Note. Although the official PIF Communique is not available at the moment a couple of the reports below mention the PIF would like to go on a fact finding mission to West Papua
——-
1) O’Neill to convey West Papua concerns to Indonesia
2) Pacific islands must now take on the world
3) Australasia feels the heat
4) Pacific Islands Forum: Nations split over climate change
———————————————————
1) O’Neill to convey West Papua concerns to Indonesia
This was the outcome announced by O’Neill this evening after much debate among leaders.
O’Neill is also expected to consult the Indonesia government on a fact finding mission by PIF to West Papua.
“We declare that this is a consultation process and we need to work together and the Indonesia government must be commended for their efforts to ensure more autonomy is given to West Papua,” he said.
West Papua Human rights issue was a key agenda discussed today by the leaders.
The Solomon Islands government had proposed three issues of West Papua to be considered:
• Full Status
• Fact finding mission to West Papua
• Self determination
O’Neill says the PNG government has been communicating with the Indonesia government and it is very encouraged by what they are hearing.
“It is just the beginning for the many steps that are before us," he added.
Yesterday Indonesia’s Vice Minister of Foreign Affairs Abdurrahman Mohammad Fachir said the Pacific Island Forum Leaders’ Summit (PIF) is not the place to discuss West Papua issues.
He said it was irrelevant to the main objective and the purpose of the establishment of the PIF.
————————————————————————
2) Pacific islands must now take on the world
Updated: 5:26 am, Friday, 11 September 2015
After failing to convince Australia and New Zealand to back stronger global warming temperature restrictions, Pacific islands vulnerable to climate change will gear up to take on the world.
The climate change showdown at the Pacific Islands Forum on Thursday ended in a stalemate with 16 leaders agreeing to disagree on whether to take a two degree or 1.5 degree warming limit stance to UN talks in Paris in December.
Small island nations facing rising seas pushed hard for the 1.5 degree target, saying anything higher risked their survival.
But Australian Prime Minister Tony Abbott and NZ counterpart John Key refused to give ground during the 'robust' discussions at the nine hour meeting.
The pair were seen celebrating the result over beers at the Grand Papua Hotel bar after the press conference.
Fiji's rival club of Pacific nations last week issued a declaration calling for a 1.5 degree limit.
That point was echoed in a forum sub-group of six small island states earlier this week.
The leaders found more common ground on fisheries and will consider a NZ catch quota system model.
Pacific islands will send ministers to NZ to learn more about how it works in coming months.
At the moment fishing vessels pay a daily fee to catch as many fish as they like, which might not be sustainable in the long term.
Mr Abbott returned to Canberra overnight, but other leaders are staying on for talks with non-forum member countries such as the US and Indonesia on Friday.
Jakarta will no doubt be keen to weigh in on the forum's stance on human rights abuses in its Papua provinces.
The leaders want to send in a fact-finding mission, but insist they respect Indonesia's sovereignty.
AAP
———————————————————————————————————————————————
3) Australasia feels the heat
Low-lying islands take the moral high ground Sep 12th 2015 | WELLINGTON | From the print edition
AUSTRALIA and New Zealand have never found it easy to corral Pacific-island leaders into supporting their initiatives. It is getting harder. Pacific politicians are no longer so dependent on aid from their rich neighbours, and they have greater capacity to embarrass them on issues such as climate change, fisheries policy and support for secessionists in West Papua, in eastern Indonesia. These all loomed large at the summit of the Pacific Islands Forum (PIF) held in Port Moresby, capital of Papua New Guinea (PNG), from September 7th to 11th.
It was attended by both Australia’s prime minister, Tony Abbott, and New Zealand’s, John Key. They were probably relieved not to be joined by Frank Bainimarama, the former military commander who led a coup in Fiji in 2006. Fiji was suspended from the forum in 2009, but readmitted after Mr Bainimarama won a general election last year. Some of his officials attended, but he himself is boycotting PIF meetings until the forum is reformed—and Australia and New Zealand are expelled. Other Pacific nations are less strident. But they too want to reshape the PIF’s agenda, particularly on climate change.
Mr Bainimarama has launched a rival group, the Pacific Island Development Forum, which held its third annual meeting in Fiji from September 2nd to 4th. The resultant communiqué endorsed the goal of keeping global average temperatures no more than 1.5˚Celsius above pre-industrial levels (the existing goal agreed among developed countries is 2˚). It is part of a strategy of “deep decarbonisation” that Mr Bainimarama hopes to take to the UN’s climate-change conference to be held in Paris in December. Tony De Brum, the Marshall Islands’ foreign minister, says Australia’s proposed 26-28% cut in emissions from 2005 levels is far too low to stop the atoll states from disappearing beneath the waves. He wants much bolder targets. Anote Tong, president of Kiribati, said that island leaders might ask Australia to leave the PIF; or they might stage a walkout if it refuses to sign up to the 1.5˚ target.
