Tuesday, June 16, 2026

1) Kuyawage Community and West Papua Baptist Church Reject Deployment of Non-Organic TNI troops


2) Lanny Jaya Students Submit Complaint to Papua Human Rights Commission

3) Indonesia: Military Court hands lenient sentences to soldiers convicted in acid attack on human rights defender Andrie Yunus amid continuing calls for accountability
----------------------------------------------------


1) Kuyawage Community and West Papua Baptist Church Reject Deployment of Non-Organic TNI troops

IN PACNEWS READING TIME: 2 MINS READ JUNE 16, 2026  0 Author : Arjuna Pademme Editor : Nuevaterra Mambor

Jayapura, Jubi – Residents of Kuyawage District in Lanny Jaya Regency, Highlands Papua Province, have declared their opposition to the presence of non-organic Indonesian Military (TNI) personnel in their area and across Papua in general.

Chairman of the Youth Department of the West Papua Baptist Church, Akias Yas Wenda, said the declaration was made during a seminar held by the Upaga Baptist Church in the Kuyawage region on 9–10 June 2026.

According to Wenda, the presence of non-organic military posts has created fear among residents, disrupted community activities, and negatively affected education, healthcare services, economic activities, and church ministry.

“There are a number of active military posts in Kuyawage, West Wano, Agandugume, Nduga, Balingga, and Goa Balim districts, with hundreds of personnel deployed. Their presence disrupts civilian life and limits the space for Indigenous communities to carry out their activities,” Wenda said in a written statement on Sunday (14 June 2026).

He said the presence of non-organic military personnel has hindered teaching and learning activities at several schools and disrupted healthcare services at community health centers, as many service providers and residents have experienced trauma.

According to him, teaching and learning activities at Kuyawage State Senior High School have been inactive since 2025. At Gwijangge State Junior High School, educational activities have not operated consistently since 2017. Similar conditions have affected Alea State Elementary School since 2023, and Kuwome Elementary School and Mume Inpres Elementary School since 2026.

“Teachers have left the district for urban areas, causing educational activities to come to a halt,” he said.

Wenda said a similar situation has affected healthcare services. The Kuyawage Community Health Center (Puskesmas) has been inactive since September 2025 after the facility was allegedly damaged by non-organic military personnel. The West Wano Community Health Center has never operated since its construction in 2023.

“Services at the Balingga Community Health Center are operating on a limited basis, while the auxiliary health center has yet to officially begin operations. In Goa Balim District, healthcare services are being provided at a TNI post,” he said.

The Youth Department of the West Papua Baptist Church and local residents declared their rejection of the presence of non-organic TNI personnel on customary land and church-owned land.

They also opposed the construction of military posts at airports, on customary land, and within places of worship. They called on the President of Indonesia and the House of Representatives (DPR RI) to immediately withdraw non-organic military personnel, arguing that their presence has created fear and adversely affected civilian communities. (*)


Nuevaterra Mambor

--------------------------------------------------------



2) Lanny Jaya Students Submit Complaint to Papua Human Rights Commission

N PACNEWS READING TIME: 3 MINS READ JUNE 16, 2026  0 Author : Aida Ulim Editor : Nuevaterra Mambor

Jayapura, Jubi – Students from Lanny Jaya Regency in Highlands Papua Province submitted a written complaint to the Papua office of Indonesia’s National Commission on Human Rights (Komnas HAM).

The complaint was handed over during a public free-speech demonstration held at the Abepura Circle area in Abepura District, Jayapura City, Papua, on Monday (15 June 2026).

The demonstration was organized to protest a military operation in Lanny Jaya Regency that allegedly resulted in civilian casualties in Wunabunggu Village, Melagi District.

Head of the Papua Representative Office of Komnas HAM, Frits Ramandey, confirmed that the commission would follow up on the complaint within its mandate.

“Komnas HAM is not a representative institution that receives public aspirations. We are an oversight body that receives complaints. We are not parliament, which receives aspirations. When a matter is submitted to Komnas HAM, it becomes a formal complaint,” Ramandey said.

He said student actions aimed at voicing the experiences of affected communities were important and should continue.

According to him, reports of aerial bombings in Papua over the past two years have become a matter of serious concern. The issue has not only generated public discussion but has also resulted in casualties.


Several victims have already provided testimony and statements to Komnas HAM regarding the violence they experienced.

“This action serves as a warning to the state to exercise caution in every measure it takes. If a state fails to take responsibility for its citizens, it poses a threat to the state’s own sustainability from a human rights perspective,” he said.

Ramandey emphasized that while Komnas HAM could not promise specific outcomes, it would ensure that the students’ complaint was addressed according to the commission’s authority.

“Let us continue to struggle together for the enforcement of human rights. We cannot rely entirely on others to fight for human rights,” he said.

He also urged the president to evaluate the system and operational patterns of military operations in Papua, warning that repressive security approaches could threaten national unity and should be reviewed comprehensively.

“If the bombing allegations are true, and if such actions were carried out by Indonesian Military (TNI) task forces operating in Papua, then they must be evaluated. I will raise this issue with the relevant task force commanders. I will seek clarification from them this afternoon,” he said.

Ramandey noted that the military is not easily subjected to external investigations because it operates under its own legal and judicial mechanisms, making accountability processes more challenging.

“This is different from the police, which is a civilian institution equipped with arms, making its oversight mechanisms relatively more open,” he said.

Therefore, he argued, one way to improve the situation is to urge the president to review military operational systems and strategies, while also reminding military institutions to move away from repressive approaches.

