2) Papuans protest over ‘Act of Free Choice’ in 13 cities in Indonesia
-----------------------------------------
1) Jokowi asked not ‘selling’ human rights issue in Papua in Presidential Election 2019
Published 1 day ago on 4 August 2018By admin
The Executive Director of LP3BH Manokwari, Yan Christian Warinussy. – Jubi/Hans Arnold Kapisa. –
Jayapura, Jubi – Manokwari, Yang Christian Warinussy, the Executive Director of the Legal Aid Study and Research (LP3BH) Manokwari, asserted President Joko Widodo, known as Jokowi, not to ‘sell’ the issue of human rights violations in Papua in regards to his candidacy in the Presidential Election 2019.
“I need to confirm this in regards to several steps taken by President Jokowi through his assistants to endorse the settlement of many cases of the alleged human rights violations in Papua which have been going for a long time and has never been a legal settlement,” he stated in the press release received by Jubi on Wednesday (1/9 / 2018).
Meanwhile, Tinus Pigai, the Coordinator of the Solidarity concerned about public and development of Paniai, said he would boycott the presidential election in Paniai if the ‘Bloody Paniai case’ continue to use by a few of people who will take advantage on this.
“President Jokowi should give an order the civil administration and the military and police to not hamper the ongoing legal actions carried out by the Human Rights National Commission (Komnas HAM) as the authorised institution to investigate this case,” said Pigai. (*)
Reporter: Hans Arnold Kapisa
Editor: Pipit Maizier
——————————————————————————
2) Papuans protest over ‘Act of Free Choice’ in 13 cities in Indonesia
Voice West Papua reports on social media that there was majority support for listing West Papua on the UN Decolonisation Agenda in huge protests on the streets on Manokwari and Jayapura in spite of the Indonesian authorities rolling out armoured vehicles, special forces and police. Image: West Papua Voice
By Kustin Ayuwuragil and Ramadhan Rizki in Jakarta
Papuans have launched protest actions in 13 cities across Indonesia to demonstrate against the so-called “Act of Free Choice” that enabled Jakarta to take control of the Melanesian region.
The Papuan Student Alliance (AMP) and the Indonesian People’s Front for West Papua (FRI-WP) organised the rallies in cities, including Jakarta, Bandung and Ambon.
AMP spokesperson Surya Anta said that they were taking to the streets based on two principal issues related to West Papuan independence.
“[Papuans had] already declared their independence in 1961, deciding not to be part of the 1945 [declaration of Indonesian] independence [from the Dutch],” Surya told CNN Indonesiain front of the State Palace in Central Jakarta last Thursday marking the August 2 date.
Surya said that at the time, the people of West Papua already had a state symbol, flag and currency, although no administration had yet been established.
The second reason was that the people of West Papua wanted to separate from Indonesia because for years and years they had suffered “slow-motion genocide”.
This was in no way in accordance with the values enshrined in the state ideology of Pancasila in realising independence for all nations.
‘Oppression, slow-motion genocide’
“They suffer oppression, abuse, slow-motion genocide, rape, abductions, no freedom of expression and access to information, and many other things,” he said.
“They suffer oppression, abuse, slow-motion genocide, rape, abductions, no freedom of expression and access to information, and many other things,” he said.
The problems facing the West Papuans also included the massive exploitation of natural resources, which according to Surya, is because of the PT Freeport Indonesian gold-and-copper mine problem.
Social inequality was also high compared with other parts of Indonesia.
Surya added that the West Papuan people wanted to separate from Indonesia because they did not feel Indonesian because of the numerous problems cited.
“Yes (they want to separate from Indonesia) because from the very beginning they did not feel Indonesian. Go ahead and check the [1948] Youth Pledge. Was West Papua mentioned there?,” he said.
Surya said that the infrastructure development which was being touted by President Joko “Jokowi” Widodo in Papua had not been enough to make the people feel Indonesian.
“Yeah, like the Dutch [colonial] period, we got schools, but did this then make us become Dutch citizens? No. We still felt convinced that our identity was different,” he said.
Widodo has become known as the Indonesian president which has most often visited Papua. His agenda has been varied but in his Nawa Cita [nine point priority programme], Widodo has prioritised the resolution of past human rights violations and the development of infrastructure in Papua.
