonesia lost its political arguments in NZ and the Pacific region. As Ambassador, Tantowi Yahya is losing legal argument to defend West Papua in the framework of NKRI. So Indonesia can only try to convince the people of NZ and Pacific by using the word fugitive. This old story is played again by Tantowi Yahya, "said Benny Wenda to Jubi, via telephone, Thursday (07/29/2017).
 Benny Wenda continued, as if the Ambassador of Indonesia in NZ is just awakened from sleep so shocked to see the development in the Pacific, especially in NZ. He said the people of the Pacific and NZ already know the lies of Indonesia about Papua for a long time. Cases of human rights violations and impunity owned by TNI and Polri which are presumed to be the main actors of human rights violations in Papua are in the public spotlight of NZ.
"I was told by NZ lawmakers that one week before I arrived the Indonesian ambassador lobbied the Auckland University so I would not be allowed to speak at the university. But NZ embraces democracy and freedom of campus, so I can not stop talking about Papua Merdeka, about West Papuan independence struggle and human rights violations that happened, "explained Benny Wenda.
Regarding accusations of fugitives thrown by the Indonesian ambassador to him, Benny Wenda confirmed Interpol has removed itself from the Red Notice list since 2012.
"I remember well how the Indonesian government attempted to silence the West Papua liberation campaign by issuing a Red Notice on my behalf to Interpol in 2011. The notice was later ignored by Interpol because they considered it highly political. The fugitive word is politically charged to Indonesia. Unfounded argument. It's been proven in international court, "said Benny Wenda.
The Indonesian side has attempted to include Benny Wenda's name on the International Arrest Warrant Interpol list since 2000, after Billy Wibisono, the secretary of information and social affairs of the Indonesian Embassy in Britain accused Benny Wenda and several of his colleagues of involvement in attacking a police post in Abepura on 7 December 2000 Causing some people to die and damage at the police station.
In 2012, the Commission for the Control of Interpol's Files sent a letter to Fair Trials International, which campaigned for Benny Wenda. The contents of the letter, among others, say that the case of Benny Wenda has been removed from the list of fugitives Interpol.
"After re-examining all the information available to it ... the Commission finally judged that the case against your client is a matter of ordinary politics," said a letter from the Interpol File Control Commission as reported by the BBC.
Benny Wenda during his visit to NZ last May took the time to speak in a "public event" on several NZ campuses. On each occasion, Benny Wenda conveyed the desire of the Papuan people to be independent and sovereign as their own country, apart from Indonesia. He also described cases of human rights violations that have occurred in Papua since the 1960s.
Benny Wenda's activity led to the Indonesian Ambassador to NZ, expressing concern over the use of several campuses in NZ including Victoria University of Wellington (VUW) by Benny Wenda. Even while meeting with the Rector of Victoria University of Wellington, Prof. Grant Guilford, Ambassador of Indonesia is calling Benny Wenda as a fugitive who actually have no right to speak on behalf of the people of Papua. He also accused Benny Wenda of lying about Papua.
However, according to the NZ Education Act, the campus can not prohibit the freedom of the academic community of the university in expressing its opinion (academic freedom).
Benny Wenda not only lives 9,000 miles away from Indonesia and lives in exile in England, but he is also the leader of the peace-loving independence movement. As the Nobel Peace Prize nominee, he has always advocated a peaceful solution so that Papuans can calmly exercise their basic right to self-determination through a referendum on independence. (*)

—————————————————
2) Workshop aimed at luring tourists to remote Papuan islands

Jakarta | Sun, July 2, 2017 | 01:34 pm



                           Beach on the island of Biak, Cenderawasih Bay, at the northern coast of Papua. (Shutterstock/File)

The Tourism Ministry has conducted a workshop in Biak, Papua, to support the development of tourism in the archipelagic regency of Biak Numfor.
The Sustainable Tourism and Fishery Development Workshop was held on Friday.
“This workshop lays out the best concept, model and practices to improve tourism in Biak Numfor regency,” said Biak Numfor Regent Thomas Alfa Edison.
“Based on the ministry’s data, tourism serves as one of the contributors to the country’s gross domestic product and foreign exchange. It also provides the easiest and cheapest job opportunities. This is why we believe [tourism] will develop well in Biak,” said the ministry's official in charge of destination and tourism industry development, Dadang Rizki Ratman, one the keynote speakers at the workshop.
“The main considerations for tourists [when visiting a destination] are security and facilities. Sixty percent of tourists come to Indonesia because they want to experience the local culture, 35 percent to explore the nature and 5 percent to enjoy man-made tourist attractions, such as sport events, MICE, music concerts and others,” Dadang added.
Another keynote speaker at the workshop, the ministry's official in charge of tourism marketing development, Esthy Reko Astuti, explained the strategies implemented by the ministry to reach the targets. “For marketing, we use the DOT [destination, origin and time] approach; for promotion, we use the BAS [branding, advertising and selling] approach and for media we use the POSE [paid Media, owned media, social media, endorser] approach,” she said. (kes)
———————————————