“If repressive measures continue, the risk is national disintegration,” he said.

“For that reason, I call on all parties involved in security operations in Papua to conduct a comprehensive evaluation.”

Amer Kogoya, coordinator of the demonstration, said families were still searching for a Lanny Jaya resident, Yoban Kiwone Wenda, who has been reported missing and has yet to be found.

He also alleged that another resident, Maju Walia, was shot and killed by TNI personnel. According to Kogoya, the victim’s family found only strands of hair and a traditional noken necklace, while the whereabouts of the body remain unknown.

“The military operation in this area has been ongoing for two weeks, and security forces continue to occupy community spaces. Residents are still displaced in neighboring areas,” Kogoya said.

He stated that the security situation in Melagi District remains unstable, preventing displaced civilians from returning to their homes.

“The actions carried out by TNI and Police personnel are highly inhumane. We question why these incidents are not being handled through the legal processes applicable in Indonesia, but instead are being carried out as though the authorities are acting as judge and executioner, undermining the rule of law,” he said.

Kogoya argued that the situation should be resolved through legal and humanitarian mechanisms, as the incidents constitute violations of humanitarian values.

He further said that the establishment of security posts following a military sweep operation on 5 January 2025 had created a sense of insecurity among local residents.

According to him, Lanny Jaya students had previously undertaken various efforts, including demonstrations and press conferences, to oppose the construction of TNI posts in the area.

“However, our concerns received no response, and the construction of military posts continued,” he said.

Kogoya added that military operations in Melagi District have created serious humanitarian impacts on civilians, forcing residents of at least one village to abandoned their homes.”

“We call for greater attention to the condition of affected civilians and for the resolution of the humanitarian issues occurring in Melagi District,” he said. (*)

Nuevaterra Mambor
--------------------------------------------



3) Indonesia: Military Court hands lenient sentences to soldiers convicted in acid attack on human rights defender Andrie Yunus amid continuing calls for accountability

On 10 June 2026, the Jakarta Military Court II-08 delivered its verdict against four members of the Headquarters Detachment of the Strategic Intelligence Agency (Denma BAIS) of the Indonesian National Armed Forces (TNI) for their involvement in the acid attack against KontraS activist and human rights defender Mr Andrie Yunus. The court sentenced Second Sergeant Edi Sudarko to three years’ imprisonment and dismissal from military service, First Lieutenant Budhi Hariyanto Widhi to two years and six months’ imprisonment and dismissal, Captain Nandala Dwi Prasetya to two years’ imprisonment, and First Lieutenant Sami Lakka to one year and six months’ imprisonment without dismissal. The panel of judges found the defendants guilty of premeditated assault causing injury but rejected allegations that the attack constituted part of a broader intelligence operation. The court considered the damage caused to the TNI’s reputation and the serious injuries sustained by the victim as aggravating factors, while accepting the defendants’ cooperation and lack of prior convictions as mitigating circumstances.
The verdict differed from the demands previously submitted by the military prosecutor, who had requested uniform prison sentences of two years and six months for all four defendants without recommending dismissal from military service. The prosecutor characterised the attack as an act of “personal revenge” that caused severe suffering to the victim and harmed the reputation of the armed forces nationally and internationally. However, both the prosecution and the court proceeded on the basis of assault charges rather than attempted murder, despite findings by the Advocacy Team for Democracy (TAUD) indicating that the attack involved a larger group of perpetrators and formed part of a structured operation extending beyond the four soldiers brought before the military tribunal.
The outcome of the proceedings drew sharp criticism from national and international observers. Human Rights Watch described the lenient sentences as “a mockery of justice”, arguing that the case demonstrates longstanding deficiencies within Indonesia’s military justice system, including a lack of transparency, independence and impartiality. Elaine Pearson, Asia Director at Human Rights Watch, called on the Indonesian authorities to amend domestic legislation to ensure that military personnel accused of serious human rights violations are tried before civilian courts. The Advocacy Team for Democracy likewise maintained that the military proceedings failed to deliver accountability and risked reinforcing patterns of impunity by limiting responsibility to a small number of direct perpetrators whilst disregarding allegations of wider involvement through the chain of command.
Legal experts further argued that the military court’s decision should not bring the case to a close. Following a pre-trial ruling by the South Jakarta District Court ordering the Jakarta Metropolitan Police to continue their investigation to provide legal certainty. Scholars and human rights advocates stress that the police remain obliged to pursue all individuals suspected of involvement, including civilians and those who may have ordered the attack.
The case reflects an increasingly institutionalised pattern of impunity through military courts and undermines public confidence in the rule of law. Constitutional and criminal law experts similarly highlighted the unresolved dualism between military and civilian jurisdictions and urged the Supreme Court to provide clear guidance to prevent legal uncertainty and ensure equal accountability before the law.
UN experts have expressed concern over Indonesia’s decision to prosecute the attack against Andrie Yunus before a military court rather than the civilian justice system. They warned that trying the case in Military Court II-08 Jakarta risks reinforcing longstanding patterns of impunity, limited transparency and weak accountability for alleged human rights violations involving members of the armed forces. The experts criticised the use of the lesser charge of “premeditated aggravated assault” and the portrayal of the attack as a personal dispute, arguing that this fails to reflect the gravity of the life-threatening assault and obscures potential responsibility of those who may have ordered or orchestrated it. They called on the Indonesian authorities to investigate and prosecute the case through civilian courts in accordance with international human rights standards, ensure public scrutiny and impartiality.

-----------------------------------------

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.