Wednesday, March 24, 2021

1) New Zealand enquires about probe into shooting of national in Papua


2) Interim President: The OPM is not a ‘terrorist’ group – the Indonesian state is 
3) Proposal to designate armed Papua groups, OPM as terrorist organisations
4) Papua exploring cooperation with Japan to develop human resources
5) Oil palm growers’ misdeeds allow an opportunity to save West Papua’s forests  
———————————————————

1) New Zealand enquires about probe into shooting of national in Papua  
6 hours ago


A virtual meeting took place between New Zealand Ambassador to Indonesia, Jonathan Austin, and Papua Police officials on March 23, 2021 (ANTARA/HO/pihak ketiga)


Jayapura, Papua (ANTARA) - The New Zealand government has sought information on the legal process instituted against the armed Papuan group accused of shooting New Zealander Graeme Thomas Wall in Papua last year, a top police officer said.

"New Zealand Ambassador to Indonesia, Jonathan Austin, has asked about the legal process against the perpetrators," Papua deputy police chief, Brig.Gen. Eko Rudi Sudarto, said in Jayapura, the capital of Papua province, on Wednesday.

Ambassador Austin raised the question during an online meeting with the Papua police on Tuesday (March 23, 2021) and was informed about the police's handling of the case, he informed.

Graeme Thomas Wall, who worked for PT Freeport Indonesia, was fatally shot by members of an armed Papuan group in Kuala Kencana, Timika, Mimika district, on March 30, 2020.

Related news: New Zealander killed in Papua shooting

One of the perpetrators, Tandi Kogoya, a battalion commander of armed Papuan criminal groups operating in Intan Jaya district, was killed in a raid in Iwaka on April 9, 2020, Sudarto informed.

The police had also detained another suspect, identified as TW, over his alleged involvement in the fatal shooting at the gold mining company's office that ended in the New Zealander's death.

"The law enforcement against the armed criminals is going on," Sudarto said, adding that the meeting with Ambassador Austin did not just focus on the shooting case

During the meeting, Ambassador Austin also offered cooperation in a capacity-building program for Indonesian police officers stationed in Papua province, he added.

"We have warmly welcomed the offered cooperation,” he said.

The Papua provincial administration has been making efforts to restore normalcy in Intan Jaya district, which has witnessed a spike in violence against civilians and security personnel in the past two years.

Related news: Five arrested for allegedly supplying firearms to Papuan armed groups

Intan Jaya recorded its bloodiest month in September, 2020, with armed groups launching a series of attacks in the area that claimed the lives of two soldiers and two civilians and left two others injured.

The armed groups have continued their acts of terror in the new year, which involve hit-and-run tactics against Indonesian security personnel, and violence against civilians to instill fear among them.

On January 6, 2021, at least 10 armed Papuans vandalized and torched a Quest Kodiak aircraft belonging to the Mission Aviation Fellowship (MAF) at the Pagamba village airstrip.

On February 8, 2021, an armed rebel reportedly shot a 32-year-old man at close range in Bilogai village, Sugapa sub-district.

The victim, identified by his initials as RNR, sustained gunshot wounds on the face and right shoulder and was taken to the Timika Public Hospital in Mimika district on February 9.

In a separate incident on February 9, 2021, six armed Papuans fatally stabbed a motorcycle taxi (ojek) driver. (INE)

Related news: Food supplier in detention for allegedly supporting Papua armed group

Reporter: Evarukdijati, Rahmad Nasution
Editor: Yuni Arisandy Sinaga

——————————————


2) Interim President: The OPM is not a ‘terrorist’ group – the Indonesian state is

March 24, 2021 in Statement

The Indonesian state is considering listing the Organisasi Papua Merdeka, OPM, as a terrorist organisation. This is a disgraceful attack on the people of West Papua, all of whom are in support of the OPM struggle for a free and independent West Papua. In reality, Indonesia is a terrorist state that has used mass violence against my people for nearly six decades.

The people of West Papua were forming their own independent state in 1961. On December 1 of that year, the West New Guinea Council selected our national anthem, flag, and symbols. We had a territory, a people, and were listed as a Non-Self-Governing Territory by the UN Decolonization Committee. Our flag was raised alongside the Dutch, and the inauguration of the West New Guinea Council was witnessed by diplomats from the Netherlands, UK, France and Australia.