3) Help to end the genocide in West Papua

Please sign this petition calling for an end to the genocide and a free and fair independence vote for the West Papuan people. 
33,257 signers. Let’s reach 50,000

Saturday, July 1, 2017

1) Torture Remains a Serious Problem in Indonesia: AHRC


2) Sabotage ruled out in Freeport’s pipeline incidents
3) Indonesia To Tighten Counterterrorism Following Concern Of Islamic State’s Spread Across Southeast Asia
—————————————————————————-

1) Torture Remains a Serious Problem in Indonesia: AHRC
By : Sheany | on 10:37 AM June 30, 2017
Jakarta. The Asian Human Rights Commission, or AHRC, last week urged Indonesia to consistently implement the United Nations Convention Against Torture, citing several areas of concern that have allowed torture to take place in the country, such as the absence of a national law to punish torture, its continued practice in police investigations and little accountability for perpetrators.

Despite having ratified the International Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment in 1998, torture remains a serious problem in the archipelago.
"The government and the parliament have failed to develop high legal standards to prosecute and punish torture," the AHRC said in a statement to mark the International Day in Support of Victims of Torture on Monday (26/06).
The AHRC highlighted several problems that prevent Indonesia from eliminating torture.
This includes a lack of an effective oversight mechanism for police, allowing power abuse as well as pretrial detention under the criminal code encouraging torture in custody.
Despite the government having issued a handbook of human rights to police officers, torture is often committed to extract confessions from suspects and witnesses.
As many victims of torture are mostly poor, uneducated people with little understanding of their legal rights and most torture cases involve suspects unable to access lawyers or public defenders, the Indonesian criminal justice systems suffer from shortcomings that allow the continued practice of torture.
The AHRC pointed out that the 2011 Legal Aid Law still proves ineffective for poorer members of the community facing criminal investigations.
"Until today, the Indonesian police are still the most frequent perpetrators of torture," the AHRC said in the statement.

Counterterrorism Efforts
Sunday's suspected terrorist attack that resulted in the death of a police officer in Medan, North Sumatra, may serve as momentum to speed up the finalization of an ongoing revision of the 2003 Antiterrorism Law, currently deliberated by the House of Representatives.
Jakarta-based human rights group, the Setara Institute, said on Wednesday that the police need pretrial authority to prevent terrorist attacks.
Along with the rest of the world, Indonesia is gearing up to face increasing threats of terrorism. Giving police greater powers and ensuring that law enforcement officers can effectively prevent terrorism will become increasingly necessary.
However, Indonesia may need to address root problems in its criminal justice system to avoid severe violations of human rights in its counterterrorism efforts.
Despite having ratified the UN Torture Convention in 1998, Indonesia is still unwilling to establish a human rights court to address violations defined in the Human Rights Law of 2000.
Besides the human rights court, Indonesia has also been eliminating the crime of genocide from the law.

External Oversight
External oversight, which is crucial in bringing perpetrators to justice, still remains ineffective in Indonesia.
Independent state agencies, such as the National Commission on Human Rights (Komnas HAM) and the National Police Commission (Kompolnas), fell short in their expected roles to ensure effective law enforcement in cases of torture cases and to contribute to the eradication of the practice.
"The government should develop high standards of law to prosecute and punish torture [...] The government should also develop effective oversight mechanisms to ensure that all forms of torture and abuse of power conducted by state agents are punished, and that the culture of impunity is abolished," the AHRC said.

————————————————

2) Sabotage ruled out in Freeport’s pipeline incidents

Jakarta | Sat, July 1, 2017 | 03:30 pm
The Papua Police said they had ruled out the possibility of an intention to commit sabotage being the motive behind recent cuttings of PT Freeport Indonesia concentrate pipelines at the gold and copper mining giant’s site in Mimika regency.
"So far, we still consider the incidents as purely criminal acts, as we have discovered similar previous cases,” Papua Police chief Insp. Gen. Boy Rafli Amar said in Timika, as quoted by Antara on Saturday.
Over the past weeks, a number of concentrate pipes in the facility had been found to have been sawed through by unidentified perpetrators. The most recent occurrence took place on June 25, during the Idul Fitri Islamic holiday.
Boy admitted that it was quite difficult to monitor Freeport Indonesia’s concentrate pipelines, which span from Tembagapura district to the Amamapare Port in the Far East Mimika district. Moreover, the pipeline also runs through the wilderness of the Papua forest.
"It will need extra effort to supervise,” he said.
In a recent meeting with Freeport Indonesia management, Boy said that detection equipment, such as CCTV cameras, was needed at every critical point of the concentrate pipeline. (dis/hwa)

