2) A Racial Justice Campaign Brought New Attention to Indonesia’s Poorest Region. Will It Translate to Support for Independence?
———————————————-
1) Papua: Reminiscence of the past, hope of the future
Eriz Wicaksono Jakarta
Jakarta / Tue, December 15 2020 / 01:00 am
For the better part of history post-1945, the discourse on Papua has been on inequity.
As a young nation still trying to find its own footing, Indonesia may have neglected development in the country’s easternmost region. This lack of development is deemed part of Papua’s present problems. Yet highlighted by efforts to bridge the gap in development, today the eastern regions of Indonesia showcase remarkable growth and hope.
Amidst this optimism, problems of the past still linger, turning Papua into both the reminiscence of our past and the hope of our future. Despite enjoying consistently high economic growth from the 1970s to the first half of the 1990s, Indonesia’s strategy to distribute wealth from the growth centers of Bali, Java, Kalimantan and Sumatra to the eastern provinces missed some of its goals.
Some regions such as Papua and West Papua were not able to enjoy development on a par with the western provinces. The implications were wide as politically, socially and economically, some regions became much less advanced than others – giving rise to discontent and feelings of discrimination.
The dawn of the Reform Era proved to be the turning point, as Indonesia made significant advances toward the fulfillment of democracy – notably by holding its first ever direct presidential election in 2004. This has finally brought unequal development into the spotlight; as an issue that needs to be heavily prioritized. And so it has. Since the inception of the special autonomy status in 2001, Papua, and a few years later West Papua, has enjoyed relatively good progress.
Today, Papua’s regional gross domestic product (GDP) growth has in recent years exceeded the national figure, and in West Papua the growth has been steadily rising every year. Regional GDP per capita of Papua today stands at more than Rp 56 million (US$4,000), surpassing its initial target of Rp 40 million by 2025 as first mandated in its long-term plan in 2005. Development in the economy is echoed by development in politics. During the 2019 presidential election, even Jakarta’s record-breaking voter turnout of 79 percent pales in comparison to the figure in Papua and West Papua, which recorded 94 and 88 percent respectively. There is no sense of apathy toward politics, instead there is a sense of belonging, as people understand their vote matters and want to be part of the development. Moreover, 91 percent in Papua and 80 percent in West Papua voted for the incumbent President Joko “Jokowi” Widodo.
This proves a good satisfaction level toward the government as people believe they have received the benefits and want more of the same for the next five years. These recent developments portray Papua’s uplifted hope. Furthered by the gradual fulfillment of basic needs, more people are more optimistic about their future. The Consumer Confidence Index, which measures public sentiment toward the future of their economy, affirms this view. The figure in the two provinces rose above the pessimistic figure of below 100 in 2008 and has never looked back since, reaching a figure of around 140 in 2020.
The international community has also echoed this optimism in the development of Papua land. Papua province has become one of the country’s top recipients of foreign direct investment (FDI), receiving up to $6 billion since 2015. Furthermore, the Papuan regions are expected to boast one of the country’s lowest dependency ratios during its golden period of bonus demography in 2030-2035, providing a window of opportunity for future investors.
Despite the positive development, the two provinces are not exempt from setbacks. For instance, Papua’s 2019 GDP growth plummeted due to a reduction in mining activities - indicating the diversification of economic contributors has yet to be materialized. Although improving rapidly, statistics on some macroeconomic indicators, such as poverty levels, both in Papua and West Papua, are still much lower than other provinces. Whilst the development gap is getting narrower, the provinces still struggle to use their special autonomy funds efficiently, and focus on the development of these regions, including a redesign of their special funding mechanism, must remain long-term goals.
Progress on Papuan land may be deemed late, yet the development of today is nothing short of fundamental and will provide foundations for future growth. Thus, it is important to ensure that the deeds to address the past do not hold back the endeavors to strive toward the future. Instead, both should be done in parallel. As every inch of development in the land of Papua will help address the problems of the past, and Indonesia’s ability to address the past will in turn define its own future. ***
The writer is assistant deputy director of governance at the Foreign Ministry. The views expressed are his own.
————————————————————
————————————————————
2) A Racial Justice Campaign Brought New Attention to Indonesia’s Poorest Region. Will It Translate to Support for Independence?
TIME
BY AMY GUNIA, DECEMBER 15
2020 1:19 AM EST
As racial justice protests swept the U.S. this summer, a related movement was taking hold thousands of miles away in Indonesia. Papuan Lives Matter began as a hashtag on social media, spreading across the sprawling archipelago of 270 million people. Indonesians shared links to webinars and websites with information about human rights issues in the region of West Papua. An Instagram post saying “We cannot talk about #Black Lives Matter without talking about West Papua” received more than 8,500 likes.
————————-
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.