Australia’s moral authority in the region has been dented. It has cut its foreign-aid budget and disbanded its specialised aid agency, AusAID, with greater aid emphasis now on Australia’s commercial interests. And the shunting of Australia’s unwanted refugees to “Offshore Processing Centres” on Nauru and in PNG has looked mean-minded, despite sweeteners such as refurbished hospitals, roads and local jobs for the host countries.
On tiny Nauru, with a population of only 10,000, the refugee centres have supplanted phosphates as the biggest source of earnings. Electoral self-interest means no politician dares oppose the centres. Nauru’s politics are troubled. An authoritarian government, led by Baron Waqa, has removed most opposition MPs from parliament. One MP, Roland Kun, has had his passport seized and been prevented from rejoining his family in New Zealand. The Australian government has refrained from criticising its island ally. But, in a rare Pacific-policy split with Australia, New Zealand suspended its aid to Nauru’s judicial sector in early September.
Unlike Nauru, Papua New Guinea, which, with 7.2m people is the largest Pacific Island state, has other sources of foreign exchange, including a $19 billion ExxonMobil liquefied-natural-gas project. But PNG’s politicians are more likely to turn on the unpopular detention centre on Manus island. Relations with Australia are often frosty. In July the prime minister, Peter O’Neill, announced a ban on foreign (mostly Australian) consultants. Then PNG stopped Australian vegetable imports.
New donors, such as Indonesia and, most noticeably, China, are offering money to the island states. So island leaders have greater leeway to pursue independent foreign policies. But that too generates its own challenges. It is harder, for example, for regional groups such as the PIF to adopt a coherent policy towards pro-independence activists in Indonesian-ruled West Papua. Many Melanesians have instinctive sympathy for the freedom-fighters. But they are much less willing to antagonise Indonesia than to tell Australia and New Zealand to mind their own business.
————————————————————————————————————————-
4) Pacific Islands Forum: Nations split over climate change
Joe Kelly Political reporter Canberra
Pacific Island leaders have split on how to tackle dangerous climate change at a key regional summit, with Australia and New Zealand declining to back an ambitious target to limit global temperature increases to 1.5C.
After meeting for nine hours in Port Moresby, the leaders of the 16 member Pacific Islands Forum failed to reach a united position on climate change to take to the UN Paris conference in December — one of the stated objectives of the summit.
President Anote Tong of the low-lying nation of Kiribati said while there was a split position between member nations, the final communique had been devised to accommodate the more ambitious aspirations of the smaller states.
“It’s not the best outcome we would have liked,” he said.
“At this point in time we’d like to be able to sit down and at least agree on a range of numbers ... this is the way we have come out of this meeting.”
Earlier in the week, Mr Tong had canvassed the prospect of Australia and New Zealand leaving the regional grouping if they did not help combat climate change by committing to contain global temperature increases to a 1.5C target.
“What I said was there is a possibility that our views might be split,” Mr Tong clarified yesterday. “We’ve got around that, and I think I’m very happy we didn’t end up in that situation.”
New Zealand Prime Minister John Key said the outcome of the 2009 Copenhagen climate conference was to try and limit temperature increases to 2C, but that lower lying nations were free to push for a more ambitious target. “There is also an agreement that ... low-lying states are particularly vulnerable and they would seek an even more ambitious target,” Mr Key said.
Tony Abbott said Australia and New Zealand had made no “additional commitments when it comes to climate change” and defended the emissions reductions efforts of both nations.
“I was very pleased to explain to the forum today, what Australia is doing, just how ambitious we are being,” the Prime Minister said. “None of us are in the business of damaging global industries like agriculture in the case of New Zealand or resources in the case of Australia.”
The final communique from the meeting was not available last night although there was a commitment by Australia for an extra $19 million a year to ensure fisheries could be properly policed.
On West Papua, PNG Prime Minister Peter O’Neill said he “respected the sovereignty of Indonesia” although he noted concerns about human rights and announced a “fact-finding mission” to determine the situation on the ground.
Earlier, Mr Abbott used a bilateral meeting with Mr O’Neill to push for the Australian Federal Police to play a more hands-on role in local law enforcement.
A key focus of his meeting with Mr O’Neill was on how to use Australian expertise to make Port Moresby a safer place to do business, he said.
“I’m disappointed that our 73 police have not been more operational,” he said. “You won’t be surprised to learn that one of the principal subjects that Prime Minister O’Neill and I discussed earlier this morning was making them as operational as possible.”
—————————————————————————————-
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.