——————————————-

3) Indonesia To Tighten Counterterrorism Following Concern Of Islamic State’s Spread Across Southeast Asia
 By Alexander Macleod -01 Jul 2017


New measures to combat extremism have been tabled in Indonesia. Although at first glance they seem logical given the growing regional militant threat – particularly from the ongoing armed conflict in Marawi – upon closer inspection they come attached with broader risks. As concern grows that Islamic State’s (IS) influence is spreading across Southeast Asia, Indonesia has revealed plans to tighten its counterterrorism legislation. Relative to Indonesia’s massive population, IS sympathisers are only thought to number in the thousands, with several hundred having left to fight in Iraq and Syria. Nevertheless, the spectre of terrorism looms large, particularly given the ongoing conflict in Marawi (less than 400km from Indonesia’s northernmost island of Miangas, North Sulawesi). Over 40 Indonesian fighters are thought to have fought in Marawi, reflecting deep and enduring cooperation between regional militant groups. Tightened legislation should prevent battle-hardened Indonesian youths from orchestrating future attacks on home territory. But this article will examine the negative implications this could have for Indonesia going forward.

The proposed changes

Indonesia is to introduce a new law to enable authorities to imprison returning fighters for up to 15 years. Law enforcement agencies will be given the ability to detain terror suspects without trial, and the definition of terrorism will be broadened to incorporate those propagating hate speech; partaking in paramilitary training; or who are members of a banned extremist group. At a cabinet meeting in May, Jokowi expressed support for a greater role for the Indonesian military (TNI) in counterterrorism operations. That meeting fell several days after a suicide bombing in East Jakarta that killed three policemen. As discussed below, if implemented this measure could prove highly problematic. The Security Affairs ministry also seeks to ban two Islamist groups: Hizbut Tahrir Indonesia, and the Islamic Defenders Front (FPI) – which played a controversial role in the Jakarta gubernatorial election.

Tackling IS activity

These measures come at an important time in Indonesia. Despite Jokowi’s drive for economic liberalism and democracy, the Jakarta gubernatorial election showed that Indonesia’s democratic and liberal progress mustn’t be taken for granted. In contrast, illiberal, hardline Islamist forces are gaining traction. Orthodox Sunni Islamic teachings have become increasingly dominant over recent years, providing fertile ground for IS-friendly views for growing and prospering. In Indonesia, a lack of specific legislation has stifled law enforcement authorities from detaining returning fighters. Arsla Jawaid does note that most known documented returnees were those who had not actually managed to enter the Middle East anyway. However, the case of Marawi is a different question altogether. Marawi represents the first cohesive, coordinated and sustained attack by IS-linked militants in Southeast Asia, and has changed the narrative regarding the regional terror threat. As IS loses ground in Syria and Iraq, and seeks to consolidate a ‘caliphate’ in the Southern Philippines, similar attacks in Southeast Asia are likely. Nevertheless, according to Jawaid it will still be hard for authorities to prove that certain citizens partook in fighting abroad. Enhanced police powers should prove useful for tackling the operations of Katibah Nusantara, the South-east Asian wing of IS that spreads propaganda and conducts recruitment and training operations. But combined, those measures will not work as effectively as they do in Malaysia and Singapore, whose smaller populations can be better monitored and contained. Executing these powers across such a complex geographical entity, in terms of logistics, manpower and infrastructure will prove difficult to manage. The case is made more complex when considering the conservative Islamic region of Aceh which is semi-autonomous.