‘Same old song’Coordinating Minister for Security, Politics and Legal Affairs Menko Polhukam Wiranto referred to protests by Papuan pro-independence activists such as these as being a “separatist” action seeking to attract international attention.
“It’s a small separatist movement but by methods such as this [they] want to get world attention,” said Wiranto at his office in Jakarta.
The former commander of ABRI (Indonesian Armed Forces, now TNI) said that threats by Papuan pro-independence groups which had been widespread lately were just the “same old song” which had been played repeatedly for a long time.
As has been reported, the United Liberation Movement for West Papua (ULMWP) were holding actions in Jakarta and London to support a new referendum for the Papuan people.
At Thursday’s action in front of the State Palace the AMP and the FRI-WP expressed their support for West Papuan liberation from the NKRI or Unitary State of the Republic of Indonesia.
Responding to this, Wiranto suggested that people do not need to become upset or anxious about the frequent actions by such groups.
“This old song is the same as the one played in the past. We don’t need to get upset, we don’t need to get anxious, we will just fight it,” he said.
Wiranto also said that the government would not be influenced by the “separatist” threat from such groups.
He asserted that in principle the government still considered Papua would remain part of the NKRI forever and did not need to be disturbed by challenges by any party at all.
“It is clear that we have a principled and standing position which cannot be disrupted by challenges from movements such as this,” he said.
Soft diplomacyWiranto also insisted that the government had repeatedly made efforts to develop diplomatic relations with neighbouring countries in order to suppress “biased issues” related to development in Papua.
Wiranto claimed that heads of state in the Asia-Pacific region such as Micronesia, Nauru, and Australia were often invited to help in “suppressing” such groups.
“Soft diplomacy activities which we are carrying out in the South Pacific continue apace. They [the Papuan separatist groups] perhaps then feel angry about the soft diplomacy activities that we are conducting,” said Wiranto.
Wiranto claimed to have invited officials from these countries to see for themselves the current conditions and social developments in remote parts of Papua.
This is aimed at preventing countries in the Asia-Pacific region from “misunderstanding” the current social developments and situation in Papua.
“So we invite them to see the facts [on the ground]. As if we do not provide good education to our friends in Papua. This issue is being continually pushed, continually made an issue of, in Europe, the South Pacific, but you know yourself right, the reality is not like that,” he said.
Wiranto said that there were still potential threats from irresponsible parties which resulted in the emergence of separatist groups in Papua.
He was reluctant however to cite which parties he meant. Wiranto said only that these parties did not want Indonesia to be united and only wanted to take the profits from mining in Papua.
“Because there are still parties that do not want our country to be united, there are still parties which take the profits from mining activities”, he said.
Translated by James Balowski for the Indoleft News Service. The original title of the article was “Aksi Referendum Papua: Infrastruktur Jokowi Bukan Jawaban”.
Background:
In 1969, Pepera — Known as the “Act of Free Choice”, a referendum, was held to decide whether West Papua, a former Dutch colony annexed by Indonesia in 1963, would be become independent or join Indonesia. The UN sanction plebiscite, in which 1025 hand-picked tribal leaders allegedly expressed their desire for integration, has been widely dismissed as a sham.
In 1969, Pepera — Known as the “Act of Free Choice”, a referendum, was held to decide whether West Papua, a former Dutch colony annexed by Indonesia in 1963, would be become independent or join Indonesia. The UN sanction plebiscite, in which 1025 hand-picked tribal leaders allegedly expressed their desire for integration, has been widely dismissed as a sham.
Critics claim that that the selected voters were coerced, threatened and closely scrutinised by the military to unanimously vote for integration.
Although it is widely held that West Papua declared independence from Indonesia on December 1, 1961, this actually marks the date when the Morning Star (Bintang Kejora)flag was first raised alongside the Dutch flag in an officially sanctioned ceremony in Jayapura, then called Hollandia.
The first declaration of independence actually took place on July 1, 1971 at the Victoria Headquarters in Waris Village, Jayapura, when Oom Nicolas Jouwe and two Free Papua Organisation (OPM) commanders, Seth Jafeth Roemkorem and Jacob Hendrik Prai, raised the Morning Starflag and unilaterally proclaimed Papua Barat or West Papua as an independent democratic republic, complete with a National Liberation Army (TPN), a provisional constitution, government, senate and parliament.
- More West Papua stories
- -------------------------------
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.