This sovereignty was stolen from us by Indonesia, which invaded and colonised our land in 1963. The birth of the independent state of West Papua was smothered. This is why the people of West Papua launched the OPM struggle to regain our country and our freedom.

Under the international conventions on human rights, we have a right to self-determination, which legal research has repeatedly shown was violated by the Indonesian take-over and the fraudulent 1969 Act of No Choice. Under the 1960 UN Declaration on the Granting of Independence to Colonial Countries and Peoples, we have a right to determine our own political status free from colonial rule. Even the Preamble to the Indonesian constitutionrecognises that, ‘Independence is the natural right of every nation [and] colonialism must be abolished in this world because it is not in conformity with Humanity and Justice.’

Indonesia wants to describe us as ‘terrorists’. Terrorism is the use of violence against civilians to intimidate a population for political aims. This is exactly what Indonesia has been doing against my people for 60 years. Over 500,000 men, women and children have been killed since Indonesia invaded. Indonesia tortures my peoplekills civiliansburns their bodiesdestroys our environment and way of life. General Wiranto, until recently Indonesia’s security minister, is wanted by the UN for war crimes in East Timor – for terrorism. A leading retired Indonesian general this year mused about forcibly removing 2 million West Papuans to Manado – this is terrorism and ethnic cleansing. How can we be the terrorists when Indonesia has sent 20,000 troops to our land in the past three years?

We never bomb Sulawesi or Java. We never kill an imam or Muslim leader. The Indonesian military has been torturing and murdering our religious leaders over the past six months. The Indonesian military has displaced over 50,000 people since December 2018, leaving them to die in the bush without medical care or food.

The ULMWP is a member of the Melanesian Spearhead Group, sitting around the table with Indonesia. We attend UN meetings and have the support of 84 countries to promote human rights in West Papua. These are not the actions of terrorists. When 84 countries recognise our struggle, Indonesia cannot stigmitise us as ‘terrorists’.

The OPM back home is like a home guard. We only act in self-defence, to protect ourselves, our homeland, our ancestral lands, our heritage and our natural resources, forests and mountain. Any country would do the same if it was invaded and colonised. We do not target civilians, and are committed to working under international law and international humanitarian law, unlike Indonesia, which will not even sign up to the International Criminal Court because it knows that its actions in West Papua are war crimes.

Indonesia cannot solve this issue with a ‘war on terror’ approach. Amnesty International and Komnas HAM, Indonesia’s national human rights body, have already condemned the proposals. Since the 2000 Papuan People’s Congress, which I was a part of, we have agreed to pursue an international solution through peaceful means. We are struggling for our right to self-determination, denied to us for decades. Indonesia is fighting to defend its colonial project.

Benny Wenda
Interim President
ULMWP Provisional Government


———————————————


3) Proposal to designate armed Papua groups, OPM as terrorist organisations

Antara News – March 22, 2021

Genta Tenri Mawangi, Jakarta – The National Counterterrorism Agency (BNPT) plans to propose that armed criminal groups (KKB) in Papua and the Free Papua Organisations (OPM) be designated as terrorist organisations.

"We have initiated discussions with ministries and related institutions on the issue of the KKB's nomenclature", said BNPT head Police General Commissioner Boy Rafli Amar during a hearing with the House of Representatives' (DPR) Commission III in Jakarta on Monday March 22.

Amar continued, "Whether or not they can be categorised as a terrorist organisation because earlier it was conveyed that it is actually appropriate for the KKB's crimes to be categorised as or to be on par with terrorist acts".

According to Amar, the BNPT is not just planning to invite ministries and other institutions to discuss the matter, but will also invite other parties including the National Human Rights Commission (Komnas HAM) and representatives of the DPR to discuss the possibility of designating the KKB, the National Liberation Army (TPN) and the OPM as terrorist organisations.

"We want to look at the possibility, then make a proposal to Pak [Mr] President (Joko Widodo), why not categorise the OPM, TPN, KKB, who have claim the lives of many security personnel and civilians as banned organisations", said Amar during the hearing at the DPR.