The military’s role

Delegating more responsibility to the army could enhance Indonesia’s terrorism prevention capabilities. Utilising the TNI’s manpower would mean having more boots on the ground. Last year the TNI was lauded for the killing of Santoso – Indonesia’s most-wanted militant – in Poso, Central Sulawesi. According to Francis Chan, that incident was pivotal to strengthening the case for them to play a greater counterterrorism role. However, a military with enhanced domestic power could lead to abuses of power, infringing upon democracy and civil society. The military became notorious for committing atrocities during the Suharto era. Despite sweeping reforms introduced after the fall of Suharto, specifically designed to keep the military in check, this reputation has never been fully eradicated – as the allegations of atrocities in West Papua suggest. Such involvement would thus likely serve as a ‘last resort’. Nevertheless, Jokowi’s proposal was endorsed by the Gerindra Party, the party led by Prabowo Subianto, formerly a general under the Suharto regime. Prabowo was Jokowi’s main opponent in the 2014 presidential election and is seeking to challenge him again in 2019. If Gerindra regains power and implements Jokowi’s proposal, this could set back the country’s progress. As it is, Indonesia already has an effective counterterrorism unit. Detachment 88 was formed with the aid of the US and Australia after the 2002 Bali bombings. It has successfully targeted and dismantled terror cells ever since, foiling numerous potential attacks. Jawaid observes that last year alone, Detachment 88 purportedly arrested 137 alleged terror suspects. That year it foiled 15 attacks, including the Batam Island plot involving Singapore.

Softer measures neglected

It is important that, in targeting harder counterterrorism measures, softer measures are not neglected. According to the Institute for Economics and Peace, deradicalisation programmes have had ‘limited success’. Deradicalisation programmes are allegedly abused by some detainees in order to reduce their sentence. Consequently, repeat offences are common. The perpetrator behind the January 2016 Jakarta attack, Bahrun Naim, was already a convicted terrorist but was somehow released and subsequently went on to mastermind that attack. The problem of prison recruitment remains critical. As J.C. Liow states, ‘corruption, incompetence, poor monitoring, and poor supervision of visits’ have contributed to the ease with which radical ideologies spread and consolidate within prison institutions. Effective monitoring of released convicts has also been neglected. This surprises Jawaid, considering the likelihood that a lack of economic opportunities and limited skill-sets will push convicts back to jihadism.

Immediate risks remain

Pushing through new anti-terror legislation quickly and efficiently requires immense political will, but it is likely to be approved. The legislation will only come into effect in September, though some officials are hoping that it is implemented sooner. This is certainly in the national interest; over the coming months, Indonesian militants will likely return from Marawi, battle-hardened and with combat experience. This is a time for authorities to be extra-vigilant. Admittedly, for a country of its size, Indonesia has done remarkably well to prevent extremist violence planned by large militant groups. But it is vulnerable to occasional small-scale ‘lone wolf’ attacks – any one of which has the potential to cause mass casualties. According to Jonathan Tepperman, Indonesia’s counterterrorism programme has worked ‘through luck as much as skill and improvisation as much as strategy’. It remains to be seen whether the proposed changes will improve upon this already successful formula.
  Alexander Macleod is a doctoral researcher at Newcastle University with a focus on Southeast Asian politics and geography. Article as appears on Global Risk Insights: http://globalriskinsights.com/2017/06/new-indonesia-counter-terrorism-measures-deserve-scrutiny/ This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Frontera and its owners.
—————————

1) Papua Police Hope No Security Issues


2) Papua Police Chief Denies Sabotage in Freeport Pipe Cutting
————————————————————————————————
SATURDAY, 01 JULY, 2017 | 13:34 WIB
1) Papua Police Hope No Security Issues

TEMPO.CO, Jakarta - Papua Police chief Insp. Gen. Boy Amar expects no security problems in the province on 1 July which marks the anniversary of Papua separatist movement.
"We hope there is no security problem. We have briefed our members to give the persuasive approach a priority and provide preventive measures and early detection towards any potential violations against our constitution," he said in Timika on Saturday, July 1.
He said that measures of early detection against any potential security problems have been constantly taken by Indonesian Police and Military in Papua by intensively communicating with all groups in Papua community. He also urges all police officers in Papua to keep raising awareness to hinder them from committing acts that go against the law.
Papua has lately been vulnerable to security problems especially on 1 July and 1 December which mark the establishment of separatist movements called Papua National Liberation Force (TPN) and Free Papua Movement (OPM).ANTARA

—————————————————————————————————————-—
2) Papua Police Chief Denies Sabotage in Freeport Pipe Cutting
Saturday, 01 July 2017 | 09:18 WIB
TIMIKA, NETRALNEWS.COM - Papua Police Chief Insp. Gen. Boy Rafli Amar denied the allegation of sabotage in the recent concentrate pipe cutting of PT Freeport Indonesia in Mimika. He said on Saturday (1/7/2017) that the case is purely criminal based on the unveiled events.
He said that the pipe monitoring is not easy due to the length of the pipe. He added that in the meeting with the management of Freeport in Tembagapura, he suggested that the company installed monitoring devices such as CCTV or digital security equipment in certain locations that are prone to cutting. (*)
----------------------------------