-----------------------------------
https://en.jubi.id/unresolved-bloody-wasior-haunts-papua-as-govt-fails-to-bring-resolution/
1) Unresolved Bloody Wasior haunts Papua as govt fails to bring resolution
News Desk - Bloody Wasior
13 June 2023
Manokwari, Jubi – The alleged human rights violations in the 2001 Bloody Wasior in Papua’s Wondiboy District, Wondama Bay Regency, remain unresolved.
President Joko Widodo, who was anticipated to address the Bloody Wasior case, did not bring about any resolution.
According to Yan Cristian Warinussy, the director of the Research Institute for the Assessment and Development of Legal Aid (LP3BH), the incident originated from an assault on five mobile brigade members and an employee of a timber company by an armed civilian group led by Daniel Awom.
“Afterward, an operation was conducted under the leadership of then Manokwari Police chief Lt. Col. (now Adj. Sr. Comr.) Bambang Budi Santoso. I remember it vividly, they carried out a pursuit operation that did not directly target the alleged perpetrators and therefore affected the civilians,” said Warinussy on June 11, 2023.
During the operation, numerous civilians became victims, with some being killed, tortured, and raped. Moreover, some residents were detained and subsequently brought to court, while others were detained without any further legal action.
Warinussy mentioned that some of the alleged perpetrators were currently serving in the local police station while others were already serving in the Papua Police.
“I am speaking out because I have been involved in the investigation process carried out by the National Commission on Human Rights (Komnas HAM). According to the investigation, there is strong evidence indicating that the Wasior case involves severe human rights violations,” he said.
Komnas HAM has provided recommendations based on the investigation to the Attorney General’s Office, but until now, the AGO has not taken any further action on the case.
“Up until now, the Attorney General’s Office has not referred the case to the Human Rights Court. However, it is worth noting that the Bloody Wasior case occurred prior to the Bloody Wamena case in 2003 and the Bloody Paniai case in 2014, yet the latter has already been brought to trial and the defendants were acquitted in the Paniai case,” he added.
Head of the AGO’s Legal Information Center Ketut Sumedang has not responded to Jubi’s inquiry regarding the progress of the case file concerning alleged human rights violations in Wasior.
One of the Bloody Wasior victims named Djanes Marambur, meanwhile, expressed that the case had not seen any significant efforts towards legal resolution up to this point. Marambur himself was pursued by security forces during a military operation and managed to escape from Wasior during the operation.
“If the government is unable to resolve even the 1965 tragedy and Munir cases alone, which were [both human rights violations] happening in Indonesia’s center of governance, Java, how can they be expected to address the problems in Papua?” Marambur said.
“For us, it would be preferable if we didn’t have to discuss the Bloody Wasior case anymore if there is no intention to solve it. It only adds to the suffering of the victims,” he added.
Pekei urged all parties to convey accurate information to the public and refrain from spreading false information that could disturb the community, suggesting that physical violence is still ongoing in Topo and Nabire.
“I urge all parties to refrain from portraying the conflict in Topo as a tribal war without considering the dynamics of the conflict and the actual situation’s development. Not all Mee and Lani tribesmen are involved in the Topo conflict. Therefore, the conflict in Topo should not be equated with tribal wars that have occurred in other areas,” he appealed.
Pekei mentioned that the conflict in Topo has been addressed by the local regents and security forces. He called for all parties to support the ongoing efforts to handle and resolve the conflict, aiming for a proper and comprehensive resolution.
“I hope the Mee and Lani tribes in Nabire could maintain mutual security and avoid interfering with each other. This will create a conducive environment for dialogue and problem-solving. It is important to refrain from provoking the situation,” said Pekei.
He also expressed his hope that the Mee and Lani communities outside of Nabire would not be influenced by the conflict in Topo and refrain from bringing the problems to other areas. He emphasized that there was currently no physical violence occurring in Topo or Nabire.
Nabire, Jubi – Meepago Regional Customary Council (DAW) has declared that the recent conflict occuring in Uwapa District’s Topo, Nabire Regency, as not being a tribal war. Marko Okto Pekei, the Council’s chairman, made this statement based on his observation and assessment, which revealed the absence of typical characteristics associated with tribal warfare.
“The conflict in Topo did not involve traditional archery where opposing sides face each other in a specific location for a certain period. This situation did not develop immediately after the land dispute. Additionally, the first two deaths were not a result of archery but occurred during normal situations involving road users,” said Pekei.
Pekei further emphasized that there was no leader commanding or leading tribal wars in the conflict. Instead, it was certain individuals outside the tribe engaged in actions such as blockades, hostage-taking, physical violence, sexual violence, and even murder, which generated widespread anger and led to spontaneous mass mobilization within the Mee tribe community.
“To put it simply, the conflict in Topo was not a tribal war because there was no warlord,” he said.
However, it is undeniable that the conflict in Topo has garnered attention not only within the Meepago customary area but also throughout Papua and beyond. The conflict has resulted in material losses and even loss of life.
According to Pekei, public opinion formed over the past few days has led people to assume that the conflict in Topo is a tribal war. This has caused unrest and concern among both the Mee and Lani tribes in the Nabire area and other regions outside of Nabire.
The escalation of the conflict subsided after the intervention of the regents of Meepago and security force leaders, who visited the Topo community.
Pekei urged all parties to convey accurate information to the public and refrain from spreading false information that could disturb the community, suggesting that physical violence is still ongoing in Topo and Nabire.
“I urge all parties to refrain from portraying the conflict in Topo as a tribal war without considering the dynamics of the conflict and the actual situation’s development. Not all Mee and Lani tribesmen are involved in the Topo conflict. Therefore, the conflict in Topo should not be equated with tribal wars that have occurred in other areas,” he appealed.
Pekei mentioned that the conflict in Topo has been addressed by the local regents and security forces. He called for all parties to support the ongoing efforts to handle and resolve the conflict, aiming for a proper and comprehensive resolution.
“I hope the Mee and Lani tribes in Nabire could maintain mutual security and avoid interfering with each other. This will create a conducive environment for dialogue and problem-solving. It is important to refrain from provoking the situation,” said Pekei.
He also expressed his hope that the Mee and Lani communities outside of Nabire would not be influenced by the conflict in Topo and refrain from bringing the problems to other areas. He emphasized that there was currently no physical violence occurring in Topo or Nabire.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.