According to Amar, the discussions and efforts to discuss the problem are in order to reach and objective understanding of armed criminal groups and separatist organisations in Papua.

Because of this, the BNPT will try to open the possibility for discussions on the problem with other parties. This is because designating the KKB, OPM and other groups as terrorist organisations cannot be done by the BNPT alone.

"We can't decide on it on our own. We are currently holding discussions. After there's some kind of agreement, we will propose changes to the category of what is being done by the KKB as terrorist acts", said Amar.

Amar also took the opportunity to convey the view that armed criminal groups and separatist organisations in Papua should be able to be prosecuted under the articles in the anti-terrorism law.

He argued that the actions of these groups conflicts with humanitarian values and spread fear in society. "The real actions they take, namely attacking TNI [Indonesian military] and Polri [Indonesian police] personnel and civilians there (in Papua)", said Amar.

Over the last few years calls to designate the OPM as a terrorist organisation have been articulated by several parties, including in 2019 by former State Intelligence Agency (BIN) chief A.M. Hendropriyono.

Despite this, up until now the OPM is still known as a separatist group and has yet to be designated as a terrorist organisation by the government. The same is the case for the KKB who are still known as an armed criminal group.

[Translated by James Balowski. The original title of the article was "BNPT berencana usul KKB dan OPM ditetapkan jadi organisasi teroris".]

Source: https://www.antaranews.com/berita/2057290/bnpt-berencana-usul-kkb-dan-opm-ditetapkan-jadi-organisasi-teroris

———————————————

4) Papua exploring cooperation with Japan to develop human resources  
7 hours ago

Jayapura, Papua (ANTARA) - The Papua provincial administration is exploring cooperation with the government of Japan's Fukuoka Prefecture to develop indigenous human resources.

The first meeting between the Papua Human Resources Development Agency (BPSDM) and the Fukuoka Prefecture Government's International Cooperation Agency took place online, and is expected to be followed up by the drafting of a memorandum of understanding, BPSDM head Aryoko Rumaropen informed.

Through the proposed cooperation, native Papuans will be able to get agricultural technical and vocational training under the Fukuoka prefecture government's scholarship scheme, he said.

The Papua provincial government has disclosed on its website, which ANTARA accessed on Wednesday, that it appreciates the cooperation with the Fukuoka government.

Papua Governor Lukas Enembe said the training program is expected to cover agricultural skills in general, including know-how on food crops, plantation, and cattle breeding.

The development of human resources in Papua and West Papua remains a challenge, considering the Human Development Index scores of the two provinces, which lag behind other Indonesian provinces.

Papua and West Papua scored 64.7 and 60.84 respectively on Indonesia's 2019 Human Development Index.

To improve the quality of human capital in Papua and West Papua, the Indonesian Finance Ministry has suggested that the regional governments allocate an endowment fund to finance human resource development and the education of native Papuans.

The fund can be allocated from Papua Province's annual budget, director of the Finance Ministry's Endowment Fund for Education (LPDP) Scholarship Program, Dwi Larso, stated.

The Papuan administration could adopt a similar endowment fund for education as the LPDP to support its human resources development efforts, he added.

The funding resources could be the Papua provincial government's annual budget, special autonomy funds, or other resources, Larso said.

Through the endowment fund for education, the Papua provincial administration could finance human resources development, education, and research programs more easily, he pointed out.

Scientists, whose research is funded by the endowment fund, could help the Papua provincial government manage the province's abundant natural resources, he added. (INE)

Related news: Papua's human development index rose 1.30 percent in 2019: BPS
Related news: Bappenas composes policy centering on swifter development in Papua


EDITED BY INE

Reporter: Muhsidin, Rahmad Nasution
Editor: Suharto


——————————————-

5) Oil palm growers’ misdeeds allow an opportunity to save West Papua’s forests
by Hans Nicholas Jong on 24 March 2021


  • An area of forest two and a half times the size of London sits inside oil palm concessions in Indonesia’s West Papua province but can still be spared from being cleared, a government review indicates.
  • Clearing the forest to plant oil palms would release the equivalent of two-fifths of Indonesia’s total annual greenhouse gas emissions, which is why leaving it intact is important, according to experts and local government officials.
  • The concession holders have been prevented from developing the land because of a lack of permits and a litany of administrative and legal violations, according to the government review.
  • This gives local authorities leverage to win back control of the concessions from the companies on administrative and procedural grounds, although officials say the process could take at least a year, even if the companies relinquish the land voluntarily.

JAKARTA — A government review has identified a massive area of forest in Indonesia’s West Papua province that has been earmarked for oil palm plantations but that can still be saved. Keeping this forested area standing could potentially prevent the release of greenhouse gases equivalent to two-fifths of Indonesia’s total annual emissions, experts say — if the concession holders can be made to relinquish their hold over the land.

Twenty-four palm oil companies control a combined 576,090 hectares (1.42 million acres) of land in West Papua, of which 383,431 hectares (947,479 acres) — an area two and a half times the size of London — is intact forest. A recently concluded government review of oil palm license holders has determined that this area remains untouched because of a litany of administrative and legal violations by the companies that prevents them from clearing the forest and starting to cultivate oil palms.

This forested area holds an estimated 185.5 million tons of above-ground carbon dioxide, according to Arief Wijaya, the climate and forests senior manager of the think tank World Resources Institute (WRI) Indonesia. That’s equivalent to nearly 40% of Indonesia’s total emissions in a year.

“Saving these 383,000 hectares of intact forests in Papua is significant in reducing emissions,” Arief told Mongabay. “If it can be done, then it could strengthen the achievement of reducing deforestation, our climate target, as well as supporting the commitment of the government of West Papua in conserving 70% of its area.”

West Papua Governor Dominggus Mandacan echoed the need to save the forests.

“We will push for the lands that can potentially be saved based on the result of this license review to be managed by Indigenous people with sustainability principles,” he said as quoted by local media.


Taking back the land

The recent license review, carried out by the West Papua government working with the national anti-corruption agency, or KPK, found 13 of the 24 concession holders had not yet started operating on the ground. It found most of the companies in violation of laws and regulations on permits and taxes, among other things.

The findings are in line with a 2019 government audit of the palm oil industry, which found more than 80% of plantations in Indonesia, the world’s biggest producer of the crop, violating numerous regulations, such as by encroaching into protected areas and failing to comply with national sustainability standards.

In the case of the West Papua concessions, the companies’ violations give local authorities leverage to win back control of the concessions and prevent them from being cleared.

Some of the companies have already stated their willingness to relinquish a combined 52,151 hectares (128,868 acres) of their concessions, according to Benidiktus Hery Wijayanto, head of the West Papua provincial agriculture department.

“So there are official written statements from the heads of the companies to return [the concessions] to the state due to various reasons,” he told Mongabay. “Maybe because the concessions are swamps, or it’s economically not viable to continue [cultivating those areas].”

Then there are 224,044 hectares (553,625 acres) of concessions, including 162,940 hectares (402,634 acres) of forest, for which the companies don’t have what’s known as a right-to-cultivate permit, or HGU — the last in a series of licenses that oil palm companies must obtain before being allowed to start planting.

And because the companies can’t legally cultivate them, these areas effectively become “dead concessions” that the government can demand the companies relinquish, Benidiktus said.

But that won’t be easy, as many of the companies seem determined to hold on to the land in anticipation of obtaining an HGU permit, Benidiktus added.

“We asked one by one, and many of them said they still wanted to continue [trying to develop the concessions],” he said. “But there are those whose location permits have been extended yet there’s still no [planting] activity. So we deem their licenses can be revoked administratively because there’s no planting at all.”

Even if the companies aren’t willing to give up their concessions, the government will cite the findings of violations from the recent government review to justify revoking any licenses they hold, he added.

“Of course it’s going to be a bit tough,” Benidiktus said. “But during a recent meeting with district heads, they said they’re ready to revoke [the licenses].”

If this effort fully succeeds, along with the voluntary relinquishing by companies, the provincial government will be able to take back control of a combined 276,196 hectares (682,495 acres) of land and prevent the remaining forests in them from being cleared.

“That’s the short-term target in two months,” Benidiktus said.


Targeting violating companies

There’s also a longer-term plan to go after the 11 concession holders that do have HGU permits. These companies hold a combined 174,845 hectares (432,051 acres) of concessions, of which about 41% has already been cleared and planted with oil palms.

That still leaves 103,423 hectares (255,564 acres) of the native land still standing. Benidiktus said these areas could be construed as “abandoned lands” under plantation regulations, which require that concession holders cultivate their full area within a given time period or risk having their licenses revoked. The regulation is meant to prevent companies obtaining concessions for land speculation purposes.

These HGU license holders have also been implicated in other violations, such as failing to allocate 20% of their concessions for smallholders, or planting before obtaining the HGU license. In some cases, the forest conversion permits allowing a forested area to be zoned for a plantation were issued long after the deadline.

“The forest conversion permits are supposed to be issued within two years since the principle permits are issued,” Benidiktus said. “There are forest conversion permits issued five years after that.”

Some of the companies can also be cited for tax dodging, he added. Of the 71,422 hectares (176,488 acres) of planted concessions, the companies only paid taxes for 18,000 hectares (44,500 acres), according to Benidiktus.

All these violations, he said, show the scope of the problems plaguing the oil palm industry.

“Can you imagine, from more than 500,000 hectares of concessions, the ones that already have HGU permits are only 170,000 hectares. And the ones that are taxed are only 18,000 hectares,” he said. “What does the state get [in revenue]?”

Given all these irregularities and violations, he said, it’s possible that district governments can revoke these companies’ licenses, although it will be more difficult than for the companies without HGU permits. For this scenario, the government is looking at up to a year to win back the concessions, Benidiktus said.


Greater scrutiny of industry

Benediktus emphasized the need for an action plan to determine what to do after the licenses are revoked.

“If the licenses are revoked by the district governments and then given to other investors, there’s nothing wrong with that, legally speaking, but we don’t want to fall into the same pit,” he said. “What will the management scheme for the 270,000 hectares of forested concessions that will be returned [to the state] look like? They can be managed as ancestral lands, customary villages, or other social forestry schemes.”

The review team led by the West Papua government and the KPK also issued recommendations to other government agencies regarding the many problems in the palm oil industry. Benediktus said the national land agency, or BPN, has been asked to look into what to do with undeveloped concessions, while the tax office has been asked to boost its scrutiny of state revenue from plantation.

“We will work together with the tax office so they are more assertive about collecting taxes,” Benidiktus said. “For instance, imagine a company with a plantation permit for 10,000 hectares that only reports taxes for 3,000 hectares. The tax office shouldn’t be doubtful [about pursuing it] because we will give it the data.”

Benidiktus said none of these measures were intended to harm the palm oil industry.

“It’s more for the improvement of the management [of the industry], and it’s actually for the benefit of the country because the tax revenue [at present] is not good,” he said. “Like it or not, palm oil’s contribution to the country is huge.”

Gaining elusive data

Regardless of whether the findings from the license review are followed up with concrete actions, they have at least unearthed problems and uncovered data that had previously been buried under red tape, Benidiktus said.

He cited the data on HGU licenses, which include details such as land boundaries, coordinates, the area of the concession, as well as the license holder’s identity. These data were elusive, even for his office, prior to the review process, Benidiktus said.

“In the beginning, it wasn’t easy to obtain the HGU data from the land agency. When we asked, we didn’t get it. But after the KPK came into the picture and they united our perceptions, all the data were handed over [by the land agency],” he said.

The review team also struggled to collect other data that were scattered across different government agencies, Benidiktus said.

“We had to collect all company data, both hard copies and soft copies,” he said. ”We also had to collect maps in shapefile formats, but it turned out that the district governments didn’t have them. They only had the names of the companies and their locations, but they didn’t have the details.”

Even identifying the contact persons in each company was a struggle, he added.

“That’s why it took us two years [to finish the review],” he said, “because we had to collect the data one by one, from location permits, to plantation business permits, to forest conversion permits, to HGU permits.”

 Banner image: Indonesian New Guinea is home to species like this Sulphur-crested Cockatoo (Cacatua galerita). Image by Rhett A. Butler/Mongabay.
 FEEDBACK: Use this form to send a message to the author of this post. If you want to post a public comment, you can do that at the bottom of the page.
Article published by 
————————————-

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.